Qualitative Study on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Within Radiation Oncology in Europe.

PURPOSE: Organizational culture plays a major role in prioritizing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) objectives by aligning individual values of employees with organizational values. However, effective strategies to create an inclusive organizational culture, in which these values are aligned, remain unclear. The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) launched a qualitative study, as a follow-up of the previous project on DEI that highlighted low levels of inclusion and work engagement among radiation oncology (RO) professionals in Europe. The aim of the present study was to gain an understanding of how DEI could be improved within RO departments by creating a more inclusive organizational culture. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A qualitative research study was conducted by enrolling RO professionals from 4 selected European countries through an open call on the ESTRO platform. Respondents who completed an online survey and met the inclusion criteria, such as experiencing low DEI levels at work, were invited for an online semistructured interview. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically with an abductive approach via concepts in relation to "DEI," "work engagement," "organizational culture," and "professional values." RESULTS: Twenty-six eligible respondents from Great Britain, Italy, Poland, and Switzerland were interviewed. The thematic analysis identified cases in which limited engagement at work emerged when the personal values of RO professionals conflicted with dominant organizational values, hampering DEI. Three conflicts were found between the following personal versus organizational values: (1) self-development versus efficiency, (2) togetherness versus competition, and (3) people-oriented versus task-oriented cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of how organizational values can conflict with professionals' values should be raised to improve inclusion and engagement in the workplace. Additionally, efforts should be focused on tackling existing power imbalances that hamper effective deliberation on organizational- versus personal-value conflicts.

An impact model to understand and improve work-life balance in early-career researchers in radiation oncology.

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial effect on mental health and work productivity of early-career researchers working in Radiation Oncology (RO). However, the underlying mechanisms of these effects are unclear. The aim of the current qualitative study was therefore to achieve a better understanding of how these effects arose and could be managed in the future. Methods: This study was conducted jointly by RO and qualitative health researchers. Data was collected in four online Focus Groups with 6-11 RO researchers (total N = 31) working in Europe. The transcripts were analysed through a qualitative cross-impact analysis. Results: Causal relations were identified between seventeen variables that depict the impact of disrupted working conditions. Mental health and work productivity were indeed the most important affected variables, but relations between variables towards these impacts were complex. Relations could either be positive or negative and direct or indirect, leading to a cascade of interrelated events which are highly personal and could change over time. We developed the model 'impact of disrupted working conditions' depicting the identified variables and their relations, to allow more individual assessment and personalised solutions. Conclusion: The impacts of disrupted working conditions on RO researchers varied due to the complexity of interrelated variables. Consequently, collective actions are not sufficient, and a more personal approach is needed. Our impact model is recommended to help guide conversations and reflections with the aim of improving work/life balance. The participants showed high levels of personal responsibility towards their own mental health and work productivity. Although being an individual issue, a collective responsibility in developing such approaches is key due to the dependency on organizational variables.