A carcinoembryonic antigen-specific cell therapy selectively targets tumor cells with HLA loss of heterozygosity in vitro and in vivo.

The CEACAM5 gene product [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] is an attractive target for colorectal cancer because of its high expression in virtually all colorectal tumors and limited expression in most healthy adult tissues. However, highly active CEA-directed investigational therapeutics have been reported to be toxic, causing severe colitis because CEA is expressed on normal gut epithelial cells. Here, we developed a strategy to address this toxicity problem: the Tmod dual-signal integrator. CEA Tmod cells use two receptors: a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) activated by CEA and a leukocyte Ig-like receptor 1 (LIR-1)-based inhibitory receptor triggered by human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02. CEA Tmod cells exploit instances of HLA heterozygous gene loss in tumors to protect the patient from on-target, off-tumor toxicity. CEA Tmod cells potently killed CEA-expressing tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. But in contrast to a traditional CEA-specific T cell receptor transgenic T cell, Tmod cells were highly selective for tumor cells even when mixed with HLA-A*02-expressing cells. These data support further development of the CEA Tmod construct as a therapeutic candidate for colorectal cancer.

A rational approach to assess off-target reactivity of a dual-signal integrator for T cell therapy.

Cell therapy is an emerging therapeutic modality with the power to exploit new cancer targets and potentially achieve positive outcomes for patients with few other options. Like all synthetic treatments, cell therapy has the risk of toxicity via unpredicted off-target behavior. We describe an empirical method to model off-tumor, off-target reactivity of receptors used for investigational T cell therapies. This approach utilizes an optimal panel of diverse human cell-lines to capture the large majority of protein-coding gene expression in adult human tissues. We apply this cell-line set to test Jurkat and primary T cells engineered with a dual-signal integrator, called TmodTM, that contains an activating receptor (activator) and a separate inhibitory receptor (blocker). In proof-of-concept experiments, we use CD19 as the activating antigen and HLA-A*02 as the blocker antigen. This specific Tmod system, which employs a blocker targeting a ubiquitously expressed HLA class I antigen to inhibit CAR activation, has an inherent mechanism for selectivity/safety, designed to activate only when a specific HLA class I antigen is lost. Nonetheless, it is important to test off-target reactivity in functional assays, especially given the disconnect between ligand-binding and function among T cell receptors (TCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). We show these cell-based assays yield consistent results with high sensitivity and specificity. The general strategy is likely applicable to more traditional single-receptor CAR- and TCR-T therapeutics.

Potent, Selective CARs as Potential T-Cell Therapeutics for HPV-positive Cancers.

Next-generation T-cell therapies will likely continue to utilize T-cell receptors (TCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) because each receptor type has advantages. TCRs often possess exceptional properties even when tested unmodified from patients' T cells. CARs are generally less sensitive, possibly because their ligand-binding domains are grafted from antibodies selected for binding affinity or avidity and not broadly optimized for a functional response. Because of the disconnect between binding and function among these receptor types, the ultimate potential of CARs optimized for sensitivity and selectivity is not clear. Here, we focus on a thoroughly studied immuno-oncology target, the HLA-A*02/HPV-E629-38 complex, and show that CARs can be optimized by a combination of high-throughput binding screens and low-throughput functional assays to have comparable activity to clinical TCRs in acute assays in vitro. These results provide a case study for the challenges and opportunities of optimizing high-performing CARs, especially in the context of targets utilized naturally by TCRs.

Re-examination of MAGE-A3 as a T-cell Therapeutic Target.

In 2013, an innovative MAGE-A3-directed cancer therapeutic of great potential value was terminated in the clinic because of neurotoxicity. The safety problems were hypothesized to originate from off-target T-cell receptor activity against a closely related MAGE-A12 peptide. A combination of published and new data led us to test this hypothesis with current technology. Our results call into question MAGE-A12 as the source of the neurotoxicity. Rather, the data imply that an alternative related peptide from EPS8L2 may be responsible. Given the qualities of MAGE-A3 as an onco-testis antigen widely expressed in tumors and largely absent from normal adult tissues, these findings suggest that MAGE-A3 may deserve further consideration as a cancer target. As a step in this direction, the authors isolated 2 MAGE-A3 peptide-major histocompatibility complex-directed chimeric antigen receptors, 1 targeting the same peptide as the clinical T-cell receptor. Both chimeric antigen receptors have improved selectivity over the EPS8L2 peptide that represents a significant risk for MAGE-A3-targeted therapeutics, showing that there may be other options for MAGE-A3 cell therapy.

Structure-function relationships of chimeric antigen receptors in acute T cell responses to antigen.

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) and their parent signaling molecule, the T cell receptor (TCR), are fascinating proteins of increasing relevance to disease therapy. Here we use a collection of 1221 pMHC-directed CAR constructs representing 10 pMHC targets to study aspects of CAR structure-activity relationships (SAR), with particular focus on the extracellular and transmembrane structural components. These experiments that involve pMHC targets whose number/cell can be manipulated by peptide dosing in vitro enable systematic analysis of the SAR of CARs in carefully controlled experimental situations (Harris and Kranz, 2016). We find that CARs tolerate a wide range of structural variation, with the ligand-binding domains (LBDs) dominating the SAR of CAR antigen sensitivity. Notwithstanding the critical role of the LBD, CAR antigen-binding on the cell surface, measured by pMHC tetramer staining, is not an effective predictor of functional sensitivity. These results have important implications for the design and testing of CARs aimed toward the clinic.