Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Oncological Surgeries: CORONAL Study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative recovery from oncology surgeries should be understood for the clinical decision-making. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the postoperative cumulative 28-day mortality and the morbidity of surgical oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients consecutively admitted to intensive care units (ICU) of three centres for postoperative care of oncologic surgeries between March to June 2019 (first phase) and March to June 2020 (second phase). The primary outcome was cumulative 28-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative organic dysfunction and the incidence of clinical complications. Because of the possibility of imbalance between groups, adjusted analyses were performed: Cox proportional hazards model (primary outcome) and multiple logistic regression model (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: After screening 328 patients, 291 were included. The proportional hazard of cumulative 28-day mortality was higher in the second phase than that in the first phase in the Cox model, with the adjusted hazard ratio of 4.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-8.82). The adjusted incidences of respiratory complications (odds ratio [OR] 5.35; 95% CI 1.42-20.11) and pulmonary infections (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.17) were higher in the second phase. However, the adjusted incidence of other infections was lower in the second phase (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical oncology patients who underwent postoperative care in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher hazard of 28-day mortality. Furthermore, these patients had higher odds of respiratory complications and pulmonary infections. Trials registration The study is registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under the code RBR-8ygjpqm, UTN code U1111-1293-5414.

Characteristics of critically ill patients with cancer associated with intensivist's perception of inappropriateness of ICU admission: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Although admitting cancer patients to the ICU is no longer an issue, it may be valuable to identify patients perceived least likely to benefit from admission. Our objective was to investigate factors associated with potentially inappropriate ICU admission. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer with unplanned ICU admission. We classified admissions as appropriate or potentially inappropriate according to Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines. We used logistic regression model to assess factors associated with inappropriateness for ICU admission. RESULTS: From 3384 patients, 663 (19.6%) were classified as potentially inappropriate. They received more invasive mechanical ventilation (25.3% vs 12.5%, P < 0.001) and vasopressors (34.4% vs 30.1%, P = 0.034), had higher ICU [3 (2,6) vs 2 (1,4), P < 0.001] length-of-stay, higher ICU (32.7% vs 8.4%, P < 0.001), hospital (71.9% vs 21.3%, P < 0.001), and one-year mortality (97.6% vs 54.7%, P < 0.001) compared with those considered appropriate. Performance status impairment, more severe organ dysfunctions at admission, metastatic disease, and source of ICU admission were the characteristics associated with intensivist's perception of inappropriateness of ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may help guide ICU admission policies and triage criteria for end-of-life discussions among hospitalized patients with cancer.

High-value care for critically ill oncohematological patients: what do we know thus far?

The number of patients with cancer requiring intensive care unit admission is increasing around the world. The improvement in the pathophysiological understanding of this group of patients, as well as the increasingly better and more targeted treatment options for their underlying disease, has led to a significant increase in their survival over the past three decades. Within the organizational concepts, it is necessary to know what adds value in the care of critical oncohematological patients. Practices in medicine that do not benefit patients and possibly cause harm are called low-value practices, while high-value practices are defined as high-quality care at relatively low cost. In this article, we discuss ten domains with high-value evidence in the care of cancer patients: (1) intensive care unit admission policies; (2) intensive care unit organization; (3) etiological investigation of hypoxemia; (4) management of acute respiratory failure; (5) management of febrile neutropenia; (6) urgent chemotherapy treatment in critically ill patients; (7) patient and family experience; (8) palliative care; (9) care of intensive care unit staff; and (10) long-term impact of critical disease on the cancer population. The disclosure of such policies is expected to have the potential to change health care standards. We understand that it is a lengthy process, and initiatives such as this paper are one of the first steps in raising awareness and beginning a discussion about high-value care in various health scenarios.

Long-term mortality of critically ill patients with cancer and delirium who survived to discharge: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Delirium is common in critically ill patients and has been associated with lower short-term survival; however, its association with long-term survival has been scarcely evaluated and few studies have shown divergent results. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and discharged from hospital from January 2015 to December 2018. We considered delirium present if the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) result was positive. We assessed the association between delirium during ICU stay and long-term mortality (up to three years after discharge). We also assessed the association between delirium type (hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed) with long-term mortality. RESULTS: We included 3,079 patients. Of these, 430 (14%) were considered delirious at some point during their ICU stay. Delirium was associated with one-year mortality after hospital discharge (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 1.83) after adjustment for potential confounders, but not with one to three year-mortality (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.39). Hypoactive and mixed delirium were associated with one-year mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.46 to 2.14 and HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.00, respectively), but none of the delirium motor types was associated with one to three-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that delirium during ICU stay was associated with increased one-year mortality, but was not with mortality after one year. This association was observed in hypoactive and mixed delirium types but not with hyperactive delirium.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le delirium est fréquent chez la patientèle gravement malade et a été associé à une survie réduite à court terme; son association avec la survie à long terme n'a cependant que très peu été évaluée et les rares études ont affiché des résultats divergents. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective de patient·es adultes atteint·es de cancer admis·es à l'unité de soins intensifs (USI) et ayant reçu leur congé de l'hôpital entre janvier 2015 et décembre 2018. Nous avons considéré qu'un delirium était présent si le résultat de la Méthode d'évaluation de la confusion pour l'unité de soins intensifs (CAM-USI) était positif. Nous avons évalué l'association entre le delirium pendant le séjour aux soins intensifs et la mortalité à long terme (jusqu'à trois ans après le congé). Nous avons également évalué l'association entre le type de delirium (hypoactif, hyperactif et mixte) et la mortalité à long terme. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 3079 patient·es. De ce nombre, 430 (14 %) personnes ont été considérées comme en delirium à un moment donné pendant leur séjour à l'USI. Le delirium était associé à la mortalité à un an après le congé de l'hôpital (rapport de risque [RR], 1,58; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95%, 1,36 à 1,83) et après ajustement des données pour tenir compte des facteurs de confusion potentiels, mais pas à la mortalité d'un à trois ans après le congé (RR, 0,92; IC 95%, 0,61 à 1,39). Les deliriums hypoactif et mixte étaient associés à la mortalité à un an (RR, 1,77; IC 95 %, 1,46 à 2,14 et RR, 1,56; IC 95 %, 1,21 à 2,00, respectivement), mais aucun des types moteurs de delirium n'était associé à la mortalité d'un à trois ans. CONCLUSION: Nous avons observé qu'un delirium pendant le séjour à l'USI était associé à une augmentation de la mortalité à un an, mais pas à la mortalité après un an. Cette association a été observée dans les types de delirium hypoactif et mixte, mais pas avec le type hyperactif.

Attributable mortality due to nosocomial sepsis in Brazilian hospitals: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial sepsis is a major healthcare issue, but there are few data on estimates of its attributable mortality. We aimed to estimate attributable mortality fraction (AF) due to nosocomial sepsis. METHODS: Matched 1:1 case-control study in 37 hospitals in Brazil. Hospitalized patients in participating hospitals were included. Cases were hospital non-survivors and controls were hospital survivors, which were matched by admission type and date of discharge. Exposure was defined as occurrence of nosocomial sepsis, defined as antibiotic prescription plus presence of organ dysfunction attributed to sepsis without an alternative reason for organ failure; alternative definitions were explored. Main outcome measurement was nosocomial sepsis-attributable fractions, estimated using inversed-weight probabilities methods using generalized mixed model considering time-dependency of sepsis occurrence. RESULTS: 3588 patients from 37 hospitals were included. Mean age was 63 years and 48.8% were female at birth. 470 sepsis episodes occurred in 388 patients (311 in cases and 77 in control group), with pneumonia being the most common source of infection (44.3%). Average AF for sepsis mortality was 0.076 (95% CI 0.068-0.084) for medical admissions; 0.043 (95% CI 0.032-0.055) for elective surgical admissions; and 0.036 (95% CI 0.017-0.055) for emergency surgeries. In a time-dependent analysis, AF for sepsis rose linearly for medical admissions, reaching close to 0.12 on day 28; AF plateaued earlier for other admission types (0.04 for elective surgery and 0.07 for urgent surgery). Alternative sepsis definitions yield different estimates. CONCLUSION: The impact of nosocomial sepsis on outcome is more pronounced in medical admissions and tends to increase over time. The results, however, are sensitive to sepsis definitions.

Association of appropriateness for ICU admission with resource use, organ support and long-term survival in critically ill cancer patients.

We aimed to evaluate the characteristics, resource use and outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer according to appropriateness of ICU admission. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer admitted to ICU from January 2017 to December 2018. Patients were classified as appropriate, potentially inappropriate, or inappropriate for ICU admission according to the Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were one-year, ICU, and hospital mortality, hospital LOS and utilization of ICU organ support. We used logistic regression and competing risk models accounting for relevant confounders in primary outcome analyses. From 6700 admitted patients, 5803 (86.6%) were classified as appropriate, 683 (10.2%) as potentially inappropriate and 214 (3.2%) as inappropriate for ICU admission. Potentially inappropriate and inappropriate ICU admissions had lower likelihood of being discharged from the ICU than patients with appropriate ICU admission (sHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49-0.61 and sHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.81, respectively), and were associated with higher 1-year mortality (OR 6.39, 95% CI 5.60-7.29 and OR 11.12, 95% CI 8.33-14.83, respectively). Among patients with appropriate, potentially inappropriate, and inappropriate ICU admissions, ICU mortality was 4.8%, 32.6% and 35.0%, and in-hospital mortality was 12.2%, 71.6% and 81.3%, respectively (p < 0.01). Use of organ support was more common and longer among patients with potentially inappropriate ICU admission. The findings of our study suggest that inappropriateness for ICU admission among patients with cancer was associated with higher resource use in ICU and higher one-year mortality among ICU survivors.

Short-term survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer admitted to intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Little is known about the outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to medical complications. We designed a study to evaluate their short-term (30-day) survival, predictors of short-term survival and chances of additional chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed all patients with advanced (stage III or IV) pancreatic adenocarcinoma admitted to an ICU in a dedicated Brazilian cancer centre from 2009 to 2018 due to medical reasons. We fitted multivariate regression models to identify predictors of 30-day survival and additional systemic chemotherapy. Results: The study population consisted of 171 patients. Ninety-four patients (55.0%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2-4 and 146 (85.4%) had metastatic disease. Most patients (N = 75; 43.9%) were admitted to the ICU during first-line treatment. Median overall survival was 32 days (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 20-49). Survival rate at 30 days was 50.6%. ECOG performance status 2-4 was the only variable associated with lower probability of survival at 30 days in multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.54; p < 0.001). Overall, 58 patients (33.9%) received additional chemotherapy and among all patients, 13.5% experienced clinical benefit from this treatment. Conclusion: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer admitted to the ICU for medical reasons have a dismal prognosis. Early palliative care and refined tools to establish those who would benefit from an ICU trial could help improve patients' care.

Organizational factors associated with adherence to low tidal volume ventilation: a secondary analysis of the CHECKLIST-ICU database.

BACKGROUND: Survival benefit from low tidal volume (VT) ventilation (LTVV) has been demonstrated for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and patients not having ARDS could also benefit from this strategy. Organizational factors may play a role on adherence to LTVV. The present study aimed to identify organizational factors with an independent association with adherence to LTVV. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the database of a multicenter two-phase study (prospective cohort followed by a cluster-randomized trial) performed in 118 Brazilian intensive care units. Patients under mechanical ventilation at day 2 were included. LTVV was defined as a VT ≤ 8 ml/kg PBW on the second day of ventilation. Data on the type and number of beds of the hospital, teaching status, nursing, respiratory therapists and physician staffing, use of structured checklist, and presence of protocols were tested. A multivariable mixed-effect model was used to assess the association between organizational factors and adherence to LTVV. RESULTS: The study included 5719 patients; 3340 (58%) patients received LTVV. A greater number of hospital beds (absolute difference 7.43% [95% confidence interval 0.61-14.24%]; p = 0.038), use of structured checklist during multidisciplinary rounds (5.10% [0.55-9.81%]; p = 0.030), and presence of at least one nurse per 10 patients during all shifts (17.24% [0.85-33.60%]; p = 0.045) were the only three factors that had an independent association with adherence to LTVV. CONCLUSIONS: Number of hospital beds, use of a structured checklist during multidisciplinary rounds, and nurse staffing are organizational factors associated with adherence to LTVV. These findings shed light on organizational factors that may improve ventilation in critically ill patients.

Procalcitonin Clearance at 24, 48, 72, and 96 Hours and Mortality in Patients With Cancer and Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have evaluated procalcitonin clearance (PCTc) as a marker of sepsis severity but at different time points and cutoffs. We aimed to assess the predictive performance of PCTc at different time points of sepsis management in patients with cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with cancer admitted to an intensive care unit between 2013 and 2016. We calculated PCTc at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after admission. Its predictive performance for hospital and 90-day mortality was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves (AUCs). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for different time points using different cutoffs. RESULTS: We included 301 patients. Areas under the curves ranged from 0.62 for PCTc at 24 hours to 0.68 for PCTc at 72 and 96 hours for hospital mortality prediction, and from 0.61 for PCTc at 24 hours to 0.68 for PCTc at 72 hours for 90-day mortality prediction. For hospital mortality prediction, PCTc at 72 hours ≤80% showed the best sensitivity (96.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.8%-98.7%), and PCTc at 96 hours ≤50% showed the best specificity (70.7%; 95% CI: 54.5%-83.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin clearance at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours poorly predicted hospital and 90-day mortality. Therefore, daily PCT measurement should not be used to predict mortality for patients with cancer and sepsis.

Oncologists' and Intensivists' Attitudes Toward the Care of Critically Ill Patients with Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer represent an important proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Oncologists and intensivists have distinct knowledge backgrounds, and conflicts about the appropriate management of these patients may emerge. METHODS: We surveyed oncologists and intensivists at 2 academic cancer centers regarding their management of 2 hypothetical patients with different cancer types (metastatic pancreatic cancer and metastatic breast cancer with positive receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and HER-2) who develop septic shock and multiple organ failure. RESULTS: Sixty intensivists and 46 oncologists responded to the survey. Oncologists and intensivists similarly favored withdrawal of life support measures for the patient with pancreatic cancer (33/46 [72%] vs 48/60 [80%], P = .45). On the other hand, intensivists favored more withdrawal of life support measures for the patient with breast cancer compared to oncologists (32/59 [54%] vs 9/44 [21%], P < .001). In the multinomial logistic regression, the oncology specialists were more likely to advocate for a full-code status for the patient with breast cancer (OR = 5.931; CI 95%, 1.762-19.956; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Oncologists and intensivists share different views regarding life support measures in critically ill patients with cancer. Oncologists tend to focus on the cancer characteristics, whereas intensivists focus on multiple organ failure when weighing in on the same decisions. Regular meetings between oncologists and intensivists may reduce possible conflicts regarding the critical care of patients with cancer.

Very Transient Cases of Acute Kidney Injury in the Early Postoperative Period After Cardiac Surgery: The Relevance of More Frequent Serum Creatinine Assessment and Concomitant Urinary Biochemistry Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if more frequent serum creatinine (sCr) measurements in the early postoperative period (first 48 hours) after cardiac surgery would help in early diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI), as well as reveal cases of AKI duration of fewer than 24 hours (vtAKI). The sequential blood and urinary biochemical profile of patients who developed vtAKI was compared with that of the patients who did not develop AKI or who developed AKI for more than 48 hours (pAKI). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Two intensive care units of 2 private hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine patients who underwent cardiac surgery who had 6 values of serum creatinine (sCr) measured within the first 48 hours after surgery and concomitant spot urine samples for urine biochemistry assessment. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen patients (62%) developed Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) sCr-based AKI, half of them for fewer than 24 hours. Most AKI patients had the sCr increase diagnosed 6 to 12 hours after surgery. When comparing the sequential alterations of blood and urinary parameters among patients with no AKI, vtAKI, and pAKI, the authors found that most of them were similar among groups, differing only in magnitude and duration. CONCLUSIONS: More frequent sCr measurements in the early postoperative period, together with urine biochemistry assessment, have the potential to anticipate AKI diagnosis after cardiac surgery and reveal cases of very transient AKI usually not diagnosed in current practice. The clinical relevance of these findings must be evaluated in larger, prospective studies.

ICU physicians are unable to accurately predict length of stay at admission: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of prediction of intensive care unit length of stay made by physicians at patient admission. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Three medical-surgical intensive care units in an oncology hospital. PATIENTS: All patients admitted between January and December 2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay was estimated by the physicians responsible for patient admission and categorized as <48 h, 2-5 days or more than 5 days. Agreement between predicted and actual intensive care unit length of stay was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 2955 patients were admitted during the study period. Physicians accurately predicted ICU length of stay in 1557 (52.7%) admissions. ICU length of stay was underestimated in 864 (29.2%) and overestimated in 534 (18.1%) cases. Agreement between predicted and actual intensive care unit length of stay was poor (Kappa = 0.22) and not associated with physician characteristics. Predictions of an intensive care unit length of stay of >5 days were significantly less accurate than those of <48 h and of 2-5 days (31.1, 59.8 and 53.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The intensive care unit length of stay prediction in these oncological intensive care units is inaccurate and, ideally, should not be made at admission.

Constipation in intensive care unit: incidence and risk factors.

PURPOSE: Although gastrointestinal motility disorders are common in critically ill patients, constipation and its implications have received very little attention. We aimed to determine the incidence of constipation to find risk factors and its implications in critically ill patients MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 6-month period, we enrolled all patients admitted to an intensive care unit from an universitary hospital who stayed 3 or more days. Patients submitted to bowel surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Constipation occurred in 69.9% of the patients. There was no difference between constipated and not constipated in terms of sex, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, type of admission (surgical, clinical, or trauma), opiate use, antibiotic therapy, and mechanical ventilation. Early (<24 hours) enteral nutrition was associated with less constipation, a finding that persisted at multivariable analysis (P < .01). Constipation was not associated with greater intensive care unit or mortality, length of stay, or days free from mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation is very common among critically ill patients. Early enteral nutrition is associated with earlier return of bowel function.