De-escalating cancer treatments during COVID 19 pandemic: Is metronomic chemotherapy a reasonable option?

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services and containment measures to reduce the risk of infection have been promptly activated worldwide. The healthcare systems reorganization has had a major impact on the management of cancer patients who are considered at high risk of infection. Recommendations and guidelines on how to manage cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic have been published. Oral administration of chemotherapy is recommended to limit the access of cancer patients to hospital facilities and in some cases to guarantee the continuum of care. Low-dose metronomic administration of chemotherapy with different drugs and schedules has emerged in the last years as a possible alternative to conventional chemotherapy, due to its promising tumor control rates and excellent safety profiles. Moreover, given that many metronomic schedules use the oral route administration, it could represent a therapeutic strategy to ensure continuum of cancer care during COVID 19 pandemic. In this review we have selected all the clinical studies that have used the metronomic strategy, especially with oral drugs, in order to identify the subgroups of cancer patients who can benefit most from a metronomic approach even during COVID 19 pandemic.

Eribulin plus trastuzumab in pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients: safety and efficacy. An Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy plus targeted therapy is the established treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer (BC). Limited data regarding the safety and activity of the combination of eribulin and trastuzumab (E/T) in pretreated HER2-positive advanced BC (ABC) are available. The aim of this observational, retrospective, multicenter study was to examine the tolerability and the clinical activity of E/T in this setting. METHODS: Patients treated with eribulin mesylate plus standard dose of trastuzumab were included. Data on overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were reported. RESULTS: Between October 2012 and November 2015, 24 consecutive patients with HER2-positive ABC were included. All patients were heavily pretreated: the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens for ABC was 3 (range 2-9). The median number of cycles with E/T was 11.5 (range 2-26). The ORR was 41.7%. Median PFS was 5.4 months, median postprogression survival was 5.4 months, and median OS was 8 months. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 clinical adverse event (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Tolerability and clinical activity of the E/T combination schedule are encouraging. The results of this study indicate that this combination might be considered for treatment of pretreated HER2 ABC.

Respiratory Mechanics, Lung Recruitability, and Gas Exchange in Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is a clinical syndrome characterized by a refractory hypoxemia due to an inflammatory and high permeability pulmonary edema secondary to direct or indirect lung insult (pulmonary and extrapulmonary form). Aim of this study was to evaluate in a large database of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients, the pulmonary versus extrapulmonary form in terms of respiratory mechanics, lung recruitment, gas exchange, and positive end-expiratory pressure response. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of previously published data. PATIENTS: One-hundred eighty-one sedated and paralyzed acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (age 60 yr [46-72 yr], body mass index 25 kg/m [22-28 kg/m], and PaO2/FIO2 184 ± 66). INTERVENTIONS: Lung CT scan performed at 5 and 45 cm H2O. Two levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (5 and 15 cm H2O) were randomly applied. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-seven and 84 patients had a pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome. The median time from intensive care admission to the CT scan and respiratory mechanics analysis was 4 days (interquartile range, 2-6). At both positive end-expiratory pressure levels, pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome presented a significantly lower PaO2/FIO2 and higher physiologic dead space compared with extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome. The lung and chest wall elastance were similar between groups. The intra-abdominal pressure was significantly higher in extrapulmonary compared with pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (10 mm Hg [7-12 mm Hg] vs 7 mm Hg [5-8 mm Hg]). The lung weight and lung recruitability were significantly higher in pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (1,534 g [1,286-1,835 g] vs 1,342 g [1,090-1,507 g] and 16% [9-25%] vs 9% [5-14%]). CONCLUSIONS: In the early stage, pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by a greater impairment of gas exchange and higher lung recruitability. The recognition of the origin of acute respiratory distress syndrome is important for a more customized ventilatory management.

Phase II Study of Preoperative Treatment with External Radiotherapy Plus Panitumumab in Low-Risk, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (RaP Study/STAR-03).

BACKGROUND: Treatment with fluoropyrimidines and concomitant long-course external radiotherapy (RTE) is the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative chemoradiation. A randomized phase II study (RaP/STAR-03) was conducted that aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of the monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor panitumumab as a single agent in combination with radiotherapy in low-risk LARC preoperative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum, cT3N- or cT2-T3N+, KRAS wild-type status, and negative circumferential radial margin. Panitumumab was administered concomitant to RTE. Rectal surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after the end of preoperative treatment. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The sample size was calculated using Simon's two-stage design. A pCR of 16% was considered to qualify the experimental treatment for further testing. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in 13 Italian centers from October 2012 to October 2015. Three panitumumab infusions were administered in 92 (93.4%) patients. The RTE compliance was median dose 50.4 Gy; ≥28 fractions in 82 (83.7%) patients. Surgical treatment was performed in 92 (93.9%) patients, and no severe intraoperative complications were observed. A pCR was observed in 10 (10.9%) patients (95% confidence interval, 4.72%-17.07%). Pathological downstaging occurred in 45 (45.9%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in 22 (22.3%) patients, and the common adverse events were skin rash in 16 (16.3%) patients. No grade 4 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: The pCR rate (our primary endpoint), at only 10.9%, did not reach the specified level considered suitable for further testing. However, the analysis showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to concomitant administration of panitumumab and RTE in preoperative treatment of LARC. The pCR evaluation in all wild-type RAS is ongoing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The aim of the RaP/STAR-03 study was to evaluate the activity and safety of monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) panitumumab as a single agent without chemotherapy in low-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative treatment. Nevertheless, the use of panitumumab in combination with radiotherapy in preoperative treatment in patients with KRAS wild type and low-risk LARC did not reach the pathologic complete response primary endpoint. This study showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to combination treatment. Further analysis of NRAS and BRAF on tissue and circulating levels of the EGFR ligands and vascular factors (soluble vascular endothelial growth factor, E-selectin) may provide insight on the potential molecular pathways involved in the anti-EGFR response.

Clinical activity and tolerability of FOLFIRI and cetuximab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the CAPRI-GOIM first-line trial.

BACKGROUND: In the cetuximab after progression in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients (CAPRI) trial patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and cetuximab in first line followed by 5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with or without cetuximab until progression. Limited data are available on the efficacy and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents on elderly patients with mCRC. In the current study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in age-defined subgroups. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis was performed in CAPRI trial patients; outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), safety) were analysed by age-groups and stratified according to molecular characterisation. 3 age cut-offs were used to define the elderly population (≥65; ≥70 and ≥75 years). RESULTS: 340 patients with mCRC were treated in first line with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Among those, 154 patients were >65 years, 86 >70 years and 35 >75 years. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 182 patients. Among them, 87 patients were >65 years, 46 >70 and 17 >75. 104 of 182 patients were wild type (WT) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA genes. In the quadruple WT group, 51 patients were ≥65 years; 29 were ≥70; 9 were ≥75. Median PFS was similar within the age-subgroups in the intention-to-treat population, NGS cohort and quadruple WT patients, respectively. Likewise, ORR was not significantly different among age-subgroups in the 3 populations. Safety profile was acceptable and similarly reported among all age-groups, with the exception of grade ≥3 diarrhoea (55% vs 25%, p=0.04) and neutropaenia (75% vs 37%, p=0.03) in patients ≥75 years and grade ≥3 fatigue (31% vs 20%, p=0.01) in patients <75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerability of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI was acceptable in elderly patients. Similar ORR and PFS were observed according to age-groups. No differences in adverse events were reported among the defined subgroups with the exception of higher incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhoea and neutropaenia in patients ≥75 years and grade ≥3 fatigue in patients <75 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2009-014041-81.

Panitumumab after progression on cetuximab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a single institution experience.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Few data describe the activity of panitumumab after cetuximab-irinotecan-based regimen failure in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (WT MCRC). METHODS: The aim of this study is to assess if panitumumab has some activity in this setting. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with KRAS WT MCRC who received panitumumab from July 2009 to January 2013 after progression on cetuximab. All patients had previously received cetuximab and irinotecan (20 patients) or oxaliplatin (5 patients). We withdrew cetuximab for intolerance in 4 patients (16%). Twenty-one patients (84%) who had previously responded to cetuximab (overall response rate [ORR] plus stable disease ≥5 months) received panitumumab off-label after progression on cetuximab because they were strongly motivated to continue treatment without chemotherapy. The median number of cycles of panitumumab was 7 (range 1-54). Only 20 patients were evaluable for ORR (5 patients received 1-2 cycles and then died). We observed 1 (5%) partial response, 5 (25%) stable disease, median duration 9 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (3-28) and 8 (5-41) months, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. No patients developed anemia or neutropenia. One patient (4%) developed grade 2 thrombocytopenia, 8 patients (32%) grade 2-3 dry skin or rash, and 2 patients (8%) grade 2 nausea-vomiting (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data, with all the limits of a retrospective analysis, show longer PFS and OS as compared to other series in the same setting, demonstrating that panitumumab has treatment effectiveness in patients with KRAS WT MCRC who progressed on prior cetuximab. Further confirmatory prospective studies with a larger series of patients are necessary.

BMI variation increases recurrence risk in women with early-stage breast cancer.

AIMS: The prognostic role of BMI variation during and/or after treatments for early-stage breast cancer is still unknown. PATIENTS & METHODS: The χ(2) test was conducted to explore the correlation between breast cancer recurrence and BMI changes in 520 early-stage breast cancer patients. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the association of BMI changes, baseline BMI, known prognostic factors and recurrences. RESULTS: BMI gain was significant determinant of recurrences (p = 0.0008). In multivariate analyses, BMI variation more than 5.71% was associated with higher rates of recurrences, as well as age less than 55 years, stage disease and molecular subtype. CONCLUSION: Women who experience BMI gain after breast cancer may be at increased risk of poor outcomes.

Clinical outcomes and cardiac safety of continuous antiHer2 therapy in c-erbB2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To explore clinical outcomes and cardiac safety of continuous antiHer2 therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluates overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and cardiac safety of 80 consecutive Her2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients that received ≥ 12 months of therapy with trastuzumab, followed by lapatinib-based or trastuzumab-based therapy. RESULTS: All patients received trastuzumab as first antiHer2 therapy; 54% received lapatinib in the second or subsequent line. Median OS was 34 months (12-120 months). Median OS was 48 months in the subgroup of 43 patients who received lapatinib and 26 months in the 37 patients who did not. Median TTF was shorter for lapatinib. There were three cardiac events and trastuzumab-based chemotherapy (CT) was interrupted in one patient because left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased to ≤ 40%. CONCLUSION: Continuous antiHer2 therapy provides good clinical outcomes, especially in those patients who received lapatinib. Cardiac dysfunction was a rare event, reversible, associated to trastuzumab and not related to treatment duration.

Targeted agents to reverse resistance to endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer: where are we now and where are we going?

Endocrine therapy is the most important systemic therapy for hormone receptor positive breast cancer; however, some patients with ER+ breast cancer show intrinsic resistance to endocrine therapy, whereas others develop acquired resistance. Preclinical models have shown that endocrine resistance is associated with enhanced expression of membrane growth factor pathways or activation of various intracellular pathways involved in signal transduction and cell survival. Despite encouraging preclinical data, clinical trials investigating the combination of endocrine therapy with trastuzumab or the TKIs gefitinib, erlotinib and lapatinib have yielded varied results. This may be related to some limitations in the studies conducted so far: lack of appropriate patient selection and stratification based on previous endocrine exposure and/or sensitivity; lack of identification of a molecular biomarker; lack of appropriate clinical endpoints in the trial design. More promising results come from clinical studies which have focused on novel agents such as the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. The two randomized trials (BOLERO-2 and TAMRAD) evaluating everolimus±endocrine therapy in a selected subgroup of HR-positive metastatic breast cancer patients have demonstrated a significant improvement in progression free survival for the combination compared to the endocrine therapy alone. The data reported so far show that the combination of target agents with endocrine therapy is effective in overcoming acquired resistance in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. However, this therapeutic strategy is not yet a standard treatment for this patients. Application of more rigorous trial design, tumor and patient selection criteria will be important to better understand the complexity of endocrine resistance.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP): rationale, preclinical and clinical evidences of its inhibition as breast cancer treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The chance to take advantage of genetic defects of cancer cells is a promising clinical tool in breast cancer therapy. Among the genetic aberrations, dysfunctions in DNA repair mechanisms are quite common and suitable for an attractive antitumor effect. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase I (PARP-1) is an enzyme with many functions in transcriptions and cell cycle regulation and in coordination of cellular response to DNA damage. Its involvement in tumorigenesis is witnessed by the overexpression found in different primary human tumors, where the increased enzymatic activity leads to cancer cell protection against DNA damage and instability. Therefore, activity of PARP and the opportunity to block it, mainly in cancer cells also deficient in other mechanisms of repair, are promising. AREAS COVERED: In this review, areas covered include the main DNA repair mechanisms, the role of PARP enzymatic activity in diverse cell pathways as well as the preclinical and clinical data with PARP inhibitors. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the theoretical role of PARP inhibitors as therapeutic strategy in specific subtypes of breast cancer (hereditary BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation-related cancers and sporadic triple-negative breast cancer), questions are still open. More exhaustive knowledge is needed about other important functions of PARPs in cellular homeostasis and about escape mechanisms of cancer cells to inhibitory effect of PARP inhibitors.

Silibinin improves hepatic and myocardial injury in mice with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a chronic metabolic disorder with significant impact on cardiovascular and liver mortality. AIMS: In this study, we examined the effects of silibinin on liver and myocardium injury in an experimental model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. METHODS: A four-week daily dose of silibinin (20 mg/kg i.p.) was administrated to db/db mice fed a methionine-choline deficient diet. Hepatic and myocardial histology, oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines were evaluated. RESULTS: Silibinin administration decreased HOMA-IR, serum ALT and markedly improved hepatic and myocardial damage. Silibinin reduced isoprostanes, 8-deoxyguanosine and nitrites/nitrates in the liver and in the heart of db/db fed the methionine-choline deficient diet, whereas glutathione levels were restored to lean mice levels in both tissues. Consistently, liver mitochondrial respiratory chain activity was significantly impaired in untreated mice and was completely restored in silibinin-treated animals. TNF-α was increased whereas IL-6 was decreased both in the liver and heart of db/db fed methionine-choline deficient diet. Silibinin reversed heart TNF-α and IL-6 expression to control mice levels. Indeed, liver JNK phosphorylation was reduced to control levels in treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a combined effectiveness of silibinin on improving liver and myocardial injury in experimental nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Gemcitabine plus mitoxantrone and prednisone in the palliative treatment of hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC): A phase II study (GOAM 01.01 study).

BACKGROUND: The present exploratory phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and tolerability of adding a second agent (gemcitabine) to the well-tolerated mitoxantrone/prednisone regimen in patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer no longer responsive to hormonal treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) were included in the study from May 2000 to April 2004. Their median age was 71 years (range, 56-81) and their median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90 (range, 70-100). The treatment schedule consisted of intravenous (i.v.) mitoxantrone (8 mg/m2 on day 1), i.v. gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, recycled every 21 days and oral prednisone administered at a dose of 10 mg per day. Hormonal treatment with LHRH was continued in all patients. Up to six cycles of treatment were planned in the absence of progressive disease. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had measurable disease (six patients only measurable disease, ten patients bone disease plus measurable disease) and 27 patients had only bone disease. Concerning the PSA levels, a partial response (PR) was observed in 15 patients (38%), stable disease (SD) in 16 patients (41%) and progressive disease (PD) in eight patients (21%). The objective response was evaluable in 16 patients; one patient was not evaluable because he had received only one cycle. Ten patients (63%) had SD and five patients (31%) PD. In the ten evaluable patients with objective SD, depending upon the PSA response, three PR, six SD and one PD were observed. Among the five patients who progressed, three PD and two SD were observed as a PSA response. Pain remission was recorded in 15/41 patients (36%) and the KPS remained stable in most patients. The median overall survival was 15 months (range, 1-41) (95% CI: 10-20 months). The 1-year survival rate was 61%. Hematological toxicity was mild: G 3-4 neutropenia was observed in five (12%) patients. There were no neutropenic, fevers. No significant non-hematological toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: The mitoxantrone, gemcitabine and prednisone combination, in accordance with the present regimen, was feasible, had a palliative effect, good tolerance and antitumor activity. Nonetheless, our results do not seem to be superior to those previously described for mitoxantrone plus prednisone.

Sequential chemotherapy with cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) followed by mitoxantrone/methotrexate/mitomycin (MMM) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. A multicenter Italian Phase II Study (SITMP1).

PURPOSE: We performed a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the impact on the activity, efficacy, symptom control and safety of using two active regimens in a sequential schedule (cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by mitoxantrone/methotrexate/mitomycin) as first-line chemotherapy for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for four courses (CG regimen) followed by mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) on day 1, methotrexate 35 mg/m(2) on day 1 and mitomycin 7 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks with mitomycin in alternate cycles for four courses (MMM regimen). RESULTS: We observed 3 complete responses (CRs) (5.6%) and 13 partial responses (PRs) (24.0%), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.6% (95% confidence interval, 17-42%), 33 stable disease (SD) (61.1%) and 5 progressive disease (PD) (9.2%). Median time to progression (TTP) was 9.5 months (range, 2-23). Median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range, 3-33); 1-year survival rate was 63%. The treatment produced a good symptom control, with an improvement during chemotherapy in dyspnea and pain in 52.9 and 48.3% of patients, respectively. The major toxicity observed was hematological. Grades 3-4 NCI-CTC v 2.0 toxicity with the CG regimen included: neutropenia (11.1%), anemia (1.9%), thrombocytopenia (7.4%), vomiting (11.1%) and with the MMM regimen: neutropenia (35.2%), anemia (5.5%), thrombocytopenia (7.4%) and stomatitis (1.9%). CONCLUSION: This phase II study with the sequential approach of two active regimens showed a good disease control in MPM, with symptom improvement and only mild toxicity.