Renal Allograft Failure After Ipilimumab Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Transplant recipients are at an increased risk of malignant melanoma, a result of chronic immunosuppression. Ipilimumab is a newer biological agent targeting T lymphocytes to potentiate an immune response against melanoma, and the use of this agent results in a new adverse effect profile that the clinician must be aware of while a patient is on therapy. We report the case of a male renal transplant recipient who developed graft failure while treated with ipilimumab and minimal immunosuppressive therapy for metastatic ocular melanoma, with biopsy evidence of glomerulonephritis and acute rejection. We highlight the immunological side effects that can manifest from ipilimumab therapy and conclude that it did influence graft function in this patient. Our case illustrates the importance of weighing the risks and benefits to graft function and long-term survival as well as the importance of considering other treatment modalities in this specific group of melanoma patients.

Epstein-Barr virus infection in adult renal transplant recipients.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia in the first year posttransplantation has been studied extensively. There is a paucity of information on prevalence and sequelae of EBV infection in adult renal transplantation beyond the first year. This single-center study examines the relationship between EBV DNAemia and demographic, immunosuppressive, hematologic and infection-related parameters in 499 renal transplant recipients between 1 month and 33 years posttransplant. Participants were tested repeatedly for EBV DNAemia detection over 12 months and clinical progress followed for 3 years. Prevalence of DNAemia at recruitment increased significantly with time from transplant. In multivariate adjusted analyses, variables associated with DNAemia included EBV seronegative status at transplant (p = 0.045), non-White ethnicity (p = 0.014) and previous posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) diagnosis (p = 0.006), while low DNAemia rates were associated with mycophenolate mofetil use (p < 0.0001) and EBV viral capsid antigen positive Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-1 positive serostatus at transplant (p = 0.044). Patient and graft survival, rate of kidney function decline and patient reported symptoms were not significantly different between EBV DNAemia positive and negative groups. EBV DNAemia is common posttransplant and increases with time from transplantation, but EBV DNAemia detection in low-risk (seropositive) patients has poor specificity as a biomarker for future PTLD risk.

Potential impact of microarray diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplants: The INTERCOM study.

We previously developed a microarray-based test for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in a reference set of 403 biopsies. To determine the potential impact of this test in clinical practice, we undertook INTERCOM, a prospective international study of 300 indication biopsies from 264 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01299168). Biopsies from six centers-Baltimore, Barcelona, Edmonton, Hannover, Manchester and Minneapolis-were analyzed by microarrays, assigning TCMR scores by an algorithm developed in the reference set and comparing TCMR scores to local histology assessment. The TCMR score correlated with histologic TCMR lesions-tubulitis and interstitial infiltration. The accuracy for primary histologic diagnoses (0.87) was similar to the reference set (0.89). The TCMR scores reclassified 77/300 biopsies (26%): 16 histologic TCMR were molecularly non-TCMR; 15 histologic non-TCMR were molecularly TCMR, including 6 with polyoma virus nephropathy; and all 46 "borderline" biopsies were reclassified as TCMR (8) or non-TCMR (38). Like the reference set, discrepancies were primarily in situations where histology has known limitations, for example, in biopsies with scarring and inflammation/tubulitis potentially from other diseases. Neither the TCMR score nor histologic TCMR was associated with graft loss. Thus the molecular TCMR score has potential to add new insight, particularly in situations where histology is ambiguous or potentially misleading.

Carbamazepine-induced acute granulomatous interstitial nephritis.

A 79-year-old man, newly started on carbamazepine, presented with rash, eosinophilia and liver dysfunction progressing to acute renal failure despite discontinuation of the anti-epileptic agent. Percutaneous renal biopsy revealed acute granulomatous interstitial nephritis, which responded successfully to high-dose oral steroid therapy.

Banff criteria as predictors of outcome following acute renal allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: The Banff classification of renal allograft rejection grades acute tubulointerstitial rejection (AIR) by severity of tubulitis and acute vascular rejection (AVR) by severity of arteritis. The intensity of tubulitis has not, however, been demonstrated to be of prognostic value and other features such as glomerulitis and eosinophil infiltration are of uncertain significance. This study was performed in order to determine the clinical value of this pathological classification. METHODS: Banff criteria were correlated with outcome in 134 consecutive graft recipients transplanted in our unit over a 3-year period (1994 1996) who experienced at least one biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode. Of 197 biopsies performed for the diagnosis of rejection, 177 contained at least one artery and were suitable for Banff grading. Tissue eosinophil counts were available for 101 biopsies. Clinical severity of rejection was classified as mild (fully responsive to pulse steroid therapy), moderate (partially steroid responsive) and severe (steroid unresponsive/requiring ATG therapy). RESULTS: Graft failure ensued in 18 of 58 patients with AVR compared with 10 of 65 patients with AIR (P= < 0.05). Clinical severity of rejection correlated with the presence of arteritis, but not severity of tubulitis; rejections graded I, IIA and IIB according to the Banff' 93 classification were clinically severe in 3/68 (4%), 2/28 (7%) and 15/67 (22%) respectively (P= <0.05). The presence of glomerulitis showed no correlation with clinical severity or graft loss. Tissue eosinophilia (>10 eosinophils/mm2) was present in 18 of 33 patients who had at least one episode of AVR (v1/2), compared with 11 of 45 patients who suffered only AIR (P= <0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that: arteritis, but not severe tubulitis or glomerulitis, is an adverse prognostic factor in acute rejection and that tissue eosinophilia is associated with vascular rejection. Our findings support the 1997 revision of the Banff classification, replacing grades with types of acute rejection.