Phase 3 RCT comparing docetaxel-platinum with docetaxel-platinum-5FU as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable oral cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5FU) is one of the treatment options in very locally advanced oral cancer with a survival advantage over PF (cisplatin and 5FU). TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) has shown promising results with a lower rate of adverse events but has never been compared to TPF. METHODS: In this phase 3 randomized superiority study, adult patients with borderline resectable locally advanced oral cancers were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either TP or TPF. After the administration of 2 cycles, patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic and further treatment was planned. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. RESULTS: 495 patients were randomized in this study, 248 patients in TP arm and 247 in TPF arm. The 5-year OS was 18.5% (95% CI 13.8-23.7) and 23.9% (95% CI 18.1-30.1) in TP and TPF arms, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.778; 95% CI 0.637-0.952; P = 0.015). Following NACT, 43.8% were deemed resectable, but 34.5% underwent surgery. The 5-year OS was 50.7% (95% CI 41.5-59.1) and 5% (95%CI 2.9-8.1), respectively, in the surgically resected versus unresected cohort post NACT (P < 0.0001). Grade 3 or above adverse events were seen in 97 (39.1%) and 179 (72.5%) patients in the TP and TPF arms, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: NACT with TPF has a survival benefit over TP in borderline resectable oral cancers, with an increase in toxicity which is manageable. Patients who undergo surgery achieve a relatively good, sustained survival.

Analysis of Differential Gene Expression and Core Canonical Pathways Involved in the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a malignant form of cancer with very high mortality and morbidity. Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is the most common pathophysiological change observed in cancer cells of epithelial origin that promotes metastasis, drug resistance and cancer stem cell formation. Since the information regarding differential gene expression in TNBC cells and cell signaling events leading to EMT is limited, this investigation was done by comparing transcriptomic data generated by RNA isolation and sequencing of a EMT model TNBC cell line in comparison to regular TNBC cells. RNA sequencing and Ingenuity Pathway Software Analysis (IPA) of the transcriptomic data revealed several upregulated and downregulated gene expressions along with novel core canonical pathways including Sirtuin signaling, Oxidative Phosphorylation and Mitochondrial dysfunction events involved in EMT changes of the TNBC cells.

An Audit of Systemic Therapy in Medullary Carcinoma Thyroid.

There is a paucity of evidence of the impact of sorafenib on MCT and it is the preferred therapy used in India. We decided to do an audit of all patients of MCT who were referred to us for systemic therapy. The objective of this exercise was to identify the treatment pattern, outcomes, and adverse events with therapy in MCT. Baseline demographics (age, gender, ECOG PS, comorbidities, habits), tumor details (site of metastasis), previous treatment details, clinical features at metastasis (symptomatic or asymptomatic), the pattern of treatment, adverse events (CTCAE version 4.02), date of progression, date of death and status, and follow-up were extracted from the rare tumor database and electronic medical records. Out of 75 patients referred for therapy for MCT, 47 (62.7%) patients were considered for immediate tyrosine kinase inhibitors as they had symptomatic status and 28 (37.3%) patients were kept on observation due to the asymptomatic nature of the disease. Out of the 28 patients, 15 (53.6%, n = 28) patients were subsequently started on TKI while in 13 (46.4%, n = 28) patients observation was continued. In the overall cohort, the median PFS was 18.9 months (95% CI 11.9-29.9) and OS was 26.6 months (95% CI 14.4-39.0). Among variables tested, only female gender had an impact on PFS (hazard ratio = 0.364 95% CI 0.148-0.895; P = 0.028) and the absence of lung metastasis had a positive impact on OS (hazard ratio = 0.443 95% CI 0.207-0.95; P = 0.037). Most commonly used TKI was sorafenib (n = 61) and sunitinib in 1 patient. The most common adverse events with TKI were palmo-plantar dysesthesia (50, 80.6%) and oral mucositis (25, 40.2%). The strategy of treating symptomatic MCT and observing in asymptomatic MCT is associated with reasonable PFS and OS. Sorafenib is the most commonly used TKI in our setup and provides similar outcomes as globally.

Audit of Demographics, Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Differentiated Thyroid Cancers Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

The real-world patterns of TKI use in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are largely governed by the accessibility and financial feasibility of the patient with more sorafenib use compared to lenvatinib. There are limited data available on the toxicity profile, safety and tolerance of sorafenib and lenvatinib in DTC. Hence, we audited our practice on DTC. This is a retrospective single-centre analysis of patients with DTC who were referred to the Department of Medical Oncology for systemic therapy. Baseline demographics (age, sex, ECOG PS, comorbidities, substance use), tumour details (site of metastasis), previous treatment details, clinical features at metastasis (symptoms), the pattern of treatment, adverse events and outcomes including progression and death were extracted. There were 67 patients with DTC referred for systemic therapy; the median age was 56 (33-81) with a male preponderance (55.6%). The most common reason to start TKI therapy was radioactive iodine (RAI) cumulative dose > 600 milliCurie, followed by low iodine uptake in the RAI low-dose scan done at progression. The most common TKI used in the first line was sorafenib in 56 (83.6%) patients followed by lenvatinib in 9 (13.4%) patients. Papillary thyroid carcinoma was the most common histology (51, 76.1%), and the rest were follicular carcinoma (16, 23.9%). With a median follow-up of 36 months, the median PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI 10.4-16.0). The median OS was 18.8 months (95% CI 10.0-27.6). Among variables tested, no factors had a significant impact on the PFS or OS. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (54, 80.5%), diarrhoea (23, 33.3%) and transaminitis (24, 34.4%). The pattern of care of patients with RAI-refractory DTC is TKI therapy, especially sorafenib and lenvatinib in the real-world settings with comparable efficacy and safety profile compared to international literature.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable head and neck cancers: a retrospective audit.

Background: The data regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable head and neck cancer (HNC) is limited and real-world studies are needed to look for the efficacy and toxicities of this approach. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in the Medical Oncology department of our hospital. All technically unresectable HNC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between May 2018 and May 2020 were included in this analysis. Patients received three-drug regimen docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen, two-drug regimens included docetaxel + cisplatin, paclitaxel + carboplatin both weekly and 3-weekly. The resectability assessment was done clinically and radiologically after completing three neoadjuvant cycles. Overall survival was calculated from the first day of chemotherapy to the date of last follow-up or date of death. Results: A total of 119 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the specified time. Response assessment showed partial response in 41.9% of patients with three-drug regimens and 37.5% of patients with other regimens. Out of 119 patients, 56 (47%) patients were offered radical intent therapy. Resectability was achieved in 32.3% of three-drug regimen patients and 26.1% of other patients. Surgery was feasible in 33 (27.7%) patients, and postoperative radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy were done in 30 patients (25.2%), and surgery with only postoperative radiotherapy was done in 3 patients (2.5%). Radical chemoradiotherapy was done in 23 patients (19.3%). The estimated median survival for patients who could undergo surgery was 18 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9-21.0], and nonsurgical patients were 9 months (95% CI, 7.3-10.6) (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Our study shows that neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable HNC patients can make the disease resectable in around one-third of the patients. The patients who could undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had significantly improved survival as compared to those who could not.

Osteosarcoma journey over two decades in India: Small steps, big changes.

BACKGROUND: The management of osteosarcoma is challenging especially in lower-income and middle-income countries, and there is an unmet need to evolve efficient and sustainable chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: We compared the outcomes in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma patients treated with three sequential non-high-dose methotrexate-based combination chemotherapy protocols at a single tertiary care center over two decades. The first protocol, OGS-99, involved dose-intense, alternating dyads of three drugs: doxorubicin (Dox), cisplatin (CDDP), and ifosfamide (Ifo). The second protocol, OGS-99 enhanced, included OGS-99 drugs with etoposide and enhanced supportive care. The OGS-12 protocol involved dose-dense administration of eight sequential dyads of Dox, CDDP and Ifo, universal growth factor prophylaxis and targeted nutritional support. Event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were reported using a retrospective chart review in the OGS-99 and OGS-99 enhanced protocols and prospectively in the OGS-12 protocol. RESULTS: A total of 41, 94, and 385 treatment-naïve, consecutive, nonmetastatic patients with extremity osteosarcoma were treated with the OGS-99 (2000-2005), OGS-99 enhanced (2010), and OGS-12 (2011-2016), respectively. At a median follow-up of 19, 86, and 39 months, the five-year EFS rates were 38%, 50%, and 62% in the OGS-99, OGS-99 enhanced, and OGS-12, respectively. The corresponding rates of five-year OS were nonevaluable, 60% and 77%, respectively, with acceptable rates of grade 3-4 toxicities: febrile neutropenia (40%), thrombocytopenia (36%), anemia (51%), and 1% deaths related to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential selection of an intelligent, dose-dense chemotherapy regimen together with enhanced supportive care resulted in marked improvement in outcomes of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma and this "small steps-big changes" model deserves wider recognition and usage.