Optimal Body Weights for Adults with Severe Motor and Intellectual Disabilities.

Determining the optimal body weight for individuals with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID) lacks a standardized approach. In this study, we aimed to develop a formula to estimate the ideal body weight for each SMID patient, considering factors such as reduced muscle and bone mass. We analyzed data from 111 SMID patients (56 male, 55 female; age range 20 to 73 y) who underwent blood tests measuring creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (cysC) for clinical reasons between Feb. 2018 and Feb. 2023. To create the optimal body weight formula, we utilized three variables: height, estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR)-Cr, and eGFR-cysC. The validity of the formula was assessed by comparing the measured triceps subcutaneous fat thickness (TSF) to the reference TSF (%TSF), evaluating how accurately it reflects the appropriate physique. The derived optimal body weight formula is as follows: Optimal body weight=(height)2×(18.5-25.0)×{1-0.41×(1-eGFR-cysC/eGFR-Cr)}×0.93. Our formula demonstrated validity when using %TSF as an indicator. Establishing a method to determine optimal body weight in SMID patients, considering their low muscle and bone mass, is crucial for accurate nutritional assessment and subsequent nutritional management.

Evaluation of eGFRs to Calculate Kidney Function in Adults with Severe Motor and Intellectual Disabilities.

Introduction: The gold standard for evaluating kidney function is kidney inulin clearance (Cin). However, this procedure is difficult to perform in patients with neuromuscular disabilities and/or bladder dysfunction. We aimed to develop a simpler method for determining the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using equations and values for three biomarkers: serum creatinine (sCr), serum cystatin C (cysC), and serum beta-2 microglobulin (ß2MG). This study evaluated three eGFR equations in patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID). Methods: We evaluated the equations using data of 18 adult SMID patients with a clinical need for creatinine clearance (Ccr). We compared the results of each equation with Ccr-based eGFR instead of Cin using mean error (ME), root mean square error (RMSE), and P30. Results: Based on eGFR, the ME values of Cr, cysC, ß2MG, and Ccr were 74.5, 2.3, and 6.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, RMSE values, 92.3, 25.7, and 33.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; and P30, 16.7%, 77.8%, and 72.2%, respectively. Conclusions: eGFR-Cr cannot be used to reliably assess kidney function in adult SMID patients. It is better to use eGFR-cysC to evaluate kidney function in this patient population.