RESUMEN
The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remains elusive in localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report interim results of a Simon's two-stage design, phase 2 trial using neoadjuvant sintilimab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. All 18 patients undergo radical surgery, with one patient experiencing surgery delay. Fourteen patients exhibit confirmed radiological response, with 44% achieving major pathological response (MPR) and no pathological complete response (pCR). Similar genomic alterations are observed before and after treatment without influencing the efficacy of subsequent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in vitro. Infiltration and T cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion of CCR8+ regulatory T (Treg)hi/CXCL13+ exhausted T (Tex)lo cells define a subtype of EGFR-mutant NSCLC highly resistant to immunotherapy, with the phenotype potentially serving as a promising signature to predict immunotherapy efficacy. Informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in EGFR-mutant NSCLC could help identify patients nonresponsive to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. These findings provide supportive data for the utilization of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and insight into immune resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy can be used to treat early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer; however, their effects on pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas (LELC) remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with stages I-III LELC were treated with chemotherapy (Chemo) or neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemo (IO) before radical-intent surgery. Short-term outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), major pathologic response (MPR), pathologic complete response (PCR), and event-free survival. For comparison, we used IO to treat 63 patients with pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas (SQC) and 47 with adenocarcinomas (ADC). Propensity score matching was analyzed to minimize bias. RESULTS: ORRs of the LELC-IO and LELC-Chemo groups were 62.5% and 42.9%, respectively (odds ratio, 2.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.423-11.678, p = 0.346). Seven (21.9%) and zero patients in LELC-IO and LELC-Chemo groups, respectively, reached PCR. MPR was identified in five (15.6%) of the 32 patients with LELC-IO. The 1-year progression-free survival rates were 96.9% and 71.4% in IO and Chemo groups, respectively (p > 0.05). However, no difference was observed in ORR, PCR, and MPR between LELC and SQC groups (ORR, 63.2% vs. 68.4%, p > 0.05; PCR, 21.1% vs. 47.4, p > 0.05; MPR, 42.1% vs. 57.9%, p > 0.05) and LELC and ADC groups (ORR, 58.8% vs. 41.2%, p > 0.05; PCR, 17.6% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.672; MPR, 29.4% vs. 47.1%, p > 0.05). The plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA level in a patient was altered posttreatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with LELC could be benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Distinct histological subtypes demonstrated comparable efficacy with respect to neoadjuvant immunotherapy.