The importance of viruses in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge. The importance of viruses in VAP is not established. We sought to determine the prevalence of viruses in VAP and the outcomes of viral VAP. DESIGN: Retrospective study of VAP over 3 years. The frequency of a viral process represented the primary endpoint. Clinical outcomes served as secondary endpoints. We identified variables independently associated with a virus and conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the interaction between type of infection and patient characteristics. SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: The final cohort consisted of 710 patients and a virus was isolated in 5.1%. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: The most common viruses included: rhinovirus, influenza A, and cytomegalovirus. Baseline characteristics were similar between those with and without viral infections. In logistic regression, immunosuppression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-6.14) and stem-cell transplantation (SCT, aOR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.17-10.99) were independently associated with a virus. The presence of either variable performed poorly as a screening test for a virus. In-hospital (22.4% vs 21.6%; P = .869) and 30-day (32.8% vs 27.9%; P = .448) mortality rates were similar between the cohorts, respectively. Sensitivity analyses restricted to patients without a mixed viral and bacterial infection or those who were immunocompetent yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Although infrequent, a range of viruses may cause VAP. Viruses more often complicate SCT and immunosuppression, but one can isolate viruses in immunocompetent subjects. Viral VAP produces severe infection and results in high mortality rates. Clinical features do not differentiate viral from nonviral VAP.

Race Does Not Impact Sepsis Outcomes When Considering Socioeconomic Factors in Multilevel Modeling.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether race is a major determinant of sepsis outcomes when controlling for socioeconomic factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Barnes-Jewish Hospital a 1,350 bed academic medical center. PATIENTS: Eleven-thousand four-hundred thirty-two patients hospitalized between January 2010 and April 2017 with sepsis and septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Multilevel random effects modeling was employed whereby patients were nested within ZIP codes. Individual patient characteristics and socioeconomic variables aggregated at the ZIP code level (education, employment status, income, poverty level, access to healthcare) were included in the model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In hospital mortality, length of stay, need for vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation were the main endpoints. Black patients had more comorbidities than White patients except for cirrhosis and malignancy. In unadjusted comparisons, White individuals were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and had higher mortality rates and longer hospital stays for both low- and high-income groups. When nesting within ZIP codes and accounting for socioeconomic variables, race did not have a significant effect on mortality. Non-White races had lower odds ratio for mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that race is not an independent risk factor for sepsis mortality, as well as sepsis-related length of stay. We should expand our inquiry into determinants of sepsis outcomes by including socioeconomic variables.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a new fifth-generation cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adult patients. This review will briefly describe the pharmacology of C/T and focus on the emerging clinical trial and real-world data supporting its current utilization. Additionally, our synthesis of these data over time has set our current usage of C/T at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (BJH). C/T is primarily employed as directed monotherapy at BJH when Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are identified with resistance to other beta-lactams. C/T can also be used empirically in specific clinical situations at BJH prior to microbiological detection of an antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate. These situations include critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, where there is a high likelihood of infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa; patients failing therapy with a carbapenem; specific patient populations known to be at high risk for infection with MDR P. aeruginosa (e.g., lung transplant and cystic fibrosis patients); and patients know to have previous infection or colonization with MDR P. aeruginosa.

Order of discontinuation of glucose-lowering medications following bariatric surgery.

AIMS: To assess the order of glucose-lowering medication (GLM) discontinuation following bariatric surgery among patients taking ≥2 GLMs. METHODS: Patients with diabetes mellitus taking ≥2 GLM classes who underwent bariatric surgery were identified using health claims data from the United States. The order of discontinuation was assessed in patients taking ≥2 GLM classes by comparing each GLM class to the other classes in aggregate. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression were used to assess the order of discontinuation and changes in trends in the order of discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 12,244 of 26,651 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent bariatric surgery were taking ≥2 GLM classes. When each GLM class was assessed separately, fewer than 50% of patients had metformin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, DPP-4 inhibitor, SGLT2 inhibitor, glucosidase inhibitor, or insulin discontinued first when compared to the other classes in aggregate. Between 2008 and 2014, thiazolidinediones were increasingly more likely to be the first GLM discontinued (p = 0.0432). Slightly more than 50% of patients whose GLM regimen included a sulfonylurea discontinued the sulfonylurea first despite clinical recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: From a population level, there was no consistent approach in the order of discontinuation of GLM classes in patients following bariatric surgery.

Clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative sepsis among hospitalized patients: Shifting burden of disease?

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli are an emerging public health threat. However, there is a paucity of data examining comparative incidence rates, risk factors, and outcomes in this population. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban tertiary-care academic medical center. We included patients admitted from 2012 to 2015 who met the following criteria: i) age ≥ 18 years; and ii) culture positive for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or carbapenem-resistant non-Enterobacteriaceae (CRNE) from any site. Exclusion criteria were: i) < 2 systemic inflammatory response criteria; ii) cystic fibrosis; and iii) no targeted treatment. We evaluated hospital survival by Cox regression and year-by-year differences in the distribution of cases by the Cochran-Armitage test. RESULTS: 448 patients were analyzed (CRE, n = 111 [24.8%]; CRNE, n = 337 [75.2%]). CRE sepsis cases increased significantly over the study period (P <.001), driven primarily by increasing incidence of Enterobacter spp. infection (P = .004). No difference was observed in hospital survival between patients with CRE versus CRNE sepsis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-2.02; P = .285), even after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.62-1.87; P = .799). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes did not differ between patients with CRE versus CRNE sepsis. Dramatic increases in CRE, particularly Enterobacter spp., appear to be causing a shift in the burden of clinically significant carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection.

Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy Severity Predicts Hospital Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether sepsis-associated coagulopathy predicts hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One-thousand three-hundred beds urban academic medical center. PATIENTS: Six-thousand one-hundred forty-eight consecutive patients hospitalized between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Mild sepsis-associated coagulopathy was defined as an international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 1.2 and less than 1.4 plus platelet count less than or equal to 150,000/µL but greater than 100,000/µL; moderate sepsis-associated coagulopathy was defined with either an international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 1.4 but less than 1.6 or platelets less than or equal to 100,000/µL but greater than 80,000/µL; severe sepsis-associated coagulopathy was defined as an international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 1.6 and platelets less than or equal to 80,000/µL. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hospital mortality increased progressively from 25.4% in patients without sepsis-associated coagulopathy to 56.1% in patients with severe sepsis-associated coagulopathy. Similarly, duration of hospitalization and ICU care increased progressively as sepsis-associated coagulopathy severity increased. Multivariable analyses showed that the presence of sepsis-associated coagulopathy, as well as sepsis-associated coagulopathy severity, was independently associated with hospital mortality regardless of adjustments made for baseline patient characteristics, hospitalization variables, and the sepsis-associated coagulopathy-cancer interaction. Odds ratios ranged from 1.33 to 2.14 for the presence of sepsis-associated coagulopathy and from 1.18 to 1.51 for sepsis-associated coagulopathy severity for predicting hospital mortality (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of sepsis-associated coagulopathy identifies a group of patients with sepsis at higher risk for mortality. Furthermore, there is an incremental risk of mortality as the severity of sepsis-associated coagulopathy increases.

The Burden of Viruses in Pneumonia Associated With Acute Respiratory Failure: An Underappreciated Issue.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) results in substantial mortality and represents a leading reason for the use of antibiotics. The role of viruses in this setting is unclear. Identifying a viral cause in such instances could facilitate antibiotic stewardship. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort with pneumonia requiring MV. We included both cases occurring in the community and hospital-onset cases and classified patients according to the cause of the pneumonia. The prevalence of viral pathogens represented the primary end point. We identified variables independently associated with isolation of a viral organism as the sole pathogen. RESULTS: The cohort included 364 patients, and a virus was the sole pathogen in 79 cases (21.7%). The most common viruses included rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 20), influenza A (n = 12), and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 11). The rate of in-hospital death was high (37.2%) and did not differ from that seen in other patients (36.5%). The duration of MV, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates also did not differ based on the cause of pneumonia. Two variables were independently associated with recovery of a virus: an Acute Physiology and Health Evaluation II score of < 26 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.93; P = .027) and stem cell transplantation (SCT) (AOR, 4.39; 95% CI, 2.03-9.50; P = .001). A sensitivity analysis excluding patients who underwent SCT did not substantially alter our observations. CONCLUSIONS: Viruses represent a major cause of pneumonia in critically ill patients requiring MV. Identifying such subjects presents an opportunity for discontinuing antibiotics. Clinicians should consider systematically evaluating patients with pneumonia requiring MV for viral pathogens.

Real-time automated clinical deterioration alerts predict thirty-day hospital readmission.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical deterioration alerts (CDAs) are increasingly employed to identify deteriorating patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to determine whether CDAs predict 30-day readmission. Patients admitted to 8 general medicine units were assessed for all-cause 30-day readmission. RESULTS: Among 3015 patients, 567 (18.8%) were readmitted within 30 days. Patients triggering a CDA (n = 1141; 34.4%) were more likely to have a 30-day readmission (23.6% vs 15.9%; P < 0.001). Logistic regression identified triggering of a CDA to be independently associated with 30-day readmission (odds ratio [OR]: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-1.55; P = 0.001). Other predictors were: an emergency department visit in the previous 6 months (OR: 1.23; 95% CI:, 1.20-1.26; P < 0.001), increasing age (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02; P = 0.003), presence of connective tissue disease (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.34-1.98; P = 0.012), diabetes mellitus with end-organ complications (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.13-1.33; P = 0.010), chronic renal disease (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.08-1.24; P = 0.034), cirrhosis (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.17-1.33; P < 0.001), and metastatic cancer (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.08-1.17; P = 0.002). Addition of the CDA to the other predictors added only modest incremental value for the prediction of hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Readily identifiable clinical variables can be identified that predict 30-day readmission. It may be important to include these variables in existing prediction tools if pay for performance and across-institution comparisons are to be "fair" to institutions that care for more seriously ill patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:768-772. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Impact of antibacterials on subsequent resistance and clinical outcomes in adult patients with viral pneumonia: an opportunity for stewardship.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory viruses are increasingly recognized as significant etiologies of pneumonia among hospitalized patients. Advanced technologies using multiplex molecular assays and polymerase-chain reaction increase the ability to identify viral pathogens and may ultimately impact antibacterial use. METHOD: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of antibacterials in viral pneumonia on clinical outcomes and subsequent multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infections/colonization. Patients admitted from March 2013 to November 2014 with positive respiratory viral panels (RVP) and radiographic findings of pneumonia were included. Patients transferred from an outside hospital or not still hospitalized 72 hours after the RVP report date were excluded. Patients were categorized based on exposure to systemic antibacterials: less than 3 days representing short-course therapy and 3 to 10 days being long-course therapy. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients (long-course, n = 67; short-course, n = 28; mixed bacterial-viral infection, n = 79) were included with most being immunocompromised (56.3 %) with active malignancy the primary etiology (69.4 %). Rhinovirus/Enterovirus (23 %), Influenza (19 %), and Parainfluenza (15.5 %) were the viruses most commonly identified. A total of 13 different systemic antibacterials were used as empiric therapy in the 95 patients with pure viral infection for a total of 466 days-of-therapy. Vancomycin (50.7 %), cefepime (40.3 %), azithromycin (40.3 %), meropenem (23.9 %), and linezolid (20.9 %) were most frequently used. In-hospital mortality did not differ between patients with viral pneumonia in the short-course and long-course groups. Subsequent infection/colonization with a MDRO was more frequent in the long-course group compared to the short-course group (53.2 vs 21.1 %; P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: This study found that long-course antibacterial use in the setting of viral pneumonia had no impact on clinical outcomes but increased the incidence of subsequent MDRO infection/colonization.

Using the number needed to treat to assess appropriate antimicrobial therapy as a determinant of outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: To assess appropriate antimicrobial therapy as an outcome determinant in severe sepsis and septic shock using the number needed to treat. DESIGN: Single-center cohort study (January 2008 to December 2012). SETTING: One thousand two hundred fifty-bed academic hospital. PATIENTS: Two thousand five hundred ninety-four patients with positive blood culture. INTERVENTIONS: We retrospectively identified patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Inappropriate antimicrobial treatment was defined as an antimicrobial regimen that lacked in vitro activity against the isolated pathogen. Information regarding demographics, severity of illness, comorbidities, microbiology, and antimicrobial treatment was recorded. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for hospital mortality and inappropriate treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-seven patients (30.3%) were nonsurvivors. Inappropriate antimicrobial treatment had the greatest adjusted odds ratio for hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.8-4.1; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified resistance to cefepime, resistance to meropenem, presence of multidrug resistance, nonabdominal surgery, and prior antibiotic use as being independently associated with the administration of inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. For the entire cohort, the number needed to treat with appropriate antimicrobial therapy to prevent one patient death was 4.0 (95% CI, 3.7-4.3). The prevalence-adjusted pathogen-specific number needed to treat (PNNT) with appropriate antimicrobial therapy to prevent one patient death was lowest for multidrug-resistant bacteria (PNNT = 20) followed by Candida species (PNNT = 34), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (PNNT = 38), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PNNT = 38), Escherichia coli (PNNT = 40), and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (PNNT = 47). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the importance of appropriate antimicrobial treatment as a determinant of outcome in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Our analyses suggest that improved targeting of empiric antimicrobials for multidrug-resistant bacteria, Candida species, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa would have the greatest impact in reducing mortality from inappropriate antimicrobial treatment in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Clinical and demographic factors associated with antipyretic use in gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Antipyretic therapy is commonly prescribed for patients with infection, but studies of its impact on clinical outcomes have yielded mixed results. No data exist to characterize the use of antipyretic medications in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical and demographic factors associated with antipyretic medication administration in severe sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study assessed febrile patients (temperature ≥ 38.3 °C) with gram-negative severe sepsis or septic shock at an 1111-bed academic medical center between January 2002 and February 2008. Patients were excluded if they had liver disease, acute brain injury, or allergy to acetaminophen. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the effect of clinical factors on treatment of patients with antipyretic medications. RESULTS: Although 76% of patients in this febrile cohort (n = 241) were prescribed an antipyretic agent, only 42% received antipyretic therapy; 95% of the doses were acetaminophen. Variables associated with antipyretic treatment were maximum body temperature (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.89), time after sepsis diagnosis (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), surgery during hospitalization (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.80), death within 36 hours (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.85), and mechanical ventilation (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.98). Severity of illness factors, demographic factors, and patient treatment location did not predict who would receive antipyretic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Most febrile episodes in patients with gram-negative severe sepsis or septic shock were not treated with antipyretic medications. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of antipyretics on clinically relevant outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Inappropriate antibiotic therapy in Gram-negative sepsis increases hospital length of stay.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy on hospital length of stay in Gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Academic urban hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with Gram-negative bacteremia (primary or secondary, nosocomial or non-nosocomial) and severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We defined initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy as occurring when the patient either was not administered an antibiotic within 24 hrs of sepsis onset or was treated with an antibiotic to which the culprit pathogen was resistant in vitro. The cohort included 760 subjects (mean age 59.3 ± 16.3 yrs, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 23.7 ± 6.7). More than half of infections were nosocomial (55.1%), and Escherichia coli represented the most common pathogen (n = 225). Pseudomonas species were isolated in 17.4% of patients. Nearly one-third of patients (31.3%) received initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients administered initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy were more likely to have a nosocomial infection, to have underlying cancer or diabetes or both, to require chronic hemodialysis, and to undergo mechanical ventilation. Those administered initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy also faced higher inhospital mortality. The unadjusted median length of stay after sepsis onset in those administered initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy was 11 days compared to 9 days in those treated appropriately (p = .028 by log-rank test). In a Cox model controlling for the multiple confounders noted, initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy independently correlated with continued hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.40, p = .044). Adjusting for these covariates indicated that initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy independently increased the median attributable length of stay by 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy occurs in one-third of persons with severe sepsis and septic shock attributable to Gram-negative organisms. Beyond its impact on mortality, initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy is significantly associated with length of stay in this population. Efforts to decrease rates of initially inappropriate antibiotic therapy may serve to improve hospital resource use by leading to shorter overall hospital stays.

Comparison of bivalirudin and argatroban for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of bivalirudin and argatroban in achieving anticoagulation goals and to compare clinical outcomes assessing the safety and efficacy in patients with known or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective analysis. SETTING: Large tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 138 adults who received either bivalirudin (92 patients) or argatroban (46 patients) for at least 24 hours for known or suspected HIT between January 2007 and July 2008. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. Data regarding demographics, direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) dosing and monitoring, and related clinical outcomes were collected; statistical analysis was performed to compare results for patients receiving bivalirudin versus those receiving argatroban. Duration of DTI use ranged from 24-658 hours. At the time of DTI initiation, 108 patients (78%) were in an intensive care unit, with the highest proportion (61/138 [44%]) in the cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) DTI doses at the time of first reaching therapeutic goal were bivalirudin 0.06 mg/kg/hour (0.04-0.08 mg/kg/hr) and argatroban 1.0 µg/kg/minute (0.5-2.0 µg/kg/min). The median percentage of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values within therapeutic range while patients were receiving DTI therapy were similar for bivalirudin and argatroban (75% and 70%, respectively, p=0.238). A greater percentage of aPTT values were supratherapeutic with argatroban versus bivalirudin treatment (18% vs 8%, p=0.046). Median time to therapeutic goal was similar for bivalirudin (5.50 hrs [IQR 4-14.5 hrs]) and argatroban (5.75 hrs [IQR 3-17.7 hrs], p=0.499). New thromboembolic events occurred in seven patients (8%) receiving bivalirudin and two (4%) receiving argatroban (p=0.718). Bleeding events occurred at similar rates in both groups (9% for bivalirudin vs 11% for argatroban, p>0.999). CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin and argatroban were similar in achieving and maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation goals, clinical outcomes, and safety. This study suggests that bivalirudin represents an alternative in the management of HIT, but prospective studies are needed.

Using protocols to improve patient outcomes in the intensive care unit: focus on mechanical ventilation and sepsis.

The care of critically ill patients has become increasingly complex as severity of illness continues to increase, the number of patients requiring intensive care is on the rise, the amount of clinical information available at the bedside is growing, and the quantity of evidence supporting or refuting specific therapies and interventions for this population is escalating. It has become problematic for clinicians to master all of these tasks and to process the quantity of available clinical and scientific information in an effective and safe manner. Additionally, a culture promoting safety and accountability has emerged in the United States and throughout the world in regard to medical care. The expectation is that patients entering hospitals should receive the highest quality of care with minimal to no medical errors occurring. To accomplish this goal, as well as to allow more accurate monitoring of day to day medical practices, several strategies have been developed that have primarily been employed in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. These strategies include the use of paper-based or electronic protocols for disease (e.g., severe sepsis and septic shock) or process of care (e.g., weaning of mechanical ventilation) management, national guidelines, and targeted clinician education with or without periodic feedback regarding compliance with best medical practices and resultant patient-based outcomes. This review focuses on the use of protocols in the ICU setting and how they can best be utilized to improve patient outcomes.