Prostate cancer: sextant localization with MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and 11C-choline PET/CT.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, three-dimensional (3D) MR spectroscopy, combined MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopy, and carbon 11 (11C)-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for intraprostatic tumor sextant localization, with histologic findings as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethics committee on human research provided approval and a waiver of informed consent for the retrospective study. MR imaging, 3D MR spectroscopy, and 11C-choline PET/CT results were retrospectively reviewed in 26 men with biopsy-proved prostate cancer (mean age, 64 years; range, 51-75 years) who underwent radical prostatectomy. Cancer was identified as areas of nodular low signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. At 3D MR spectroscopy, choline-plus-creatine-to-citrate and choline-to-creatine ratios were used to distinguish healthy from malignant voxels. At PET/CT, focal uptake was visually assessed, and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) were recorded. Agreement between 3D MR spectroscopic and PET/CT results was calculated, and ability of maximum SUV to help localize cancer was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis. Significant differences between positive and negative sextants with respect to mean maximum SUV were calculated with a paired t test. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were, respectively, 55%, 86%, and 67% at PET/CT; 54%, 75%, and 61% at MR imaging; and 81%, 67%, and 76% at 3D MR spectroscopy. The highest sensitivity was obtained when either 3D MR spectroscopic or MR imaging results were positive (88%) at the expense of specificity (53%), while the highest specificity was obtained when results with both techniques were positive (90%) at the expense of sensitivity (48%). Concordance between 3D MR spectroscopic and PET/CT findings was slight (kappa=0.139). CONCLUSION: In localizing cancer within the prostate, comparable specificity was obtained with either 3D MR spectroscopy and MR imaging or PET/CT; however, PET/CT had lower sensitivity relative to 3D MR spectroscopy alone or combined with MR imaging.

Detection and localization of prostate cancer: correlation of (11)C-choline PET/CT with histopathologic step-section analysis.

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the potential usefulness of (11)C-choline PET/CT for detection and localization of tumors within the prostate. We used the results of step-section histopathologic examination as the standard of reference. METHODS: The results were analyzed on a sextant basis. We reviewed the results of the (11)C-choline PET/CT scans of 36 patients with prostate cancer and of 5 control subjects with bladder cancer. All patients underwent (11)C-choline PET/CT and, subsequently, radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection within 1 mo. (11)C-Choline PET/CT scans were obtained 5-10 min after intravenous injection of 370-555 MBq of (11)C-choline. Images were reviewed visually and semiquantitatively using maximum SUV and tumor-to-background ratio. RESULTS: On a sextant basis, histopathologic analysis detected cancer foci in 143 of 216 sextants; high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasm foci were detected in 89 of 216 sextants (in 59 sextants in association with carcinoma, in 30 sextants alone), acute prostatitis was detected in 7 of 216 sextants (in 3 sextants in association with carcinoma, in 4 sextants alone), and 39 of 216 sextants were normal. PET/CT demonstrated focal (11)C-choline uptake in 108 sextants (94 of which involved tumor), and 108 sextants showed no abnormal (11)C-choline uptake (49 of which were false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET/CT were 66%, 81%, 71%, 87%, and 55%, respectively. In the 5 control subjects, high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasm was detected at histologic examination in 16 of 30 sextants. PET/CT showed increased (11)C-choline uptake in 5 of 16 sextants. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of using (11)C-choline PET/CT to identify cancer foci within the prostate. However, we also found that (11)C-choline PET/CT has a relative high rate of false-negative results on a sextant basis and that prostatic disorders other than cancer may accumulate (11)C-choline. Therefore, our data do not support the routine use of PET/CT with (11)C-choline as a first-line screening procedure for prostate cancer in men at high risk.

PET and PET-CT. State of the art and future prospects.

Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) enables the in vivo study of tissue metabolism, and thus is able to identify malignant tumours as hypermetabolic lesions by an increase in tracer uptake. Many papers have demonstrated both the relevant impact of FDG PET on staging of many cancers and the superior accuracy of the technique compared with conventional diagnostic methods for pre-treatment evaluation, therapy response evaluation and relapse identification. In particular PET was found useful in identifying lymph nodal and metastatic spread, thus altering patient management in more than 30% of cases. PET images, however, provide limited anatomical data, which in regions such as the head and neck, mediastinum and pelvic cavity is a significant drawback. The exact localization of lesions may also be difficult in some cases on the basis of PET images alone. The introduction of combined PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanners enables the almost simultaneous acquisition of transmission and emission images, thus obtaining optimal fusion images in a very short time. PET-CT fusion images enable lesions to be located, reducing false positive studies and increasing accuracy; the overall duration of the examination may also be reduced. On the basis of both literature data and our experience we established the clinical indications when PET-CT may be particularly useful, in comparison with PET alone. It should also be underlined that the use of PET-CT is almost mandatory for new tracers such as 11C-choline and 11C-methionine; these new tracers may be applied for studying tumours not assessable with FDG, such as prostate cancer. In conclusion PET-CT is at present the most advanced method for metabolic imaging, and is capable of precisely localizing and assessing tumours; fusion images reduce false positive and inconclusive studies, thus increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Potential pitfalls of 18F-FDG PET in a large series of patients treated for malignant lymphoma: prevalence and scan interpretation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and scan interpretation criteria useful in identifying non-tumoural F-FDG focal uptakes (potential pitfalls) in patients who had been previously treated for a malignant lymphoma studied by positron emission tomography (PET). MATERIALS: Nine hundred and ninety-six consecutive PET scans obtained in 706 patients with malignant lymphoma were reviewed. All patients had been previously treated by first-line chemo-radiotherapy, plus surgery when required, and were then studied by FDG PET to investigate suspected recurrence at doubtful or inconclusive conventional radiological imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging). PET was obtained with patients in the fasted condition and after i.v. injection of 370 MBq of F-FDG; imaging was acquired 60-90 min later. In patients with focal FDG uptake the final diagnosis was reached on the basis of histological findings or long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-one of 134 PET scans (23.1%) showing focal FDG uptake were diagnosed as non-tumoural radiotracer uptake, related to the presence of brown fat in seven cases, thymic hyperplasia in five, muscles contraction in four, lymph node unspecific inflammation in four, mediastinal/pulmonary unspecific inflammation in four, gastritis in two, colitis in two, bacterial abscess in one, lactating breast in one, and herpes zoster in one. Each of the above cited situations has been reported in the literature, generally in the form of sporadic reports, as a potential cause of misinterpretation (false positive) in reading a PET scan with the potential for incorrect patient management. An accurate diagnosis in these patients was important for the following therapeutic decision making. CONCLUSIONS: In the whole series of patients with treated malignant lymphoma, the prevalence of non-tumoural FDG focal uptake during follow-up was relatively low (3.1%); conversely, it was relatively high when considering the sub-group of 'positive' PET only (23.1%). The importance of knowing these situations in order to avoid misinterpretation in reading PET scans needs to be emphasized. In this light, an accurate patient's history and a skilful nuclear medicine physician are very important factors. For the same purpose, it is reasonable to think that the use of hybrid PET/CT tomographs could also play an important role in helping to identify non-tumoural FDG focal uptake.

18F-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma: significance of positive findings.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of increased uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in patients with malignant lymphoma (ML) studied by positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: A total of 1,120 consecutive scans carried out in 848 patients were reviewed; all patients had a diagnosis of ML [574 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 274 Hodgkin's disease (HD)] and were studied at completion of therapy, for suspected recurrence or during follow-up. PET was carried out after intravenous injection of 370 MBq of 18F-FDG; images were recorded after 60-90 min. Patients were selected whose reports indicated areas of increased FDG uptake. PET findings were considered positive for lymphomatous localisation when uptake occurred at sites of previous disease, in asymmetrical lymph nodes or in nodes unlikely to be affected by inflammation (mediastinal, except for hilar, and abdominal). PET findings were adjudged negative for neoplastic localisations in the following instances: physiological uptake (urinary, muscular, thymic or gastrointestinal in patients without MALT), symmetrical nodal uptake, uptake in lesions unrelated to lymphoma that had already been identified by other imaging methods at the time of PET scan, uptake at sites atypical for lymphoma, very low uptake and non-focal uptake. PET findings were compared with the results of other diagnostic procedures (including CT and ultrasound), biopsy findings and follow-up data. RESULTS: Overall, 354 scans (in 256 patients) showed increased FDG uptake (244 scans in NHL and 110 in HD): in 286 cases, FDG uptake was considered pathological and indicative of ML, in 41 cases the findings were described as uncertain or equivocal and in 37 cases, FDG uptake was considered unrelated to ML (in ten scans, concurrent findings of abnormal FDG uptake attributed to ML and uptake assigned to other causes were obtained) . Of the 286 patients with positive PET findings, 274 (95.8%) were found to have residual or recurrent ML (i.e. true positives). Four of the 41 patients with inconclusive findings turned out to have ML, while in 13 patients, pathological processes other than ML could be identified as the cause of FDG uptake. ML was excluded in all patients with findings reported as non-pathological (100% true-negative rate). Therefore, the false-positive rate in our series was about 5%. The main cause of increased FDG uptake mimicking ML was inflammation. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that 18F-FDG-PET has very high but not absolute specificity for ML. As already suggested, increased FDG uptake may also be observed in patients without active disease; in most cases, however, non-pathological FDG accumulation is properly identified. Less frequently, inconclusive scans are encountered; these cases are usually caused by inflammation, which subsequently resolves.

Role of 18F-FDG PET for evaluating malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a relatively rare neoplasia characterized by a poor prognosis. Recent studies show that new therapeutic approaches can lead to an improvement in life quality and to a prolonged survival; therefore, proper evaluation of MPM before, as well as after, therapy, is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 18F-FDG photon emission tomography (PET) scan compared to computed tomography (CT) findings in patients affected by MPM, whether untreated or already treated. We studied 15 consecutive patients (13 male and 2 female) with a histological diagnosis of MPM, with a mean age of 69.9 years (range: 38-78 years old) and a recent total-body CT scan. Five (5) patients were studied for staging, while 10 patients were studied after therapy. An FDG PET scan was carried out 60 minutes after an intravenous (i.v.) injection of 370 MBq of 18F-FDG. For each patient, we compared the PET stage to the CT stage, and evaluated the role of PET in choosing a therapeutic approach. In 9 of 15 (60%) patients, there was no difference between the PET and the CT stage. In 2 of 15 (13%) patients, PET upstaged the disease, while in 4 of 15 (27%) patients PET downstaged MPM. According to these results, patient management was changed in 3 cases. Specifically, 1 patient was excluded from surgery, and 2 patients had different chemotherapy. These data suggest that PET is useful in the evaluation of MPM, giving additional data that can clarify doubtful CT findings, especially regarding lymph node involvement and distant lesions. In conclusion, FDG PET was found to play a worth-while role in patient management.

18F-FDG PET early after radiotherapy in lymphoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of postactinic inflammatory alterations that could lead to false-positive results in FDG-PET images, in a group of lymphoma patients studied with positron emission tomography (PET) early after the end of radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen (16) consecutive patients were referred to our center for malignant lymphoma; 14 of 16 patients had a mediastinal bulky mass at diagnosis. Each patient underwent chemotherapy and then radiotherapy (RT): for clinical reasons, shortly after RT (range, 25-56 days; mean, 38.7 days) a FDG PET scan was required to evaluate the effect of therapy. We intravenously injected 370 MBq of 18F-FDG, and after 60-90 minutes we recorded images. RESULTS: Despite a relatively short time after RT, there was no pathological tracer uptake in 13 of 16 patients. In 3 cases, a mild increase in FDG uptake was observed, but no findings which would lead to a false-positive diagnosis. In 2 of 3 cases, postactinic pneumopathy was diagnosed (PET scan performed 51 and 52 days after RT); while in 1 patient, soft-tissue inflammation was present (PET scan performed 42 days after RT). CONCLUSION: Our data indicates that the rate of postactinic PET inflammatory alterations in lymphoma patients is not very high and appear to be not strictly linked to the elapsed time since the end of RT treatment.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for bronchial carcinoid follow-up.

PURPOSE: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been used to diagnose bronchial carcinoids (BC) and is a valuable tool for accurate staging of BC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of SRS in restaging BC and following patients after treatment. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (18 male, 13 female) with confirmed BC who were referred during the last 7 years were included. Patients were examined via chest radiograph (12 studies), chest or abdominal computed tomography (CT; 28 scans), chest magnetic resonance imaging (2 scans), and liver ultrasound (5 scans). RESULTS: Overall, in 22 patients (71%), SRS confirmed the data obtained by other diagnostic procedures (16 negative and 6 positive findings). In 6 patients, SRS showed focal lesions not previously demonstrated. In 2 patients, SRS resolved uncertain findings of CT. In 1 patient, SRS showed fewer lesions compared with CT. In 8 of 31 patients, important diagnostic information obtained by SRS was not revealed by any other imaging procedure. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that SRS is a reliable, noninvasive method that could be considered the principal follow-up procedure in patients with BC.

Scintigraphic findings in necrotizing myopathy.

Necrotizing myopathy is a rare syndrome associated with several causes, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma. The authors present a case of this infrequently occurring disease, describe an unusual scintigraphic pattern, and show tracer uptake localized in soft tissues rather than the skeleton.