The state of art of awake craniotomy in Latin American countries: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Awake craniotomy (AC) is a valuable technique for surgical interventions in eloquent areas, but its adoption in low- and middle-income countries faces challenges like limited infrastructure, trained personnel shortage, and inadequate funding. This scoping review explores AC techniques in Latin American countries, focusing on patient characteristics, tumor location, symptomatology, and outcomes. METHODS: A scoping review followed PRISMA guidelines, searching five databases in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. We included 28 studies with 258 patients (mean age: 43, range: 11-92). Patterns in AC use in Latin America were analyzed. RESULTS: Most studies were from Brazil and Mexico (53.6%) and public institutions (70%). Low-grade gliomas were the most common lesions (55%), most of them located in the left hemisphere (52.3%) and frontal lobe (52.3%). Gross-total resection was achieved in 34.3% of cases. 62.9% used an Asleep-Awake-Asleep protocol, and 14.8% used Awake-Awake-Awake. The main complication was seizures (14.6%). Mean post-surgery discharge time was 68 h. Challenges included limited training, infrastructure, and instrumentation availability. Strategies discussed involve training in specialized centers, seeking sponsorships, applying for awards, and multidisciplinary collaborations with neuropsychology. CONCLUSION: Improved accessibility to resources, infrastructure, and adequate instrumentation is crucial for wider AC availability in Latin America. Despite disparities, AC implementation with proper training and teamwork yields favorable outcomes in resource-limited centers. Efforts should focus on addressing challenges and promoting equitable access to this valuable surgical technique in the region.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Ki-67, Dopamine D1 and Dopamine D2 Receptors in Meningiomas in a Tertiary Institution in Mexico.

Objectives Meningiomas (MNGs) are the most common intracranial tumors found in the adult population. While most intracranial MNGs may be surgically removed, a subset of patients remains ineligible for conventional treatment. This is either because of a lack of surgical access or due to atypical, anaplastic or invasive characteristics of the tumors. These patients may benefit from targeted therapies that focus on cell receptor expression. The aim of this study was to assess dopamine receptor (DR) and Ki-67 expression in the MGNs of patients treated with surgery in the Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Mexico. Materials and methods This study analyzed 23 patients with confirmed MNG diagnoses (10 female and 13 male (mean age: 44.5 years)) who had undergone surgical resection between 2010 and 2014 at our institution. In the collected samples, we performed analyses for Ki-67, Dopamine 1 and Dopamine 2 receptors' expression. Results For the markers Ki-67, DR-D1 and DR-D2, the mean percentual expressions were 18.9%, 23.02% and 8.33%. No significant correlation was found between the expressions of these receptors and the studied MNG characteristics. The expression index of Ki-67 showed a significant relation with mean age (p = 0.03) and prolactin levels (p = 0.02). Conclusions Samples showed varied expressions of the studied receptors. Despite the difference in expressions between the markers, more studies are needed to confirm the findings. In contrast to previous studies, we could not find any relationship between D2-R and tumor characteristics.

Following the light in glioma surgery: a comparison of sodium fluorescein and 5-aminolevulinic acid as surgical adjuncts in glioma resection.

Gliomas are molecularly complex neoplasms and require a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Maximal safe resection is often the initial goal of treatment and extent of resection (EOR) is an important prognostic factor correlating with both progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Postoperative patient outcome is also a critical and independent prognosticator and high EOR must not be achieved at the expense of good functional outcome. Several intraoperative adjuvant techniques have been developed to help the surgeon push the boundaries of EOR while maintaining safety. Fluorescence-guided surgery for brain tumors is a contemporary adjuvant technique that allows for intraoperative delineation of diseased and normal brain thus improving maximal safe resection. The most extensively used fluorophores are 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and sodium fluorescein (SFL). These fluorophores have different spectrophotometric properties, mechanisms of action and considerations for use. Both have demonstrated utility in neurosurgical oncology. They are safe and both are FDA approved for use as surgical adjuncts during resection of primary CNS neoplasms although they have been used with varying success for other tumor types. When combined with other surgical adjuvant strategies such as neuronavigation, intraoperative ultrasound, intraoperative MRI, awake resection and/or electrophysiological mapping/monitoring, fluorescence-guided resection appears to further improve resection quality in regard to EOR and safety. In this article, we review the current knowledge related to both fluorophores for brain tumor resection, their benefits, and pitfalls, as well as the major advantages associated with their use. We also briefly review additional fluorophores in early clinical development. Fluorescence-guided surgery is a novel surgical adjuvant which allows for real-time delineation of neoplastic tissues. The most widely used fluorophores are 5-ALA and SFL. They are safe compounds and there is a large body of evidence suggesting improvement in EOR when these are employed. There are nuances to the use of each; the fluorescence intensity is dose-dependent in either case and the sensitivity and specificity for various tumors vary widely. Additional prospective studies will be necessary to parse the impact of this technique and these fluorophores on survival metrics.