Host B cells escape CAR-T immunotherapy by reversible downregulation of CD19.

Anti-CD19-CAR-T cells are a successful clinical immunotherapy for B cell lymphomas, although some lymphomas can escape attack by downregulating surface CD19 levels. An undesirable consequence of this therapy is that it can also eliminate healthy B cells expressing CD19. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of CD19 expression in B cells under CAR-T cell immunotherapy can help mitigate both escape and adverse outcomes. Previous studies suggested that mechanisms responsible for the loss of CD19 expression in lymphomas usually involves genomic deletion or epigenetic modification which permanently removes CD19 as a therapeutic target in these cells. We examined if healthy B cells can use similar processes to lose CD19 expression and escape CAR-T attack. In the presence of CAR-T cells, untransformed B cells both when cultured in vitro or in vivo in non-tumor bearing animals downregulate expression of CD19. We then used adoptive transfer strategies to remove CD19-low B cells from αCD19-CAR-T pressure in vivo. Intriguingly, these B cells systematically recovered surface expression of CD19 comparable to wild-type levels. These data suggest that unlike many cases of lymphomas, healthy B cells downregulate CD19 in a reversible fashion. Taken together, these data suggest a dynamic regulatory process of CD19 surface expression on healthy B cells that could be exploited to modulate the expression of CD19 on cancer cells to improve immunotherapy or minimize the depletion of endogenous B cell compartment during treatment.

CD5 dynamically calibrates basal NF-κB signaling in T cells during thymic development and peripheral activation.

Immature T cells undergo a process of positive selection in the thymus when their new T cell receptor (TCR) engages and signals in response to self-peptides. As the T cell matures, a slew of negative regulatory molecules, including the inhibitory surface glycoprotein CD5, are up-regulated in proportion to the strength of the self-peptide signal. Together these regulators dampen TCR-proximal signaling and help avoid any subsequent peripheral activation of T cells by self-peptides. Paradoxically, antigen-specific T cells initially expressing more CD5 (CD5hi) have been found to better persist as effector/memory cells after a peripheral challenge. The molecular mechanisms underlying such a duality in CD5 function is not clear. We found that CD5 alters the basal activity of the NF-κB signaling in resting peripheral T cells. When CD5 was conditionally ablated, T cells were unable to maintain higher expression of the cytoplasmic NF-κB inhibitor IκBα. Consistent with this, resting CD5hi T cells expressed more of the NF-κB p65 protein than CD5lo cells, without significant increases in transcript levels, in the absence of TCR signals. This posttranslationally stabilized cellular NF-κB depot potentially confers a survival advantage to CD5hi T cells over CD5lo ones. Taken together, these data suggest a two-step model whereby the strength of self-peptide-induced TCR signal lead to the up-regulation of CD5, which subsequently maintains a proportional reserve of NF-κB in peripheral T cells poised for responding to agonistic antigen-driven T cell activation.

Manipulating the TCR signaling network for cellular immunotherapy: Challenges & opportunities.

T cells can help confer protective immunity by eliminating infections and tumors or drive immunopathology by damaging host cells. Both outcomes require a series of steps from the activation of naïve T cells to their clonal expansion, differentiation and migration to tissue sites. In addition to specific recognition of the antigen via the T cell receptor (TCR), multiple accessory signals from costimulatory molecules, cytokines and metabolites also influence each step along the progression of the T cell response. Current efforts to modify effector T cell function in many clinical contexts focus on the latter - which encompass antigen-independent and broad, contextual regulators. Not surprisingly, such approaches are often accompanied by adverse events, as they also affect T cells not relevant to the specific treatment. In contrast, fine tuning T cell responses by precisely targeting antigen-specific TCR signals has the potential to radically alter therapeutic strategies in a focused manner. Development of such approaches, however, requires a better understanding of functioning of the TCR and the biochemical signaling network coupled to it. In this article, we review some of the recent advances which highlight important roles of TCR signals throughout the activation and differentiation of T cells during an immune response. We discuss how, an appreciation of specific signaling modalities and variant ligands that influence the function of the TCR has the potential to influence design principles for the next generation of pharmacologic and cellular therapies, especially in the context of tumor immunotherapies involving adoptive cell transfers.