Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Br J Cancer ; 112(5): 925-33, 2015 Mar 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25688738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nulliparity is an endometrial cancer risk factor, but whether or not this association is due to infertility is unclear. Although there are many underlying infertility causes, few studies have assessed risk relations by specific causes. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of 8153 cases and 11 713 controls from 2 cohort and 12 case-control studies. All studies provided self-reported infertility and its causes, except for one study that relied on data from national registries. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Nulliparous women had an elevated endometrial cancer risk compared with parous women, even after adjusting for infertility (OR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.59-1.94). Women who reported infertility had an increased risk compared with those without infertility concerns, even after adjusting for nulliparity (OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.13-1.33). Among women who reported infertility, none of the individual infertility causes were substantially related to endometrial cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Based on mainly self-reported infertility data that used study-specific definitions of infertility, nulliparity and infertility appeared to independently contribute to endometrial cancer risk. Understanding residual endometrial cancer risk related to infertility, its causes and its treatments may benefit from large studies involving detailed data on various infertility parameters.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paridad , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme
2.
Ann Oncol ; 25(10): 2065-2072, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25057164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been associated with an excess risk of pancreatic cancer, but the magnitude of the risk and the time-risk relationship are unclear, and there is limited information on the role of antidiabetic medications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed individual-level data from 15 case-control studies within the Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium, including 8305 cases and 13 987 controls. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated from multiple logistic regression models, adjusted for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 1155 (15%) cases and 1087 (8%) controls reported a diagnosis of diabetes 2 or more years before cancer diagnosis (or interview, for controls), corresponding to an OR of 1.90 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.72-2.09). Consistent risk estimates were observed across strata of selected covariates, including body mass index and tobacco smoking. Pancreatic cancer risk decreased with duration of diabetes, but a significant excess risk was still evident 20 or more years after diabetes diagnosis (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.63). Among diabetics, long duration of oral antidiabetic use was associated with a decreased pancreatic cancer risk (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.69, for ≥15 years). Conversely, insulin use was associated with a pancreatic cancer risk in the short term (OR 5.60, 95% CI 3.75-8.35, for <5 years), but not for longer duration of use (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.53-1.70, for ≥15 years). CONCLUSION: This study provides the most definitive quantification to date of an excess risk of pancreatic cancer among diabetics. It also shows that a 30% excess risk persists for more than two decades after diabetes diagnosis, thus supporting a causal role of diabetes in pancreatic cancer. Oral antidiabetics may decrease the risk of pancreatic cancer, whereas insulin showed an inconsistent duration-risk relationship.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Insulina , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar
3.
Ann Oncol ; 24(11): 2903-10, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23970016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer and its treatments have been associated to pancreatic cancer risk, although the evidence is inconsistent. METHODS: We pooled 10 case-control studies within the Pancreatic Cancer Case-control Consortium (PanC4), including 4717 pancreatic cancer cases and 9374 controls, and estimated summary odds ratios (OR) using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: The OR for pancreatic cancer was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.23] for history of ulcer (OR = 1.08 for gastric and 0.97 for duodenal ulcer). The association was stronger for a diagnosis within 2 years before cancer diagnosis (OR = 2.43 for peptic, 1.75 for gastric, and 1.98 for duodenal ulcer). The OR was 1.53 (95% CI 1.15-2.03) for history of gastrectomy; however, the excess risk was limited to a gastrectomy within 2 years before cancer diagnosis (OR = 6.18, 95% CI 1.82-20.96), while no significant increased risk was observed for longer time since gastrectomy. No associations were observed for pharmacological treatments for ulcer, such as antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, or proton-pump inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: This uniquely large collaborative study does not support the hypothesis that peptic ulcer and its treatment materially affect pancreatic cancer risk. The increased risk for short-term history of ulcer and gastrectomy suggests that any such association is due to increased cancer surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Úlcera/patología , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera/complicaciones , Úlcera/epidemiología , Úlcera/cirugía
4.
Br J Cancer ; 108(3): 727-34, 2013 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23348519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Uterine sarcomas are characterised by early age at diagnosis, poor prognosis, and higher incidence among Black compared with White women, but their aetiology is poorly understood. Therefore, we performed a pooled analysis of data collected in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. We also examined risk factor associations for malignant mixed mullerian tumours (MMMTs) and endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) for comparison purposes. METHODS: We pooled data on 229 uterine sarcomas, 244 MMMTs, 7623 EEC cases, and 28,829 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk factors associated with uterine sarcoma, MMMT, and EEC were estimated with polytomous logistic regression. We also examined associations between epidemiological factors and histological subtypes of uterine sarcoma. RESULTS: Significant risk factors for uterine sarcoma included obesity (body mass index (BMI)≥30 vs BMI<25 kg m(-2) (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.22-2.46), P-trend=0.008) and history of diabetes (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.41-3.83). Older age at menarche was inversely associated with uterine sarcoma risk (≥15 years vs <11 years (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.34-1.44), P-trend: 0.04). BMI was significantly, but less strongly related to uterine sarcomas compared with EECs (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.82-3.26) or MMMTs (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.60-3.15, P-heterogeneity=0.01). CONCLUSION: In the largest aetiological study of uterine sarcomas, associations between menstrual, hormonal, and anthropometric risk factors and uterine sarcoma were similar to those identified for EEC. Further exploration of factors that might explain patterns of age- and race-specific incidence rates for uterine sarcoma are needed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Tumor Mulleriano Mixto/etiología , Sarcoma/etiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/etiología , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumor Mulleriano Mixto/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Sarcoma/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología
5.
Ann Oncol ; 23(11): 2964-2970, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22767586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer; however, an unknown fraction of the disease is thought to be a consequence of tumor-related duct obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis of a history of pancreatitis and risk of pancreatic cancer was carried out considering the time interval between diagnoses and potential modification by covariates. Adjusted pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from 10 case-control studies (5048 cases of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 10,947 controls) taking part in the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4). RESULTS: The association between pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer was nearly three-fold at intervals of >2 years between diagnoses (OR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.96-3.74) and much stronger at intervals of ≤2 years (OR: 13.56, 95% CI: 8.72-21.90) probably reflecting a combination of reverse causation and antecedent misdiagnosis of pancreas cancer as pancreatitis. The younger (<65 years) pancreatic cancer cases showed stronger associations with previous (>2 years) pancreatitis (OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 2.53-6.04) than the older (≥65 years) cases (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.76; P value for interaction: 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a moderately strong association between pancreatitis (diagnosed before >2 years) and pancreatic cancer, the population attributable fraction was estimated at 1.34% (95% CI: 0.612-2.07%), suggesting that a relatively small proportion of pancreatic cancer might be avoided if pancreatitis could be prevented.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Pancreatitis/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos
6.
Ann Oncol ; 23(7): 1880-8, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22104574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and pancreatic cancer and to examine the effects of temporal variables. METHODS: We analyzed data from 12 case-control studies within the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4), including 6507 pancreatic cases and 12 890 controls. We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) by pooling study-specific ORs using random-effects models. RESULTS: Compared with never smokers, the OR was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.3) for former smokers and 2.2 (95% CI 1.7-2.8) for current cigarette smokers, with a significant increasing trend in risk with increasing number of cigarettes among current smokers (OR=3.4 for ≥35 cigarettes per day, P for trend<0.0001). Risk increased in relation to duration of cigarette smoking up to 40 years of smoking (OR=2.4). No trend in risk was observed for age at starting cigarette smoking, whereas risk decreased with increasing time since cigarette cessation, the OR being 0.98 after 20 years. CONCLUSIONS: This uniquely large pooled analysis confirms that current cigarette smoking is associated with a twofold increased risk of pancreatic cancer and that the risk increases with the number of cigarettes smoked and duration of smoking. Risk of pancreatic cancer reaches the level of never smokers ∼20 years after quitting.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
Ann Oncol ; 22(6): 1420-1426, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21245160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is the best-characterized risk factor for pancreatic cancer. However, data are limited for other tobacco smoking products and smokeless tobacco. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of cigar and pipe smoking and smokeless tobacco use and risk of pancreatic cancer using data from 11 case-control studies (6056 cases and 11,338 controls) within the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4). Pooled odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by unconditional multiple logistic regression models adjusted for study center and selected covariates. RESULTS: Compared with never tobacco users, the OR for cigar-only smokers was 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2-2.3), i.e. comparable to that of cigarette-only smokers (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.4-1.6). The OR was 1.1 (95% CI 0.69-1.6) for pipe-only smokers. There was some evidence of increasing risk with increasing amount of cigar smoked per day (OR 1.82 for ≥ 10 grams of tobacco), although not with duration. The OR for ever smokeless tobacco users as compared with never tobacco users was 0.98 (95% CI 0.75-1.3). CONCLUSION: This collaborative analysis provides evidence that cigar smoking is associated with an excess risk of pancreatic cancer, while no significant association emerged for pipe smoking and smokeless tobacco use.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Tabaco sin Humo/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Tabaquismo
9.
J Surg Oncol ; 100(1): 8-12, 2009 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19384918

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of data in a younger population of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAC) regarding epidemiology, genetics, prognosis, and outcome. This report examines a large cohort of patients with PAC

Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Gynecol Oncol ; 93(3): 615-20, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15196853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: One way in which parity and use of oral contraceptives may protect against ovarian cancer is by preventing inflammation and oxidative stress associated with ovulation. Since the genes superoxide dismutase (SOD2), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) are involved in inflammation and oxidative stress, we investigated whether variants of these genes are associated with risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS: In a hospital-based case-control study, we compared 125 cases and 193 controls with respect to prevalence of (1) the T-->C (val-->ala) substitution at the -9 position in the signal sequence of SOD2; (2) the G-->A substitution at the -463 position in the promoter region of MPO; and (3) the C-->T (pro-->ser) change in exon 6 of NQO1. Genotyping was done using PCR and gel electrophoresis for MPO and NQO1 and using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for SOD2. RESULTS: For SOD2, women with the TC (val/ala) or CC (ala/ala) genotypes were at increased risk [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-4.0]. Results for MPO and NQO1 were in the hypothesized directions but were not statistically significant. For MPO, there was a small inverse association among women with GA or AA genotypes (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.2). For NQO1, the TT (ser/ser) genotype was associated with somewhat increased risk (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 0.69-7.6). CONCLUSIONS: While these results need to be confirmed in other studies, they point to a possible role for genes involved in oxidative stress in the development of ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
NAD(P)H Deshidrogenasa (Quinona)/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/enzimología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Peroxidasa/genética , Superóxido Dismutasa/genética , Adulto , Alelos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Variación Genética , Genotipo , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , NAD(P)H Deshidrogenasa (Quinona)/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo/genética , Peroxidasa/metabolismo , Polimorfismo Genético , Factores de Riesgo , Superóxido Dismutasa/metabolismo
11.
Am J Epidemiol ; 154(6): 574-81, 2001 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11549563

RESUMEN

There is concern that participation in case-control studies has declined. To address this question, the author and colleagues reviewed data from 82 US and Canadian case-control studies published in epidemiologic journals during two periods: 1988-1990 and 1997-January 1999. The median year of data collection, which ranged from 1972 to 1996, was the primary independent variable. Reported response among both cases and controls remained constant over this time period. The regression coefficients (beta) were small: For each year, there was a change of 0.15 percentage points for cases (p = 0.56) and -0.16 percentage points for controls (p = 0.54). Possible confounders included the location where the study had been conducted and, for cases, the disease under study (cancer vs. others). After adjustment for these factors in case groups, there was still no association between year of data collection and response: For each year, there was a change of -0.20 percentage points (p = 0.43). After adjustment of results for study location among controls, there was a moderate decline over time: For each year, there was a change of -0.44 percentage points (p = 0.12). Overall, reported response in more recent studies was similar to that in earlier studies; for control groups, this may reflect changes in locations where the studies were conducted.


Asunto(s)
Estudios Epidemiológicos , Selección de Paciente , Sesgo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Recolección de Datos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Análisis de Regresión , Tamaño de la Muestra
12.
Obstet Gynecol ; 98(2): 212-7, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11506835

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the symptoms of ovarian cancer in patients compared with symptoms experienced by healthy women using a case-control design. METHODS: Cases (n = 168) were women with ovarian cancer diagnosed at two hospitals in New York between 1994 and 1997 who were interviewed shortly after diagnosis. They were compared with healthy women (n = 251 controls) from the community. Women were asked about the prevalence, duration, and constancy of eight symptoms and about use of three types of medications in the 6 to 12 months before diagnosis (cases) or interview (controls). RESULTS: Nearly all the cases (93%) reported at least one symptom, compared with 42% of controls. The most common symptoms among cases were: unusual bloating, fullness, and pressure in the abdomen (71%); unusual abdominal pain or lower back pain (52%); and lack of energy (43%). The proportions of controls reporting these symptoms were 9, 15, and 16%, respectively, resulting in odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 25.3 (15.6, 40.9), 6.2 (4.0, 9.6), and 3.9 (2.5, 6.1), respectively, for these symptoms. Bloating, fullness, and pressure was of more recent onset among cases than controls (4.9 months compared with 7.6 months, P =.01). There were only minor differences in reported symptoms between cases with early and later stage disease. CONCLUSION: Unusual bloating, fullness, and pressure, abdominal or back pain, and lack of energy are prominent symptoms in women with ovarian cancer and distinguish them from controls. Information on symptoms may make women and physicians more aware of changes associated with ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antidiarreicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Catárticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Nutr Cancer ; 40(2): 92-8, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11962261

RESUMEN

Several studies of dietary and serum antioxidant micronutrients (vitamins A, C, and E and beta-carotene) suggest that higher levels may be protective for ovarian cancer. None of these has examined supplements. We used a food frequency questionnaire and additional questions on supplements to study 168 histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer cases, 159 community controls, and 92 hospital-based controls. Antioxidant consumption from diet or supplements was calculated in milligrams or international units per day. In multivariate analyses using only community controls, the highest levels of intake of vitamins C and E from supplements were protective: odds ratio (OR) = 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.21-0.78] and OR = 0.33 (95% CI = 0.18-0.60), respectively. Consumption of antioxidants from diet was unrelated to risk. In analyses combining antioxidant intake from diet and supplements, vitamins C (> 363 mg/day) and E (> 75 mg/day) were associated with reduced risks: OR = 0.45 (95% CI = 0.22-0.91) and OR = 0.44 (95% CI = 0.21-0.94), respectively. Results were similar, with some attenuation toward the null, in analyses combining both control groups. The levels of vitamins C and E associated with the protective effect were well above the current US Recommended Dietary Allowances. These findings support the hypothesis that antioxidant vitamins C and E from supplements are related to a reduced risk of ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Dieta , Suplementos Dietéticos , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Ácido Ascórbico/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Política Nutricional , Oportunidad Relativa , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vitamina E/administración & dosificación
14.
Am J Epidemiol ; 152(6): 585-92, 2000 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10997549

RESUMEN

Identifying a control group when cases come from a specialized hospital is a challenge for epidemiologists. The authors compared controls recruited by using a commercial database with those recruited by random digit dialing in the context of a hospital-based case-control study of ovarian cancer. This part of the study was conducted in 1997-1998 among women aged 18 years or older who resided in the New York metropolitan area. A mailing list owner grouped cases into "lifestyle" clusters based on US zip+4 postal code microneighborhoods and generated a random sample of potential controls with the same distribution across the clusters. Controls recruited from the commercial database (n = 82) and from random digit dialing (n = 90) were similar in age and race. Women from the commercial database had somewhat more education and higher incomes and were more similar to the cases on these measures. The control groups resembled each other closely in terms of oral contraceptive use, nulliparity, and religion and differed from the cases on these measures. Response rates were similar for the two groups. Only 28% of the cases were included on the mailing list, indicating that it did not reflect the source population of the cases. Use of a commercial database provided a control group whose socioeconomic factors were similar to those of cases at a lower cost than when random digit dialing was used but did not result in a higher response rate.


Asunto(s)
Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Teléfono , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis por Conglomerados , Bases de Datos Factuales/economía , Epidemiología/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Teléfono/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Epidemiology ; 9(6): 669-71, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9799180

RESUMEN

We investigated whether survival was related to recent childbirth or parity in a cohort of 540 women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 45 years who were followed for up to 14 years. Women who had given birth within 2 years before their diagnosis of breast cancer were at increased risk of dying, compared with nulliparous women, with an adjusted relative risk of 3.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.8-5.4). There was a moderate association of parity with mortality, with an adjusted relative risk of 1.8 (95% confidence interval = 1.2-2.9) for women with three or more births, compared with nulliparous women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Paridad , Embarazo , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 6(10): 815-7, 1997 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9332764

RESUMEN

We studied 54 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 1981 and 1994 following a diagnosis of breast cancer. We used a case-case analysis, comparing tumors with and without overexpression of the p53 gene product to evaluate the association of putative p53 mutations with tamoxifen use and other risk factors for endometrial cancer. Twenty-four % of the tumors showed strong positive staining for the p53 gene product. Tumors in a more advanced stage (stage 2, 3, or 4, compared to stage 1) were more likely to overexpress p53 [odds ratio (OR) = 4.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-16.2], as were tumors with serous or clear cell, compared to endometrioid, histology (OR = 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-26.5). There was a small association between p53 overexpression and treatment with tamoxifen for breast cancer (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 0.69-9.8). There was a strong relationship between overexpression of p53 and having a first-degree relative with breast cancer (OR = 12.3; 95% CI, 2.6-57.4) and between overexpression of p53 and having an additional cancer, i.e., at sites other than breast or endometrium (OR = 7.9; 95% CI, 1.6-40.1). In this group of women, genetic predisposition to cancer, as reflected in family history of breast cancer and personal history of an additional primary cancer, was strongly associated with overexpression of p53 in endometrial tumors. The results suggest that use of tamoxifen may be associated with an increase in tumors that overexpress p53, although the results could be due to chance.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias Endometriales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/biosíntesis , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Genes p53 , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos
17.
Ann Epidemiol ; 7(1): 46-53, 1997 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9034406

RESUMEN

We conducted a case-control study in western New York state among 232 women with newly-diagnosed endometrial cancer and 631 controls selected from the community. Physical activity was measured by participation in vigorous exercise and walking at four time periods: at age 16, and at 20, 10, and 2 years before the interview and by occupational activity based on a detailed lifetime history. Women who did a moderate amount of vigorous exercise at age 16 and at 20 years before the interview were at reduced risk as compared with those who reported no activity, with odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals) of 0.51 (0.31-0.83) and 0.50 (0.29-0.89), respectively. However, there was no evidence of declining risk with greater amount of activity. At later times, 10 years and 2 years before the interview, being in the highest group with regard to vigorous activity was associated with a slightly but nor significant lower risk as compared with women who reported no activity; the adjusted OR were 0.72 (0.43-1.19) and 0.67 (0.42-1.09), respectively. Being in the highest category of miles walked at age 16 (i.e., > or = 15 miles per week) was associated with a slightly reduced risk as compared with not walking at all (OR 0.64 (0.26-1.16)), whereas the number of miles walked at other times was not related to reduced risk. Occupational physical activity was not related to the risk of endometrial cancer. Overall, these results indicate that physical activity at levels prevalent in this population has at most a modest relationship to reduced risk of endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Ejercicio Físico , Ocupaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Caminata/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
Nutr Cancer ; 23(2): 141-9, 1995.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7644383

RESUMEN

Excess weight near the time of diagnosis is a well-established risk factor for endometrial cancer; less is known about the influence of weight at earlier periods of a woman's life or weight gain in adulthood. In a case-control study in western New York State, interviews were conducted with 232 incident endometrial cancer cases, diagnosed between 1986 and 1991, and 631 community controls. Body mass index at 16 years of age and 20, 10, and 2 years before interview and changes in body mass index between these time periods were examined. While being relatively heavy at 16 years of age was associated with slightly increased risk [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84-1.96], large gains over the entire period from 16 years of age to 2 years ago (OR = 3.45, CI = 2.13-5.57) and high body mass index close to the time of diagnosis (OR = 3.21, CI = 2.01-5.15) were associated with greater risk. Differences in mean body mass index between cases and controls increased over time.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Aumento de Peso , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Menarquia , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
19.
Am J Epidemiol ; 135(2): 210-22, 1992 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1536136

RESUMEN

Control groups selected by random digit dialing are frequently used in case-control studies. Concern about the potential for bias in these control groups has been expressed, primarily because of low response rates. This study compares the characteristics of a hypothetical control group consisting of 341 men and women aged 40-74 years, selected by random digit dialing and participating in an interview in 1990, with the characteristics of 15,563 men and women aged 40-74 years who participated in a privately conducted census in the same upstate New York county in 1989. For most measures, no differences were seen between the random digit dialing sample and the census population. However, the hypothetical control group was more likely to have had their cholesterol checked in the past 2 years and was somewhat more likely to have had other screening tests as well. In addition, the hypothetical control group was somewhat better educated. The results suggest that, at least in this setting, control groups selected by random digit dialing are representative of the general population in most respects; however, caution should be used when studying the relation between screening tests and disease occurrence by means of case-control studies using controls selected by random digit dialing.


Asunto(s)
Estudios de Casos y Controles , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Muestreo , Sesgo de Selección , Teléfono , Adulto , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Demografía , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York
20.
Neuroendocrinology ; 36(5): 335-9, 1983 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6406926

RESUMEN

Castration of male hamsters that have been exposed to a nonstimulatory photoperiod (e.g., LD 6:18) results in an attenuated increase in serum LH and FSH levels when compared to the increase observed following castration of hamsters exposed to a stimulatory photoperiod (e.g., LD 14:10). The short-day-induced inhibition of pituitary gonadotropin release, which is not dependent on the negative feedback effects of gonadal steroid hormones, is abolished if (1) the animals are transferred to LD 14:10; (2) the suprachiasmatic nuclei are lesioned at the time of castration; or (3) pinealectomy accompanies castration. These results indicate that both the pineal gland and the SCN mediate the steroid-independent inhibition of pituitary gonadotropin release that occurs during exposure to short days.


Asunto(s)
Castración , Luz , Glándula Pineal/fisiología , Núcleo Supraquiasmático/fisiología , Animales , Cricetinae , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/sangre , Hormona Luteinizante/sangre , Masculino , Melatonina/fisiología , Mesocricetus , Glándula Pineal/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA