Is it safe to operate selected low-risk endometrial cancer patients in secondary hospitals?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a preoperative screening algorithm in identifying low-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients to ensure optimal care. METHODS: A total of 277 patients with primary EC confirmed through biopsy underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with risk factors for advanced high-risk EC, such as non-endometrioid histology, high-grade differentiation status, deep myometrial invasion, or spread beyond the uterine corpus, were systematically excluded. The remaining preoperatively screened patients with stage IA low-grade endometrioid EC (EEC) (n = 93) underwent surgery in a tertiary hospital. The accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis was evaluated by comparing the findings with the postoperative histopathological results. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using 8-year follow-up data. RESULTS: Postoperative histopathological analysis revealed that all patients had grade 1-2 EEC localized to the corpus uteri. Only three patients had deep myometrial invasion (stage IB), but they remained disease-free after 6-9 years of follow-up. The median follow-up time for all patients was 8.7 years. The DFS was 7.6 years, and the OS was 8.6 years. Two patients with stage IA grade 1 EEC experienced relapse and, despite treatment, died of EC. No other EC-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The screening algorithm accurately identified low-risk EC patients without compromising survival. Therefore, the algorithm appears to be feasible for selecting patients for surgery in secondary hospitals.

Locus-specific LINE-1 expression in clinical ovarian cancer specimens at the single-cell level.

Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1s/L1s) are a group of retrotransposons that can copy themselves within a genome. In humans, it is the most successful transposon in nucleotide content. L1 expression is generally mild in normal human tissues, but the activity has been shown to increase significantly in many cancers. Few studies have examined L1 expression at single-cell resolution, thus it is undetermined whether L1 reactivation occurs solely in malignant cells within tumors. One of the cancer types with frequent L1 activity is high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). Here, we identified locus-specific L1 expression with 3' single-cell RNA sequencing in pre- and post-chemotherapy HGSOC sample pairs from 11 patients, and in fallopian tube samples from five healthy women. Although L1 expression quantification with the chosen technique was challenging due to the repetitive nature of the element, we found evidence of L1 expression primarily in cancer cells, but also in other cell types, e.g. cancer-associated fibroblasts. The expression levels were similar in samples taken before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, indicating that L1 transcriptional activity was unaffected by clinical platinum-taxane treatment. Furthermore, L1 activity was negatively associated with the expression of MYC target genes, a finding that supports earlier literature of MYC being an L1 suppressor.

Imaging of Tumor Hypoxia With 18F-EF5 PET/MRI in Cervical Cancer.

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of hypoxia using 18F-EF5 as a hypoxia tracer in cervical cancer patients with PET/MRI. We investigated the association between this 18F-EF5-PET tracer and the immunohistochemical expression of endogenous hypoxia markers: HIF1α, CAIX, and GLUT1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with biopsy-proven primary squamous cell cervix carcinoma (FIGO 2018 radiological stages IB1-IIIC2r) were imaged with dual tracers 18F-EF5 and 18F-FDG using PET/MRI (Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145:129-135). 18F-EF5 images were analyzed by calculating the tumor-to-muscle ratio to determine the hypoxic tissue (T/M ratio >1.5) and further hypoxic subvolume (HSV) and percentage hypoxic area. These 18F-EF5 hypoxic parameters were correlated with the size and localization of tumors in 18F-FDG PET/MRI and the results of hypoxia immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All primary tumors were clearly 18F-FDG and 18F-EF5 PET positive and heterogeneously hypoxic with multiple 18F-EF5-avid areas in locally advanced cancer and single areas in clinically stage I tumors. The location of hypoxia was detected mainly in the periphery of tumor. Hypoxia parameters 18F-EF5 max T/M ratio and HSV in primary tumors correlated independently with the advanced stage (P = 0.036 and P = 0.040, respectively), and HSV correlated with the tumor size (P = 0.027). The location of hypoxia in 18F-EF5 imaging was confirmed with a higher hypoxic marker expression HIF1α and CAIX in tumor fresh biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The 18F-EF5 imaging has promising potential in detecting areas of tumor hypoxia in cervical cancer.

Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI alone, and SUV and ADC values in staging of primary uterine cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: The use of PET/MRI for gynecological cancers is emerging. The purpose of this study was to assess the additional diagnostic value of PET over MRI alone in local and whole-body staging of cervical cancer, and to evaluate the benefit of standardized uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in staging. METHODS: Patients with histopathologically-proven cervical cancer and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI obtained before definitive treatment were retrospectively registered. Local tumor spread, nodal involvement, and distant metastases were evaluated using PET/MRI or MRI dataset alone. Histopathology or clinical consensus with follow-up imaging were used as reference standard. Tumor SUVmax and ADC were measured and SUVmax/ADC ratio calculated. Area under the curve (AUC) was determined to predict diagnostic performance and Mann-Whitney U test was applied for group comparisons. RESULTS: In total, 33 patients who underwent surgery (n = 23) or first-line chemoradiation (n = 10) were included. PET/MRI resulted in higher AUC compared with MRI alone in detecting parametrial (0.89 versus 0.73), vaginal (0.85 versus 0.74), and deep cervical stromal invasion (0.96 versus 0.74), respectively. PET/MRI had higher diagnostic confidence than MRI in identifying patients with radical cone biopsy and no residual at hysterectomy (sensitivity 89% versus 44%). PET/MRI and MRI showed equal AUC for pelvic nodal staging (both 0.73), whereas AUC for distant metastases was higher using PET/MRI (0.80 versus 0.67). Tumor SUVmax/ADC ratio, but not SUVmax or ADC alone, was significantly higher in the presence of metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI shows higher accuracy than MRI alone for determining local tumor spread and distant metastasis emphasizing the added value of PET over MRI alone in staging of cervical cancer. Tumor SUVmax/ADC ratio may predict pelvic nodal involvement.