Cleft closure and other predictors of contemporary outcomes after atrioventricular canal repair in patients with parachute left atrioventricular valve.

OBJECTIVES: Parachute left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) complicates atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) repair. We evaluate outcomes of AVSD patients with parachute LAVV and identify risk factors for adverse outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated all patients undergoing repair of AVSD with parachute LAVV from 2012 to 2021. The primary outcome was a composite of time-to-death, LAVV reintervention and development of greater than or equal to moderate LAVV dysfunction (greater than or equal to moderate LAVV stenosis and/or LAVV regurgitation). Event-free survival for the composite outcome was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and competing risks analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included with a median age at repair of 4 months (interquartile range 2.3-5.5 months). Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.0-5.6 years), 6 (17%) patients underwent LAVV reintervention. All 6 patients who underwent LAVV reintervention had right-dominant AVSD. Sixteen patients (44%) met the composite outcome, and all did so within 2 years of initial repair. Transitional AVSD (versus complete), prior single-ventricle palliation, leaving the cleft completely open and greater than or equal to moderate preoperative LAVV regurgitation were associated with a higher risk of LAVV reintervention in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, leaving the cleft completely open was associated with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of AVSD with parachute LAVV remains a challenge with a significant burden of LAVV reintervention and dysfunction in medium-term follow-up. Unbalanced, right-dominant AVSDs are at higher risk for LAVV reintervention. Leaving the cleft completely open might independently predict poor overall outcomes and should be avoided when possible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRB-P00041642.

Left atrioventricular valve repair after primary atrioventricular canal surgery: Predictors of durability.

OBJECTIVE: Acute outcomes after atrioventricular canal defects (AVCD) surgery in the current era are excellent; yet despite surgical advances, ∼15% of patients require future left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) repair. Among patients with AVC who undergo LAVV repair after primary AVC surgery, we sought to characterize the durability of these repairs. Specifically, we aimed to determine predictors for reintervention following an LAVV repair in patients with repaired AVCD, with a focus on postoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: We reviewed all patients undergoing LAVV repair (after a primary AVCD surgery) at Boston Children's Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Competing risk analysis was performed to evaluate cumulative incidence of LAVV reinterventions. Predictors of LAVV reintervention were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 137 LAVV repairs following primary AVCD surgery were performed in 113 patients. Median age and weight at LAVV repair were 25 months (interquartile range, 12-76 months) and 11.1 kg (interquartile range, 7.8-19.4 kg). Original anatomy was complete AVCD in 87 (63%), transitional AVCD in 27 (20%), and partial AVCD in 23 (17%) cases. Over a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range, 1.3 months-4 years), 47 (34%) of the LAVV repairs required LAVV reintervention. Reinterventions included a total of 27 LAVV re-repairs and 20 LAVV replacements. In multivariable analysis, age at LAVV repair younger than 72 months, partial AVCD anatomy, left ventricle dysfunction, mean LAVV stenosis gradient ≥5 mm Hg, and multiple jets of regurgitation on postoperative LAVV repair TEE were associated with LAVV reintervention. Grade of LAVV regurgitation on postoperative TEE was not an independent risk factor, but reintervention rates were high when residual LAVV stenosis gradient was ≥5 mm Hg and residual mild LAVV regurgitation was present on postoperative TEE (47%) and even higher when residual LAVV stenosis gradient was ≥5 mm Hg and LAVV regurgitation was greater than mild (73%). CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention rates remain high for LAVV repairs that occur after primary AVCD surgery, particularly for patients with LAVV stenosis gradient ≥5 mm Hg and mild or greater LAVV regurgitation on postoperative TEE.