Effect of day of the week on short- and long-term mortality after emergency general surgery.

BACKGROUND: The effect of day of the week on outcome after surgery is the subject of debate. The aim was to determine whether day of the week of emergency general surgery alters short- and long-term mortality. METHODS: This was an observational study of all patients undergoing emergency general surgery in Scotland between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2007, followed to 2012. Multilevel logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess the effect of day of the week of surgery on outcome after adjustment for case mix and risk factors. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality; the secondary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 50 844 patients were identified, of whom 31 499 had an emergency procedure on Monday to Thursday and 19 345 on Friday to Sunday. Patients undergoing surgery at the weekend were younger (mean 45·9 versus 47·5 years; P < 0·001) and had fewer co-morbidities, but underwent riskier and/or more complex procedures (P < 0·001). Patients who had surgery at the weekend were more likely to have been operated on sooner than those who had weekday surgery (mean time from admission to operation 1·2 versus 1·6 days; P < 0·001). No difference in perioperative mortality (odds ratio 1·00, 95 per cent c.i. 0·89 to 1·13; P = 0·989) or overall survival (hazard ratio 1·01, 0·97 to 1·06; P = 0·583) was observed when surgery was performed at the weekend. There was no difference in overall survival after surgery undertaken on any particular day compared with Wednesday; a borderline reduction in perioperative mortality was seen on Tuesday. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in short- or long-term mortality following emergency general surgery at the weekend, compared with mid-week.

Time to CT and Surgery for HPB Trauma in Scotland Prior to the Introduction of Major Trauma Centres.

AIMS: To assess the time taken to CT and emergency surgery for trauma patients with an injury to liver, spleen or pancreas prior to the introduction of major trauma centres (MTCs) in Scotland. METHODS: A search was performed of the Scottish Trauma Audit Group database for any patient with relevant injuries over a 2-year period. Primary outcome measures were time to CT and emergency surgery. Patient demographics were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients were identified of whom 23 had more than one organ affected. There were a total of 234 injuries (123 liver, 99 splenic and 12 pancreatic) in these patients. A total of 160 injuries (75.8%) suffered blunt trauma. Of 211 patients, 157 underwent emergency CT with a median time to scan of 73 min (range 4-474). Hospitals provisionally designated as MTCs were 9 min faster than non-MTCs in time to CT. There was no difference in time of day. Ninety-nine patients had surgery within 24 h at a median time of 200 min. Twenty-five patients with hypotension on presentation took a median time of 130 min. Only 44 patients (27%) had a CT or emergency surgery within the expected MTC target of 1 h. Thirty-nine patients required transfer to another centre. CONCLUSIONS: Current management of patients with abdominal trauma and haemodynamic instability remains sub-optimal in Scotland when compared to recognized performance indicators of CT and emergency surgery within 1 h. Implementation of a major trauma network in Scotland should improve access to emergency radiology and surgery and efforts to shorten current timelines should improve patient outcomes.

Surgery for colorectal liver metastases.

Half of all patients with colorectal cancer develop metastatic disease. The liver is the principal site for metastases, and surgical resection is the only modality that offers the potential for long-term cure. Appropriate patient selection for surgery and improvements in perioperative care have resulted in low morbidity and mortality rates, resulting in this being the therapy of choice for suitable patients. Modern management of colorectal liver metastases is multimodal incorporating open and laparoscopic surgery, ablative therapies such as radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The majority of patients with hepatic metastases should be considered for resectional surgery, if all disease can be resected, as this offers the only opportunity for prolonged survival.

Hepatic cytokine response can be modulated using the Kupffer cell blocker gadolinium chloride in obstructive jaundice.

INTRODUCTION: Depletion of Kupffer cells by gadolinium chloride (GdCl(3)) reduces the systemic response during sepsis. The study aim was to investigate the effect of this depletion on hepatic proinflammatory cytokine response to portal endotoxaemia. METHODS: Sixteen Wistar rats were randomised to receive either saline IV (n = 8) or GdCl(3) (10 mg/kg IV, n = 8) six days after bile duct ligation (BDL). 24 h later the animals were perfused for 2 h, using isolated hepatic perfusion. Aliquots of effluent perfusate were collected at 20-min intervals for cytokine analysis. Sections of liver were sampled and the hepatic Kupffer cell number of each group was measured using ED1 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Pre-treatment with GdCl(3) resulted in significantly reduced serum bilirubin concentrations but significantly elevated serum ALP and AST levels compared to the control group. It was also associated with a significant reduction in Kupffer cell numbers and a corresponding significant reduction in hepatic TNFα and IL-6 production in response to portal endotoxaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment with GdCl(3) in jaundiced animals reduced Kupffer cell numbers, attenuated liver enzyme abnormalities and reduced TNFα and IL-6 in response to portal endotoxaemia. Hepatic Kupffer cells, therefore, play a significant role in the development of an exaggerated inflammatory response in obstructive jaundice.

Outcomes following a dedicated period of research during surgical training.

With recent 'working-time'-related changes to surgical training structure, the value of dedicated research during surgical training has been questioned. Online survey examining career and academic outcomes following a period of surgically related dedicated research at a Scottish University between 1972 and 2007. Of 58 individuals identified, contact details were available for 49 and 43 (88%) responded. Ninety-five percent (n = 41) of respondents continue to pursue a career in surgery and 41% (n = 17) are currently in academic positions. Ninety-one percent (n = 39) had published one or more first-author peer-reviewed articles directly related to their research, with 53% (n = 23) publishing three or more. Respondents with a clinical component to their research published significantly more papers than those with purely laboratory-based research (P = 0.04). Eighty-one percent (n = 35) thought that research was necessary for career progression, but only 42% (n = 18) felt research should be integral to training. In conclusion, the majority of surgical trainees completing a dedicated research period, published papers and continued to pursue a surgical career with a research interest. A period of dedicated research was thought necessary for career progression, but few thought dedicated research should be integral to surgical training.

Randomized clinical trial of laxatives and oral nutritional supplements within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Routine laxatives may expedite gastrointestinal recovery and early tolerance of food within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme. Combined with carbohydrate loading and oral nutritional supplements (ONS), it may further enhance recovery of gastrointestinal function and promote earlier overall recovery. METHODS: Seventy-four patients undergoing liver resection were randomized in a two-by-two factorial design to receive either postoperative magnesium hydroxide as a laxative, preoperative carbohydrate loading and postoperative ONS, their combination or a control group. Patients were managed within an ERAS programme of care. The primary outcome measure was time to first passage of stool. Secondary outcome measures were gastric emptying, postoperative oral calorie intake, time to functional recovery and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients completed the trial. The laxative group had a significantly reduced time to passage of stool: median (interquartile range) 4 (3-5) versus 5 (4-6) days (P = 0.034). The ONS group showed a trend towards a shorter time to passage of stool (P = 0.076) but there was no evidence of interaction in patients randomized to the combination regimen. Median length of hospital stay was 6 (4-7) days. There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Within an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing liver resection, routine postoperative laxatives result in an earlier first passage of stool but the overall rate of recovery is unaltered.

The relationship between hospital volume and post-operative mortality rates for upper gastrointestinal cancer resections: Scotland 1982-2003.

BACKGROUND: Centralisation of surgical treatment of cancer has resulted in improved outcomes. We aimed to determine evidence of benefit for specialised management of upper gastrointestinal cancer in high-volume centres in Scotland. METHODS: Discharge records of patients undergoing oesophagectomy, gastrectomy, hepatectomy or pancreatectomy between 1982 and 2003 were identified. Hospital data were analysed on a year-by-year basis to derive 'hospital-years'. Hospital-years were divided into quartiles by volume, and were analysed with regard to in-hospital mortality during the operative admission [Chi-square test (chi(2)) and Chi-square test for trend (chi(2)(trend))]. RESULTS: 10,625 patients and 982 in-hospital deaths were included. In-hospital mortality rates declined during the study period: oesophagectomy 11.7-7.9%; gastrectomy 11.2-7.2%; hepatectomy 11.1-3.0%; and pancreatectomy 8.3-4.9%. For all resections except gastrectomy, mortality decreased as quartile of hospital-year volume increased (oesophagectomy: chi(2)p=0.006, chi(2)(trend)p=0.001; hepatectomy: chi(2)p=0.004, chi(2)(trend)p=0.003; pancreatectomy: chi(2)p=0.002, chi(2)(trend)p=0.001). ORs of death were lower for oesophagectomy (OR=0.58; 95%CI=0.39, 0.88; p=0.009) and pancreatectomy (OR=0.35; 95%CI=0.19, 0.64; p<0.001) in hospital-years within highest-volume quartiles compared with lowest. Scattergraphs of all resection types demonstrated inverse power relationships between number of resections per hospital-year and mortality. CONCLUSION: Concentration of cancer care has had major effects on health service delivery in Scotland. Centralisation should be supported in surgical management of upper gastrointestinal cancer.

What proportion of basic surgical trainees continue in a surgical career? A survey of the factors which are important in influencing career decisions.

INTRODUCTION: Since the launch of Modernising Medical Careers, trainees are selected for a run-through training programme in a single surgical specialty. The surgical training bodies are currently considering the recommendations of the Tooke report as they review the policy for selection into surgical training in the UK. There is little information available on the factors involved in career choices amongst surgical trainees and this study aimed to address this issue. METHOD: Trainees appointed to the Basic Surgical Training Programmes in the west and south-east of Scotland (1996-2006) were contacted by email and invited to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: Of 467 trainees identified, valid email addresses were available for 299 of which 191 (64%) responded to the survey. One hundred and forty-nine (78%) trainees were still working in surgery but 38 (20%) had moved to a non-surgical specialty and 4 (2%) had left the medical profession. Of those who had obtained a NTN at the time of the survey (n = 138), 62 (45%) had a NTN in the specialty they chose at the start of the BST but 34 (25%) had changed to a different surgical specialty and 42 (30%) had left surgery altogether. For those still working in surgery, enjoyment of the specialty was the most important factor affecting career choice. Achieving an acceptable work/life balance was the most significant factor influencing trainees who left surgery. CONCLUSION: The majority of trainees recruited to surgery at an early stage change specialty or leave surgery altogether. Both social and professional factors are important in career choices. The findings of this study support a period of core surgical training to provide flexibility prior to further training in a surgical specialty.

Intraoperative cholangiography in modern surgical practice.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the practice of performing intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a busy teaching hospital. METHODS: Data were obtained from a surgical database for patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2000 and December 2003. The findings of IOC and follow-up were analysed. RESULTS: 1,651 patients were included in the study. Of the 745 patients (45.1%) who underwent IOC, this was normal in 586 patients and abnormal in 68 patients. Of these 68 patients, 4 underwent immediate conversion to open common bile duct exploration. 33 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 31 patients were observed. During a median follow-up period of 920 days (range 371-1,821), 5 of the 745 patients had retained stones. Two patients re-presented after a failed IOC while 5 of the 906 patients from the non-cholangiogram group returned with stones. Of the 1,651 patients, definite stones were identified in 1.5% patients. CONCLUSION: When the surgeon deemed that IOC was not required, very few subsequent problems were encountered. An observational policy with monitoring of the liver function tests may be appropriate to avoid unnecessary invasive interventions in patients with an abnormal IOC.

Risk assessment in acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis has a variable natural history and in a proportion of patients is associated with severe complications and a significant risk of death. The various tools available for risk assessment in acute pancreatitis are reviewed. METHODS: Relevant medical literature from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library websites to May 2008 was reviewed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Over the past 30 years several scoring systems have been developed to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis in the first 48-72 h. Biochemical and immunological markers, imaging modalities and novel predictive models may help identify patients at high risk of complications or death. Recently, there has been a recognition of the importance of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction.

Validation of a prognostic nomogram in patients undergoing resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a UK tertiary referral centre.

INTRODUCTION: Survival following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains poor. The aim of this study was to validate a survival nomogram designed at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) in a UK tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection for PDAC between 1995 and 2005 were analysed retrospectively. Standard prognostic factors and nomogram-specific data were collected. Continuous data are presented as median (inter-quartile range). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were analysed. The median survival was 326 (209-680) days. On univariate analysis lymph node status (node +ve 297 (194-471) days versus node -ve 367 (308-1060) days, p=0.005) and posterior margin involvement (margin +ve 210 (146-443) days versus margin -ve 355 (265-835) days, p=0.024) were predictors of a poor survival. Only lymph node positivity was significant on multivariate analysis (p=0.006). The median nomogram score was 217 (198-236). A nomogram score of 113-217 predicted a median survival of 367 (295-847) days compared to 265 (157-443) days for a score of 218-269, p=0.012. CONCLUSION: Increasing nomogram score was associated with poorer survival. However the accuracy demonstrated by MSKCC could not be replicated in the current cohort of patients and may reflect differences in patient demographics, accuracy of pathological staging and differences in treatment regimens between the two centres.

Glutathione supplementation to University of Wisconsin solution causes endothelial dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Glutathione (GSH) is added to University of Wisconsin (UW) organ preservation solution to protect against oxidative stress. This study assesses the effect of GSH-supplementation on endothelial function in tissues subjected to cold ischaemia and compares its effects to a mono-ethyl ester equivalent (GSH-MEE) and S-nitrosated GSH (GSNO). METHODS: Rat aortic rings were stored for 1 h or 48 h in cold, hypoxic UW solution with or without GSH (3 mM), GSH-MEE (3 mM) or GSNO (100 mciroM) supplementation. Aortic rings were reoxygenated in warm Krebs solution; smooth muscle function was assessed by responses to phenylephrine (PE), and endothelial function by vasodilatation to the endothelium-dependent dilator, acetylcholine (ACh). The protective effects against oxidant-induced endothelial cell death were assessed in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). RESULTS: Supplementation of UW with either GSH or GSH-MEE had no effect on vascular responses to PE, but smooth muscle contraction was significantly attenuated in rings incubated for 48 h with GSNO. Endothelium-dependent relaxation was significantly impaired in tissues stored under hypoxic conditions in GSH, GSH-MEE and GSNO supplemented UW solution for 1 h. However, impairment at 48 h was significantly more pronounced in GSH-treated vessels. Cultured HUVEC death was exacerbated by GSH and GSH-MEE in unstressed cells and in those stressed with a superoxide anion generator. CONCLUSIONS: GSH supplementation of UW solution exacerbates cold-ischaemia induced endothelial dysfunction. GSNO did not share the detrimental effects of GSH and promoted NO-mediated vasodilatation.

Liver resection and transplantation in the management of iatrogenic biliary injury.

BACKGROUND: Biliary injury during cholecystectomy can be managed successfully by biliary reconstruction in the majority of patients; however, a proportion of patients may require hepatic resection or even liver transplantation. METHODS: Data on all patients referred with biliary injuries were recorded prospectively. The details of patients who required hepatic resection or transplantation were analyzed and compared to those patients managed with biliary reconstruction alone. RESULTS: From November 1984 until November 2003 there were 119 patients referred with Strasberg grade E injuries to the biliary tree, 14 of whom (9 women, 5 men) required hepatic resection or transplantation. The median age of these 14 patients was 48 (range: 30-81) years. Nine patients were considered for hepatic resection, and of these six underwent right hepatectomy, two had a left lateral sectionectomy, and one patient was deemed unfit for surgery and underwent metal stenting of the right hepatic duct. All patients are alive and remain well. Five patients developed hepatic failure and were considered for liver transplantation. Two patients who were unfit for transplantation died, and another died while on the waiting list for transplantation. The remaining two patients underwent liver transplantation, and one of them died from overwhelming sepsis. Concomitant vascular injury was demonstrated in 8 of the 14 patients (57%), and in 3 of the 4 (75%) patients that died. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic atrophy or sepsis after biliary injury can be managed successfully with hepatic resection. Liver transplantation is required occasionally for patients with secondary biliary cirrhosis, but is rarely successful for early hepatic failure following iatrogenic biliary injury.

Pre-operative high sensitivity C-reactive protein and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery.

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) adds important prognostic information, not reflected by traditional risk factors, to the prediction of both the development and outcome of cardiovascular pathology. HsCRP levels also correlate inversely with cardiorespiratory fitness, an important determinant of peri-operative outcome. We hypothesised that pre-operative hsCRP should be associated with excess peri-operative morbidity and longer length of stay. Pre-operative hsCRP was measured blinded to standardised postoperative outcomes in 129 elective orthopaedic patients. HsCRP levels were divided into high (> 3 mg x l(-1)) or low (< 3 mg x l(-1)) groups (Center for Disease Control stratification). High-CRP patients had significant cardiovascular history, received cardiac medication or steroid therapy (p < 0.05). Higher pre-operative hsCRP was associated with longer length of stay: mean 7.5 days (95% CI: 6.2-8.8) vs 6.0 days (95% CI: 5.5-6.5; p = 0.03; log rank test). In 21 patients with > 8 days length of stay, high pre-operative hsCRP patients were over-represented (p = 0.04). Pre-operative hsCRP is related to length of stay and delayed postoperative complications.

Prognostic factors in patients undergoing surgery for severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

Pancreatic necrosectomy remains an important treatment modality for the management of infected pancreatic necrosis but is associated with significant mortality. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with mortality following pancreatic necrosectomy. Patients who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy from January 1995 to December 2004 were reviewed. The association between admission, preoperative and postoperative variables, and mortality was assessed using logistic regression analysis. A total of 1248 patients presented with acute pancreatitis, of whom 94 (7.5%) underwent pancreatic necrosectomy (51 men, 43 women). The preoperative median Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score was 9 (range 2-19). The median cumulative organ dysfunction score was 2 (0-9) preoperatively and 4 (1-11) postoperatively. In all, 23 patients (24.5%) died. Those who died were older than the survivors; the ages (median and range) were 69 years (40-80 years) versus 52 years (19-79 years) (p < 0.05). They also had higher admission APACHE II scores (median and range): 14 (12-19) versus 9 (2-22) (p < 0.001). There were significant associations between preoperative (p < 0.01) and postoperative (p < 0.01) Marshall scores and mortality following pancreatic necrosectomy. The presence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) during the first 48 hours (p < 0.01) and the time between presentation and necrosectomy (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of survival. Pancreatic necrosectomy is associated with higher mortality in patients with increased APACHE II scores, early persistent SIRS, and unresolved multiorgan dysfunction. Necrosectomy is associated with poorer outcome when performed within 2 weeks of presentation.

Open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era.

INTRODUCTION: As techniques in laparoscopic cholecystectomy have improved, surgeon experience of open cholecystectomy may be limited. This study examined the current indications for and techniques used in primary open cholecystectomy. METHODS: Some 3100 consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency cholecystectomy over a 5-year interval were identified from a prospective surgical audit database. Demographic, diagnostic and procedural data were examined. RESULTS: There were 123 (4.0 per cent) primary and 219 (7.4 per cent) converted open cholecystectomies. Some 48.0 and 45.6 per cent of patients in the primary open cholecystectomy and converted groups respectively were men, compared with 24.0 per cent of 2758 who had a successful laparoscopic procedure. Primary open cholecystectomy was employed principally for previous upper abdominal open surgery (22.7 per cent) and emergency operation for general peritonitis (19.5 per cent). The fundus-first approach was employed in 53.7 per cent of primary open procedures and 53.0 per cent of conversions, with subtotal excision in 4.9 and 13.2 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: Primary open cholecystectomy remains a common procedure in the treatment of gallbladder disease despite the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Successful outcome in difficult cases requires familiarity with specific techniques, exposure to which may be limited in current training programmes.

An audit of the management of patients with acute pancreatitis against national standards of practice.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to audit the management of patients with acute pancreatitis against the standards of practice in the British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines. METHODS: The study assessed consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis over 5 years. Audit targets were overall mortality below 10 per cent, mortality for severe acute pancreatitis below 30 per cent, correct diagnosis and severity stratification within 48 h, aetiology determined in more than 80 per cent, availability of computed tomography and high-dependency or intensive therapy units when indicated and definitive treatment of gallstone pancreatitis within 2 weeks. RESULTS: Of 759 patients with acute pancreatitis, 219 (28.9 per cent) had severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Overall mortality was 5.9 per cent, and 19.6 per cent in those with SAP. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed within 48 h of presentation in 96.3 per cent of patients. The definitive aetiology was classified in 87.5 per cent. Of patients with SAP, 95.9 per cent underwent computed tomography within 6-10 days of admission. Of 93 patients with severe gallstone pancreatitis, 48 per cent had urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 89.6 per cent of 359 patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis underwent definitive management within 2 weeks of admission. CONCLUSION: Patients with acute pancreatitis can be managed according to revised guidelines with a low associated mortality.