WHO/ICC Classification for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms/Syndromes Performs Better for Subtype Cytomorphological Diagnosis?

The International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO 2022) have refined the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Both classifications segregate MDS subtypes based on molecular or cytogenetic findings but rely on the subjective assessment of blast cell percentage and dysplasia in hematopoietic cell lineages. This study aimed to evaluate interobserver concordance among 13 cytomorphologists from eight hospitals in assessing blast percentages and dysplastic features in 44 MDS patients. The study found fair interobserver agreement for the PB blast percentage and moderate agreement for the BM blast percentage, with the best concordance in cases with <5% BM blasts and >10% BM blasts. Monocyte count agreement was fair, and dysplasia assessment showed moderate concordance for megakaryocytic lineage but lower concordance for erythroid and granulocytic lineages. Overall, interobserver concordance for MDS subtypes was moderate across all classifications, with slightly better results for WHO 2022. These findings highlight the ongoing need for morphological evaluation in MDS diagnosis despite advances in genetic and molecular techniques. The study supports the blast percentage ranges established by the ICC but suggests refining BM blast cutoffs. Given the moderate interobserver concordance, a unified classification approach for MDS is recommended.

Oxidative imbalance in low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients: The influence of iron overload.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the involvement of the main antioxidant pathways in low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with iron overload (IOL). METHODS: We examined the levels of superoxide anion (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), antioxidants (glutathione, GSH; superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; and glutathione peroxidase, GPx), mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), and by-products of oxidative damage (8-isoprostanes and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, 8-oxo-dG) in 42 MDS patients (28 without IOL at diagnosis, and 14 who developed IOL) and 20 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Patients with IOL showed higher O2- levels (39.4 MFI) than normal controls (22.7 MFI, p=0.0356) and patients at diagnosis (19.4 MFI, p=0.0049). Antioxidant systems, except SOD activity, exhibited significant changes in IOL patients with respect to controls (CAT: 7.1 vs 2.7nmol/ml/min, p=0.0023; GPx: 50.9 vs 76.4nmol/ml/min, p=0.0291; GSH: 50.2 vs 24.1 MFI, p=0.0060). Furthermore, mitochondrial dysfunction was only detected in IOL cases compared to controls (ΔΨm: 3.6 vs 6.4 MFI, p=0.0225). Finally, increased levels of 8-oxo-dG were detected in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Oxidative stress is an important but non-static phenomenon in MDS disease, whose status is influenced by, among other factors, the presence of injurious iron.

The role of bone marrow biopsy and FDG-PET/CT in identifying bone marrow infiltration in the initial diagnosis of high grade non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Accuracy in a multicenter series of 372 patients.

Bone marrow infiltration (BMI), categorized as an extra-nodal site, affects stage and is associated with poor prognosis in newly diagnosed lymphoma patients. We have evaluated the accuracy of PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) to assess BMI in 372 lymphoma patients [140 Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) and 232 High Grade B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (HG B-NHL), among them 155 Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLCL)]. For HL cases, and taking into account PET/CT, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were 96.7, 99.3, and 99.3% while those of BMB were 32.3, 83.8, and 85%, respectively. For HG B-NHL and considering PET/CT, sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy were 52.7, 81.7, and 84.1%, while those of BMB were 77.6, 90.2, and 90.7%, respectively. In the HG B-NHL group, 25 patients would have been under-staged without BMB. These results lead us to recommend PET/CT and the avoidance of BMB to assess BMI in HL. In the case of HG B-NHL, bone marrow status should be assessed firstly by means of PET/CT; only in either focal or diffuse PET/CT with low borderline SUV max values or in negative cases, should BMB be carried out afterwards. In the HG B-NHL setting and at the present moment, both techniques are complementary.