Clinical Predictors of Overall Survival in Very Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma: A National Cancer Database Multivariable Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery for the very elderly is a progressively important paradigm as life expectancy continues to rise. Patients with glioblastoma multiforme often undergo surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy (CT) to prolong overall survival (OS). However, the efficacy of these treatment modalities in patients aged 80 years and older has yet to be fully assessed in the literature. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to retrospectively identify patients aged 65 years and older with glioblastoma multiforme (1989-2016). All available patient demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. To study OS, bivariable survival models were created using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used for final adjusted analyses. RESULTS: A total of 578 very elderly patients (aged 80 years and older) and 2836 elderly patients (aged 65-79 years) were identified. Compared with elderly patients, very elderly patients were more likely to have Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 1.899 [95% CI: 1.417-2.544], P < .001) while less likely to have private insurance status (OR 0.544 [95% CI: 0.401-0.739], P < .001). In addition, very elderly patients were more likely to travel the least distance for treatment and have multiple tumors (P < .001). When controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, very elderly patients were less likely to receive gross total resection (GTR) (OR 0.822 [95% CI: 0.681-0.991], P < .041), RT (OR 0.385 [95% CI: 0.319-0.466], P < .001), or postoperative CT (OR 0.298 [95% CI: 0.219-0.359], P < .001) relative to elderly counterparts. Within very elderly patients, GTR, RT, and CT all independently and significantly predicted improved OS (P < .001 for all). These predictive models were deployed in an online calculator (https://spine.shinyapps.io/GBM_elderly). CONCLUSION: Very elderly patients are less likely to receive GTR, RT, or CT when compared with elderly counterparts despite use of these therapies conferring improved OS. Selected very elderly patients may benefit from more aggressive attempts at surgical and adjuvant treatment.

Fractionated radiotherapy after gross-total resection of spinal chordoma: a systematic review of survival outcomes using individualized patient data.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal chordoma treatment guidelines recommend resection. However, in patients in whom gross-total resection (GTR) is achieved, the benefits of radiation therapy (RT) are unclear. Therefore, the authors performed a systematic review to determine if RT is associated with postoperative progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after achieving GTR of spinal chordoma. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for studies including individualized data of patients undergoing GTR with or without RT for spinal chordoma. Patients < 18 years of age or those who underwent stereotactic body RT were excluded. Qualitative assessment was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale guidelines. Log-rank tests for time-to-event data and a Cox proportional-hazards model were generated for a multivariable statistical model. RESULTS: Complete data of 132 patients were retrieved, with 37 (28%) patients receiving adjuvant RT and 95 (72%) not receiving adjuvant RT. The mean follow-up was not statistically significantly different between those undergoing RT and not undergoing RT (54.02 months and 65.43 months, respectively). Patients were more likely not to undergo RT if their disease was located in the sacrum versus the mobile spine (p < 0.001). When controlling for age ≥ 65 years, male sex, disease location, and treatment year ≥ 2010, patients undergoing RT had similar PFS and OS when compared with those not undergoing RT on multivariable survival analysis (HR 0.935 [95% CI 0.703-2.340], p = 0.844 and HR 2.078 [95% CI 0.848-5.090], p = 0.110, respectively). However, age ≥ 65 years was associated with poorer OS in adjusted analyses (HR 2.761 [95% CI 1.185-6.432], p = 0.018) relative to patients < 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: After achieving GTR of spinal chordoma, the utility of RT on PFS and OS remains unclear. Age ≥ 65 years appears to be associated with OS in spinal chordoma patients. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the utility of RT in this patient population.

Quality of life in chordoma survivors: results from the Chordoma Foundation Survivorship Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Chordomas are rare malignant bone tumors whose location in the skull base or spine, invasive surgical treatment, and accompanying adjuvant radiotherapy may all lead patients to experience poor quality of life (QOL). Limited research has been conducted on specific demographic and clinical factors associated with decreased QOL in chordoma survivors. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate several potential variables and their impact on specific QOL domains in these patients as well the frequencies of specific QOL challenges within these domains. METHODS: The Chordoma Foundation (CF) Survivorship Survey was electronically distributed to chordoma survivors subscribed to the CF Chordoma Connections forum. Survey questions assessed QOL in three domains: physical, emotional/cognitive, and social. The degree of impairment was assessed by grouping the participants into high- and low-challenge groups designated by having ≥ 5 or < 5 symptoms or challenges within a given QOL domain. Bivariate analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics between these groups was conducted using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: A total of 665 chordoma survivors at least partially completed the survey. On bivariate analysis, female sex was significantly associated with increased odds of significant emotional (p = 0.001) and social (p = 0.019) QOL burden. Younger survivors (age < 65 years) were significantly more likely to experience significant physical (p < 0.0001), emotional (p < 0.0001), and social (p < 0.0001) QOL burden. Skull base chordoma survivors had significantly higher emotional/cognitive QOL burden than spinal chordoma survivors (p = 0.022), while the converse was true for social QOL challenges (p = 0.0048). Survivors currently in treatment were significantly more likely to experience significant physical QOL challenges compared with survivors who completed their treatment > 10 years ago (p = 0.0074). Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) was the most commonly reported emotional/cognitive QOL challenge (49.6%). Only 41% of the participants reported having their needs met for their physical QOL challenges as well as 25% for emotional/cognitive and 18% for social. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings suggest that younger survivors, female survivors, and survivors currently undergoing treatment for chordoma are at high risk for adverse QOL outcomes. Additionally, although nearly half of the participants reported a FCR, very few reported having adequate emotional/cognitive care. These findings may be useful in identifying specific groups of chordoma survivors vulnerable to QOL challenges and bring to light the need to expand care to meet the QOL needs for these patients.

The Socioeconomic Distressed Communities Index Predicts 90-Day Mortality Among Intracranial Tumor Patients.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a major determinant of quality of life and outcomes. However, SES remains difficult to measure comprehensively. Distress communities index (DCI), a composite of 7 socioeconomic factors, has been increasingly recognized for its correlation with poor outcomes. As a result, the objective of the present study is to determine the predictive value of the DCI on outcomes following intracranial tumor surgery. METHODS: A single institution, retrospective review was conducted to identify adult intracranial tumor patients undergoing resection (2016-2021). Patient ZIP codes were matched to DCI and stratified by DCI quartiles (low:0-24.9, low-intermediate:25-49.9, intermediate-high:50-74.9, high:75-100). Univariate followed by multivariate regressions assessed the effects of DCI on postoperative outcomes. Receiver operating curves were generated for significant outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2389 patients were included: 1015 patients (42.5%) resided in low distress communities, 689 (28.8%) in low-intermediate distress communities, 445 (18.6%) in intermediate-high distress communities, and 240 (10.0%) in high distress communities. On multivariate analysis, risk of fracture (adjusted odds ratio = 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.05, P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.06, P < 0.001) increased with increasing DCI quartile. Good predictive accuracy was observed for both models, with receiver operating curves of 0.746 (95% CI 0.720-0.766) for fracture and 0.743 (95% CI 0.714-0.772) for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial tumor patients from distressed communities are at increased risk for adverse events and death in the postoperative period. DCI may be a useful, holistic measure of SES that can help risk stratifying patients and should be considered when building healthcare pathways.

Availability and utilization of molecular testing for primary central nervous system tumors among US hospitals.

Advanced molecular testing has increasingly become an integral component for accurate diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. We sought to establish the current state of molecular testing availability and approaches for the diagnosis of CNS tumors in US hospitals that conduct high volumes of CNS tumor resections. We distributed a 16-item survey inquiring about molecular testing approaches for CNS tumors to 115 neuropathologists at US hospitals with neurosurgery residency programs. Thirty-five neuropathologists (30.4%) responded to the survey, all of whom indicated their institutions perform molecular testing on CNS tumor tissue. The most commonly offered tests were MGMT methylation profiling and next-generation sequencing. Fourteen respondents (40%) indicated that their institution is able to test for and report all of the molecular alterations included in our survey. Nine (25.7%) respondents indicated that molecular testing is performed as standard of care for all patients with resected CNS tumors. Our results suggest that even in academic hospitals with a high volume of CNS tumor resections, molecular testing for these tumors is limited. Continued initiatives are necessary to expand the availability of molecular testing for CNS tumors to ensure diagnostic accuracy and guide targeted therapy.

Exploring the impact of primary care utilization and health information exchange upon treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of glioblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: There is limited literature describing care coordination for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We aimed to investigate the impact of primary care and electronic health information exchange (HIE) between neurosurgeons, oncologists, and primary care providers (PCP) on GBM treatment patterns, postoperative outcomes, and survival. METHODS: We identified adult GBM patients undergoing primary resection at our institution (2007-2020). HIE was defined as shared electronic medical information between PCPs, oncologists, and neurosurgeons. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the effect of PCPs and HIE upon initiation and completion of adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 374 patients (mean age ± SD: 57.7 ± 13.5, 39.0% female), 81.0% had a PCP and 62.4% had electronic HIE. In multivariate analyses, having a PCP was associated with initiation (OR: 7.9, P < 0.001) and completion (OR: 4.4, P < 0.001) of 6 weeks of concomitant chemoradiation, as well as initiation (OR: 4.0, P < 0.001) and completion (OR: 3.0, P = 0.007) of 6 cycles of maintenance temozolomide thereafter. Having a PCP (median OS [95%CI]: 14.6[13.1-16.1] vs. 10.8[8.2-13.3] months, P = 0.005) and HIE (15.40[12.82-17.98] vs. 13.80[12.51-15.09] months, P = 0.029) were associated with improved OS relative to counterparts in Kaplan-Meier analysis and in multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, [95% CI] 0.5-1.0, P = 0.048). In multivariate analyses, chemoradiation (HR = 0.34, [95% CI] 0.2-0.7, P = 0.002) and maintenance temozolomide (HR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.8, P = 0.002) were associated with improved OS relative to counterparts. CONCLUSION: Effective care coordination between neurosurgeons, oncologists, and PCPs may offer a modifiable avenue to improve GBM outcomes.

Preoperative patient-reported physical health-related quality of life predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to assess patients' perioperative health. The PROM Information System 29 (PROMIS-29) is a well-validated global health assessment instrument for patient physical health, though its utility in cranial neurosurgery is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of preoperative PROMIS-29 physical health (PH) summary scores in predicting postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients. METHODS: Adult brain tumor patients undergoing resection at a single institution (January 2018-December 2021) were identified and prospectively received PROMIS-29 surveys during pre-operative visits. PH summary scores were constructed and optimum prediction thresholds for length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (DD), and 30-day readmission were approximated by finding the Youden index of the associated receiver operating characteristic curves. Bivariate analyses were used to study the distribution of low (z-score≤-1) versus high (z-score>-1) PH scores according to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression models quantified the association between preoperative PH summary scores and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 157 brain tumor patients were identified (mean age 55.4±15.4 years; 58.0% female; mean PH score 45.5+10.5). Outcomes included prolonged LOS (24.8%), non-routine discharge disposition (37.6%), and 30-day readmission (19.1%). On bivariate analysis, patients with low PH scores were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with a high-grade tumor (69.6% vs 38.85%, p=0.010) and less likely to have elective surgery (34.8% vs 70.9%, p=0.002). Low PH score was associated with prolonged LOS (26.1% vs 22%, p<0.001), nonroutine discharge (73.9% vs 31.3%, p<0.001) and 30-day readmission (43.5% vs 14.9%, p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, low PH scores predicted greater LOS (odds ratio [OR]=6.09, p=0.003), nonroutine discharge (OR=4.25, p=0.020), and 30-day readmission (OR=3.93, p=0.020). CONCLUSION: The PROMIS-29 PH summary score predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients and may be incorporated into prospective clinical workflows.

Exploring disparities in surgical recommendations for patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2019.

OBJECTIVE: Factors that may drive recommendations for operative intervention for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (ISCTs) have yet to be extensively studied. The authors investigated racial and socioeconomic disparities in the management of patients with primary spinal cord ependymomas and nonependymal gliomas, with the aim of determining the associations between socioeconomic patient characteristics, survival, and recommendations for the resection of primary ISCTs. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was queried to identify all patients > 18 years of age with ISCTs diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for variables associated with receiving a surgical recommendation. Log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: The authors identified 2325 patients (mean age 49 [SD 16] years; 48.8% female; 67.4% non-Hispanic White, 7.8% non-Hispanic Black, 16.2% Hispanic, 6.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.6% Native American; 56.7% married; 64.4% with household income < $75,000; 73.8% with spinal ependymoma; and 26.2% with nonependymal spinal glioma). Eighty-seven percent of patients received a surgical recommendation. In multivariable models, marriage was associated with higher odds of receiving a surgical recommendation for ependymomas (OR 1.80, p = 0.005). In multivariable models for nonependymal spinal gliomas, older age (OR 0.98, p = 0.001) and increased number of tumors (OR 0.62, p = 0.015) were associated with decreased odds of receiving surgical recommendations. Among ependymomas, marriage (HR 0.59, p = 0.001), younger age (HR 0.93, p < 0.001), female sex (HR 0.43, p = 0.006), and decreased number of tumors (HR 0.56, p < 0.001) were associated with improved OS. Among nonependymal spinal gliomas, median household income ≥ $75,000 (HR 0.69, p = 0.020) and younger age (HR 0.98, p < 0.001) were associated with improved DSS, while Black race (HR 4.65, p = 0.027) and older age (HR 1.05, p < 0.001) were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with spinal ependymomas and nonependymal spinal gliomas, recommendations for surgery appear to be unaffected by patient sex, race, or income. Survival disparities appear to exist among unmarried, male, Black, and lower-income cohorts. Continued initiatives to identify drivers of disparities while improving health equity in this patient population are needed.

Operative Corridors in Endoscopic Skull Base Tumor Surgery.

Advances in technology, instrumentation, and reconstruction have paved the way for extended endoscopic approaches to skull base tumors. In the sagittal plane, the endonasal approach may safely access pathologies from the frontal sinus to the craniocervical junction in the sagittal plane, the petrous apex in the coronal plane, and extend posteriorly to the clivus and posterior cranial fossa. This review article describes these modular extended endoscopic approaches, along with crucial anatomic considerations, illustrative cases, and practical operative pearls.

The hospital frailty risk score independently predicts postoperative outcomes in meningioma patients.

OBJECTIVE: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a recently developed tool that uses ICD-10 codes to measure patient frailty. However, the effectiveness of HFRS has not yet been assessed in meningioma patients specifically. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HFRS in predicting surgical outcomes for patients with meningiomas. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized data from patients undergoing meningioma resection at a single institution (2017-2019). Data were obtained through a combination of automated data retrieval and manual chart review. Bivariate logistic regression was used to assess the prognostic ability of several frailty indices for predicting postoperative outcomes. Further, discrimination for each model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Generalized linear models with gamma error distributions and a log-link function were used to model hospital length of stay (LOS), total charges, complications, and disposition. RESULTS: A total of 464 meningioma patients (mean age 58.20 years, 72.8 % female, 66.4 % white) were included. HFRS had a significantly greater AUROC when compared to ASA (p = 0.0074) for postoperative complications, and HFRS significantly outperformed ASA (p = 0.0021) and mFI-5 (p = 0.018) when predicting nonroutine discharge. On multivariate analysis, increasing HFRS scores were significantly and independently associated with greater LOS (p < 0.0001), higher hospital charges (p < 0.0001), higher odds of postoperative complications (OR = 1.05, p = 0.019), and nonroutine discharge (OR = 1.12, p < 0.0001). The HFRS was non-inferior compared to the mFI-5, CCI, ASA and mFI-11 in terms of model discrimination. CONCLUSION: HFRS effectively predicts postoperative outcomes for meningiomas and outperforms other indices in predicting complications and nonroutine discharge. This novel index may be used to improve clinical decision-making and reduce adverse postoperative outcomes among meningioma patients.

The Hospital Frailty Risk Score Independently Predicts Postoperative Outcomes in Glioblastoma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a tool for quantifying patient frailty using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. This study aimed to determine the utility of the HFRS in predicting surgical outcomes after resection of glioblastoma (GBM) and compare its prognostic ability with other validated indices such as American Society of Anesthesiologists score and Charlson Comorbidity Index. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a GBM patient database (2017-2019) at a single institution. HFRS was calculated using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Bivariate logistic regression was used to model prognostic ability of each frailty index, and model discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to assess for significant associations between HFRS and continuous and binary postoperative outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: The study included 263 patients with GBM. The HFRS had a significantly greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve compared with American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = 0.016) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.037) for predicting 30-day readmission. On multivariate analysis, the HFRS was significantly and independently associated with hospital length of stay (P = 0.0038), nonroutine discharge (P = 0.018), and 30-day readmission (P = 0.0051). CONCLUSIONS: The HFRS has utility in predicting postoperative outcomes for patients with GBM and more effectively predicts 30-day readmission than other frailty indices. The HFRS may be used as a tool for optimizing clinical decision making to reduce adverse postoperative outcomes in patients with GBM.

Awake Versus Asleep Craniotomy for Patients With Eloquent Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Awake vs asleep craniotomy for patients with eloquent glioma is debatable. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare awake vs asleep craniotomy for the resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions. METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception to December 13, 2022. Primary outcomes were the extent of resection (EOR), overall survival (month), progression-free survival (month), and rates of neurological deficit, Karnofsky performance score, and seizure freedom at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation (minute) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (day). RESULTS: Fifteen studies yielded 2032 patients, from which 800 (39.4%) and 1232 (60.6%) underwent awake and asleep craniotomy, respectively. The meta-analysis concluded that the awake group had greater EOR (mean difference [MD] = MD = 8.52 [4.28, 12.76], P < .00001), overall survival (MD = 2.86 months [1.35, 4.37], P = .0002), progression-free survival (MD = 5.69 months [0.75, 10.64], P = .02), 3-month postoperative Karnofsky performance score (MD = 13.59 [11.08, 16.09], P < .00001), and 3-month postoperative seizure freedom (odds ratio = 8.72 [3.39, 22.39], P < .00001). Furthermore, the awake group had lower 3-month postoperative neurological deficit (odds ratio = 0.47 [0.28, 0.78], P = .004) and shorter LOS (MD = -2.99 days [-5.09, -0.88], P = .005). In addition, the duration of operation was similar between the groups (MD = 37.88 minutes [-34.09, 109.86], P = .30). CONCLUSION: Awake craniotomy for gliomas in the eloquent regions benefits EOR, survival, postoperative neurofunctional outcomes, and LOS. When feasible, the authors recommend awake craniotomy for surgical resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions.

A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study of Surgical vs Nonsurgical Management for Pituitary Apoplexy.

CONTEXT: Pituitary apoplexy (PA) has been traditionally considered a neurosurgical emergency, yet retrospective single-institution studies suggest similar outcomes among patients managed medically. OBJECTIVE: We established a multicenter, international prospective registry to compare presentation and outcomes in PA patients treated with surgery or medical management alone. METHODS: A centralized database captured demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, visual findings, hormonal status, and imaging features at admission. Treatment was determined independently by each site. Key outcomes included visual, oculomotor, and hormonal recovery, complications, and hospital length of stay. Outcomes were also compared based on time from symptom onset to surgery, and from admission or transfer to the treating center. Statistical testing compared treatment groups based on 2-sided hypotheses and P less than .05. RESULTS: A total of 100 consecutive PA patients from 12 hospitals were enrolled, and 97 (67 surgical and 30 medical) were evaluable. Demographics, clinical features, presenting symptoms, hormonal deficits, and imaging findings were similar between groups. Severe temporal visual field deficit was more common in surgical patients. At 3 and 6 months, hormonal, visual, and oculomotor outcomes were similar. Stratifying based on severity of visual fields demonstrated no difference in any outcome at 3 months. Timing of surgery did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSION: We found that medical and surgical management of PA yield similar 3-month outcomes. Although patients undergoing surgery had more severe visual field deficits, we could not clearly demonstrate that surgery led to better outcomes. Even without surgery, apoplectic tumor volumes regress substantially within 2 to 3 months, indicating that surgery is not always needed to reduce mass effect.

Decreasing Reimbursement of Pituitary Tumor Surgery: An Analysis of Medicare Data From 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the extensive amount of research aimed at comparing patient outcomes between microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (MTSS) and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) approaches, there has been relatively little recent investigation into the nationwide utilization and reimbursement trends of both techniques. This study aimed to identify trends in pituitary tumor surgery utilization, charges to Medicare, and reimbursement dependent on (1) MTSS/ETSS surgery type, (2) provider type (ie, neurosurgeon vs ear, nose, and throat), and (3) cosurgery status. METHODS: This study used publicly available data from the Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary for the years 2010-2020. Linear regression was used to quantify temporal trends for submitted service counts, submitted charges, reimbursements, and reimbursement-to-charge across the 2010-2020 period. RESULTS: Regarding service count trends from 2010 to 2020, our results demonstrate a significant increase in ETSS utilization ( = 1.55, CI = 0.99-2.12, P < .001), a significant decrease in MTSS utilization ( = -0.86, CI = -1.21 to -0.51, P < .001), a significant increase in services submitted by otolaryngologists ( = 0.59, CI = 0.24-0.93, P = .0040), and a significant increase in cosurgeries ( = 1.03, CI = 0.24-0.93, P = .0051). Importantly, our results also demonstrated a significant decrease in reimbursements for ETSS procedures ( = -12.74, CI = -22.38 to -3.09, P = .015) and for pituitary tumor surgeries submitted by neurosurgeons specifically ( = -41.56, CI = -51.67 to -31.63, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated a significant increase in ETSS utilization and a significant decrease in MTSS utilization. We also noted a significant decrease in reimbursements for ETSS procedures and among procedures submitted by neurosurgeons specifically. We hope that our study highlights nationwide utilization and reimbursement patterns that may be useful for guiding future reimbursement-oriented policy development.

Exoscope Use in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications, Benefits, and Limitations.

BACKGROUND: Exoscopes were recently developed as an alternative to the operative microscope (OM) and endoscope for intraoperative visualization during neurosurgery. Prior reviews studying mixed cranial and spinal surgical cohorts reported advantages with exoscope use, including improved ergonomics and teaching. In recent years, there has been an increase in exoscope research, with no updated systematic review focused exclusively on the benefits and limitations of exoscope use in spine surgery. Thus, we sought to systematically synthesize the literature related to exoscope-assisted spine surgery. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies reported between 2010 and September 2023. Data, such as the exoscope model used, procedure types performed, and user observations, were then collected. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 481 patients with spine pathologies who underwent a surgical procedure using 1 of 9 exoscope models. The lumbar region was the most frequently operated area (n = 234; 48.6%), and discectomies comprised the most overall procedures (n = 273; 56.8%). All patients benefited clinically. The reported advantages of exoscopes compared with OMs or endoscopes were improved focal distance, surgeon posture, trainee education, compactness, and assistant participation. Other aspects such as stereopsis, illumination, and cost had various observations. CONCLUSIONS: Exoscopes have advantages compared with OMs or endoscopes during spine surgery. The user learning curve is minimal, and no negative patient outcomes have been reported. However, some aspects of exoscope use necessitate longer term prospective research before exoscopes can be considered a standard tool in the armamentarium of intraoperative visualization strategies.

Management and Molecular Characterization of Intraventricular Glioblastoma: A Single-Institution Case Series.

While the central nervous system (CNS) tumor classification has increasingly incorporated molecular parameters, there is a paucity of literature reporting molecular alterations found in intraventricular glioblastoma (IVGBM), which are rare. We present a case series of nine IVGBMs, including molecular alterations found in standardized next-generation sequencing (NGS). We queried the clinical charts, operative notes, pathology reports, and radiographic images of nine patients with histologically confirmed IVGBM treated at our institution (1995-2021). Routine NGS was performed on resected tumor tissue of two patients. In this retrospective case series of nine patients (22% female, median (range) age: 64.3 (36-85) years), the most common tumor locations were the atrium of the right lateral ventricle (33%) and the septum pellucidum (33%). Five patients had preoperative hydrocephalus, which was managed with intraoperative external ventricular drains in three patients and ventriculoperitoneal shunts in one patient. Hydrocephalus was managed with subtotal resection of a fourth ventricular IVGBM in one patient. The most common surgical approach was transcortical intraventricular (56%). Gross total resection was achieved in two patients, subtotal resection was achieved in six patients, and one patient received a biopsy only. Immunohistochemistry for IDH1 R132H mutant protein was performed in four cases and was negative in all four. Genetic alterations common in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, were seen in two cases with available NGS data, including EGFR gene amplification, TERT promoter mutation, PTEN mutation, trisomy of chromosome 7, and monosomy of chromosome 10. Following surgical resection, four patients received adjuvant chemoradiation. Median survival among our cohort was 4.7 months (IQR: 0.9-5.8 months). Management of IVGBM is particularly challenging due to their anatomical location, presentation with obstructive hydrocephalus, and fast growth, necessitating prompt intervention. Additional studies are needed to better understand the genetic landscape of IVGBM compared to parenchymal glioblastoma and may further elucidate the unique pathophysiology of these rare tumors.

Seq-ing the SINEs of central nervous system tumors in cerebrospinal fluid.

It is often challenging to distinguish cancerous from non-cancerous lesions in the brain using conventional diagnostic approaches. We introduce an analytic technique called Real-CSF (repetitive element aneuploidy sequencing in CSF) to detect cancers of the central nervous system from evaluation of DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) are PCR amplified with a single primer pair, and the PCR products are evaluated by next-generation sequencing. Real-CSF assesses genome-wide copy-number alterations as well as focal amplifications of selected oncogenes. Real-CSF was applied to 280 CSF samples and correctly identified 67% of 184 cancerous and 96% of 96 non-cancerous brain lesions. CSF analysis was considerably more sensitive than standard-of-care cytology and plasma cell-free DNA analysis in the same patients. Real-CSF therefore has the capacity to be used in combination with other clinical, radiologic, and laboratory-based data to inform the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected cancers of the brain.

Intracranial Gliosarcoma: A National Cancer Database Survey of Clinical Predictors for Overall Survival.

OBJECTIVE: Gliosarcoma (GSM) is a variant of glioblastoma, 1 of the most common and aggressive primary brain tumors in adults. Our study seeks to analyze a large cohort of patients with GSM in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to elucidate clinical predictors of overall survival (OS). METHODS: Data was collected on patients diagnosed with histologically-confirmed GSM using the NCDB (2004-2016). OS was determined via univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis. Bivariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses were also utilized. RESULTS: Our cohort of 1015 patients had a median age at diagnosis of 61 years. Six hundred thirty-one (62.2%) were male, 896 (89.0%) were Caucasian, and 698 (68.8%) lacked any comorbidities. Median OS was 11.5 months. Regarding treatment, 264 (26.5%) patients underwent surgery (S) only (OS = 5.19 months), 61 (6.1%) underwent surgery and radiotherapy (S + RT) (OS = 6.87 months), 20 (2.0%) underwent surgery and chemotherapy (S + CT); (OS = 15.51 months), and 653 (65.4%) underwent S + CT + RT (triple) combination therapy (OS = 13.8 months). Notably, on bivariate analysis, S + CT (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, P-value = 0.04) and triple therapy (HR = 0.57, P < 0.01) were associated with increased OS. S + RT was not significantly associated with OS. Similarly, on multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses, gross total resection (HR = 0.76, P = 0.02), S + CT (HR = 0.46, P < 0.01), and triple therapy (HR = 0.52, P < 0.01) predicted significantly increased OS. Furthermore, age >60 years old (HR = 1.03, P < 0.01) and the presence of comorbidities (HR = 1.43, P < 0.01) predicted significantly decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite maximal multimodal treatment, GSMs have poor median OS. NCDB data suggest age, comorbidities, extent of resection, and adjuvant treatment each minimally delays poor outcomes.

The mFI-5 and Postoperative Outcomes in Brain Tumor Patients: A Bayesian Approach to Quantifying Uncertainty.

OBJECTIVE: To the best of our knowledge, prior research has not investigated the uncertainty in the relationship between patient frailty and postoperative outcomes after brain tumor surgery. The present study used Bayesian methods to quantify the statistical uncertainty between the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing brain tumor resection. METHODS: The present study used retrospective data collected from patients undergoing brain tumor resection during a 2-year period (2017-2019). Posterior probability distributions were used to estimate the means of model parameters that are most likely given the priors and the data. Additionally, 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were constructed for each parameter estimate. RESULTS: Our patient cohort included 2519 patients with a mean age of 55.27 years. Our multivariate analysis demonstrated that each 1-point increase in the mFI-5 score was associated with an 18.76% (95% CrI, 14.35%-23.36%) increase in hospital length of stay and a 9.37% (CrI, 6.82%-12.07%) increase in hospital charges. We also noted an association between an increasing mFI-5 score and greater odds of a postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; CrI, 1.34-1.87) and a nonroutine discharge (OR, 1.54; CrI, 1.34-1.80). However, no meaningful statistical association was found between the mFI-5 score and 90-day hospital readmission (OR, 1.16; CrI, 0.98-1.36) or between the mFI-5 score and 90-day mortality (OR, 1.12; CrI, 0.83-1.50). CONCLUSIONS: Although mFI-5 scores might be able to effectively predict short-term outcomes such as length of stay, our results demonstrate no meaningful association between mFI-5 scores and 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality. Our study highlights the need for rigorously quantifying statistical uncertainty to safely risk-stratify neurosurgical patients.