Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 10(1): 121-132, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at the time of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery. Furthermore, the best management of DOACs (interruption vs continuation) is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the incidence of device-related bleeds and thrombotic events based on anticoagulant type (DOAC vs VKA) and regimen (interrupted vs uninterrupted). METHODS: This was an observational multicenter study. We included patients on chronic oral anticoagulation undergoing CIED surgery. Patients were matched using propensity scoring. RESULTS: We included 1,975 patients (age 73.8 ± 12.4 years). Among 1,326 patients on DOAC, this was interrupted presurgery in 78.2% (n = 1,039) and continued in 21.8% (n = 287). There were 649 patients on continued VKA. The matched population included 861 patients. The rate of any major bleeding was higher with continued DOAC (5.2%) compared to interrupted DOAC (1.7%) and continued VKA (2.1%) (P = 0.03). The rate of perioperative thromboembolism was 1.4% with interrupted DOAC, whereas no thromboembolic events occurred with DOAC or VKA continuation (P = 0.04). The use of dual antiplatelet therapy, DOAC continuation, and male sex were independent predictors of major bleeding on a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world cohort, a continued DOAC strategy was associated with a higher bleeding risk compared to DOAC interruption or VKA continuation in patients undergoing CIED surgery. However, DOAC interruption was associated with increased thromboembolic risk. Concomitant dual antiplatelet therapy should be avoided whenever clinically possible. A bespoke approach is necessary, with a strategy of minimal DOAC interruption likely to represent the best compromise.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Tromboembolia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrinolíticos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/etiología , Vitamina K , Femenino
2.
Europace ; 25(5)2023 05 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37213071

RESUMEN

AIMS: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients develop ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) responsive to anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). However, VA episodes have not been characterized in accordance with the device therapy, and with the emergence of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD), the appropriate device prescription in ARVC remains unclear. Study aim was to characterize VA events in ARVC patients during follow-up in accordance with device therapy and elicit if certain parameters are predictive of specific VA events. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective single-centre study utilizing prospectively collated registry data of ARVC patients with ICDs. Forty-six patients were included [54.0 ± 12.1 years old and 20 (43.5%) secondary prevention devices]. During a follow-up of 12.1 ± 6.9 years, 31 (67.4%) patients had VA events [n = 2, 6.5% ventricular fibrillation (VF), n = 14], 45.2% VT falling in VF zone resulting in ICD shock(s), n = 10, 32.3% VT resulting in ATP, and n = 5, 16.1% patients had both VT resulting in ATP and ICD shock(s). Lead failure rates were high (11/46, 23.9%). ATP was successful in 34.5% of patients. Severely impaired right ventricular (RV) function was an independent predictor of VT resulting in ATP (hazard ratio 16.80, 95% confidence interval 3.74-75.2; P < 0.001) with a high predictive accuracy (area under the curve 0.88, 95%CI 0.76-1.00; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: VA event rates are high in ARVC patients with a majority having VT falling in the VF zone resulting in ICD shock(s). S-ICDs could be of benefit in most patients with ARVC with the absence of severely impaired RV function which has the potential to avoid consequences of the high burden of lead failure.


Asunto(s)
Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica , Cardiomiopatías , Desfibriladores Implantables , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Función Ventricular Derecha , Estudios de Seguimiento , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/prevención & control , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Ventricular/prevención & control , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Cardiomiopatías/complicaciones , Adenosina Trifosfato , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/complicaciones , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/diagnóstico , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/terapia
3.
Europace ; 25(5)2023 05 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37001913

RESUMEN

AIMS: The SMART Pass™ (SP) algorithm is a high-pass filter that aims to reduce inappropriate therapy (IT) in subcutaneous internal cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD), but SP can deactivate due to low amplitude sensed R waves or asystole. The association between IT and SP deactivation and management strategies were evaluated, hypothesizing SP deactivation increases the risk of IT and device re-programming, or lead/generator re-positioning could reduce this risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective single-centre audit of Emblem™ S-ICD devices implanted 2016 to 2020 utilizing health records and remote monitoring data. Cox regression models evaluated associations between SP deactivation and IT. A total of 348 patients (27 ± 16.6 months follow-up) were studied: 73% primary prevention. Thirty-eight patients (11.8%) received 83 shocks with 27 patients (7.8%) receiving a total of 44 IT. Causes of IT were oversensing (98%) and aberrantly conducted atrial fibrillation (2%). SP deactivation occurred in 32 of 348 patients (9%) and was significantly associated with increased risk of IT (hazard ratio 5.36, 95% CI 2.37-12.13). SP deactivation was due to low amplitude R waves (94%), associated with a higher defibrillation threshold at implant and presence of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. No further IT occurred 16 ± 15.5 months after corrective interventions, with changing the sensing vector being successful in 59% of cases. CONCLUSION: To reduce the risk of IT, the cause of the SP deactivation should be investigated, and appropriate reprogramming, device, or lead modifications made. Utilizing the alert for SP deactivation and electrograms could pro-actively prevent IT.


Asunto(s)
Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica , Fibrilación Atrial , Desfibriladores Implantables , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/terapia
4.
Clin Case Rep ; 6(9): 1727-1729, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30214751

RESUMEN

Knowledge of anatomy is vital preimplant to screen the patient for the subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD), particularly those who have previously had thoracic surgery. X-ray screening in these patients is highly recommended.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA