2020 update of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) and the Austrian Society of Cardiac Surgery (ÖGHTG) on the position statement of the ÖKG and ÖGHTG for transcatheter aortic valve implantation 2011.

This position statement is an update to the 2011 consensus statement of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) and the Austrian Society of Cardiac Surgery (ÖGTHG) for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Due to a number of recently published studies, broadening of indications and recommendations of medical societies and our own national developments, the ÖKG and the ÖGHTG wish to combine the 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease with a national position paper and to focus on certain details for the application in Austria. Thus, this position statement serves as a supplement and further interpretation of the international guidelines.

Impact of On-Site Cardiac Surgery on Clinical Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the outcome of high-risk and inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in hospitals with (iOSCS) versus without institutional on-site cardiac surgery (no-iOSCS). BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the use of TAVR only in institutions with a department for cardiac surgery on site. METHODS: In this analysis of the prospective multicenter Austrian TAVI registry, 1,822 consecutive high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVR were evaluated. A total of 290 (15.9%) underwent TAVR at no-iOSCS centers (no-iOSCS group), whereas the remaining 1,532 patients (84.1%) were treated in iOSCS centers (iOSCS group). RESULTS: Patients of the no-iOSCS group had a higher perioperative risk defined by the logistic EuroSCORE (20.9% vs. 14.2%; p < 0.001) compared with patients treated in hospitals with iOSCS. Procedural survival was 96.9% in no-iOSCS centers and 98.6% in iOSCS centers (p = 0.034), whereas 30-day survival was 93.1% versus 96.0% (p = 0.039) and 1-year survival was 80.9% versus 86.1% (p = 0.017), respectively. After propensity score matching for confounders procedural survival was 96.9% versus 98.6% (p = 0.162), 93.1% versus 93.8% (p = 0.719) at 30 days, and 80.9% versus 83.4% (p = 0.402) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR in hospitals without iOSCS had a significantly higher baseline risk profile. After propensity score matching short- and long-term mortality was similar between centers with and without iOSCS.

Volumetric intravascular ultrasound imaging to illustrate the extent of coronary plaque burden in type 2 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Although angiography is the gold standard for coronary imaging, its efficacy in outlining diffuse coronary atherosclerosis in diabetic patients remains questionable. We aimed to compare quantitative cineangiographic analysis (QCA) with three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: IVUS runs of 104 significant coronary lesions in 88 diabetic patients were performed. Arterial remodeling index was calculated as vessel area at minimal lumen area divided by mean reference vessel area. RESULTS: No difference between the two analysis modes was shown for lesion length and minimal lumen diameter, whereas a significant discrepancy between QCA and IVUS was found for diameter stenosis (10 +/- 9% vs. 41 +/- 8%; P<.001) and vessel diameter (3.01 +/- 0.66 vs. 4.53 +/- 0.70 mm; P<.001). A significant difference on arterial remodeling at lesion site was found between insulin-treated diabetic patients and non-insulin-treated diabetic patients (remodeling index: 0.98 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.21; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angiographic diagnosis in diabetic patients may be distorted due to a large plaque burden over longer vessel segments and the resulting absence of plaque-free reference segments. This distortion was found to be more pronounced in QCA analysis requiring a reference diameter, whereas volumetric IVUS imaging illustrated coronary artery dimensions more accurately according to anatomic structures. Constrictive arterial remodeling was observed more frequently in type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin.

Randomized comparison between intracoronary beta-radiation brachytherapy and implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracoronary brachytherapy was the primary therapeutic option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) during the last years. Especially for the treatment of diffuse ISR (lesions >10mm), beta-source brachytherapy was significantly superior to singular balloon angioplasty. Despite lacking clinical database, the implantation of drug eluting stents recently became a common procedure for the treatment of ISR. This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-brachytherapy with beta-radioisotopes (90)Sr/(90)Y and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of diffuse ISR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to beta-brachytherapy after balloon angioplasty (Beta-Cath in 17 patients) or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (Taxus-Express2 in 20 patients). Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients, while angiographic follow-up was available for 30 patients. RESULTS: Binary ISR (restenosis >50%) within target segment was observed in three patients treated with Beta-Cath, of which one needed target segment revascularisation for recurrent ISR, whereas no significant restenosis occurred in the patients treated with Taxus-Express2 (P=0.037). No further major adverse cardiac (target segment revascularisation, myocardial infarction, death) was found in either group (P=NS). Stent implantation was the more time-saving (31+/-11 min versus 60+/-23 min, P<0.001) procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although this trial revealed a significant reduction of binary restenosis in the Taxus-Express2 arm, we found no difference in clinical outcome after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse ISR when compared to beta-brachytherapy.