Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 182: 112018, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome is associated with an increased risk for otitis media with effusion (OME), a childhood condition in which fluid accumulates in the middle ear, potentially leading to hearing loss. The American Academy of Pediatrics Down syndrome guidelines and the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery OME guidelines recommend hearing testing to assess the hearing status of children with Down syndrome diagnosed with OME. METHODS: Through an Institutional Review Board approved retrospective chart review at Children's Mercy, this project assessed how clinical factors affect the frequency in which children with Down syndrome receive hearing testing after diagnosis of OME. The study included data from all children with Down syndrome between 1 and 8 years old diagnosed with OME in the Down syndrome, general pediatrics, and otolaryngology clinics between 2018 and 2020. Demographics and clinical factors, including clinic setting, were collected. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients identified, 91.1 % were diagnosed with OME in the otolaryngology clinic and 33.1 % received hearing testing. While most diagnoses occurred in the otolaryngology clinic, a higher proportion of hearing testing at the time of diagnosis occurred in the Down syndrome clinic. This could be explained by the fact that the Down syndrome clinic is a multidisciplinary clinic, where yearly visits include hearing screening. Bivariate analysis using chi-square or Fisher's tests showed that clinic setting had a significant association (p-value <0.001) with hearing testing. However, logistic regression depicted all clinical factors had an insignificant effect on hearing testing at 5 % significance. CONCLUSION: While results indicate hearing testing is largely not performed to assess OME early in otolaryngology clinics, they may be used to assess intervention efficacy post-diagnosis. Results point to the importance of Down syndrome clinics in early diagnosis of hearing loss leading to timely referrals to otolaryngology clinics which diagnose and manage OME in children with Down syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Pruebas Auditivas , Otitis Media con Derrame , Humanos , Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Otitis Media con Derrame/diagnóstico , Otitis Media con Derrame/complicaciones , Niño , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Preescolar , Lactante , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología
2.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 132(11): 1293-1299, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36635859

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of literature on what contributes to 30-day readmission rates from the patient's perspective in head and neck cancer patients. Post-operatively, these patients are often discharged with multiple surgical sites and home equipment requiring education and a large responsibility upon arriving home. Patients have a unique understanding of the discharge process and rationale behind presenting for care following initial discharge. Understanding the experience of the readmitted patient may be critical in finding effective methods to prevent unnecessary readmissions. METHODS: Through key-informant interviews, we assessed factors that impact readmission rates from the patient perspective. Patients were eligible if they were discharged within the last 30 days and subsequently readmitted following an admission for a head and neck cancer surgery. Inductive coding was used to analyze interview transcripts and develop themes. RESULTS: Thirteen respondents were interviewed. 46% (n = 6) did not feel ready for discharge after the index admission. Out of these 6 patients, 83% (n = 5) felt their readmission could have been avoided. Patients often encountered unexpected events after returning home from the index admission and felt their readmissions were potentially avoidable with more information regarding what to expect at home, prior to discharge. Although medically stable upon discharge, these findings indicate some patients might be discharged sooner than they should be due to factors outside of medical indications. CONCLUSIONS: To address the various biopsychosocial components of patient care in addition to medical aspects, an otolaryngology-specific, prior-to-discharge checklist could aid in lowering 30-day readmissions. Since the amount of education each patient requires to feel competent managing their health at home varies, more work is needed to craft post-education assessments of patient/caregiver competencies for home equipment, prior to discharge to reduce avoidable readmissions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA