Loss-of-Function KCNE2 Variants: True Monogenic Culprits of Long-QT Syndrome or Proarrhythmic Variants Requiring Secondary Provocation?

BACKGROUND: Insight into type 6 long-QT syndrome (LQT6), stemming from mutations in the KCNE2-encoded voltage-gated channel ß-subunit, is limited. We sought to further characterize its clinical phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individuals with reported pathogenic KCNE2 mutations identified during arrhythmia evaluation were collected from inherited arrhythmia clinics and the Rochester long-QT syndrome (LQTS) registry. Previously reported LQT6 cases were identified through a search of the MEDLINE database. Clinical features were assessed, while reported KCNE2 mutations were evaluated for genotype-phenotype segregation and classified according to the contemporary American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. Twenty-seven probands possessed reported pathogenic KCNE2 mutations, while a MEDLINE search identified 17 additional LQT6 cases providing clinical and genetic data. Sixteen probands had normal resting QTc values and only developed QT prolongation and malignant arrhythmias after exposure to QT-prolonging stressors, 10 had other LQTS pathogenic mutations, and 10 did not have an LQTS phenotype. Although the remaining 8 subjects had an LQTS phenotype, evidence suggested that the KCNE2 variant was not the underlying culprit. The collective frequency of KCNE2 variants implicated in LQT6 in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database was 1.4%, in comparison with a 0.0005% estimated clinical prevalence for LQT6. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of clinical phenotype, the high allelic frequencies of LQT6 mutations in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database, and absence of previous documentation of genotype-phenotype segregation, our findings suggest that many KCNE2 variants, and perhaps all, have been erroneously designated as LQTS-causative mutations. Instead, KCNE2 variants may confer proarrhythmic susceptibility when provoked by additional environmental/acquired or genetic factors, or both.

Variabilidad de la respuesta plaquetaria a la aspirina / Assessing platelet response to aspirin

Introducción y objetivos: A pesar de que el estudio Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration demostró una reducción del 25% de los eventos mayores con el uso de aspirina en enfermos de alto riesgo, un porcentaje de pacientes presentan eventos isquémicos recurrentes. Esto ha llevado a la descripción de la "resistencia a la aspirina" con una tasa muy variable, de 0.4% a 83%. Este estudio evaluó la variabiliad en la función plaquetaria basal, la prevalencia de la resistencia a la aspirina, y la efectividad y reproducibilidad de los estudios de función plaquetaria. Materiales y métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio aleatorizado y cruzado de mediciones repetidas, con sujetos saludables de entre 18 y 60 años. Luego de firmar el consentimiento informado, los pacientes fueron distribuidos en forma aleatorizada a recibir aspirina en dosis de 75 mg o 300 mg; fueron evaluados al inicio y luego de cuatro períodos de tres semanas mediante diferentes técnicas: Optical Platelet Aggregation (OPA), PFA-100™, VerifyNow™, y los niveles séricos y urinarios de tromboxano B2 (TXB2). Se obtuvo la aprobación del comité de ética local. El análisis estadístico fue realizado con el programa SPSS17. Resultados: El índice global de resistencia a la aspirina fue variable, entre 2.4% y 63.5% en función de la técnica utilizada. Se demostró una variabilidad interindividual e intraindividual significativa al inicio y con la administración de placebo en las diferentes técnicas. La sensibilidad de los ensayos varió entre 24% (OPA ADP10) y 87.8% (tromboxano sérico), y la especificidad varió entre 81% (PFA-100™) y 97.4% (tromboxano). La selección de "valores de corte" alternativos provocó tasas de prevalencia diferentes de resistencia bioquímica a la aspirina, con un mecanismo de compensación entre la sensibilidad y la especificidad. Conclusiones: La respuesta a la aspirina mostró una marcada variabilidad interensayo, interindividual y temporal. Se requieren varias evaluaciones con diferentes técnicas para diagnosticar en forma confiable la resistencia a la aspirina. La selección de valores discriminativos alternativos debería considerarse al evaluar formalmente esta entidad

Introduction: Despite the 25% reduction in major events with aspirin in high-risk patients reported by the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration, a proportion of patients develop recurrent ischaemic events. This has led to the emergence of 'aspirin resistance' with rates between 0.4% and 83% reported. This study assessed variability in baseline platelet function, prevalence of aspirin resistance, and the performance and reproducibility of platelet function testing methods. Materials and Methods: A repeated-measures randomised crossover study was performed in healthy individuals aged 18-60 years. After informed consent, patients were randomised to aspirin dose (75 mg or 300 mg) and treatment sequence with testing at baseline and after each four 3-week treatment period via Optical Platelet Aggregation (OPA), PFA-100™, VerifyNow™, and serum and urinary thromboxane (TXB2) levels. Local ethical approval was granted. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS17. Results: The overall rate of aspirin resistance varied from 2.4% to 63.5% depending on the assay used. Significant inter- and intra-individual variability existed at baseline and on placebo testing between assays. Assay sensitivities ranged from 24.0% (OPA ADP10) to 87.8% (serum TXB2), and specificities from 81.0% (PFA-100™) to 97.4% (serum TXB2). Selection of alternative "cut-off" values resulted in differing prevalence rates of biochemical aspirin resistance with a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: Response to aspirin shows marked inter-assay, inter-individual and temporal variability. Testing on multiple occasions using several assays is necessary to reliably diagnose aspirin resistance. Selection of alternative assay "cut-off" values should be considered when formally assessing aspirin response