Rheumatic heart disease: current status of diagnosis and therapy.

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is the only preventable cardiovascular disease which causes significant morbidity and mortality particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Early clinical diagnosis is key, the updated Jones criteria increases the likelihood of diagnosis in endemic settings, including the echo diagnosis of sub-clinical carditis, polyarthralgia and monoarthritis as well as amended thresholds of minor criteria. The mainstay of rheumatic heart valve disease (RHVD) is a thorough clinical and echocardiographic investigation while severe disease is managed with medical, interventional and surgical treatment. In this report we detail some of the more recent epidemiological findings and focus on the diagnostic and interventional elements of the specific valve lesions. Finally, we discuss some of the recent efforts to improve medical and surgical management for this disease. As we are already more than a year from the historic 2018 World Heart Organization Resolution against Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease, we advocate strongly for renewed efforts to prioritize this disease across the endemic regions of the world.

Assessment of myocardial fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement imaging and biomarkers of collagen metabolism in chronic rheumatic mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: In chronic rheumatic mitral regurgitation (CRMR), involvement of the myocardium in the rheumatic process has been controversial. Therefore, we sought to study the presence of fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) and biomarkers of collagen turnover in CRMR. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with CRMR underwent CMR and echocardiography. Serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase- 1 (MMP-1), tissue inhibitor of MMP-1 (TIMP- 1), MMP-1-to-TIMP-1 ratio, procollagen III N-terminal pro-peptide (PIIINP) and procollagen type IC peptide (PIP) were measured. RESULTS: Four patients had fibrosis on LGE-CMR. PICP and PIIINP concentrations were similar to those of the controls, however MMP-1 concentration was increased compared to that of the controls (log MMP-1 3.5 ± 0.7 vs 2.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.02). There was increased MMP-1 activity as the MMP-1-to- TIMP-1 ratio was higher in CRMR patients compared to the controls ( -1.2 ± 0.6 vs -2.1 ± 0.89, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial fibrosis was rare in CRMR patients. CRMR is likely a disease characterised by the predominance of collagen degradation rather than increased synthesis and myocardial fibrosis.

Prednisolone and Mycobacterium indicus pranii in tuberculous pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculous pericarditis is associated with high morbidity and mortality even if antituberculosis therapy is administered. We evaluated the effects of adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy and Mycobacterium indicus pranii immunotherapy in patients with tuberculous pericarditis. METHODS: Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned 1400 adults with definite or probable tuberculous pericarditis to either prednisolone or placebo for 6 weeks and to either M. indicus pranii or placebo, administered in five injections over the course of 3 months. Two thirds of the participants had concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis, or constrictive pericarditis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between patients who received prednisolone and those who received placebo (23.8% and 24.5%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.18; P=0.66) or between those who received M. indicus pranii immunotherapy and those who received placebo (25.0% and 24.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; P=0.81). Prednisolone therapy, as compared with placebo, was associated with significant reductions in the incidence of constrictive pericarditis (4.4% vs. 7.8%; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.87; P=0.009) and hospitalization (20.7% vs. 25.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99; P=0.04). Both prednisolone and M. indicus pranii, each as compared with placebo, were associated with a significant increase in the incidence of cancer (1.8% vs. 0.6%; hazard ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 10.03; P=0.03, and 1.8% vs. 0.5%; hazard ratio, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.03 to 13.24; P=0.03, respectively), owing mainly to an increase in HIV-associated cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with tuberculous pericarditis, neither prednisolone nor M. indicus pranii had a significant effect on the composite of death, cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis, or constrictive pericarditis. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; IMPI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00810849.).

Rationale and design of the Investigation of the Management of Pericarditis (IMPI) trial: a 2 × 2 factorial randomized double-blind multicenter trial of adjunctive prednisolone and Mycobacterium w immunotherapy in tuberculous pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: In spite of antituberculosis chemotherapy, tuberculous (TB) pericarditis causes death or disability in nearly half of those affected. Attenuation of the inflammatory response in TB pericarditis may improve outcome by reducing cardiac tamponade and pericardial constriction, but there is uncertainty as to whether adjunctive immunomodulation with corticosteroids and Mycobacterium w (M. w) can safely reduce mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the IMPI Trial is to assess the effectiveness and safety of prednisolone and M. w immunotherapy in reducing the composite outcome of death, constriction, or cardiac tamponade requiring pericardial drainage in 1,400 patients with TB pericardial effusion. DESIGN: The IMPI trial is a multicenter international randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 2 × 2 factorial study. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive oral prednisolone or placebo for 6 weeks and M. w injection or placebo for 3 months. Patients are followed up at weeks 2, 4, and 6 and months 3 and 6 during the intervention period and 6-monthly thereafter for up to 4 years. The primary outcome is the first occurrence of death, pericardial constriction, or cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis. The secondary outcome is safety of immunomodulatory treatment measured by effect on opportunistic infections (eg, herpes zoster) and malignancy (eg, Kaposi sarcoma) and impact on measures of immunosuppression and the incidence of immune reconstitution disease. CONCLUSIONS: IMPI is the largest trial yet conducted comparing adjunctive immunotherapy in pericarditis. Its results will define the role of adjunctive corticosteroids and M. w immunotherapy in patients with TB pericardial effusion.

Therapy of ischemic cardiomyopathy with the immunomodulating agent pentoxifylline: results of a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory immune activation commonly occurs in heart failure and may perpetuate this syndrome. We sought to determine whether the immunomodulating agent pentoxifylline enhances left ventricular function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. We also investigated the effect of therapy on levels of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and the marker of apoptosis, Fas/Apo-1. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 38 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy received pentoxifylline 400 mg TID or placebo in addition to standard therapy. Clinical assessment, radionuclide ventriculography, echocardiography, and blood analyses were performed at baseline and after 6 months. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Five patients died (4 in the placebo group). Pentoxifylline treatment resulted in an improvement in functional class (P<0.005) and an increase in systolic blood pressure (P<0.05) and left ventricular radionuclide ejection fraction (P<0.05) compared with the placebo-treated group. There were reductions in plasma concentrations of CRP, NT-pro BNP, TNF-alpha, and Fas/Apo-1 in the pentoxifylline compared with the placebo-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure due to ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, the addition of pentoxifylline to standard therapy results in improvements in clinical status and radionuclide ejection fraction, which are accompanied by reductions in plasma markers of inflammation, prognosis, and apoptosis.