Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 187: 204-211, 2024 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795509

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the annual percentage of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who could be eligible for and benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy amidst changing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications. METHODS: This is a simulated retrospective observational study using publicly available data on patients with advanced-stage EOC. PARPi eligibility is based on FDA approvals and withdrawals from 2014 through 2023, along with published demographic and genomic data. Clinical trial data is used to estimate treatment benefit. PARPi including olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib are analyzed in aggregate with sub-analyses by molecular classification and treatment timing. Results are reported as the percentage of EOC patients appropriate for any cancer-directed therapy. RESULTS: PARPi were approved for 9 different indications in EOC between 2014 and 2021; reduced to 6 indications by 2023. Eligibility increased from 2.0% (95% CI,1.3%-1.6%) in 2014 to a maximum of 93.4% (95% CI,90.1%-94.6%) in 2021. The maximum percentage of patients with 2-year PFS benefit was 22.0% (95% CI, 17.2%-26.8%) in 2021, projected to decrease to 13.0% (95% CI, 9.9%-15.9%) in 2024. Most of this decrease was seen in the homologous recombination deficient, BRCA wild-type population (8.4% to 4.0%). CONCLUSIONS: PARPi eligibility increased at a greater rate than benefit resulting in a low population-level benefit-to-eligibility ratio until 2021. Recent FDA withdrawals improved this ratio with an accompanied decrease in the absolute number of patients benefiting. To further optimize population-level benefit-to-eligibility ratio of targeted therapies in ovarian cancer, we need to identify better biomarkers, treatment combinations, and novel therapeutic targets.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Estados Unidos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Aprobación de Drogas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Selección de Paciente , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Indoles
2.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 25(1): 20-26, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170388

RESUMEN

OPINION STATEMENT: Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and dissection (SLND) should be used as an alternative to full inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFLND) in select patients with early-stage vulvar cancer. IFLND is associated with high postoperative complications such as wound breakdown, lymphedema, lymphocyst formation, and infection. SLND in select patients offers a safe, effective, and less morbid alternative. Candidates for SLND include patients with a unifocal vulvar tumor less than four centimeters, clinically negative lymph nodes, and no prior inguinofemoral surgeries. SLND should ideally be performed by a high-volume SLN surgeon. Most commonly, SLND is performed using both radiocolloid lymphoscintigraphy (e.g., Technetium-99) and a visual tracer such as blue dye; however, near infrared imaging with indocyanine green injection is becoming more widely adopted. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the safety and efficacy of various techniques for SLND. SLND has been demonstrated to be cost-effective, especially when including perioperative complications. Further studies are needed to demonstrate quality of life differences between IFLND and SLND.


Asunto(s)
Linfadenopatía , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias de la Vulva , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vulva/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vulva/patología , Calidad de Vida , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Linfadenopatía/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología
3.
Cell Death Dis ; 14(7): 456, 2023 07 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479754

RESUMEN

Ovarian cancer is a complex disease associated with multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations. The emergence of treatment resistance in most patients causes ovarian cancer to become incurable, and novel therapies remain necessary. We identified epigenetic regulator ATPase family AAA domain-containing 2 (ATAD2) is overexpressed in ovarian cancer and is associated with increased incidences of metastasis and recurrence. Genetic knockdown of ATAD2 or its pharmacological inhibition via ATAD2 inhibitor BAY-850 suppressed ovarian cancer growth and metastasis in both in vitro and in vivo models. Transcriptome-wide mRNA expression profiling of ovarian cancer cells treated with BAY-850 revealed that ATAD2 inhibition predominantly alters the expression of centromere regulatory genes, particularly centromere protein E (CENPE). In ovarian cancer cells, changes in CENPE expression following ATAD2 inhibition resulted in cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis induction, which led to the suppression of ovarian cancer growth. Pharmacological CENPE inhibition phenotypically recapitulated the cellular changes induced by ATAD2 inhibition, and combined pharmacological inhibition of both ATAD2 and CENPE inhibited ovarian cancer cell growth more potently than inhibition of either alone. Thus, our study identified ATAD2 as regulators of ovarian cancer growth and metastasis that can be targeted either alone or in combination with CENPE inhibitors for effective ovarian cancer therapy.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Unión al ADN , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , ATPasas Asociadas con Actividades Celulares Diversas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Adenosina Trifosfatasas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología
4.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 19(3): 116-122, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603168

RESUMEN

Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of mortality in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Advanced-stage high-grade serous carcinoma accounts for most ovarian cancer cases. Current issues in the management of patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer include decisions on primary versus interval cytoreduction, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, maintenance therapy, incorporation of bevacizumab, and germline and somatic genetic testing. Evidence and guidelines regarding these topics are addressed in this review.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/genética
5.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 41: 101009, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35652061

RESUMEN

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin when used at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been shown to provide a survival advantage compared to interval cytoreduction alone for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in a cost-effective manner. A recent large multi-center retrospective cohort study showed a survival advantage with HIPEC given during primary debulking surgery compared to surgery alone. While there is an ongoing randomized controlled trial examining HIPEC at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) before chemotherapy (OVHIPEC-2), there is currently no study of this practice in the United States or cost data to inform incorporation of this practice. To help guide the use of HIPEC in the upfront setting until the results of the OVHIPEC-2 are available in 2026, a decision-analytic cost-effectiveness model of the US healthcare sector was developed for patients undergoing PCS with or without HIPEC. Effectiveness inputs were extracted from a Chinese retrospective cohort study of 425 patients who underwent PCS with HIPEC and 159 patients who underwent PCS alone. We found incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) of $9,789 per life year saved (LYS) for optimal PCS, $18,164/LYS for suboptimal PCS, and $7,854/LYS for all patients. Our findings provide preliminary data to support that HIPEC at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery can be considered cost-effective regardless of residual disease status when using a standard willingness to pay threshold.

6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2028620, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33295974

RESUMEN

Importance: There are large randomized clinical trials-SOLO-1 (Olaparib Maintenance Monotherapy in Patients With BRCA Mutated Ovarian Cancer Following First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy [December 2018]), PRIMA (A Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy [September 2019]), and PAOLA-1 (Platine, Avastin and Olaparib in 1st Line [December 2019])-reporting positive efficacy results for maintenance regimens for women with primary, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The findings resulted in approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of the treatments studied as of May 2020. However, there are pressing economic considerations given the many eligible patients and substantial associated costs. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maintenance strategies for patients with (1) a BRCA variant, (2) homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant, or (3) homologous recombination proficiency. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation of the US health care sector using simulated patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, 3 decision trees were developed, one for each molecular signature. The maintenance strategies evaluated were olaparib (SOLO-1), olaparib-bevacizumab (PAOLA-1), bevacizumab (PAOLA-1), and niraparib (PRIMA). Base case 1 assessed olaparib, olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation of a patient with a BRCA variant. Base case 2 assessed olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation in a patient with homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant. Base case 3 assessed olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation in a patient with homologous recombination proficiency. The time horizon was 24 months. Costs were estimated from Medicare claims, wholesale acquisition prices, and published sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses with microsimulation were then conducted to account for uncertainty and assess model stability. One-way sensitivity analyses were also performed. The study was performed from January through June 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in US dollars per progression-free life-year saved (PF-LYS). Results: Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/PF-LYS, none of the drugs could be considered cost-effective compared with observation. In the case of a patient with a BRCA variant, olaparib was the most cost-effective (ICER, $186 777/PF-LYS). The third-party payer price per month of olaparib would need to be reduced from approximately $17 000 to $9000 to be considered cost-effective. Olaparib-bevacizumab was the most cost-effective in the case of a patient with homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant (ICER, $629 347/PF-LYS), and bevacizumab was the most cost-effective in the case of patient with homologous recombination proficiency (ICER, $557 865/PF-LYS). Even at a price of $0 per month, niraparib could not be considered cost-effective as a maintenance strategy for patients with homologous recombination proficiency. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that, at current costs, maintenance therapy for primary ovarian cancer is not cost-effective, regardless of molecular signature. For certain therapies, lowering the drug price alone may not make them cost-effective.


Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Indazoles , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Neoplasias Ováricas , Ftalazinas , Piperazinas , Piperidinas , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/economía , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/economía , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/economía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Metodologías Computacionales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Recombinación Homóloga , Humanos , Indazoles/economía , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Mantención/economía , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ftalazinas/economía , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/economía , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/economía , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos
7.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 29: 83-84, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31417953

RESUMEN

Female first authorship and senior authorship in academic obstetrics and gynecology has increased over time but gender-specific publishing data are lacking within gynecologic oncology. We examined contribution by gender to the subspecialty's flagship journal, Gynecologic Oncology, over five decades, from 1972 to 2014, to identify trends in gender representation. Chi-square tests were used to compare gender distributions within and between the first and last years studied (1972-73 and 2014) as well as linear regression to model trends over time. Female first and senior authorship increased significantly from 1972 to 2014 (first: χ2 = 20.9, p < .01; senior: χ2 = 9.9, p < .01). The number of female first authors increased markedly after 2000. Male senior authors still outnumber female senior authors. Papers with senior female authors were more likely to have female first authors, suggesting a mentorship role. Subspecialty-wide gender equity initiatives should encourage continued mentorship of women by female colleagues.

8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 152(2): 293-297, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30497792

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Returning home after surgery is a desirable patient-centered outcome associated with decreased costs compared to non-home discharge. Our objective was to develop a preoperative risk-scoring model predicting non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy. METHODS: Women who underwent surgery involving hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancy from 2013 to 2015 were identified from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database. Patients were divided by discharge destination, and a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to create a nomogram to assign case-specific risk scores. The model was validated using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. RESULTS: Non-home discharge occurred in 3.1% of 2134 women. The proportion of non-home discharges did not differ by cancer diagnosis (uterine 3.5%, ovarian 2.5%, and cervical 1.6%, p = 0.2). Skilled nursing facilities were the most common non-home destination (68.2%). Among patients with comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease /dyspnea, arrhythmia, and history of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism), non-home discharge was more common in women with 1 (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.4; p = 0.03) or ≥2 of these comorbidities (aOR 5.1; p = 0.003) compared to none. Non-home discharge was more common after laparotomy (aOR 6.7; p < 0.0001) than laparoscopy, and in those aged ≥70 years (aOR 3.4; p < 0.0001) with American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 (aOR 4.5; p = 0.0004) and dependent functional status (aOR 8.7; p < 0.0001). The model C-statistic was 0.89. When the model was applied to 4248 eligible patients from the NSQIP dataset, the C-statistic was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy was predicted with high accuracy in this retrospective analysis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Histerectomía/métodos , Alta del Paciente , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
9.
Mol Cancer Ther ; 17(1): 96-106, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29133618

RESUMEN

Antiangiogenic therapies, despite initial encouragement, have demonstrated a limited benefit in ovarian cancer. Laboratory studies suggest antiangiogenic therapy-induced hypoxia can induce tumor "stemness" as resistance to antiangiogenic therapy develops and limits the therapeutic benefit. Resistance to antiangiogenic therapy and an induction of tumor stemness may be mediated by proangiogenic tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). As such, TAMs have been proposed as a therapeutic target. We demonstrate here that ovarian TAMs express high levels of the folate receptor-2 (FOLR2) and can be selectively targeted using G5-dendrimer nanoparticles using methotrexate as both a ligand and a toxin. G5-methotrexate (G5-MTX) nanoparticles deplete TAMs in both solid tumor and ascites models of ovarian cancer. As a therapeutic agent, these nanoparticles are more effective than cisplatin. Importantly, these nanoparticles could (i) overcome resistance to antiangiogenic therapy, (ii) prevent antiangiogenic therapy-induced increases in cancer stem-like cells in both murine and human tumor cell models, (iii) prevent antiangiogenic therapy-induced increases in VEGF-C, and (iv) prevent antiangiogenic therapy-induced BRCA1 gene expression. Combined, this work strongly supports the development of TAM-targeted nanoparticle therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 96-106. ©2017 AACR.


Asunto(s)
Macrófagos/efectos de los fármacos , Nanopartículas/metabolismo , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Humanos , Ratones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA