Day-case Karydakis flap for pilonidal sinus.

PURPOSE: The Karydakis flap for pilonidal sinus is associated with primary wound healing and infrequent recurrence. Previous studies had reported in-patient protocols. This cohort study was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and practicalities of day-case Karydakis flap surgery. Factors relating to wound healing also were explored. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing day-case Karydakis flap surgery, by one consultant surgeon, for pilonidal sinus were studied prospectively. Patients were assessed at weekly intervals after surgery until healing was complete. Wound healing time was compared with 1) patients' gender, age, body mass index, deprivation index, occupation and smoking status, 2) pilonidal diseases' dimensions and proximity to anus, 3) wounds' dimensions and proximity to anus, and 4) drain volume. RESULTS: Day-case Karydakis flap surgery was feasible, safe, and effective. None of the 51 patients in the study required readmission to hospital, sepsis drainage, or surgery for recurrent sinus. Median wound healing time was three weeks. Smokers healed quicker than nonsmokers. No other factors were identified that were associated with delayed healing. Normal activity was resumed within one month of surgery in 95 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Karydakis flap can offer the advantage of day-case surgery for pilonidal sinus patients in addition to primary wound healing and low sinus recurrence rates.

Comparison of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM in predicting mortality after oesophagogastric resections.

BACKGROUND: P-POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity) predicts mortality and morbidity in general surgical patients providing an adjunct to surgical audit. O-POSSUM was designed specifically to predict mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing oesophagogastric surgery. AIM: To compare P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM in predicting surgical mortality in patients undergoing elective oesophagogastric cancer resections. METHODS: Elective oesophagogastric cancer resections in a district general hospital from 1990 to 2002 were scored by P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM methods. Observed mortality rates were compared to predicted mortality rates in six risk groups for each model using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The power to discriminate between patients who died and those who survived was assessed using the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: 313 patients underwent oesophagogastric resections. 32 died within 30 days (10.2%). P-POSSUM predicted 36 deaths (chi2 = 15.19, df = 6, p = 0.019, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test), giving a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 0.89. O-POSSUM predicted 49 deaths (chi2 = 16.51, df = 6, p = 0.011), giving an SMR of 0.65. The area under the ROC curve was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.76) for P-POSSUM and 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.72) for O-POSSUM. CONCLUSION: Neither model accurately predicted the risk of postoperative death. P-POSSUM provided a better fit to observed results than O-POSSUM, which overpredicted total mortality. P-POSSUM also had superior discriminatory power.