RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the associations between iron metabolism and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by examining multiple iron-related indicators. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study involving 907 Chinese pregnant women. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure serum concentrations of iron-related indicators during the first trimester (≤ 14 weeks of gestation). GDM outcomes were measured through oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) conducted between weeks 24 and 28 of gestation. RESULTS: Subjects with iron-related indicators below the 10th percentile (except for serum iron and soluble transferrin receptor) had a higher risk of GDM compared to normal subjects (10th-90th percentiles). The ORs (95â¯%CI; p-value) were 1.88 (1.10, 3.20; P=0.020) for ferritin, 1.88 (1.10, 3.19; P=0.020) for hepcidin. Higher levels of ferritin (> 90th percentile) were associated with a higher risk of abnormal fasting blood glucose, while lower levels (< 10th percentile) of ferritin, hepcidin, and transferrin were associated with a higher risk of one-hour postprandial glucose ≥ 8.6â¯mmol/L in the OGTT. CONCLUSIONS: Lower levels (< 10th percentiles) of several iron-related indicators (ferritin, hepcidin, and transferrin) were associated with a higher risk of GDM and abnormal blood glucose compared to normal subjects.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS: The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to treat poorly differentiated superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is unclear. AIMS: To exploring the efficacy and prognosis of ESD treatment poorly differentiated SESCC compared with esophagectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, the data of poorly differentiated SESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy from Jan 2011 to Jan 2021 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and procedure-related variables were compared between ESD and esophagectomy group. RESULTS: 95 patients underwent ESD, while 86 underwent esophagectomy. No significant differences were found between the two groups in OS (P = 0.587), DSS (P = 0.172), and RFS (P = 0.111). Oncologic outcomes were also similar between the two groups in propensity score-matched analysis. For T1a ESCC, the rates of R0 resection, LVI or nodal metastasis and additional therapy were similar between ESD and esophagectomy groups. But for T1b ESCC, the rates of positive resection margin and additional therapy were significantly higher in ESD group than those in esophagectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is a minimally invasive procedure that has comparable oncologic outcomes with esophagectomy for treatment poorly differentiated T1a ESCC. However, ESD is not suitable for poorly differentiated T1b ESCC, additional surgery or radiochemotherapy should be required.