2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Endoscopic description of renal papillae and stones.

Endoscopic observation is performed during treatments by flexible ureteroscopy to differentiate in situ between renal papillary abnormalities and stones based on their concordance with Daudon's morphological/composition descriptions adapted to endoscopy. These intraoperative visual analyses are now an integral part of the urinary stone disease diagnostic approach in addition to the morphological/structural and spectrophotometric analysis that remains the reference exam, but that loses information on the stone component representativeness due to the development of in situ laser lithotripsy. These are the first practical recommendations on the endoscopic description of renal papillae and stones. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendations (CPR) and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Management of symptomatic urinary stones.

The acute situation, caused by an obstructive stone, is defined by a renal colic that may be uncomplicated, complicated, or at risk in specific conditions. Its management may be medical or require interventional treatment by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, endoscopic removal, or ureteroscopy. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods, the Clinical Practice Recommendations (CPR) and the ADAPTE method, in function of whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022] and whether they could be adapted to the French context.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Ureteroscopy and ureterorenoscopy.

Technical advances, including miniaturization, have improved the deflection and optical performance of the ureteroscopes, and the availability of dedicated disposable devices have led to their increasing use for kidney and ureteral stone management. Ureterorenoscopy brings diagnostic evidence through the endoscopic description of stones and renal papillary abnormalities. Currently, intracorporeal lithotripsy during ureterorenoscopy is based on laser sources. Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary before ureterorenoscopy, especially because preoperative stenting for>30 days is considered as an independent risk factor of infection. Ureteral access sheaths allow the easy and repeated access to the upper urinary tract and thus facilitate ureterorenoscopy. Their use improves vision, decreases intrarenal pressure, and possibly reduces the operative time, but they may cause ureteral injury. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether or not the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Combined approach for the management of kidney and ureteral stones (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery, ECIRS).

The primary objective of the combined approach is to limit the number of percutaneous access tracts for the treatment of staghorn, or complex kidney stones by simultaneous percutaneous antegrade and retrograde ureteroscopy. The other indication is the simultaneous presence of several kidney and ureteral stones or of an impacted pelvic stone. The combination of the two techniques may increase the stone-free rate and decrease the retreatment rate of complex stones compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy alone. The patient is usually in the modified supine position. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022] and their adaptability to the French context.

2022 Recommendations of The AFU Lithiasis Committee: Open surgery and laparoscopy.

Only few hundred interventions are performed in France each year to remove upper urinary tract stones using a laparoscopic/robotic transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. These interventions are proposed to patients with large (>20mm) and complex stones, sometimes after failure of endoscopic techniques or in the presence of malformations that can be treated at the same time. The major interest of these interventions is the possibility to remove the whole stone without prior fragmentation. Some anatomical situations can increase the technical difficulty, particularly the presence of an intrarenal pelvis and the presence of pelvic and periureteral adhesions. The reported complications are essentially urinary fistula and ureteral stenosis, the risks of which are reduced by the use of double J stenting. As struvite stones are more friable, their whole removal is more difficult and may lead to dispersion of fragments, particularly during laparoscopy. Conventional open surgery has a higher stone-free rate, but comes with a greater kidney function loss. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) (EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022) and their adaptability to the French context.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Radiation protection in the operating theater.

It has been shown that the relative risk of cancer is higher in patients with urinary stone disease, probably due to the repeated radiological exams and procedures under fluoroscopic guidance. Reducing the radiation doses delivered to the patient also decreases the doses delivered to the operators and their assistants. The doses delivered during endoscopic procedures decrease with the urologist's experience. Training in radiation protection and the use of protocols can decrease the use of ionizing radiation in the operating room. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022] and whether they were adaptable to the French context.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Summary of indications.

The spontaneous elimination rate of ureteral stones decreases with their size, but also in function of their location. The objectives of stone surveillance are to detect the occurrence of a complication (e.g., fever, clinical tolerance) and to verify the potential stone migration/elimination. The use of urological procedures and the choice of technique are based on many different factors. Kidney stone surveillance is proposed mainly to people with low risk of progression or complications (size<4mm and/or lower calyx location and non-infection stone). Surveillance may be extended to patients with larger stones, in function of the clinical context and comorbidities. Conversely, a urological procedure may also be proposed to patients with stones<4mm for professional (e.g., soldier, pilot, expatriate) or social reasons or if travelling is planned. The choice of technique is based on the stone composition (if already known) and density, the advantages and limitations of each technique, and also the clinical context, while trying to choose the least invasive procedure for a stone-free objective. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendations method (CPR) and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) [EAU 2022] and their adaptability to the French context. This chapter is based on the references used in the chapters on the different techniques (extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, medical expulsive therapy, postural therapy, chemolysis by alkalinization) as well as the American Urological Association (AUA) and EAU recommendations.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Medical management - from diagnosis to treatment.

The morphological-compositional analysis of urinary stones allows distinguishing schematically several situations: dietary, digestive, metabolic/hormonal, infectious and genetic problems. Blood and urine testing are recommended in the first instance to identify risk factors of urinary stone disease in order to avoid recurrence or progression. The other objective is to detect a potential underlying pathology associated with high risk of urinary stone disease (e.g. primary hyperparathyroidism, primary or enteric hyperoxaluria, cystinuria, distal renal tubular acidosis) that may require specific management. Lifestyle-diet measures are the basis of the management of all stone types, but pharmacological treatments may be required. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) [EAU 2022] and their adaptability to the French context.

Perioperative results of radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to the implementation of ERAS pathway.

BACKGROUND: The effect of ERAS protocols in a population of radical cystectomy (RC) patients fit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been specifically explored. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes of open RC according to the application of an ERAS protocol in a population of patients treated by cisplatin-based NAC. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated by NAC and RC between 2016 and 2019 were included. The ERAS pathway was implemented in June 2018 and followed the EAU recommendations. All data were prospectively collected. Patients' characteristics, operative outcomes, length of stay (LOS), complication rate according to Clavien-Dindo and pathological results were compared between pre- and post-ERAS. Statistical analysis was performed using R. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients were included, 29 in the ERAS group and 50 in the non-ERAS group. A median number of 19 out of 22 ERAS criteria were followed. Mean number of NAC cycles was 4.45 vs. 4.79 in the pre- and post-ERAS groups respectively (P=0.24). Median time between NAC and RC was 3.8months. Thirty-eight percent vs. 48% of patients received an ileal neobladder in the pre- and post-ERAS group respectively (P=0.51). No differences were observed regarding operative time, blood loss or operative transfusion rates. LOS was drastically reduced in the ERAS period (18.94 vs. 12.10days, P<0.001) as well as major (>Clavien 2) complications rate (65% vs. 28%, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: ERAS drastically reduced the LOS and the rate of high-grade complications and can be effectively applied to patients receiving NAC without delaying RC.

Morbidity and long-term results of subcutaneous pyelovesical bypass in chronic ureteral obstruction.

BACKGROUND: We present the long-term results and complications of the DETOUR® prosthesis, a permanent subcutaneous pyelovesical bypass for the treatment of ureteral obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 et 2018, 34 prosthesis were implanted in 28 patients (mean age 65,8 years) with ureteral obstruction of malignant or benign etiologies. The prosthesis, composed to an inner tube of silicone and an outer tube of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, is placed subcutaneously between the kidney and the bladder. We are performed infrared spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy on two removed prostheses to explore the prosthetic encrustation. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 25,8 months (Maximum: 64 months). Stent revision was required for early bladder fistula in three patients. The major long-term complications were infection (46%), obstruction (3 patients) and bladder fistula (7 patients). The most frequently infection are non-severe, but two patients died from septic shock after fungic colonization of the prosthesis. The infrared spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the obstruction was favored by urinary infection and an alkaline medium. The functional prosthesis rate at 1,2 and 3 years was 94%, 71% and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DETOUR® subcutaneous extra-anatomical urinary bypass is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to permanent percutaneous nephrostomy, for both malignant and benign ureteral obstructions in selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Active surveillance of prostate cancer: treatement-free survival according to restricted or expanded eligibility criteria]. / Surveillance active du cancer de prostate : survie sans traitement curatif selon critères d'éligibilité stricts ou élargis.

AIM: Overtreatment is an actual problem in low risk localized prostate cancer (PC) management. Active surveillance (AS) is a solution to limit this problem, but eligibility criteria remained discussed. The aim was to assess possibilities of widening selection criteria for patient in AS, studying curative treatment free survival (CTFS) according to restricted or expanded eligibility criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients beginning AS between 2008 and 2014, for Gleason 6 localized PC, PSA<15ng/ml,

[Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the peri-operative morbidity of radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer]. / Impact de la chimiothérapie néoadjuvante sur la morbidité péri-opératoire de la cystectomie pour tumeur de vessie infiltrant le muscle.

INTRODUCTION: Platinum-based neoadjvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) is the gold standard in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We aimed to compare the peri-operative morbidity in patients treated by NAC then RC and patients having RC alone. METHODS: Between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2015, we retrospectively included consecutive patients undergoing RC for MIBC in 2centers. We collected clinical, pathological and peri-operative data (30day post operative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo score, delayed complications, pathological results). Patients treated by NAC (NAC-RC group) before RC were compared to patients performing RC alone. The NAC-RC group received 1 to 6cycle of high-dose MVAC, MVAC or gemcitabine-cisplatine chemotherapy. Logistic regression identified independant factors of peri-operative complications. RESULTS: We included 199 patients: 48in the NAC-RC group and 151in the RC group. Complications rate was 73.9% in the NAC-RC group versus 73.8% in the RC group (P=1.0). In multivariate analyses, only the Charlson score was associated with an increased risk of peri-operative complications (P=0.05). PT0 tumour rate was significantly higher in the NAC-CR group (50% vs 7%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: NAC does not increase the peri-operative morbidity of the RC. Patients' pre operative comorbidities is the main risk factor for peri-operative complications.

[Penile intra-epithelial neoplasia]. / Les néoplasies intra-épithéliales du pénis.

INTRODUCTION: Penile intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) are precancerous lesions, characterized by architectural and cytological abnormalities of the genital epithelium, from which can arise squamous carcinomas. METHODS: A literature review was performed on the Medline database, considering the articles listed between October 2007 and October 2017 dealing with PIN, using the following keywords "intraepithelial neoplasia" or "Bowen's disease" or "erythroplasia of Queyrat" or "bowenoid papulosis" and "penis ¼. Papers were selected according to their language (English and French) and their relevance. RESULTS: One hundred seventy four articles related to PIN were listed. Twenty-five of them were selected for their relevance. The analysis of the references of these articles identified 6 relevant papers published before October 2007, which were considered for this review based on a total of thirty-one articles. We describe clinical and pathological characteristics of PIN, emphasizing treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: Urologists should distinguish HPV-related and non HPV-related PIN, both of them sharing clinical presentation, but needing different management.

[Abnormalities of the male median raphe]. / Anomalies du raphé médian chez l'homme.

INTRODUCTION: Abnormalities of the male median raphe can either be detected during postnatal examination or appear later during childhood or adulthood. They can be isolated or sometimes associated with severe congenital genitourinary malformations. METHODS: A literature review was performed on the Medline database, considering the articles listed until April 2015 dealing with abnormalities of the male median raphe using the following keywords: male, median raphe and abnormalities. Papers were selected according to their language (English and French) and their relevance. RESULTS: Forty-one articles related to male median raphe abnormalities were listed. Five of them were selected for their relevance. We describe frequent median raphe abnormalities (hyperpigmentation, deviation, division, cyst, canal and sinus), emphasizing the clinical aspects, the explorations, the risk of associated genitourinary abnormalities and the treatment. DISCUSSION: Male raphe abnormalities should be known by the urologists since functional, infectious and aesthetic complications could lead patients to consultation.

[Update for the management of kidney stones in 2013. Lithiasis Committee of the French Association of Urology]. / Mise au point sur la prise en charge des calculs du rein en 2013. Comité Lithiase de l'Association française d'urologie.

Since the publication of the latest recommendations of the Lithiasis Comity of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU) on the management of ureteral and renal stones, practices have evolved. This text provides an update for the treatment of kidney stones. It is especially the important advances in the field of laser-ureterorenoscopy that changed practices. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has been enriched by technical modifications and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy confirmed its predominant place in the first line of treatment. For stones less than 20mm, extracorporeal lithotripsy remains the standard, but in some cases the possibility of recommending a flexible ureterorenoscopy is possible in first line. For stones more than 20mm, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the standard treatment, but optional flexible ureteroscopy and extracorporeal lithotripsy are possible. The treatment carried out, collect the stone fragments for a morpho-constitutional analysis and achieve a metabolic evaluation is necessary, to investigate etiologic and give dietary advices to prevent recurrence.

[Management of adult's renal and ureteral stones. Update of the Lithiasis Committee of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU). General considerations]. / Prise en charge urologique des calculs rénaux et urétéraux de l'adulte. Mise au point du Comité Lithiase de l'Association Française d'Urologie (CLAFU). Aspects généraux.

The Lithiasis Committee of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU) aimed to update the current knowledge about urolithiasis. This update will be divided into four parts: 1) general considerations; 2) the management of ureteral stones; 3) the management of kidney stones; 4) metabolic assessment and medical treatment of urolithiasis. Recent technicals advances helped the urologists to improve stones management: new extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) devices, new flexible ureterorenoscopes, development of laser fragmentation. ESWL, semi-rigid and flexible ureteroscopy and the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remain currently the main therapeutic options. The first part of this update deals with the description and classification of stones, preoperative assessment, post-operative management and clinical follow-up. Main criteria of therapeutic choices are stone location, stone composition and stone size. Stone composition is assessed with infrared spectrophotometry analysis and its hardness is correlated with U.H. density on CT scan assessment. Preoperative assessment consists in urinary cytobacteriological examine, urinary PH, blood creatininemia, hemostasis. Low-dose CT scan is recommended before urological treatment. The result of the treatment must be done 1 or 3 months later with plain abdominal film and ultrasonography. Medical management of urolithiasis will be based on stone composition, metabolic and nutritional evaluation. Treatment success is definited by absence of residual fragments. Annual follow-up is recommended and based either on plain abdominal film and ultrasonography or low-dose CT scan.

[Place of the flexible ureterorenoscopy first choice for the treatment of kidney stones. Survey results practice committee of the AFU lithiasis completed in 2011]. / Place de l'urétérorénoscopie souple en première intention pour le traitement des calculs du rein. Résultats de l'enquête de pratique du comité lithiase de l'AFU réalisée en 2011.

UNLABELLED: The flexible ureterorenoscopy coupled with photovaporisation LASER (USSR-L) for the treatment of kidney kidney is a modern tool whose place is under evaluation. METHODS: Its place has been assessed in France in 2010 by the Committee of urolithiasis of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU). A practice survey among 27 experts concerned the following decision criteria: comorbid patient's supposed nature of the calculation, anatomy of the urinary tract of the patient. This investigation has been proposed to calculate the size not exceeding 20mm, for a calculation of size greater than 20mm and for multiple calculations kidney. RESULTS: Fourteen experts responded. The criteria for the USSR-The first line were: morbid obesity (BMI>30), anticoagulation or anti platelet aggregation, calculations Hard (UH>1000, cystine stones), calculations within diverticular caliceal calculations below, the failure of a first treatment or the wish of the patient. CONCLUSION: The URS-SL was a first-line treatment validated regardless of size and number of kidney stones, when ESWL and PCNL were contraindicated or when their predictable results were poor (hard stones/morbid obesity/lower pole stones) or when stone access is difficult (intradiverticular). It was also the treatment of choice after the failure of a first treatment (ESWL/PCNL).

[Endoscopic removal of renal stones through laparoscopic access of the ureter and the pelvis]. / Urétérorénoscopie perlaparoscopie dans le traitement des calculs du rein.

PURPOSE: We studied the efficiency and the morbidity of endoscopic removal of kidney stones during laparoscopic removal of ureteral stone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients presenting with an ureteral stone resisting to ESWL and four patients presenting with an UPJ obstruction were studied. Every patient had one to five associated kidney stones. The patients were operated with transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy or pyeloplasty. An endoscopy of the upper urinary tract was realized during the same operating time through laparoscopic access. A flexible ureteroscope (five cases) or semi-flexible ureteroscope (one case) were used after ureterolithotomy. A fibroscope (four cases) was used before pyeloplasty. The endoscope was introduced through the port of the iliac fossa and the stones were extracted with a basket grasper. The patients were followed by abdominal plain film 12 weeks after surgery, by IPV six weeks after surgery and then annually with abdominal plain film and ultrasound. RESULTS: No operative complication arose. Nine of 10 patients had a complete extraction of the kidney stones (one patient had an extraction only of four out of five kidney stones). No damage of any endoscope was observed. At a minimum follow-up of 18 months, no fistula nor stenosis of the ureter was diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic removal of kidney stones through laparoscopic access of the upper urinary tract is effective, sure and reproducible. Such procedure requires experience in laparoscopy and endoscopy of the upper urinary tract. The evaluation of this procedure must be pursued.