[Three Cases of Bilateral Metachronous Testicular Tumors].

We present three cases of bilateral metachronous testicular tumors. The patient in case 1 had a history of left orchiectomy for undescended testis at the age of 19. The pathological findings revealed germ cell neoplasia in situ. Twenty-four years later (age＝43), he was diagnosed with right testicular tumor with lymph node and lung metastasis (stage IIIc). Right orchiectomy was performed, and the pathological finding showed nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. He underwent chemotherapy, followed by lymph node dissection and lung metastasectomy. The patient in case 2 had a history of left orchiectomy for testicular tumor at the age of 41. The pathological finding of the left testis revealed seminoma (stage IA). Nineteen years later (age＝60), he was diagnosed with right testicular tumor and underwent right orchiectomy. Herein, the pathological finding showed seminoma (stage IA). The patient in case 3 had a history of right orchiectomy for testicular tumor at the age of 25. The pathological findings revealed seminoma (stage IS), and he underwent adjuvant radiation of the para-aortic field without subsequent recurrence. Fourteen years later (age＝39), he was diagnosed with left testicular tumor and underwent left orchiectomy. The pathological finding revealed seminoma (stage IB). The patient underwent adjuvant carboplatin monotherapy to prevent recurrence. Due to the long interval between the occurrence of bilateral metachronous testicular tumors (mean＝19 years ; three cases), long-term observation is necessary to detect the possible occurrence of contralateral testicular tumors. Contralateral testicular biopsy might be considered at the time of orchiectomy for unilateral testicular tumor if associated with testicular atrophy and/or a history of undescended testis.

[Pre-Operative Factors Affecting Trifecta Achievement in the Initial Series of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy].

We investigated pre-operative factors affecting trifecta achievement in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients who underwent RAPN from December 2016 to September 2021 with final malignant pathologies. Trifecta was defined as negative resection margin (RM),warm ischemic time (WIT) less than 25 minutes, and no severe perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo＜III). Factors affecting trifecta achievement were analyzed using sex, age, body mass index, RENAL nephrometry score (low or moderate/high complexity), surgical approach (transabdominal or retroperitoneal), tumor diameter and surgical experiences of each surgeon. Negative RM, WIT less than 25 minutes, and no severe complications were obtained in 75 (93%), 65 (80%), and 79 patients (98%), respectively. The trifecta was achieved in 60 patients (74%). In multivariate regression analysis, surgical experience (OR:0.92, 95% CI : 0.86-0.99) was significantly associated with trifecta achievement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 9 cases as the optimal cut-off values for the predication of trifecta achievement (AUC＝0.69,p ＝0.11). The achievement of WIT less than 25 minutes (65 vs 90%, p＜0.01) and trifecta (58 vs 84%,p ＜0.05) were significantly lower in surgical experiences less than 9 cases than in 9 or greater. We conclude that surgical experience in RAPN is an important factor affecting WIT and trifecta achievement in the initial series.

[Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Open and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy].

We compared the perioperative outcomes of open (ORC) and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) for patients with bladder cancer. We retrospectively investigated the intraoperative and 90-day postoperative complications of ORC and RARC performed from March 2014 to September 2021 based on the medical records. Perioperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien- Dindo classification. We used the propensity score matching to adjust for the inherent bias of the different patient characteristics at baseline including gender, age, preoperative chemotherapy, and pathological T classification. Surgery time of RARC was significantly shorter than that of ORC, and blood transfusion was significantly less frequent in RARC than in ORC (3% vs 81%, p＜0.01). The rate of overall complications of Grade III/IV was lower in RARC (8%) than in ORC (25%) (P＝0.09). The prevalence of perioperative urinary tract infection, ileus, and abscess/infectious cyst was similar in ORC and RARC. In patients who underwent RARC, the complication rate was similar in extracorporeal and intracorporeal urinary diversion. Compared to ORC, RARC is more beneficial to reduce blood loss and severe complications.

Deterioration of bladder compliance after botulinum toxin A injection and discontinuation of medication for overactive bladder.

Introduction: We report a case of deterioration of bladder compliance after botulinum toxin type A injection and discontinuation of medication for overactive bladder. Case presentation: A female patient with overactive bladder in her sixties had been visiting our outpatient clinic regularly for 4 years. She had received posterolateral spondylus fusion twice, which resulted in a compression fracture. She had been receiving a combination therapy of anticholinergics and ß3-adrenoceptor agonist for the management of overactive bladder. She received botulinum toxin type A injection for refractory overactive bladder and discontinued medical treatment for overactive bladder. Three months after botulinum toxin type A injection, cystometry revealed the deterioration of bladder compliance. Renal dysfunction, hydronephrosis, and vesicoureteral reflux were shown. Renal function and hydronephrosis were improved after restarting anticholinergics and ß3-adrenoceptor agonist therapy and inserting a temporary transurethral catheter. Conclusion: Deterioration of bladder compliance may occur after botulinum toxin type A injection and discontinuation of overactive bladder medication in some patients with underlying neurological disease.

[Treatment Outcome of Ureteral Reconstruction Surgery].

We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome of ureteral reconstruction that was performed in Asahikawa Medical University Hospital between 2005 and 2021. A total of 14 patients (3 males, 11 females; 15 ureters) were included in this analysis. The median age was 57 years old. The reason for ureteral reconstruction was ureteral injury or stenosis due to pelvic surgery in 9 patients, transurethral lithotripsy for ureteral stone in 3, ureteral invasion of sigmoid colon cancer in one and ovarian cancer in one. The site of ureteral reconstruction was proximal ureter in 2, middle in 3 and distal in 10. The surgical procedure was ureteroneocystostomy with Boari flap in 8 patients (57%), ureteroureterostomy in 4 (21%), transureteroureterostomy in one (7%), and transureteroureterostomy combined with Boari flap for bilateral ureteral stenosis in the remaining patient (7%). Postoperatively, vesicoureteral reflux, ileus and surgical site infection were observed in 3, 2 and 1 patient, respectively. No patient required nephrostomy or ureteral catheter, or any additional procedure after the surgery. There was no episode of febrile urinary tract infection after the surgery. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was, respectivery 75.8 and 78.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 before surgery and at 1-101 months (median of 18) after the surgery. In conclusion, satisfactory outcome was achieved after ureteral reconstruction surgery. We emphasize the importance of selecting the most appropriate procedure for ureteral reconstruction in each patient to prevent renal function deterioration and urinary tract infection.

[Clinical Significance of Preoperative Image Classification Systems in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy].

Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is being used in Japan as a less invasive procedure. RENAL nephrometry (RN) score, Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) Classification and Simplified PADUA Renal (SPARE) nephrometry system are tumor-specific morphometry scoring systems used for predicting the difficulty of partial nephrectomy. Adherent perinephric fat (APF) is one of the patient-specific factors related to the difficulty of partial nephrectomy. Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score measures the difficulty of partial nephrectomy due to APF. Whether these scoring systems were associated with perioperative outcome of RAPN was retrospectively analyzed in 57 patients who underwent RAPN by two experienced surgeons at our hospital from December 2016 to March 2020. Forty-five patients were male and 12 were female. The right side was resected in 25 and the left side in 32 patients. The approach was transperitoneal in 42 and retroperitoneal in 15 patients. There were significant correlations among RN, PADUA and SPARE scores, while MAP score was independent from the other scores. Warm ischemic time was significantly correlated with RN (r＝0.46, p＜0.001), PADUA (r＝0.45, p＜0.001) and SPARE scores (r＝0.44, p＜0.001). Time for console was significantly correlated with MAP score (r＝0.28, p＝0.035). In conclusion, RN and MAP scores might be useful parameters to predict warm ischemic time and time for console during RAPN, respectively.

Dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil for patients with benign prostatic enlargement is similarly effective as dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha blocker: a propensity-score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in patients with BPE who had not been satisfied with tadalafil monotherapy for more than 3 months. Inclusion criteria were prostate volume (PV) ≥ 30 ml and IPSS ≥ 8 or QOL index ≥ 3 under administration of tadalafil without anticholinergic agent. Before and 24 weeks after dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil, we assessed IPSS, overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), serum PSA and testosterone, and uroflowmetry (UFM) to compare these parameters before and after dutasteride add-on treatment. Using a propensity-score matching analysis, the efficacy of dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil was compared with the previous study of dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha blocker. RESULTS: Of 52 patients who were enrolled in this study, 48 patients completed the study (mean age: 72 ± 5 years old). Dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil significantly improved IPSS (from 16.4 ± 5.2 to 13.3 ± 6.4) and IPSS-QOL (from 4.0 ± 1.2 to 3.3 ± 1.1), and reduced PV from 55 ± 26 to 39 ± 22 ml. Propensity-score matching identified 42 matched pairs of patients. The improvement rate of IPSS and reduction rate of PV were similar between patients treated with dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil and dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha blocker. The logistic regression analysis showed that PV at baseline and reduction rate of PV after treatment were associated with the effective symptomatic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The dutasteride add-on is a reasonable treatment option for male patients with LUTS who are not satisfied with tadalafil monotherapy.

Risk factors for failure of long-term dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha-adrenergic antagonist for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement.

PURPOSE: To identify the clinical factors resulting in the failure of dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha-adrenergic antagonist for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed the patient cohort who had been enrolled in the study of dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha-adrenergic antagonist from December 2009 to November 2011. Treatment failure was defined as receiving surgery for BPE or requiring intermittent catheterization or permanent bladder catheter for urinary retention or huge postvoid residual urine. Clinical parameters before dutasteride treatment were compared between the successful and failed group. RESULTS: Of 92 patients, 23 (25%) were defined as treatment failure at 7-109 months (mean: 38 months) after dutasteride add-on treatment. In the failed group, the patient' age was younger (71.6 ± 6.8 vs 75.4 ± 8.4, p = 0.033), prostatic volume (PV) was larger (76 ± 41 vs 49 ± 26 ml, p = 0.005), voiding efficiency was lower (54 ± 27 vs 68 ± 24%, p = 0.045) and bladder outlet obstruction index was higher (73 ± 30 vs 48 ± 30, p = 0.015). The cox proportional-hazards model indicated that only intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) was associated with treatment failure. Non-failure rate at 3 years after dutasteride add-on treatment was 89% with patients of IPP < 13 mm versus 51% with those of IPP ≥ 13 mm (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IPP ≥ 13 mm is the risk factor resulting in the failure of dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha-adrenergic antagonist. This kind of information should be provided to the patients early in the clinical practice so that they could consider the necessity of BPE surgery in the long run.