Multi-Site Benchmark Study for Standardized Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in Untreated Brain Metastases Using the DSC-MRI Consensus Acquisition Protocol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A national consensus recommendation for the collection of DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast) MRI perfusion data, used to create maps of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), has been recently established for primary and metastatic brain tumors. The goal was to reduce inter-site variability and improve ease of comparison across time and sites, fostering widespread use of this informative measure. To translate this goal into practice the prospective collection of consensus DSC-MRI data and characterization of derived rCBV maps in brain metastases is needed. The purpose of this multi-site study was to determine rCBV in untreated brain metastases in comparison to glioblastoma and normal appearing brain using the national consensus protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects from three sites with untreated enhancing brain metastases underwent DSC-MRI according to a recommended option that uses a mid-range flip angle, GRE-EPI acquisition and the administration of both a pre-load and 2nd DSC-MRI dose of 0.1 mmol/kg GBCA. Quantitative maps of standardized rCBV (sRCBV) were generated and enhancing lesion ROIs determined from post-contrast T1-weighted images alone or calibrated difference maps, termed delta T1 (dT1) maps. Mean sRCBV for metastases were compared to normal appearing white matter (NAWM) and glioblastoma (GBM) from a previous study. Comparisons were performed using either the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired comparisons or the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test for unpaired comparisons. RESULTS: 49 patients with a primary histology of lung (n=25), breast (n=6), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n=1), melanoma (n=5), gastrointestinal (GI) (n=3) and genitourinary (GU) (n=9) were included in comparison to GBM (n=31). The mean sRCBV of all metastases (1.83+/-1.05) were significantly lower (p=0.0009) than mean sRCBV for GBM (2.67±1.34) with both statistically greater (p<0.0001) than NAWM (0.68 +/- 0.18). Histologically distinct metastases are each statistically greater than NAWM (p<0.0001) with lung (p=0.0002) and GU (p=.02) sRCBV being significantly different than GBM sRCBV. CONCLUSIONS: 49 patients with a primary histology of lung (n=25), breast (n=6), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n=1), melanoma (n=5), gastrointestinal (GI) (n=3) and genitourinary (GU) (n=9) were included in comparison to GBM (n=31). The mean sRCBV of all metastases (1.83+/-1.05) were significantly lower (p=0.0009) than mean sRCBV for GBM (2.67+1.34) with both statistically greater (p<0.0001) than NAWM (0.68 +/- 0.18). Histologically distinct metastases are each statistically greater than NAWM (p<0.0001) with lung (p=0.0002) and GU (p=.02) sRCBV being significantly different than GBM sRCBV. ABBREVIATIONS: dT1=delta T1; GBCA=gadolinium-based contrast agent; NAWM=normal appearing white matter; normalized relative cerebral blood volume=nRCBV; relative cerebral blood volume=rCBV; standardized relative cerebral blood volume=sRCBV.

A cross-sectional study to test equivalence of low- versus intermediate-flip angle dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume in patients with high-grade gliomas at 1.5 Tesla field strength.

Introduction: 1.5 Tesla (1.5T) remain a significant field strength for brain imaging worldwide. Recent computer simulations and clinical studies at 3T MRI have suggested that dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI using a 30° flip angle ("low-FA") with model-based leakage correction and no gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) preload provides equivalent relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements to the reference-standard acquisition using a single-dose GBCA preload with a 60° flip angle ("intermediate-FA") and model-based leakage correction. However, it remains unclear whether this holds true at 1.5T. The purpose of this study was to test this at 1.5T in human high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. Methods: This was a single-institution cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone 1.5T MRI for HGG. DSC-MRI consisted of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) with a low-FA without preload (30°/P-); this then subsequently served as a preload for the standard intermediate-FA acquisition (60°/P+). Both normalized (nrCBV) and standardized relative cerebral blood volumes (srCBV) were calculated using model-based leakage correction (C+) with IBNeuro™ software. Whole-enhancing lesion mean and median nrCBV and srCBV from the low- and intermediate-FA methods were compared using the Pearson's, Spearman's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Twenty-three HGG patients composing a total of 31 scans were analyzed. The Pearson and Spearman correlations and ICCs between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ acquisitions demonstrated high correlations for both mean and median nrCBV and srCBV. Conclusion: Our study provides preliminary evidence that for HGG patients at 1.5T MRI, a low FA, no preload DSC-MRI acquisition can be an appealing alternative to the reference standard higher FA acquisition that utilizes a preload.

Disparities in the Surgical Treatment of Cerebrovascular Pathologies: A Contemporary Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review analyzes contemporary literature on racial/ethnic, insurance, and socioeconomic disparities within cerebrovascular surgery in the United States to determine areas for improvement. METHODS: We conducted an electronic database search of literature published between January 1990 and July 2020 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for studies analyzing a racial/ethnic, insurance, or socioeconomic disparity within adult cerebrovascular surgery. RESULTS: Of 2873 articles screened for eligibility by title and abstract, 970 underwent full-text independent review by 3 authors. Twenty-seven additional articles were identified through references to generate a final list of 47 included studies for analysis. Forty-six were retrospective reviews and 1 was a prospective observational cohort study, thereby comprising Levels III and IV of evidence. Studies investigated carotid artery stenting (11/47, 23%), carotid endarterectomy (22/47, 46.8%), mechanical thrombectomy (8/47, 17%), and endovascular aneurysm coiling or surgical aneurysm clipping (20/47, 42.6%). Minority and underinsured patients were less likely to receive surgical treatment. Non-White patients were more likely to experience a postoperative complication, although this significance was lost in some studies using multivariate analyses to account for complication risk factors. White and privately insured patients generally experienced shorter length of hospital stay, had lower rates of in-hospital mortality, and underwent routine discharge. Twenty-five papers (53%) reported no disparities within at least one examined metric. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive contemporary systematic review demonstrates the existence of disparity gaps within the field of adult cerebrovascular surgery. It highlights the importance of continued investigation into sources of disparity and efforts to promote equity within the field.

Systematic Review of Racial, Socioeconomic, and Insurance Status Disparities in the Treatment of Pediatric Neurosurgical Diseases in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Increasing light is being shed on how race, insurance, and socioeconomic status (SES) may be related to outcomes from disease in the United States. To better understand the impact of these health care disparities in pediatric neurosurgery, we performed a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines and MeSH terms involving neurosurgical conditions and racial, ethnic, and SES disparities. Three independent reviewers screened articles and analyzed texts selected for full analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were included in the final analysis, of which all but 2 were retrospective database reviews. Thirty-four studies analyzed race, 22 analyzed insurance status, and 13 analyzed SES/income. Overall, nonwhite patients, patients with public insurance, and patients from lower SES were shown to have reduced access to treatment and greater rates of adverse outcomes. Nonwhite patients were more likely to present at an older age with more severe disease, less likely to undergo surgery at a high-volume surgical center, and more likely to experience postoperative morbidity and mortality. Underinsured and publicly insured patients were more likely to experience delay in surgical referral, less likely to undergo surgical treatment, and more likely to experience inpatient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Health care disparities are present within multiple populations of patients receiving pediatric neurosurgical care. This review highlights the need for continued investigation into identifying and addressing health care disparities in pediatric neurosurgery patients.

Systematic Review of Racial, Socioeconomic, and Insurance Status Disparities in Neurosurgical Care for Intracranial Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The impact of race, socioeconomic status (SES), insurance status, and other social metrics on the outcomes of patients with intracranial tumors has been reported in several studies. However, these findings have not been comprehensively summarized. METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA systematic review of all published articles between 1990 and 2020 that analyzed intracranial tumor disparities, including race, SES, insurance status, and safety-net hospital status. Outcomes measured include access, standards of care, receipt of surgery, extent of resection, mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, readmission rate, and hospital charges. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies were included. Disparities in mortality were reported in 27 studies (47%), showing minority status and lower SES associated with poorer survival outcomes in 14 studies (52%). Twenty-seven studies showed that African American patients had worse outcomes across all included metrics including mortality, rates of surgical intervention, extent of resection, LOS, discharge disposition, and complication rates. Thirty studies showed that privately insured patients and patients with higher SES had better outcomes, including lower mortality, complication, and readmission rates. Six studies showed that worse outcomes were associated with treatment at safety-net and/or low-volume hospitals. The influence of Medicare or Medicaid status, or inequities affecting other minorities, was less clearly delineated. Ten studies (18%) were negative for evidence of disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Significant disparities exist among patients with intracranial tumors, particularly affecting patients of African American race and lower SES. Efforts at the hospital, state, and national level must be undertaken to identify root causes of these issues.

Disparities in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spine Diseases: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to systematically review the literature on racial/ethnic, insurance, and socioeconomic disparities in adult spine surgery in the United States and analyze potential areas for improvement. METHODS: We conducted a database search of literature published between January 1990 and July 2020 using PRISMA guidelines for all studies investigating a disparity in any aspect of adult spine surgery care analyzed based on race/ethnicity, insurance status/payer, or socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Of 2679 articles identified through database searching, 775 were identified for full-text independent review by 3 authors, from which a final list of 60 studies were analyzed. Forty-three studies analyzed disparities based on patient race/ethnicity, 32 based on insurance status, and 8 based on SES. Five studies assessed disparities in access to care, 15 examined surgical treatment, 35 investigated in-hospital outcomes, and 25 explored after-discharge outcomes. Minority patients were less likely to undergo surgery but more likely to receive surgery from a low-volume provider and experience postoperative complications. White and privately insured patients generally had shorter hospital length of stay, were more likely to undergo favorable/routine discharge, and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality. After discharge, white patients reported better outcomes than did black patients. Thirty-three studies (55%) reported no disparities within at least 1 examined metric. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive systematic review underscores ongoing potential for health care disparities among adult patients in spinal surgery. We show a need for continued efforts to promote equity and cultural competency within neurologic surgery.

Prevalence Rate of Coexisting Rathke Cleft Cysts and Pineal Cysts: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs) are benign sellar lesions originating from remnants of primitive ectoderm. They have not been previously linked to other cystic lesions, such as pineal cysts (PCs). Our objective was to perform a multicenter cross-sectional neuroimaging study to examine prevalence rates of coexisting RCC and PC. METHODS: We retrospectively queried prospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved, databases from the authors' centers. All patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for RCC between the years of 2011 and 2020 were included for analysis. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed to identify the coexistence of a PC. Patient demographics and neuroimaging characteristics were recorded. A control cohort comprised of 100 age- and sex-matched patients with nonfunctional pituitary adenoma (NFPA) who also underwent surgical intervention was utilized. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with RCC were identified for analysis. A coexistent PC was identified in 40.5% (n = 34) of patients with RCC compared with 14.3% (n = 12) in the NFPA cohort (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in PC size between patients with RCC and PA (8 vs. 8.8 mm, respectively; P = 0.77). Although the majority (85.7%; n = 72) of the RCC cohort were female patients, there was no sex predominance with respect to coexisting PC in either the RCC or PA cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report an increased prevalence of coexisting PC and RCC, possibly because of an embryologic link or other propensity for intracranial cyst formation. Additional studies in more generalizable populations can further explore the relation between RCC and PC, or other cyst formation.