Custom-Made Artificial Iris and Toric-Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Flange Fixation: A Case Report.

Different techniques for artificial iris implantation with or without an intraocular lens, depending on lens status, are described in the literature. We describe a surgical technique for a custom-made artificial iris and toric-intraocular lens intrascleral flange fixation. We modified the "Backpack" artificial iris implantation surgical technique to facilitate an accurate alignment of the toric-intraocular lens in a patient with aphakia, aniridia, and high asymmetric astigmatism secondary to blunt trauma. Two months after the surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/30, corrected to 20/25 with a refraction of -2.00 in the diopter sphere with no residual astigmatism. The artificial iris implant and toric-intraocular lens were well-centered. The patient was satisfied with the visual and cosmetic outcomes. This procedure, however, is not complication-free as our patient developed uveitis and increased intraocular pressure during the postoperative period, which was treated successfully.

Influence of the CleaRing intraocular open capsule device on refractive predictability in cataract surgery.

BACKGROUND: The marked improvement in cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) quality has led to a decline in posterior capsular opacification (PCO) incidence; however, PCO remains a common complication of cataract surgery. The CleaRing intraocular capsule open device (IOCD) decreases PCO incidence. We aimed to investigate the influence of the CleaRing IOCD on refractive predictability in cataract surgery. METHODS: We conducted this prospective pilot study at the Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel. Ten eyes of patients who underwent cataract surgery and insertion of an IOL after IOCD implantation into the capsular bag were included. All patients completed 12 months of follow-up, including refraction, measurement of uncorrected (UDVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy. RESULTS: All the surgeries were uneventful, with no postoperative complications. The IOL was centred in the device and bag in all cases. The mean prediction error at 1 and 12 months postoperatively was +0.28 ± 0.32 D and +0.50 ± 0.32 D, respectively. The mean UDVA was 0.17 ± 0.13 and 0.15 ± 0.11 logMAR, and the mean CDVA was 0.04 ± 0.10 and 0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR, respectively. The manifest refractive cylinders at 12 months postoperatively were compatible with corneal astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the IOCD resulted in a slight, predicted, and stable hyperopic shift with a low standard deviation. The standard deviation of the prediction error demonstrated excellent refractive accuracy and predictability using the IOCD, which was as low as 0.32 D at the 12-month follow-up.

Limbal-conjunctival autograft healing process-early postoperative OCT angiography study.

PURPOSE: To assess the normal healing process of limbal-conjunctival autograft (LCA) after pterygium removal during the early postoperative period using anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: Prospective case series of seven patients undergoing pterygium removal with LCA transplantation procedure, imaged with anterior segment OCTA, and anterior segment colour photos prior to the procedure and on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 7 and 30. Revascularization of the graft was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively to estimate patterns of blood vessel growth. Association between revascularization to graft thickness was also investigated. RESULTS: On POD 1, all autografts showed either minimal flow signal or no signal at all (Mean 7.1 ± 3.3%). Regrowth of blood vessels into the graft was detected on OCTA scans on POD3 (8.7 ± 3.6%) to 7 (14.3 ± 4.1%), as nonorganised vessels formation in their appearance. Blood vessels were seen growing in a centrifugal pattern towards the surrounding conjunctiva, originating from the underlying episcleral vessels. Revascularization flow signal was seen throughout nearly all graft extent on day 30 (21.6 ± 2.2%). Graft oedema was evident on the first week (Mean 611 ± 120 µm, 695 ± 84 µm, 639 ± 96 µm of POD 1, 3 and 7, respectively), reducing substantially by day 30 (300 ± 108 µm). CONCLUSIONS: OCTA imaging can be used to assess the LCA healing process during the early postoperative period. Revascularization occurring as early as 3-7 days post-surgery, seems to originate from the underlying episcleral vessels. Therefore, careful handling of the bare scleral surface during surgery may be prudent for achieving an adequate healing process.

Toric IOL Calculation in Eyes With High Posterior Corneal Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate different calculation approaches for toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in cases with high posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent cataract extraction with implantation of toric IOLs by a single surgeon were reviewed. Eyes with measured PCA of 0.80 diopters (D) or greater were included. Errors in the predicted postoperative refractive astigmatism were calculated for the Abulafia-Koch formula, vector summation of anterior keratometry with posterior tomography, and the Barrett toric calculator using predicted and measured PCA. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three consecutive cases of toric IOL implantation were reviewed. Seventeen eyes (10%) had PCA of 0.80 D or greater and were investigated. The mean absolute error was the lowest with Barrett's measured PCA (0.55 ± 0.38) followed by Barrett's predicted PCA mean absolute error (0.65 ± 0.31), vector summation (0.69 ± 0.33), and the Abulafia-Koch formula (0.80 ± 0.36). The rate of eyes with prediction errors within 0.25 D or less was the highest for Barrett's measured PCA (29.4%) followed by Barrett's predicted PCA (5.9%) and no eyes for the Abulafia-Koch formula and vector summation. The mean centroid prediction errors were lowest for Barrett's measured PCA and Barrett's predicted PCA (0.14 ± 0.66 @70, 0.14 ± 0.73 @179, respectively), followed by vector summation (0.35 ± 0.70 @5), and the Abulafia-Koch formula (0.39 ± 0.80 @179). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that in cases of high PCA, the Barrett toric calculator using direct measurements of PCA may have a potential advantage over predicted PCA in toric IOL calculations and vector summation of the anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(12):820-825.].