Pronociceptive effects of spinal dynorphin promote cannabinoid-induced pain and antinociceptive tolerance.

Recent studies indicate that sustained opioid administration produces increased expression of spinal dynorphin, which promotes enhanced sensitivity to non-noxious and noxious stimuli. Such increased "pain" may manifest behaviorally as a decrease in spinal antinociceptive potency. Here, the possibility of similar mechanisms in the antinociception of spinal cannabinoids was explored. Response thresholds to non-noxious mechanical and noxious thermal stimuli were assessed. Antinociception was determined using the 52 degrees C tail-flick test. Mice received repeated WIN 55,212-2, its inactive enantiomer, WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle (i.th., bid, 5 days). WIN 55,212-2, but not WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle, produced a time-related increased sensitivity to non-noxious and noxious stimuli. WIN 55,212-2, but not WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle, elicited a significant increase in lumbar spinal dynorphin content at treatment day 5. Increased sensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimuli produced by WIN 55,212-2 was reversed to baseline levels by i.th. MK-801 or dynorphin antiserum; control serum had no effect. WIN 55,212-2, but not WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle, produced dose-related antinociception and repeated administration resulted in antinociceptive tolerance. While MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum did not alter acute antinociception produced by WIN 55,212-2, these substances significantly blocked antinociceptive tolerance when given immediately prior to WIN 55,212-2 challenge on day 5. Daily MK-801 pretreatments, prior to WIN 55,212-2 injection, also produced a significant block of antinociceptive tolerance. These data suggest that like opioids, repeated spinal administration of a cannabinoid CB1 agonist elicits abnormal pain, which results in increased expression of spinal dynorphin. Manipulations that block cannabinoid-induced pain also block the behavioral manifestation of cannabinoid tolerance.

The cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 suppresses opioid-induced emesis in ferrets.

BACKGROUND: Cannabinoid receptor agonists reverse nausea and vomiting produced by chemotherapy and radiation therapy in animals and humans but have not been tested against opioid-induced emesis. This study tests the hypothesis that cannabinoid receptor agonists will prevent opioid-induced vomiting. METHODS: Twelve male ferrets were used. They weighed 1.2-1.6 kg at the beginning and 1.8-2.3 kg at the end of the experiments. All drugs were injected subcutaneously. WIN55,212-2, a mixed CB1-CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist, was administered 25 min before morphine. Retches and vomits were counted at 5-min intervals for 30 min after morphine injection. RESULTS: Retching and vomiting responses increased with increasing morphine doses up to 1.0 mg/kg, above which the responses decreased. Previous administration of naloxone prevented morphine-induced retching and vomiting. WIN55,212-2 dose-dependently reduced retching and vomiting. The ED50 was 0.05 mg/kg for retches and 0.03 mg/kg for vomits. At 0.13 mg/kg, retching decreased by 76% and vomiting by 92%. AM251, a CB1 receptor-selective antagonist, blocked the antiemetic actions of WIN55,212-2, but AM630, a CB2 receptor-selective antagonist, did not. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that WIN55,212-2 prevents opioid-induced vomiting and suggest that the antiemetic activity of WIN55,212-2 occurs at CB1 receptors. This is consistent with findings that CB1 receptors are the predominant cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system and that antiemetic effects of cannabinoids appear to be centrally mediated.

Renal toxicity with sevoflurane: a storm in a teacup?

The inhaled anaesthetic sevoflurane is metabolised into two products that have the potential to produce renal injury. Fluoride ions are produced by oxidative defluorination of sevoflurane by the cytochrome P450 system in the liver. Until recently, inorganic fluoride has been thought to be the aetiological agent responsible for fluorinated anaesthetic nephrotoxicity, with a toxic concentration threshold of 50 micromol/L in serum. However, studies of sevoflurane administration in animals and humans have not shown evidence of fluoride-induced nephrotoxicity, despite serum fluoride concentrations in this range. Compound A (fluoromethyl-2,2-difluoro-1-[trifluoromethyl] vinyl ether) is a breakdown product of sevoflurane produced by its interaction with carbon dioxide absorbents in the anaesthesia machine. The patient then inhales compound A. Compound A produces evidence of transient renal injury in rats. The mechanism of compound A renal toxicity is controversial, with the debate focused on the role of the renal cysteine conjugate beta-lyase pathway in the biotransformation of compound A. The significance of this debate centres on the fact that the beta-lyase pathway is 10- to 30-fold less active in humans than in rats. Therefore, if biotransformation by this pathway is responsible for the production of nephrotoxic metabolites of compound A, humans may be less susceptible to compound A renal toxicity than are rats. In three studies in human volunteers and one in surgical patients, prolonged (8-hour) sevoflurane exposures and low fresh gas flow rates resulted in significant exposures to compound A. Transient abnormalities were found in biochemical markers of renal injury measured in urine. These studies suggested that sevoflurane can result in renal toxicity, mediated by compound A, under specific circumstances. However, other studies using prolonged sevoflurane administration at low flow rates did not find evidence of renal injury. Finally, there are substantial data to document the safety of sevoflurane administered for shorter durations or at higher fresh gas flow rates. Therefore, the United States Food and Drug Administration recommends the use of sevoflurane with fresh gas flow rates at least 1 L/min for exposures up to 1 hour and at least 2 L/min for exposures greater than 1 hour. We believe this is a rational, cautious approach based on available data. However, it is important to note that other countries have not recommended such limitations on the clinical use of sevoflurane and problems have not been noted.

Lack of involvement of capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents in nerve-ligation injury induced tactile allodynia in rats.

Tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, two robust signs of neuropathic pain associated with experimental nerve injury, have been hypothesized to be mechanistically distinguished based on (a) fiber types which may be involved in the afferent input, (b) participation of spinal and supraspinal circuitry in these responses, and (c) sensitivity of these endpoints to pharmacological agents. Here, the possibility that nerve-injury induced tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia may be mediated via different afferent fiber input was tested by evaluating these responses in sham-operated or nerve-injured (L5/L6) rats before or after a single systemic injection of resiniferatoxin (RTX), an ultrapotent analogue of the C-fiber specific neurotoxin, capsaicin. Tactile allodynia, and three measures of thermal nociception, tail-flick, paw-flick and hot-plate responses, were determined before and at various intervals for at least 40 days after RTX injection. Nerve-injured, but not sham-operated, rats showed a long-lasting tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia (paw-flick) within 2-3 days after surgery; responses to other noxious thermal stimuli (i.e., tail-flick and hot-plate tests) did not distinguish the two groups at the stimulus intensities employed. RTX treatment resulted in a significant and long-lasting (i.e. essentially irreversible) decrease in sensitivity to thermal noxious stimuli in both sham-operated and nerve-injured rats; thermal hyperalgesia was abolished and antinociception produced by RTX. In contrast, RTX treatment did not affect the tactile allodynia seen in the same nerve-injured rats. These data support the concept that thermal hyperalgesia seen after nerve ligation, as well as noxious thermal stimuli, are likely to be mediated by capsaicin-sensitive C-fiber afferents. In contrast, nerve-injury related tactile allodynia is insensitive to RTX treatment which clearly desensitizes C-fibers and, therefore such responses are not likely to be mediated through C-fiber afferents. The hypothesis that tactile allodynia may be due to inputs from large (i.e. A beta) afferents offers a mechanistic basis for the observed insensitivity of this endpoint to intrathecal morphine in this nerve-injury model. Further, these data suggest that clinical treatment of neuropathic pains with C-fiber specific agents such as capsaicin are unlikely to offer significant therapeutic benefit against mechanical allodynia.

Cardiovascular effects of sevoflurane compared with those of isoflurane in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is a new inhalational anesthetic with desirable clinical properties. In some clinical situations, an understanding of the detailed cardiovascular properties of an anesthetic is important, so the authors evaluated the hemodynamic effects of sevoflurane in healthy volunteers not undergoing surgery. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects were randomized to receive sevoflurane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane: 60% N2O. Anesthesia was induced and maintained by inhalation of the designated anesthetic. Hemodynamic measurements were performed before anesthesia, during controlled ventilation, during spontaneous ventilation, and again during controlled ventilation after 5.5 h of anesthesia. RESULTS: A few subjects became excessively hypotensive at high anesthetic concentrations (2.0 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] sevoflurane, 1.5 and 2.0 MAC isoflurane), preventing data collection. Sevoflurane did not alter heart rate, but decreased mean arterial pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure. Cardiac index decreased at 1.0 and 1.5 MAC, but in subjects with mean arterial pressure > or = 50 mmHg returned to baseline values at 2.0 MAC when systemic vascular resistance decreased. Sevoflurane did not alter echocardiographic indices of ventricular function, but did decrease an index of afterload. Sevoflurane caused a greater decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure than did isoflurane, but the cardiovascular effects were otherwise similar. Administration of sevoflurane with 60% N2O, prolonged administration or spontaneous ventilation resulted in diminished cardiovascular depression. CONCLUSIONS: At 1.0 and 1.5 MAC, sevoflurane was well tolerated by healthy volunteers. At 2.0 MAC, in subjects with mean arterial pressure > or = 50 mmHg, no adverse cardiovascular properties were noted. Similar to other contemporary anesthetics, sevoflurane caused evidence of myocardial depression. Hemodynamic instability was noted in some subjects at high anesthetic concentrations in the absence of surgical stimulation. The incidence was similar to that with isoflurane. The cardiovascular effects of sevoflurane were similar to those of isoflurane, an anesthetic commonly used in clinical practice since 1981.

Plasma inorganic fluoride levels with sevoflurane anesthesia in morbidly obese and nonobese patients.

Administration of several of the inhaled anesthetics result in plasma inorganic fluoride concentrations that are higher in obese compared to nonobese patients. Sevoflurane, a new inhaled anesthetic, is metabolized to inorganic fluoride; however, plasma inorganic fluoride levels with sevoflurane anesthesia in obese subjects have not been evaluated. We studied plasma inorganic fluoride concentrations during and after sevoflurane surgical anesthesia in morbidly obese (n = 13, body mass index > 35) and nonobese (n = 10) patients. Sevoflurane anesthesia in 60% nitrous oxide/40% oxygen was administered with a semiclosed circle absorption system. Mean anesthetic duration was 1.4 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) hours (sevoflurane MAC = 2.05%) for both groups. Pre- and postoperative blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and liver function tests were evaluated. Venous blood samples were obtained during and after anesthesia for plasma inorganic fluoride analysis. In six morbidly obese and nonobese patients arterial blood samples were obtained during and after sevoflurane anesthesia for determining sevoflurane blood concentration. Plasma fluoride concentrations during and after anesthesia did not differ between morbidly obese and non-obese groups. Peak plasma inorganic fluoride ion concentrations were 30 +/- 2 mumol/L (mean +/- SEM) in obese and 28 +/- 2 mumol/L in nonobese patients 1 h after discontinuing anesthesia. The hourly rate of change of fluoride ion concentration in plasma during anesthesia was similar between the groups. The maximal recorded plasma fluoride concentrations were 49 mumol/L in an obese patient and 42 mumol/L in a nonobese patient. Pre- and postoperative hepatic and renal tests did not differ significantly in either group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Quantification of the degradation products of sevoflurane in two CO2 absorbants during low-flow anesthesia in surgical patients.

Sevoflurane, a new inhalational anesthetic agent has been shown to produce degradation products upon interaction with CO2 absorbants. Quantification of these sevoflurane degradation products during low-flow or closed circuit anesthesia in patients has not been well evaluated. The production of sevoflurane degradation products was evaluated using a low-flow anesthetic technique in patients receiving sevoflurane anesthesia in excess of 3 h. Sevoflurane anesthesia was administered to 16 patients using a circle absorption system with O2 flow of 500 ml/min and average N2O flow of 273 ml/min. Preoperative and postoperative hepatic and renal function studies were performed. Gas samples were obtained from the inhalation and exhalation limbs of the anesthetic circuit for degradation product analysis and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for four degradation products. The first eight patients received sevoflurane anesthesia using soda lime, and the following eight patients received anesthesia using baralyme as the CO2 absorbant. CO2 absorbant temperatures were measured during anesthesia. Of the degradation products analyzed, only one compound [fluoromethyl-2, 2-difluoro-1-(trifluoromethyl) vinyl ether], designated compound A, was detectable. Concentrations of compound A increased during the first 4 h of anesthesia with soda lime and baralyme and declined between 4 and 5 h when baralyme was used. Mean maximum inhalation concentration of compound A using baralyme was 20.28 +/- 8.6 ppm (mean +/- SEM) compared to 8.16 +/- 2.67 ppm obtained with soda lime, a difference that did not reach statistical significance. A single patient achieved a maximal concentration of 60.78 ppm during low-flow anesthesia with baralyme. Exhalation concentrations of compound A were less than inhalation concentrations, suggesting patient uptake.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The difficult airway in obstetric anesthesia: techniques for airway management and the role of regional anesthesia.

A case is presented illustrating the use of a continuous spinal anesthetic in a parturient with a difficult airway who required urgent cesarean delivery. Options for endotracheal intubation of a parturient with a difficult airway are reviewed. The role of regional anesthesia in this setting is discussed. The most appropriate methods for intubation of the obstetric patient are direct laryngoscopy, the lighted stylet, and fiberoptic endoscopy. Available data suggest that regional anesthesia, specifically continuous spinal anesthesia, may be a safe and effective option for management of a parturient with a difficult airway. Further investigation of this technique is merited.

Mechanism of CRP-cAMP activation of lac operon transcription initiation activation of the P1 promoter.

CRP-cAMP was shown to activate transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli lac promoter in vitro as a result of two separate effects. An indirect component of the activation resulted from an enhancement of the fraction of promoters productively bound by RNA polymerase. This effect was due largely to CRP-cAMP repression of RNA polymerase binding to an overlapping site (lac P2) within the promoter region. In addition, a direct enhancement of RNA polymerase binding at the principal lac promoter (lac P1) was found. The combination of indirect and direct activation by CRP-cAMP was suggested to be responsible for the large activation observed in vivo. Promoter strength parameters were also determined for the L8, UV5 and Ps promoters. The effect of CRP-cAMP on these mutant promoters was shown to be consistent with the activation mechanism deduced for the lac wild-type promoter. DNA supercoiling enhanced the promoter strength of the lac wild-type and UV5 promoters. The combination of supercoiling and CRP-cAMP was necessary for optimal promoter strength for the lac wild-type promoter.

Dual promoter control of the Escherichia coli lactose operon.

The control of transcription initiation at the lactose operon promoter was investigated in vitro. We found that an upstream promoter (termed lac P2) interfered with RNA polymerase binding at the principal promoter (termed lac P1). The start site for lac P2 was located at base pair position -22 relative to the P1 start site. The addition of cAMP receptor protein and cAMP was shown to repress lac P2 and to activate lac P1. Abortive initiation reactions for both promoters were used to investigate the coordinate repression-activation elicited by CRP-cAMP. The effects of lac promoter mutations (L8, Ps, and UV5) were consistent with an important RNA polymerase positioning role for CRP-cAMP in the activation of lac operon expression.