Treatment failure in persistent tic disorders: an expert clinicians' consensus-based definition.

A standardized definition of treatment failure in the management of tics is currently lacking. Such definition would prevent persistent use of unnecessary interventions and help clinicians to determine when to offer less established treatments (e.g., deep brain stimulation surgery). To achieve an expert consensus-based definition of failure of medical treatments for tics, we used a multi-step, multi-round, web-based Delphi approach involving international specialist clinicians with specific expertise in tic disorders. These experts were identified through professional networks or consortia related to chronic tic disorders. We created a survey and reviewed the questions with stakeholders prior to two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by a final review and discussion among research team members. Both survey rounds were completed using a sample of 36 expert stakeholders from 14 countries, including neurologists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists. The Delphi process led to consensus on 10 statements which formed the final definition of treatment failure. The definition was structured and operationalized according to two separate sections, one for behavioral and one for pharmacological treatments. Core components of the definition and its operationalization included lack of efficacy, adherence, and tolerability, as well as a definition of failure of behavioral therapies as a whole, and of pharmacological therapies as a whole. The group concluded that the components of this specific definition reflect the range and complexity of characteristics to consider in establishing tic-related treatment failure. Future research should assess the feasibility of this operational definition and whether it will change clinical decision-making and improve management outcomes.

Rhabdomyolysis secondary to severe tic fits.

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a condition wherein motor and vocal tics occur, provoked by an urge, but often not able to be completely voluntarily controlled. Tics are known to cause physical and emotional risks to quality of life, and in rare extreme cases, may have permanent consequences. We report the first cases, to our knowledge, of rhabdomyolysis due to extreme tic fits in two distinct patients with TS. Both patients presented with severe tics, leading to elevated creatine kinase and a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis requiring hospitalisation and intravenous fluids. Neither had neuroleptic malignant syndrome. One patient was on concurrent neuroleptic therapy, but his laboratory parameters improved when tics subsided despite continued neuroleptic use. Our cases highlight the potential complication of rhabdomyolysis secondary to severe tic fits independent of neuroleptic use.

The 5 Pillars in Tourette Syndrome Deep Brain Stimulation Patient Selection: Present and Future.

The selection of patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery rests on 5 fundamental pillars. However, the operationalization of the multidisciplinary screening process to evaluate these pillars remains highly diverse, especially across sites. High tic severity and tic-related impact on quality of life (first 2 pillars) require confirmation from objective, validated measures, but malignant features of TS should per se suffice to fulfill this pillar. Failure of behavioral and pharmacologic therapies (third pillar) should be assessed taking into account refractoriness through objective and subjective measures supporting lack of efficacy of all interventions of proven efficacy, as well as true lack of tolerability, adherence, or access. Educational interventions and use of remote delivery formats (for behavioral therapies) play a role in preventing misjudgment of treatment failure. Stability of comorbid psychiatric disorders for 6 months (fourth pillar) is needed to confirm the predominant impact of tics on quality of life, to prevent pseudo-refractoriness, and to maximize the future DBS response. The 18-year age limit (fifth pillar) is currently under reappraisal, considering the potential impact of severe tics in adolescence and the predictive effect of tic severity in childhood on tic severity when transitioning into adulthood. Future advances should aim at a consensus-based definition of failure of specific, noninvasive treatment strategies for tics and of the minimum clinical observation period before considering DBS treatment, the stability of behavioral comorbidities, and the use of a prospective international registry data to identify predictors of positive response to DBS, especially in younger patients.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: Potential Role in the Pediatric Population.

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder. Despite an expected natural history of improvement with age, many individuals continue to have severe tics and remain refractory to the current best pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a potential treatment option. This article reviews the published reports on the use of deep brain stimulation in Tourette syndrome revealing that 2 anatomical targets have been most commonly used: the centromedian thalamus and the globus pallidus internus. The evidence supports a significant clinical improvement of tics with deep brain stimulation, though the data are limited by the small number of patients and variable methodology employed. To bridge these limitations, the international Tourette syndrome deep brain stimulation database and registry have been created, fostering collaboration among multiple centers from 10 countries. By standardizing data collection, the database and registry are providing valuable insights into deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome. In conclusion, deep brain stimulation offers significant promise for the management of tics.

Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome: The International Tourette Syndrome Deep Brain Stimulation Public Database and Registry.

Importance: Collective evidence has strongly suggested that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for Tourette syndrome. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of DBS in a multinational cohort of patients with Tourette syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants: The prospective International Deep Brain Stimulation Database and Registry included 185 patients with medically refractory Tourette syndrome who underwent DBS implantation from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, at 31 institutions in 10 countries worldwide. Exposures: Patients with medically refractory symptoms received DBS implantation in the centromedian thalamic region (93 of 163 [57.1%]), the anterior globus pallidus internus (41 of 163 [25.2%]), the posterior globus pallidus internus (25 of 163 [15.3%]), and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (4 of 163 [2.5%]). Main Outcomes and Measures: Scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale and adverse events. Results: The International Deep Brain Stimulation Database and Registry enrolled 185 patients (of 171 with available data, 37 females and 134 males; mean [SD] age at surgery, 29.1 [10.8] years [range, 13-58 years]). Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder were present in 97 of 151 patients (64.2%) and 32 of 148 (21.6%) had a history of self-injurious behavior. The mean (SD) total Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score improved from 75.01 (18.36) at baseline to 41.19 (20.00) at 1 year after DBS implantation (P < .001). The mean (SD) motor tic subscore improved from 21.00 (3.72) at baseline to 12.91 (5.78) after 1 year (P < .001), and the mean (SD) phonic tic subscore improved from 16.82 (6.56) at baseline to 9.63 (6.99) at 1 year (P < .001). The overall adverse event rate was 35.4% (56 of 158 patients), with intracranial hemorrhage occurring in 2 patients (1.3%), infection in 4 patients with 5 events (3.2%), and lead explantation in 1 patient (0.6%). The most common stimulation-induced adverse effects were dysarthria (10 [6.3%]) and paresthesia (13 [8.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Deep brain stimulation was associated with symptomatic improvement in patients with Tourette syndrome but also with important adverse events. A publicly available website on outcomes of DBS in patients with Tourette syndrome has been provided.

Web-based phenotyping for Tourette Syndrome: Reliability of common co-morbid diagnoses.

Collecting phenotypic data necessary for genetic analyses of neuropsychiatric disorders is time consuming and costly. Development of web-based phenotype assessments would greatly improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of genetic research. However, evaluating the reliability of this approach compared to standard, in-depth clinical interviews is essential. The current study replicates and extends a preliminary report on the utility of a web-based screen for Tourette Syndrome (TS) and common comorbid diagnoses (obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)). A subset of individuals who completed a web-based phenotyping assessment for a TS genetic study was invited to participate in semi-structured diagnostic clinical interviews. The data from these interviews were used to determine participants' diagnostic status for TS, OCD, and ADHD using best estimate procedures, which then served as the gold standard to compare diagnoses assigned using web-based screen data. The results show high rates of agreement for TS. Kappas for OCD and ADHD diagnoses were also high and together demonstrate the utility of this self-report data in comparison previous diagnoses from clinicians and dimensional assessment methods.

An independent elderly woman with rapid onset of coma.

A 75-year-old woman was transferred from a local hospital because of rapid progression to coma preceded by lower back pain and recurrent falls. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis at the local hospital revealed increased protein with a slightly elevated white blood cell count. Our imaging studies revealed multiple punctate foci with nodular enhancement in the brain and multifocal cystic lesions on the chest and abdomen. The patient was empirically treated with antibiotics and corticosteroids without improvement. She died 3 days after transfer, and autopsy was performed. The differential diagnosis, pathologic findings, and final diagnosis are discussed.

The "brittle response" to Parkinson's disease medications: characterization and response to deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Formulate a definition and describe the clinical characteristics of PD patients with a "brittle response" (BR) to medications versus a "non-brittle response" (NBR), and characterize the use of DBS for this population. METHODS: An UF IRB approved protocol used a retrospective chart review of 400 consecutive PD patients presenting to the UF Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration. Patient records were anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis. SPSS statistics were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Of 345 included patients, 19 (5.5%) met criteria for BR PD. The BR group was comprised of 58% females, compared to 29% in the NBR group (P = .008). The former had a mean age of 63.4 compared to 68.1 in the latter. BR patients had lower mean weight (63.5 vs. 79.6, P = <.001), longer mean disease duration (12.6 vs. 8.9 years, P = .003), and had been on LD for more years compared to NBR patients (9.8 vs. 5.9, P = .001). UPDRS motor scores were higher (40.4 vs. 30.0, P = .001) in BR patients. No differences were observed regarding the Schwab and England scale, PDQ-39, and BDI-II. Sixty-three percent of the BR group had undergone DBS surgery compared to 18% (P = .001). Dyskinesias were more common, severe, and more often painful (P = <.001) in the BR group. There was an overall positive benefit from DBS. CONCLUSION: BR PD occurred more commonly in female patients with a low body weight. Patients with longer disease duration and longer duration of LD therapy were also at risk. The BR group responded well to DBS.

Deep brain stimulation may improve quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease without affecting caregiver burden.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the influence of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on caregiver burden and quality of life in Parkinson's disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study utilizing the National Parkinson Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative clinical study was conducted. A group of 275 patients who had undergone DBS for Parkinson's disease were extracted from 2916 subjects who were included in this data base. The data were compared to an age, sex, and disease severity matched control group. A secondary analysis was then performed on two more control groups that were matched to account for presence or absence of motor fluctuations. The multidimensional caregiver strain index and Parkinson's disease quality-of-life questionnaire 39 summary index were compared. RESULTS: The multidimensional caregiver strain index did not differ between the DBS group (16.9 ± 11.8) and a matched non-DBS group (16.1 ± 17.6, p = 0.618). The quality-of-life index was, however, significantly better in the DBS group (28.9 ± 15.6) than in the non-DBS group (32.3 ± 17.6, p = 0.034). A secondary analysis revealed that the total caregiver strain score was lower in the no motor fluctuation control group than the other two groups (p < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed significant relationships between the quality-of-life index and caregiver strain index total scores (p < 0.001), between caregiver strain index total score and age at surgery (p = 0.027), and also between the interval since surgery (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were several limitations to this study, DBS seems to improve quality of life without significantly increasing caregiver burden.

Smell and taste disorders in primary care.

Smell and taste disorders can be challenging to diagnose because of the large number of potential etiologies. Patients are often unable to provide a clear history of symptoms, because they frequently cannot distinguish between difficulties with smell and taste. Standardized questionnaires may be helpful in diagnosis. Smell and taste dysfunction have been implicated in loss of appetite, unintended weight loss, malnutrition, and reduced quality of life. Taste dysfunction may be complete or partial, and affect one or more aspects of taste (sweetness, bitterness, sourness, saltiness, and umami [savory]). An estimated 95% of taste disorders are caused by impairment of smell rather than gustatory loss. The most common causes of olfactory dysfunction include allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis (with or without sinonasal polyps), and upper respiratory infection. Other potential causes include head trauma, neurodegenerative diseases (including Parkinson disease and cognitive impairments), and medications. Examination of the nose, mouth, and oropharynx as well as neurologic examination (focusing on cranial nerves I, VII, IX, and X) is essential. Additional assessment such as cognitive testing, nasal endoscopy, computed tomography of the sinuses or nose, or brain magnetic resonance imaging may be indicated. Up to one-half of patients with olfactory dysfunction improve over time. Improvement in olfactory function is inversely correlated with severity and duration of loss, age, smoking, and male sex.

Taking a better history for behavioral issues pre- and post-deep brain stimulation: issues missed by standardized scales.

OBJECTIVES: To screen for potentially underreported behavioral changes in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) pre- and post-deep brain stimulation (DBS), a retrospective data base review was performed. METHODS: In total, 113 patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral DBS at the University of Florida in either subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus for PD were screened for behavioral issues by asking about the presence or absence of seven neuropsychiatric symptoms (panic, fear, paranoia, anger, suicidal flashes, crying, and laughing). RESULTS: There was a high prevalence of fear (16.3%), panic (14.0%), and anger (11.6%) at baseline in this cohort. In the first six months following DBS implantation, anger (32.6%), fear (26.7%), and uncontrollable crying (26.7%) were the most frequent symptoms reported. Those symptoms also were present following six months of DBS surgery (30.2%, 29.1%, and 19.8%, respectively). New uncontrollable crying occurred more in the acute postoperative stage (less than or equal to six months) (p = 0.033), while new anger occurred more in the chronic postoperative stage (greater than six months) (p = 0.017). The frequency of uncontrollable laughing significantly increased with bilateral DBS (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Many of the neuropsychiatric issues were identified at preoperative baseline and their overall occurrence was more than expected. There was a potential for worsening of these issues post-DBS. There were subtle differences in time course, and in unilateral vs. bilateral implantations. Clinicians should be aware of these potential behavioral issues that may emerge following DBS therapy, and should consider including screening questions in preoperative and postoperative interviews. Standardized scales may miss the presence or absence of these clinically relevant issues.

Rescue leads: a salvage technique for selected patients with a suboptimal response to standard DBS therapy.

OBJECT: We present four cases where supplementary "rescue" deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads were added for patients who failed to obtain anticipated clinical benefits. METHODS: Nine patients out of 295 patients who underwent DBS between 2002 and 2009, were identified as rescue lead recipients. Of these nine cases, four cases were evaluated. Two had medication refractory tremor which was incompletely suppressed by Vim (nucleus ventralis intermedius) thalamic DBS, and supplemental rescue leads were implanted in either the VO (ventral oralis) thalamic nucleus or the STN (subthalamic nucleus). The remaining two cases were patients with severe dystonia who were initially treated with bilateral GPi (globus pallidus internus)-DBS, and following suboptimal clinical benefits, a second GPi rescue lead was added in a case, and bilateral STN rescue leads were added in the other case. Outcomes of scores collected included Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) for tremor cases and the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) for dystonia cases and the symptom specific patient global impression scales (PGIS; 7 point scale). RESULTS: In the tremor cases, the TRS scale improved by 34.1 ± 7.4% and the PGIS following rescue lead was "minimally improved" to "very much improved" (range 1-2). In dystonia cases, the UDRS improved by 50.0 ± 23.6% and the PGIS was "minimally improved" to "very much improved" (range 1-2) after rescue lead surgery. CONCLUSION: This small retrospective case series demonstrated that, in appropriately selected patients with suboptimal results of standard DBS therapy, the addition of rescue lead(s) may provide meaningful clinical benefit.

Hospitalization in Parkinson disease: a survey of National Parkinson Foundation Centers.

OBJECTIVES: To explore current practices and opinions regarding hospital management of Parkinson disease (PD) patients in specialized PD Centers. METHODS: Fifty-one out of 54 National Parkinson Foundation (NPF) Centers worldwide completed an online survey regarding hospitalization of PD patients. RESULTS: Many Centers were concerned about the quality of PD-specific care provided to their patients when hospitalized. Primary concerns were adherence to the outpatient medication schedule and poor understanding by hospital staff of medications that worsen PD. Few Centers had a policy with their primary hospital that notified them when their patients were admitted. Rather, notification of hospitalization came often from the patient or a family member. Several Centers (29%) reported not finding out about a hospitalization until a routine clinic visit after discharge. Quick access to outpatient PD care following discharge was a problem in many Centers. Elective surgery, fall/fracture, infection, and mental status changes, were identified as common reasons for hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: There is a perceived need for PD specialists to be involved during hospitalization of their patients. Improvement in communication between hospitals and PD Centers is necessary so that hospital clinicians can take advantage of PD specialists' expertise. Education of hospital staff and clinicians regarding management of PD, complications of PD, and medications to avoid in PD is critical. Most importantly, outpatient access to PD specialists needs to be improved, which may prevent unnecessary hospitalizations in these patients.

Steady or not following thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become an important option for medication-refractory essential tremor (ET), but may contribute to worsened gait and falling. This study evaluates impaired gait in a cohort of patients treated with DBS with a retrospective review of ET patients before and after DBS implantation. Factors examined included: age, duration of symptoms, pre-morbid gait difficulties/falls, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremorrating scale (TRS) scores at baseline, 6 months post-unilateral DBS implantation, and 6 or 12 months post-bilateral implantation. All implantations targeted the nucleus ventralis intermediate (Vim). Thirty-eight patients (25 males, 13 females) were included. Twenty-five patients (65.8%) underwent unilateral DBS implantation and 13 (34.2%) bilateral. The mean age at surgery was 67.1 years ± 11.4 (range 34-81). The mean disease duration was 31 years ± 18.3 (range 6-67). Fifty-eight percent of patients had worsened gait post-operatively. Seventy percent of patients with unilateral Vim DBS experienced gait worsening while 55% of bilateral DBS patients experienced gait worsening. Patients with worsened gait post-DBS had higher baseline pre-operative TRS scores than those without worsened gait (43.1 points ± 8.4 vs. 33.1 points ± 10.1, p = 0.002) (odds ratio 2.5, p = 0.02). Gait/balance may worsen following DBS for medication refractory ET. Higher baseline TRS score may factor into these issues, although a larger prospective study will be required with a control population. The larger percentage of difficulties observed in unilateral versus bilateral cases likely reflected the bias not to proceed to second-sided surgery if gait/balance problems were encountered.

A closer look at unilateral versus bilateral deep brain stimulation: results of the National Institutes of Health COMPARE cohort.

OBJECT: In this paper, the authors' aim was to examine reasons underpinning decisions to undergo, or alternatively forgo, a second-sided deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS: Fifty-two patients with Parkinson disease (PD) were randomized to receive DBS to the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus (GPi) as part of the COMPARE trial. Forty-four patients had complete data sets. All patients were offered a choice at 6 months after unilateral implantation whether to receive a contralateral DBS implant. All patients had advanced PD. The mean patient age was 59.8 years (range 43-76 years), and the mean duration of disease was 12.2 years (range 5-21 years). The mean baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III motor score was 42.7. The main outcome measures used in this study were the UPDRS-III Motor Scale and the UPDRS-IV Dyskinesia Scale. RESULTS: Twenty-one (48%) of the 44 patients in the cohort did not undergo bilateral implantation and have been successfully treated for an average of 3.5 years; of these, 14 (67%) had a GPi target. The most common reason for adding a second side was inadequacy to address motor symptoms. Patient satisfaction with motor outcomes after unilateral DBS implantation was the most common reason for not undergoing bilateral implantation. Those who chose a second DBS procedure had significantly higher baseline UPDRS-III motor and ipsilateral UPDRS-III scores, and a significantly lower asymmetrical index. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds of proceeding to bilateral DBS was 5.2 times higher for STN than for GPi DBS. For every 1% increase in asymmetry, the odds of bilateral DBS decreased [corrected] by 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral DBS is an effective treatment for a subset of patients with PD. Baseline asymmetry is an important factor in the effectiveness and decision-making process between unilateral and bilateral DBS. Patients with GPi DBS in this cohort were more likely to choose to remain with unilateral implantation.