Randomized study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes have largely replaced nasogastric tubes (NGT) for nutritional support of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing curative (chemo)radiotherapy without any good scientific basis. A randomized trial was conducted to compare PEG tubes and NGT in terms of nutritional outcomes, complications, patient satisfaction and cost. The study was closed early because of poor accrual, predominantly due to patients' reluctance to be randomized. There were 33 patients eligible for analysis. Nutritional support with both tubes was good. There were no significant differences in overall complication rates, chest infection rates or in patients' assessment of their overall quality of life. The cost of a PEG tube was 10 times that of an NGT. The duration of use of PEG tubes was significantly longer, a median 139 days compared with a median 66 days for NGT. We found no evidence to support the routine use of PEG tubes over NGT in this patient group.

Parotid-sparing radiotherapy: does it really reduce xerostomia?

AIMS: Parotid-sparing radiotherapy (PSRT) was introduced for patients with selected head and neck cancer requiring bilateral upper-neck irradiation at our centre in 2000. The aim of this study was to compare the subjective degree of xerostomia in patients treated with PSRT between January 2000 and June 2003 with patients treated using conventional techniques (radiotherapy) over the same period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were required to have completed treatment 6 months previously and be recurrence-free at the time of interview. PSRT was defined as conformal radiotherapy, in which the mean dose to at least one parotid gland was 33 Gy or less, as determined by the dose-volume histogram. Patients receiving radiotherapy were treated with standard parallel-opposed fields, such that both parotids received a minimum of 40 Gy. Xerostomia was assessed using a validated questionnaire containing six questions with a rating between 0 and 10. Lower scores indicated less difficulty with xerostomia. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eligible patients treated with PSRT were identified: 25 with oropharyngeal cancer and 13 with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). The mean overall questionnaire score (Q1-5) for this group was 4.20 (standard error = 0.33). Forty-four patients (24 oropharyngeal, 21 NPC) treated with radiotherapy over the same period were eligible. The mean overall questionnaire score (Q1-5) for this group was 5.86 (standard error = 0.35). The difference in mean overall scores between the two groups of patients was statistically significant (P < 0.001), as were the scores for four of the six individual questions. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PSRT offers improved long-term xerostomia-related quality of life compared with conventional radiotherapy.

Clinical verification of the superiority of the current International Union Against Cancer staging criteria in an Australian population of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic abilities of the fourth and fifth edition International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Australian patients. All patients planned for curative treatment at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre from April 1985 to December 1999 were included in this study. There were 181 patients eligible for this study. The median follow up was 7.6 years. Histological subgroups were World Health Organization (WHO) 1 (23), WHO 2 (12), and WHO 3 (146). Presentation with stage IV disease was 83% by UICC fourth edition staging and 34% by UICC fifth edition staging. The 5 years failure-free survival (FFS) rates for stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 disease by the fourth edition was 77, 100, 93, and 49% respectively,and by the fifth edition was 85, 76, 57 and 36%, respectively. The 5 years overall survival (OS) for stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 disease by the fourth edition was 77, 100, 100 and 61%; respectively, and by the fifth edition was 85, 82, 67 and 53%, respectively. Stage 4 patients by the fourth edition were reclassified as stages 2, 3 and 4 by the fifth edition with hazard ratios of 0.77, 1.01 and 1.79, respectively. In multifactor analysis, the fifth edition staging system was significantly related to FFS and OS after allowing for the fourth edition (FFS: P = 0.002; OS: P = 0.005), but the fourth edition was not significantly related to FFS or OS after allowing for the fifth edition (FFS: P = 0.96; OS: P = 0.96). This study confirms the prognostic superiority of the fifth edition UICC staging system over the fourth edition staging system in an Australian NPC population.

Primary melanoma of the oesophagus well palliated by radiotherapy.

A case of a 16 cm primary melanoma of the mid oesophagus in a Caucasian male is reported. Radiological investigations at presentation revealed asymptomatic mediastinal and lower oesophageal metastases. The patient was treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy and achieved durable local disease control and excellent palliation of his dysphagia and chest pain until his death from widespread metastatic disease 5 months after treatment. The role of external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of primary oesophageal melanoma is reviewed.

Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial was undertaken in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to address (1) the validity of using pathologic risk features, established from a previous study, to determine the need for, and dose of, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); (2) the impact of accelerating PORT using a concomitant boost schedule; and (3) the importance of the overall combined treatment duration on the treatment outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 288 consecutive patients with advanced disease registered preoperatively, 213 fulfilled the trial criteria and went on to receive therapy predicated on a set of pathologic risk features: no PORT for the low-risk group (n = 31); 57.6 Gy during 6.5 weeks for the intermediate-risk group (n = 31); and, by random assignment, 63 Gy during 5 weeks (n = 76) or 7 weeks (n = 75) for the high-risk group. Patients were irradiated with standard techniques appropriate to the site of disease and likely areas of spread. The study end points were locoregional control (LRC), survival, and morbidity. RESULTS: Patients with low or intermediate risks had significantly higher LRC and survival rates than those with high-risk features (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0001, respectively), despite receiving no PORT or lower dose PORT, respectively. For high-risk patients, a trend toward higher LRC and survival rates was noted when PORT was delivered in 5 rather than 7 weeks. A prolonged interval between surgery and PORT in the 7-week schedule was associated with significantly lower LRC (p = 0.03) and survival (p = 0.01) rates. Consequently, the cumulative duration of combined therapy had a significant impact on the LRC (p = 0.005) and survival (p = 0.03) rates. A 2-week reduction in the PORT duration by using the concomitant boost technique did not increase the late treatment toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This Phase III trial established the power of risk assessment using pathologic features in determining the need for, and dose of, PORT in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer in a prospective, multi-institutional setting. It also revealed the impact of the overall treatment time in the combination of surgery and PORT on the outcome in high-risk patients and showed that PORT acceleration without a reduction in dose by a concomitant boost regimen did not increase the late complication rate. These findings emphasize the importance of coordinated interdisciplinary care in the delivery of combined surgery and RT.

Combined modality treatment for locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in a woman with Bloom's syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

We describe a case of locally advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in a young woman with Bloom's syndrome. She was treated with radical radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-flurouracil). She was unable to complete treatment due to the development of severe side effects: confluent mucositis, moist desquamating skin reaction, severe diarrhea and severe myelosupression with neutropenic sepsis. The limited relevant literature is presented. We conclude that chemotherapy should be used with extreme caution in Bloom's syndrome patients.

A randomised trial of accelerated and conventional radiotherapy for stage III and IV squamous carcinoma of the head and neck: a Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this randomized controlled trial were to determine whether there were differences in the disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and a continuous 3 week accelerated radiotherapy regimen (ART) in stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 14 centres throughout Australia and New Zealand were randomly assigned to either CRT, using a single 2 Gy/day to a dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions in 49 days or to ART, using 1.8 Gy twice a day to a dose of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions in 24 days. Treatment allocation was stratified for site and stage. The accrual began in 1991 and the trial was closed in 1998 when the target of 350 patients was reached. RESULTS: The median potential follow-up time was 53 months (range, 14-101). The DFS at 5 years was 41% (95% CI, 33-50%) for ART and 35% (95% CI, 27-43%) for CRT (P=0.323) and the hazard ratio was 0.87 in favour of ART (95% CI, 0.66-1.15). The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 40% for CRT and 46% for ART (P=0.398) and the loco-regional control was 47% for CRT vs. 52% for ART (P=0.300). The respective hazard ratios were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.65-1.2) and 0.85 (0.62-1.16), favouring the accelerated arm. In the ART arm, confluent mucositis was more severe (94 vs. 71%; P<0.001) and peaked about 3 weeks earlier than in the CRT arm, but healing appeared complete in all cases. There were statistically significant reductions in the probability of grade 2 or greater late soft tissue effects over time in the ART arm (P<0.05), except for the mucous membrane where late effects were similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in DFS, disease-specific survival and loco-regional control have not been demonstrated. ART resulted in more acute mucosal toxicity, but this did not result in greater prolongation of the treatment time compared with the CRT arm. There were less late effects in the ART arm, with the exception of late mucosal effects. This trial has confirmed that tumour cell repopulation occurs during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. However, it has also provided additional evidence that overall improvements in the therapeutic ratio using accelerated fractionation strategies are seriously constrained by the need to limit total doses to levels that do not exceed acute mucosal tolerance. The accelerated schedule tested has been shown in this trial to be an acceptable alternative to conventionally fractionated irradiation to 70 Gy.

Biological factors influencing the RBE of neutrons: implications for their past, present and future use in radiotherapy.

The recent resurgence of interest in fast-neutron therapy, particularly for the treatment of prostate cancer, warrants a review of the original radiobiological basis for this modality and the evolution of these concepts that resulted from subsequent experimentation with the fast-neutron beams used for randomized clinical trials. It is clear from current radiobiological knowledge that some of the postulates that formed the mechanistic basis for past clinical trials were incorrect. Such discrepancies, along with the inherent physical disadvantages of neutron beams in terms of collimation and intensity modulation, may partially account for the lack of therapeutic benefit observed in many randomized clinical trials. Moreover, it is equally apparent that indiscriminate prescription of fast-neutron therapy is likely to lead to an adverse clinical outcome in a proportion of patients. Hence any renewed efforts to establish a niche for this modality in clinical radiation oncology will necessitate the development of a triage system that can discriminate those patients who might benefit from fast-neutron therapy from those who might be harmed by it. In the future, fast-neutron therapy might be prescribed based upon the relative status of appropriate molecular parameters that have a differential impact upon radiosensitivity to photons compared to fast neutrons.

Quality assurance in a Radiation Oncology Unit: the Chart Round experience.

Quality assurance ensures that planned treatments eventuate. Programmes must include feedback loops to promptly correct any shortfall in predetermined standards. In March 1999, a weekly Chart Round was introduced to verify that certain items relevant to quality care were being completed for patients of the Head and Neck Radiotherapy Unit at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute. The experience was reviewed after 1 year and it was found that the initiation of Chart Rounds has assisted in raising the level of item completion from 80% to 99% in similar groups of patients treated before and after the initiation of the Chart Round. Initiation of the Chart Round has also provided a useful forum for in-house peer-review, education and effective real-time communication between medical and allied health personnel, all of which has further added to the quality of patient care.

Clonidine inhibits postprandial response of antral myoelectrical activity.

Clonidine, an alpha2-adrenergic agonist, is known to inhibit gastric motility and delay gastric emptying in both humans and animals, but its effect on gastric myoelectric activity is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of clonidine on postprandial gastric myoelectric activity. The experiment was performed in eight hound dogs (14.5-22.6 kg) implanted with three pairs of bipolar serosal electrodes with an interval of 4 cm and the most distal pair 2 cm above the pylorus. Each dog was studied twice on two separate days after a complete recovery from surgery. Gastric myoelectrical activity was recorded for 30 min in the fasting state and 90 min after a solid test meal of 838 kcal. Two tablets of clonidine (0.4 mg) were given with the meal in one of the sessions. The dominant frequency and power of the slow waves from the most distal pair were calculated by computerized spectral analysis. All data were expressed as mean +/- SE. A significant postprandial increase in the dominant power of the slow wave and an increase in the percentages of gastric slow waves with spike bursts were observed in the control session, whereas the dominant frequency of gastric slow waves showed a significant postprandial decrease after the meal. The dominant power increased 8.24+/-0.5, 8.6+/-0.2, and 7.5+/-0.3 dB, respectively, in the first, and second, and third 30-min period after the meal (all P < 0.01 vs baseline). Clonidine completely abolished the postprandial increase in the dominant power of the gastric slow wave and significantly inhibited spike bursts. The dominant power only increased 2.4+/-1.1 dB (P > 0.05 vs baseline; P < 0.01 vs the first postprandial period in the control session), 0.6+/-1.5 dB (P > 0.05 vs baseline; P < 0.05 vs the second postprandial period in the control session) and -1.5+/-2.2 dB (P > 0.05 vs baseline; P < 0.05 vs the third postprandial period in the control session) respectively during the first, second, and third periods after the meal and clonidine. However, it did not affect the postprandial change of the dominant frequency of gastric slow waves. No significant changes in percentage of regular slow waves were noted with the meal or with clonidine (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the postprandial response of gastric myoelectrical activity in dogs to a solid meal is featured with an increase in amplitude and spike bursts, which is inhibited by clonidine.

Targeting hypoxia in head and neck cancer.

The idea of 'targeting' hypoxia stems from recognition of the fact that oxygen (or its lack) is central to the practice of radiation oncology. Targeting embraces the alternative goals of trying to overcome hypoxia on the one hand and trying to exploit it on the other. This presentation briefly reviews these two approaches with major emphasis on the latter.

Radiation with concurrent late chemotherapy intensification ('chemoboost') for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

The aim of this study was to review our experience with a treatment regimen that combined conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) with chemotherapy (cisplatin and fluorouracil), given concurrently in the last 2 weeks of radiation therapy in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck region.Twenty-eight patients, all but two having UICC stage IV disease, were treated at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute between November 1995 and April 1998. Planned chemotherapy consisted initially of continuous infusion at 10 mg/m(2) per day of cisplatin and 400 mg/m(2) per day of fluorouracil on days 1-5 of weeks 6 and 7 of a conventionally fractionated course of radiotherapy. After the first 14 patients, the dose of fluorouracil was reduced to 360 mg/m(2) per day because of acute toxicity.36.8 months), with an estimated 50% surviving at 2 years (CI, 29-71%). Sixteen patients (57%) developed confluent mucositis and 11 (39%) developed patchy mucositis. The median duration of mucositis for these 27 patients was 1.5 months. Seventeen patients (61%) required nutritional support for a median duration of 1.4 months. Fourteen patients (50%) had grade three skin reactions, and 12 (43%) had one or more other significant (Grade 3) toxicities, predominantly infective. Grade 3 late toxicity has been observed in three patients to date (three xerostomia, including one with severe depression), and one patient had chronic ulceration of the oral tongue (grade 4). This chemoradiation regimen achieved an excellent complete response rate and good locoregional control at 2 years in patients with a poor initial prognosis. Acute toxicity was significant but manageable. The regimen offers an alternative to surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Total biological effect on late reactive tissues following reirradiation for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the additional damage of normal tissues attributable to reirradiation and the magnitude of partial recovery following the initial course. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Symptomatic late complication rates (excluding xerostomia) in 3635 patients receiving one course (Group 1) and 487 patients receiving two courses of external radiotherapy (Group 2) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Group 2 had significantly lower actuarial complication-free survival rates than Group 1: 48% versus 81% at 5 years. The post-retreatment incidence was significantly affected by biologically effective dose (BED) (assuming an alpha/beta ratio of 3 Gy) of the first course: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.04 per Gy(3) (p = 0.01), but only marginally by that of the second course: HR = 1.01 per Gy(3) (p = 0.06). If the summated BED was taken as the dose unit, it was estimated that a total BED of 143 Gy(3) would induce a 20% incidence at 5 years, while the corresponding dose projected from Group 1 was 111 Gy(3). The gap effect was insignificant in the overall analyses, but a trend of decreasing risk with increasing interval was observed in patients with gap > or = 2 years: HR = 0.86 per year (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The major determinant of post-retreatment complication is the severity of damage during the initial course. The sum of total doses tolerated is higher than that expected with a single-course treatment, suggesting occurrence of partial recovery (particularly in those reirradiated after an interval of 2 years or more).

Radiation therapy with hyperbaric oxygen at 4 atmospheres pressure in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present the results of a randomized trial evaluating HBO-4 in combination with hypofractionated radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1974 and December 1975, 48 patients with locally advanced unresected SCCHN, referred for primary radiation therapy, were randomized to radiation delivered in air in two fractions of 12.65 Gy over 21 days to a total of 25.30 Gy (air, n = 25); or radiation under HBO-4 in two fractions of 11.50 Gy over 21 days to at total of 23.00 Gy (HBO-4, n = 23). The HBO-4 was administered under general anesthesia to minimize patient discomfort and potential problems with seizures associated with rapid compression to 4 atmospheres. Patients were monitored regularly by the radiation oncologists for toxicity, response, local control, and survival. The original hospital records, radiation records, and hyperbaric treatment logs were recently reviewed, and all data were entered onto a computerized database for the current analysis. The results of this trial have not previously been published. RESULTS: The air and HBO-4 arms were evenly matched with respect to age, sex, performance status, hemoglobin level, primary site, and stage of disease. Acute toxicities were acceptable with no significant differences between the two treatment arms. A trend toward excess severe late complications were noted in the hyperbaric arm (12 vs 7). There was a highly significant difference in complete clinical responses between the two arms, with 21/25 in complete dinical responses in the HBO-4 arm compared with 13/25 in complete clinical responses in the air arm, and a statistically insignificant trend toward improved 5-year local control in the HBO-4 arm (29% vs 16%). There were no significant differences between the two arms with respect to 5-year survival, distant metastasis, or second primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome from this historical randomized trial demonstrate substantial improvements in response rate with the use of HBO-4. The hypofractionation scheme used in the trial resulted in relatively low local control and high complication rates in this group of patients with very advanced SCCHN. However, these results support the theory that radioresistant hypoxic cells limit the radiocurability of SCCHN. Further investigations addressing the hypoxic cell problem with hypoxic cytotoxins or hypoxic cell sensitizers in combination with radiation therapy using more conventional fractionation schemes are warranted.