Exploring environmental selection on genome size in angiosperms.

Angiosperms show a remarkable range in genome size (GS), yet most species have small genomes, despite the frequency of polyploidy and repeat amplification in the ancestries of most lineages. It has been suggested that larger genomes incur costs that have driven selection for GS reduction, although the nature of these costs and how they might impact selection remain unclear. We explore potential costs of increased GS encompassing impacts on minimum cell size with consequences for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency and effects of greater nitrogen and phosphorus demands of the nucleus leading to more severe trade-offs with photosynthesis. We suggest that nutrient-, water-, and/or CO2-stressed conditions might favour species with smaller genomes, with implications for species' ecological and evolutionary dynamics.

Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures.

An analysis of over 10 000 plant genome sizes (GSs) indicates that most species have smaller genomes than expected given the incidence of polyploidy in their ancestries, suggesting selection for genome downsizing. However, comparing ancestral GS with the incidence of ancestral polyploidy suggests that the rate of DNA loss following polyploidy is likely to have been very low (4-70 Mb/million years, 4-482 bp/generation). This poses a problem. How might such small DNA losses be visible to selection, overcome the power of genetic drift and drive genome downsizing? Here we explore that problem, focussing on the role that double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways (non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination) may have played. We also explore two hypotheses that could explain how selection might favour genome downsizing following polyploidy: to reduce (i) nitrogen (N) and phosphate (P) costs associated with nucleic acid synthesis in the nucleus and the transcriptome and (ii) the impact of scaling effects of GS on cell size, which influences CO2 uptake and water loss. We explore the hypothesis that losses of DNA must be fastest in early polyploid generations. Alternatively, if DNA loss is a more continuous process over evolutionary time, then we propose it is a byproduct of selection elsewhere, such as limiting the damaging activity of repetitive DNA. If so, then the impact of GS on photosynthesis, water use efficiency and/or nutrient costs at the nucleus level may be emergent properties, which have advantages, but not ones that could have been selected for over generational timescales.