Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Health Psychol ; 43(4): 310-322, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127508

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an online multicomponent intervention called FATIGUEWALK (FaW) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). METHOD: FaW included pain neuroscience education, therapeutic exercise, cognitive restructuring, and mindfulness training. A total of 428 patients with CFS/ME were randomized into two study arms: online FaW plus TAU versus TAU alone. A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted. Validated patient-reported outcome measures of fatigue, pain, anxiety, depression, and physical function were collected at baseline and posttreatment, following the FaW intervention, which lasted 12 weeks. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements (with small-to-moderate effect sizes) were observed in online FaW versus TAU alone with respect to multidimensional aspects of fatigue (Cohen's d ranging from 0.25 to 0.73) and most secondary outcomes (pain and fatigue intensity, depressive and anxious symptomatology, functional impairment, kinesiophobia, physical functioning). The absolute risk reduction in FaW versus TAU was 19%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [12.19, 25.80] with number needed to treat = 6, 95% CI [3.9, 8.2]. Overall, similar clinical improvements were observed in sensitivity analyses including a subgroup of patients without comorbidity with fibromyalgia (n = 70). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the short-term effectiveness of an online multicomponent intervention added to TAU, compared to TAU alone, for the management of CFS/ME. Further trials, including active control groups with an equivalent treatment dose, and assessing the long-term effectiveness of the online FaW, are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Humanos , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Depresión/terapia , Dolor
2.
Neurophysiol Clin ; 53(4): 102841, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716611

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate pain thresholds, impairment of the endogenous pain modulatory system, and self-reported cognitive-emotional and central sensitization-related symptoms among three subject groups: a rarely studied patient cohort with neuropathic pain from lumbosacral radiculopathy (NPLSR), patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Patient-reported pain-related symptomology was evaluated with psychometricallyvalidated questionnaires. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), heat pain threshold (HPT), and cold pain threshold (CPT) were assessed in the low back and contralateral forearm. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was evaluated with a recently introduced methodology that accounts for a standard error of measurement. RESULTS: Compared to the HC subjects, the FM and NPLSR subjects had significantly lower pain thresholds and more CPM impairment. No significant differences in PPT and CPM were observed between the FM and NPLSR groups. Significant group differences were found in self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and central sensitization. Self-reported symptom severity increased in a stair-step fashion, with the HC group scoring lowest and FM group scoring highest. CONCLUSION: The NPLSR group manifested CPM dysfunction and pressure hyperalgesia at similar levels to the FM group, indicating that these two chronic pain syndromes, likely based on different pathophysiological mechanisms, in fact share some common pain processing features. However, though both patient groups demonstrated similarities in pain processing, self-reported cognitive-emotional and central sensitization-related symptom severity was significantly higher in the FM cohort, which distinguished them from the chronic NPLSR cohort.

3.
Front Physiol ; 13: 1046613, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36452042

RESUMEN

Introduction: The On&Out study is aimed at assessing the effectiveness, cost-utility and physiological underpinnings of the FIBROWALK multicomponent intervention conducted in two different settings: online (FIBRO-On) or outdoors (FIBRO-Out). Both interventions have proved to be efficacious in the short-term but there is no study assessing their comparative effectiveness nor their long-term effects. For the first time, this study will also evaluate the cost-utility (6-month time-horizon) and the effects on immune-inflammatory biomarkers and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) levels of both interventions. The objectives of this 6-month, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) are 1) to examine the effectiveness and cost-utility of adding FIBRO-On or FIBRO-Out to Treatment-As-Usual (TAU) for individuals with fibromyalgia (FM); 2) to identify pre-post differences in blood biomarker levels in the three study arms and 3) to analyze the role of process variables as mediators of 6-month follow-up clinical outcomes. Methods and analysis: Participants will be 225 individuals with FM recruited at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (Barcelona, Spain), randomly allocated to one of the three study arms: TAU vs. TAU + FIBRO-On vs. TAU + FIBRO-Out. A comprehensive assessment to collect functional impairment, pain, fatigue, depressive and anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, central sensitization, physical function, sleep quality, perceived cognitive dysfunction, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, psychological inflexibility in pain and pain knowledge will be conducted pre-intervention, at 6 weeks, post-intervention (12 weeks), and at 6-month follow-up. Changes in immune-inflammatory biomarkers [i.e., IL-6, CXCL8, IL-17A, IL-4, IL-10, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor will be evaluated in 40 participants in each treatment arm (total n = 120) at pre- and post-treatment. Quality of life and direct and indirect costs will be evaluated at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Linear mixed-effects regression models using restricted maximum likelihood, mediational models and a full economic evaluation applying bootstrapping techniques, acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses will be computed. Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research. The results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, social media and various community engagement activities. Trial registration number NCT05377567 (clinicaltrials.gov).

4.
Behav Res Ther ; 158: 104188, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36116229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of two video-based multicomponent programs (FIBROWALK) and the Multicomponent Physiotherapy Program (MPP) for patients with fibromyalgia (FM) compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU) only. We posit that FIBROWALK, due to inclusion of specific psychological ingredients (cognitive restructuring and mindfulness), can produce additional clinical benefits when compared to TAU or MPP alone. METHODS: A total of 330 patients with FM were recruited and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to TAU only, TAU + FIBROWALK, or TAU + MPP. FIBROWALK and MPP consisted of weekly videos on pain neuroscience education, therapeutic exercise and self-management patient education, but only the FIBROWALK intervention provided cognitive restructuring and mindfulness. Both programs were structurally equivalent. Between-group differences in functional impairment, pain, kinesiophobia, anxious-depressive symptoms and physical functioning were evaluated at post-treatment following Intention-To-Treat and complete-case approaches. RESULTS: Compared to TAU only, individuals in the FIBROWALK arm showed larger improvements in all clinical outcomes; similarly, participants in the MPP program also showed greater improvements in functional impairment, perceived pain, kinesiophobia, depressive symptoms compared to TAU only. The FIBROWALK intervention showed superior effects in improving pain, anxiety and depressive symptoms and physical functioning compared to MPP. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT supports the short-term effectiveness of the video-based multicomponent programs FIBROWALK and MPP for FM and provides evidence that cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based techniques can be clinically useful in the context of physiotherapeutic multicomponent treatment programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04571528.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia , Atención Plena , Ansiedad , Reestructuración Cognitiva , Fibromialgia/psicología , Fibromialgia/terapia , Humanos , Atención Plena/métodos , Dolor , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Arch Rheumatol ; 36(4): 518-526, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35382371

RESUMEN

Objectives: The aim of this study was to translate the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) into the Turkish language, to perform a psychometric validation, and to investigate its reliability in patients with chronic spinal pain with an organic origin, patients with fibromyalgia, and pain-free control individuals. Patients and methods: Between April 2016 and February 2017, the translation of the original English version of the CSI into Turkish was performed using the forward-backward translation method. A total of 100 fibromyalgia patients (6 males, 94 females; mean age: 45.0±8.4 years; range, 25 to 60 years), 100 patients with chronic spinal pain with an identified organic origin (CSPO), (10 males, 90 females; mean age: 43.8±9.7 years; range, 21 to 60 years), and 100 healthy controls (8 males, 92 females; mean age: 35.8±10.1 years; range, 25 to 55 years) were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were collected. Test-retest reliability was determined by re-administering the CSI-Turkish (CSI-Turk) two weeks after the first application. Results: The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was found to be 0.92 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93. Patients with fibromyalgia, a very common central sensitivity syndrome (CSS), had the highest mean CSI-Turk scores, and healthy controls had the lowest. Using the recommended cut-off score of 40 resulted in 87% sensitivity and 90% specificity in distinguishing between fibromyalgia and control individuals. Conclusion: This study suggests that the CSI-Turk can be effectively used as a screening tool to elucidate CS-related symptomology among patients with chronic pain with a high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.

6.
Pain Med ; 21(11): 2958-2963, 2020 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32232473

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders (CMPDs) are among the leading causes of disabilities across populations, resulting in high social and financial burden. This persistent pain condition may include the central sensitization (CS) phenomenon, which implies a wide range of symptoms and that may be taken into account in CMPD treatment. CS symptoms can be measured by the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). The aims of the study were to describe CS symptoms in patients suffering from several CMPDs and to analyze differences due to gender, age, and body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: This cross-sectional study recruited a total of 395 Spanish participants suffering from several CMPDs. SETTING: CS symptoms were measured with the Spanish Version of the CSI. The total score (0-100) and a cutoff score of 40 were recorded. SUBJECTS: A total of 395 participants were included. RESULTS: The mean CSI total score for the whole sample was 24.6 ± 12.0 points. CSI total score had subclinical values in the whole sample, whereas participants with scores >40 were found across different CMPDs, such as low back pain (37.8%) and neck pain (32.4%); 14.6% of females and 1.7% of males presented CSI scores >40. Patients showed significant differences in CSI cutoff point by gender (P = 0.010) and CSI total score by age (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Given the high prevalence of clinically relevant CSI scores (>40) in people with a CMPD, especially low back pain and neck pain, we recommend that clinicians supplement their assessment with the CSI for improved decision-making during treatment.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Pain Pract ; 20(7): 724-736, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32285543

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to explore additional evidence of validity of the Serbian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), a patient-reported outcome measure of symptoms that have been found to be associated with central sensitization (CS). The CSI has been found to be psychometrically sound, and has demonstrated evidence of convergent and discriminant validity in numerous published studies and in multiple languages. METHODS: CSI data were collected from 399 patients with chronic pain who had various diagnoses and from 146 pain-free controls. In addition, the patient sample completed a battery of validated patient-reported outcome measures of sleep problems, cognitive problems, pain catastrophizing, pain-related fear-avoidance, decreased quality of life, and decreased perception of social support. Six patient subgroups were formed, with presumably different levels of CS (including those with fibromyalgia, multiple pain sites, and localized pain sites). RESULTS: Significant differences were found in total CSI scores among the controls and patient subgroups. Those with fibromyalgia and multiple pathologies scored highest and the control subjects scored lowest. Other patient-reported CS-related symptom dimensions were significantly correlated with total CSI scores. When the patients were divided into CSI severity subgroups (from subclinical to extreme), the severity of these other symptom dimensions increased with the severity of CSI scores. CONCLUSIONS: The current study successfully demonstrated additional evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Serbian version of the CSI.


Asunto(s)
Catastrofización/diagnóstico , Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Psicometría/instrumentación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Serbia , Traducción
8.
Pain Pract ; 20(2): 188-196, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31605651

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies support the opinion that central sensitization (CS) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of many chronic pain conditions. CS refers to hyperexcitability of the central nervous system, which can result in pain hypersensitivity and other somatosensory symptoms. Recognition of CS-related symptomology is crucial in chronic pain evaluation and rehabilitation. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was created to evaluate symptoms that have been found to be associated with CS. The aim of the current study was the cross-cultural adaptation of the CSI into Greek (CSI-Gr). METHODS: To evaluate discriminate validity, 200 patients with chronic pain and 50 healthy control subjects participated. The sample was divided into 4 diagnostic groups (fibromyalgia, single pain complaints, multiple pain complaints, and a control group) and into 5 CSI severity subgroups, from subclinical to extreme. Convergent validity was determined by evaluation of the relationship between the CSI-Gr and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Additionally, 30 patients completed the CSI a second time for the purpose of a test/retest analysis. RESULTS: The results showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.994) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.993). The standard error of measurement was 2.1. The CSI-Gr correlated moderately with the PCS (r = 0.68). Statistically significant differences were found among the 3 comparison groups, with patients who had fibromyalgia reporting the highest CSI severity and healthy control subjects reporting the lowest severity. CONCLUSIONS: As determined in the present study, the CSI-Gr was found to be a reliable and valid tool for recognition of CS-related symptomology.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etnología , Comparación Transcultural , Dimensión del Dolor/normas , Psicometría/normas , Adulto , Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiología , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/etnología , Grecia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Psicometría/métodos , Distribución Aleatoria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto Joven
9.
Pain Pract ; 18(4): 463-472, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28777895

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It has been increasingly recognized that many chronic pain conditions are associated with central sensitization (CS). The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a potentially useful tool for screening patients whose presenting symptoms are suspected of being related to CS, so that additional diagnostic evaluation can be performed and appropriate treatment can be initiated. The original English version is currently not available in Serbian. METHODS: The CSI was translated into Serbian (CSI-Serb) and then psychometrically evaluated in a sample of 363 chronic pain subjects. RESULTS: The CSI-Serb showed a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.909), excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient type 2.1 = 0.947), and a significant goodness of fit test result (χ2  = 888.44; P < 0.001). A factor analysis confirmed a 4-factor solution, as found by the original authors of the CSI, with all items retained. Higher CSI-Serb scores were associated with higher pain severity and longer pain duration. Total CSI scores distinguished between 3 subject groups with presumably different levels of CS, including fibromyalgia (53.3, SD = 11.2), chronic regional pain only (29.7, SD = 11.6), and a pain-free control group (20.9, SD = 9.1). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate strong psychometric properties, including evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, of the CSI-Serb. These results correspond with those of other translated versions of the CSI that have been psychometrically evaluated and published. Due to the current interest in CS, and its relationship with many chronic pain conditions, it is anticipated that the CSI-Serb will benefit Serbian-speaking clinicians in the evaluation of patients with chronic pain conditions.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Psicometría/instrumentación , Adulto , Comparación Transcultural , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Serbia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducción , Adulto Joven
10.
Clin J Pain ; 33(12): 1088-1099, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28328697

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical validity and factor structure of the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS), a new fear-avoidance measure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 426 chronic musculoskeletal pain disorder patients were admitted to a Functional Restoration Program (FRP). They were categorized into 5 FACS severity levels, from subclinical to extreme, at admission, and again at discharge. Associations with objective lifting performance and other patient-reported psychosocial measures were determined at admission and discharge, and objective work outcomes for this predominantly disabled cohort, were assessed 1 year later. RESULTS: Those patients in the severe and extreme FACS severity groups at admission were more likely to "drop out" of treatment than those in the lower severity groups (P=0.05). At both admission and discharge, the FACS severity groups were highly and inversely correlated with objective lifting performance and patient-reported fear-avoidance-related psychosocial variables, including kinesiophobia, pain intensity, depressive symptoms, perceived disability, perceived injustice, and insomnia (Ps<0.001). All variables showed improvement at FRP discharge. Patients in the extreme FACS severity group at discharge were less likely to return to, or retain, work 1 year later (P≤0.02). A factor analysis identified a 2-factor solution. DISCUSSION: Strong associations were found among FACS scores and other patient-reported psychosocial and objective lifting performance variables at both admission and discharge. High discharge-FACS scores were associated with worse work outcomes 1 year after discharge. The FACS seems to be a valid and clinically useful measure for predicting attendance, physical performance, distress, and relevant work outcomes in FRP treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain disorder patients.


Asunto(s)
Reacción de Prevención , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Miedo , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/psicología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Depresión , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Admisión del Paciente , Alta del Paciente , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Reinserción al Trabajo , Autoimagen , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Pain Pract ; 17(2): 166-175, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26989894

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to create and validate severity levels for the central sensitization inventory (CSI), a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome instrument designed to identify patients whose presenting symptoms may be related to a central sensitivity syndrome (CSS; eg, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome), with a proposed common etiology of central sensitization (CS). METHODS: Based on CSI score means and standard deviations from previously published subject samples, the following CSI severity levels were established: subclinical = 0 to 29; mild = 30 to 39; moderate = 40 to 49; severe = 50 to 59; and extreme = 60 to 100. The concurrent validity of the CSI severity levels was then confirmed in a separate chronic pain patient sample (58% with a CSS diagnosis and 42% without) by demonstrating associations between CSI scores and (1) the number of physician-diagnosed CSSs; (2) CSI score distributions in both CSS and non-CSS patient samples; (3) patient-reported history of CSSs; and (4) patient-reported psychosocial measures, which are known to be associated with CSSs. RESULTS: Compared to the non-CSS patient subsample, the score distribution of the CSS patient subsample was skewed toward the higher severity ranges. CSI mean scores moved into higher severity levels as the number of individual CSS diagnoses increased. Patients who scored in the extreme CSI severity level were more likely to report previous diagnoses of fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, tension/migraine headaches, and anxiety or panic attacks (P < 0.01). CSI severity levels were also associated with patient-reported depressive symptoms, perceived disability, sleep disturbance, and pain intensity (P ≤ 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study provides support for these CSI severity levels as a guideline for healthcare providers and researchers in interpreting CSI scores and evaluating treatment responsiveness.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Manejo del Dolor/instrumentación , Dimensión del Dolor/instrumentación , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/psicología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/psicología , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/psicología , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/psicología , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Pánico/psicología , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Pain Pract ; 16(2): 168-74, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25565481

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The patient health questionnaire (PHQ) is designed for screening psychopathology in primary care settings. However, little is known about its clinical utility in other chronic pain populations, which usually have high psychiatric comorbidities. DESIGN: A consecutive cohort of 546 patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder (CDOMD) was administered and compared upon psychosocial assessments, including the PHQ and a structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Four PHQ modules were assessed: major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder (PD), and alcohol use disorders (AUD) [including both alcohol abuse and dependence]. Based on the SCID diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity were determined. RESULTS: The specificity of the PHQ ranged from moderate to high for all 4 PHQ modules (MDD, 0.79; GAD, 0.67; PD, 0.89; AUD, 0.97). However, the sensitivity was relatively low: MDD (0.58); GAD (0.61); PD (0.49); and AUD (0.24). The PHQ was also associated with psychosocial variables. Patients whose PHQ showed MDD, GAD, or PD reported significantly more depressive symptoms and perceived disability than patients who did not (Ps < 0.001). Patients with MDD or GAD reported significantly higher pain than those without (Ps < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The strong specificity of the PHQ appears to be its primary strength for this cohort. Due to its high specificity, the PHQ could be employed as an additional screening tool to help rule out potential psychiatric comorbidity in patients with CDOMD. The low sensitivity of the PHQ in this population, however, remains a weakness of the PHQ.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
13.
J Occup Environ Med ; 56(9): 959-64, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25046323

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary functional restoration program (FRP) for treating chronic cervical disorders. METHODS: Consecutive chronic occupational lumbar disorder patients (n = 898) and chronic occupational cervical disorder patients (n = 215) were admitted to an FRP from 2001 to 2011. Patients were compared on demographics, work-related and psychosocial factors, and socioeconomic outcomes 1 year after discharge. RESULTS: Compared with lumbar patients, cervical patients were more likely to be female, have preadmission surgery, perform white-collar work, and have a longer time between injury and treatment admission. Cervical patients were similar to lumbar patients on most psychosocial self-report outcome measures. In addition, both groups exhibited high work return and work retention rates 1 year after FRP discharge. CONCLUSIONS: An FRP seems to be equally efficacious for treating both chronic occupational cervical and lumbar disorders.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Recuperación de la Función , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/rehabilitación , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa
14.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 39(17): 1393-400, 2014 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24831498

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether comorbid fibromyalgia, identified in patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders (CDOMDs), resolves with a functional restoration program (FRP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Fibromyalgia involves widespread bodily pain and tenderness to palpation. In recent studies, 23% to 41% of patients with CDOMDs entering an FRP had comorbid fibromyalgia, compared with population averages of 2% to 5%. Few studies have examined whether fibromyalgia diagnoses resolve with any treatment, and none have investigated diagnosis responsiveness to an FRP. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients with CDOMDs (82% with spinal disorders and all reporting chronic spinal pain) and comorbid fibromyalgia (N = 117) completed an FRP, which included quantitatively directed exercise progression and multimodal disability management. Diagnosis responsiveness, evaluated at discharge, created 2 groups: those who retained fibromyalgia and those who did not. These groups were compared with chronic regional lumbar pain only patients (LO group, n = 87), lacking widespread pain and fibromyalgia. RESULTS: Of the patients with comorbid fibromyalgia, 59% (n = 69) retained the fibromyalgia diagnosis (RFM group) and 41% (n = 48) lost the fibromyalgia diagnosis (LFM group) at discharge. Although all 3 groups reported decreased pain intensity, disability, and depressive symptoms from admission to discharge, RFM patients reported higher symptom levels than the LFM and LO groups at discharge. The LFM and LO groups were statistically similar. At 1-year follow-up, LO patients demonstrated higher work retention than both fibromyalgia groups (P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: Despite a significant comorbid fibromyalgia prevalence in a cohort of patients with CDOMDs entering an FRP, 41% of patients with an initial fibromyalgia diagnosis no longer met diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia at discharge and were indistinguishable from LO patients on pain, disability, and depression symptoms. However, both fibromyalgia groups (LFM and RFM) had lower work retention than LO patients 1 year later, suggesting that an FRP may suppress symptoms of fibromyalgia in a subset of patients, but prolonged fibromyalgia-related disability may be more difficult to overcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Trabajo , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Spine J ; 14(6): 892-902, 2014 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24246746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Abnormal pretreatment flexion-relaxation in chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients has been shown to improve with functional restoration rehabilitation. Little is known about the effects of prior lumbar surgeries on flexion-relaxation and its responsiveness to treatment. PURPOSE: To quantify the effect of prior lumbar surgeries on the flexion-relaxation phenomenon and its responsiveness to rehabilitative treatment. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective cohort study of chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients, including those with and without prior lumbar spinal surgeries. PATIENT SAMPLE: A sample of 126 chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients with prior work-related injuries entered an interdisciplinary functional restoration program and agreed to enroll in this study. Fifty-seven patients had undergone surgical decompression or discectomy (n=32) or lumbar fusion (n=25), and the rest had no history of prior injury-related spine surgery (n=69). At post-treatment, 116 patients were reevaluated, including those with prior decompressions or discectomies (n=30), lumbar fusions (n=21), and no surgery (n=65). A comparison group of 30 pain-free control subjects was tested with an identical assessment protocol, and compared with post-rehabilitation outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean surface electromyography (SEMG) at maximum voluntary flexion; subject achievement of flexion-relaxation (SEMG≤3.5 µV); gross lumbar, true lumbar, and pelvic flexion ROM; and a pain visual analog scale self-report during forward bending task. Identical measures were obtained at pretreatment and post-treatment. METHODS: Patients entered an interdisciplinary functional restoration program, including a quantitatively directed, medically supervised exercise process and a multimodal psychosocial disability management component. The functional restoration program was accompanied by a SEMG-assisted stretching training program, designed to teach relaxation of the lumbar musculature during end-range flexion, thereby improving or normalizing flexion-relaxation and increasing lumbar flexion ROM. At 1 year after discharge from the program, a structured interview was used to obtain socioeconomic outcomes. RESULTS: At pre-rehabilitation, the no surgery group patients demonstrated significantly better performance than both surgery groups on absolute SEMG at maximum voluntary flexion and on true lumbar flexion ROM. Both surgery groups were less likely to achieve flexion-relaxation than the no surgery patients. The fusion patients had reduced gross lumbar flexion ROM and greater pain during bending compared with the no surgery patients, and reduced true lumbar flexion ROM compared with the discectomy patients. At post-rehabilitation, all groups improved substantially on all measures. When post-rehabilitation measures were compared with the pain-free control group, with gross and true lumbar ROM corrected by 8° per spinal segment fused, there were no differences between any of the patient groups and the pain-free control subjects on spinal ROM and only small differences in SEMG. The three groups had comparable socioeconomic outcomes at 1 year post-treatment in work retention, health-care utilization, new injury, and new surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the patients with prior surgery demonstrated greater pretreatment SEMG and ROM deficits, functional restoration treatment, combined with SEMG-assisted stretching training, was successful in improving all these measures by post-treatment. After treatment, both groups demonstrated ROM within anticipated limits, and the majority of patients in all three groups successfully achieved flexion-relaxation. In a chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder cohort, surgery patients were nearly equal to nonoperated patients in responding to interdisciplinary functional restoration rehabilitation on measures investigated in this study, achieving close to normal performance measures associated with pain-free controls. The responsiveness and final scores shown in this study suggests that flexion-relaxation may be a useful, objective diagnostic tool to measure changes in physical capacity for chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients.


Asunto(s)
Discectomía/rehabilitación , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Región Lumbosacra/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Profesionales/fisiopatología , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Fusión Vertebral/rehabilitación , Traumatismos Vertebrales/cirugía , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Electromiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Región Lumbosacra/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Profesionales/cirugía , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos Vertebrales/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Pain ; 14(5): 438-45, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23490634

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Central sensitization (CS) is a proposed physiological phenomenon in which central nervous system neurons become hyperexcitable, resulting in hypersensitivity to both noxious and non-noxious stimuli. The term central sensitivity syndrome (CSS) describes a group of medically indistinct (or nonspecific) disorders, such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and irritable bowel syndrome, for which CS may be a common etiology. In a previous study, the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was introduced as a screening instrument for clinicians to help identify patients with a CSS. It was found to have high reliability and validity (test-retest reliability = .82; Cronbach's alpha = .88). The present study investigated a cohort of 121 patients who were referred to a multidisciplinary pain center, which specializes in the assessment and treatment of complex pain and psychophysiological disorders, including CSSs. A large percentage of patients (n = 89, 74%) met clinical criteria for one or more CSSs, and CSI scores were positively correlated with the number of diagnosed CSSs. A receiver operating characteristic analysis determined that a CSI score of 40 out of 100 best distinguished between the CSS patient group and a nonpatient comparison sample (N = 129) (area under the curve = .86, sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 75%). PERSPECTIVE: The CSI is a new self-report screening instrument to help identify patients with CSSs, including fibromyalgia. The present study investigated CSI scores in a heterogeneous pain population with a large percentage of CSSs, and a normative nonclinical sample to determine a clinically relevant cutoff value.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiología , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Fibromialgia/fisiopatología , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Adolescente , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
17.
Pain Pract ; 12(4): 276-85, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21951710

RESUMEN

Central sensitization (CS) has been proposed as a common pathophysiological mechanism to explain related syndromes for which no specific organic cause can be found. The term "central sensitivity syndrome (CSS)" has been proposed to describe these poorly understood disorders related to CS. The goal of this investigation was to develop the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), which identifies key symptoms associated with CSSs and quantifies the degree of these symptoms. The utility of the CSI, to differentiate among different types of chronic pain patients who presumably have different levels of CS impairment, was then evaluated. Study 1 demonstrated strong psychometric properties (test-retest reliability = 0.817; Cronbach's alpha = 0.879) of the CSI in a cohort of normative subjects. A factor analysis (including both normative and chronic pain subjects) yielded 4 major factors (all related to somatic and emotional symptoms), accounting for 53.4% of the variance in the dataset. In Study 2, the CSI was administered to 4 groups: fibromyalgia (FM); chronic widespread pain without FM; work-related regional chronic low back pain (CLBP); and normative control group. Analyses revealed that the patients with FM reported the highest CSI scores and the normative population the lowest (P < 0.05). Analyses also demonstrated that the prevalence of previously diagnosed CSSs and related disorders was highest in the FM group and lowest in the normative group (P < 0.001). Taken together, these 2 studies demonstrate the psychometric strength, clinical utility, and the initial construct validity of the CSI in evaluating CS-related clinical symptoms in chronic pain populations.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiología , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Adulto Joven
18.
J Occup Environ Med ; 52(12): 1186-91, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21124244

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders (CDOMD) who met criteria for fibromyalgia. METHODS: This was a prospective prognostic study of a consecutive cohort of CDOMD patients (n = 449) admitted for treatment. Patients were assessed for chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia. The measures included demographic, injury-related and occupational information, psychosocial measures, and 1-year work status follow-up. RESULTS: The CDOMD patients with fibromyalgia reported higher-level psychosocial distress. Women with fibromyalgia were 9.6 times less likely to return to work 1-year posttreatment and, of those who did, were 4.3 times less likely to retain work. CONCLUSIONS: Of this cohort, 23.2% patients met criteria for fibromyalgia. Patients with fibromyalgia were found to show greater psychosocial distress and significantly poorer rates of work return and work retention 1-year postrehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Fibromialgia/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/psicología , Fibromialgia/rehabilitación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 33(17): 1889-97, 2008 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18670343

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study assessing chronic widespread pain (CWP) and psychiatric comorbidities in patients with chronic disabling occupational spinal disorders (CDOSDs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of CWP, demographic characteristics, and associated psychiatric comorbidity among CDOSD patients, as well as determine if CWP is a risk factor for less successful one-year postrehabilitation socioeconomic outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CWP is an essential criterion for diagnosing fibromyalgia. CWP is estimated to affect between 4.1% to 13.5% of the general population and it is associated with higher rates of psychiatric disorders and growing rates of disability. The prevalence of CWP, or its associations as a comorbidity, in patients with CDOSDs are unknown. METHODS: The socioeconomic outcomes, demographic characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidity of CDOSD patients with CWP were compared to non-CWP patients within a cohort of consecutive CDOSD patients (n = 2730), treated in an interdisciplinary functional restoration program. CWP was determined according to American College of Rheumatology criteria. Psychiatric comorbidity was assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fourth Edition at the beginning of the rehabilitation program. RESULTS.: In the CDOSD cohort, 32% of the patients (N = 878) met American College of Rheumatology criteria for CWP, relative to 4.1% to 13.5% within the general population. CWP patients (82%) were much more likely than non-CWP patients (16%) to have multisite pain complaints, leading to the finding that CDOSD patients with multisite pain showed a CWP prevalence of 70%. CWP patients were 1.5 times more likely to be female, more likely to have multiple compensable injuries, and had slightly elevated rates of pre- and postinjury Axis I psychopathology. Nevertheless, CWP was not associated with less successful 1-year socioeconomic outcomes. CONCLUSION: A surprisingly high frequency of CDOSD patients participating in interdisciplinary rehabilitation met criteria for CWP, though the diagnosis was generally unknown to the patient. In this large workers' compensation cohort, CWP was not associated with longer periods of disability, more prerehabilitation surgery or higher pain self-report. With appropriate rehabilitation, CWP patients can have equally successful work return and health utilization outcomes compared to non-CWP patients, despite having significantly higher rates of certain psychiatric disorders.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Dolor/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Dolor/psicología , Dolor/rehabilitación , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/psicología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA