Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 57(6): 823-831, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31130420

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: In critical limb ischaemia (CLI), current guidelines recommend revascularisation whenever possible, preferentially through endovascular means. However, in the case of long occlusions or failed endovascular attempts, distal bypasses still have a place. Single segment great saphenous vein (GSV), which provides the best conduit, is often not available and currently there is no consensus about the best alternative graft. METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2015, 42 cryopreserved arterial allografts were used for a distal bypass. Autologous GSVs or alternative autologous conduits were unavailable for all patients. The patients were observed for survival, limb salvage, and allograft patency. The results were analysed with Kaplan-Meier graphs. RESULTS: Estimates of secondary patency at one, two and five years were 81%, 73%, and 57%, respectively. Estimates of primary patency rates at one, two and five years were 60%, 56%, and 26%, respectively. Estimates of limb salvage rates at one, two and five years were 89%, 89%, and 82%, respectively. Estimates of survival rates at one, two and five years were 92%, 76% and 34%, respectively. At 30 days, major amputations and major adverse cardiac events were one and zero, respectively. Six major amputations occurred during the long-term follow up. CONCLUSION: Despite a low primary patency rate at two years, the secondary patency of arterial allografts is acceptable for distal bypasses. This suggests that cryopreserved arterial allografts are a suitable alternative for limb saving distal bypasses in the absence of venous conduits, improving limb salvage rates and, possibly, quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Arterias/trasplante , Criopreservación , Isquemia/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aloinjertos , Amputación Quirúrgica , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
2.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol ; 58: 107-120, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30770283

RESUMEN

In this review article, we discuss the most common fetal tumors, their prenatal management, and outcomes. Overall, the most important outcome predictors are tumor histology, size, vascularity, and location. Very large lesions, lesions causing cardiac failure, and hydrops and lesions obstructing the fetal airway have the poorest outcome, as they may cause fetal death or complications at the time of delivery. Fetal therapy has been developed to improve outcomes for the most severe cases and can consist of transplacental therapy (sirolimus for rhabdomyomas or steroids for hemangiomas and microcystic lung lesions) or surgical intervention (shunting of cystic masses, tumor ablation, occlusion of blood flow or airway exploration, and protection). Given the rarity of fetal tumors, patients should be referred to expert centers where care can be optimized and individualized to allow the best possible outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Fetales/patología , Neoplasias/patología , Femenino , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Fetales/terapia , Terapias Fetales/efectos adversos , Terapias Fetales/métodos , Humanos , Hidropesía Fetal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias/terapia , Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA