Timing of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation to prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this analysis were: to evaluate the impact of timing of ablation on the rate of atrial arrhythmias recurrence, verify if the timing of ablation impact differently in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. METHODS: Three thousand two hundred and five patients (60.5 ± 10 years, female 28.4%%, 78.8%% paroxysmal AF) were included in the analysis. All patients underwent only cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein (PV) isolation during the index procedure. RESULTS: The mean procedure time was 102.8 ± 50 min, with a mean fluoroscopy time of 26.3 ± 49 min. Acute PV isolation was achieved in 11760/11793 (99.7%) PVs. A total of 91 (2.8%) patients experienced a procedure-related complication. During the observation period 913/3205 (28.5%) patients had at least one atrial arrhythmias episode: 28% of patients with paroxysmal AF vs 33% of patients with persistent AF. In multivariate analysis, persistent AF together with time from symptomatic AF diagnosis to ablation, female sex, and ablation time showed to be significant predictors for AF recurrence. In particular, months from first symptomatic AF episode > 18 months was a significant predictor of AF recurrence (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.03-1.46, p = 0.020). In patients with paroxysmal AF, the multivariate analysis confirmed that months from first symptomatic AF episode > 18 month was an independent predictor of AF recurrence together with age > 62 years and female sex. In patients with persistent AF, the time from persistent AF showed to be significant predictor for AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter analysis, time from first symptomatic AF episode > 18 months was a significant predictor of AF recurrence after CB PV isolation.

Patient report outcomes in cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation during the COVID Era: Insights from the 1STOP project.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation by cryoablation (PVI-C) is a standard therapy for the treatment of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). AF symptoms are highly subjective; however, they are important outcomes for the patient. The aim is to describe the use and impact of a web-based App to collect AF-related symptoms in a population of patients who underwent PVI-C in seven Italian centers. METHODS: A patient App to collect AF-related symptoms and general health status was proposed to all patients who underwent an index PVI-C. Patients were divided into two groups according to the utilization of the App or the non-usage. RESULTS: Out of 865 patients, 353 (41%) subjects composed the App group, and 512 (59%) composed the No-App group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two cohorts except for age, sex, type of AF, and body mass index. During a mean follow-up of 7.9±13.8 months, AF recurrence was found in 57/865 (7%) subjects with an annual rate of 7.36% (95% CI:5.67-9.55%) in the No-App versus 10.99% (95% CI:9.67-12.48%) in the App group, p=0.007. In total, 14,458 diaries were sent by the 353 subjects in the App group and 77.1% reported a good health status and no symptoms. In only 518 diaries (3.6%), the patients reported a bad health status, and bad health status was an independent parameter of AF recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a web App to record AF-related symptoms was feasible and effective. Additionally, a bad health status reporting in the App was associated with AF recurrence during follow-up.

Clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients implanted with a transvenous or subcutaneous defibrillator.

AIMS: The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a life-saving therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at risk of sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator complications are of concern. The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) does not use transvenous leads and is expected to reduce complications. However, it does not provide bradycardia and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). The aim of this study was to compare appropriate and inappropriate ICD interventions, complications, disease-related adverse events and mortality between HCM patients implanted with a S- or transvenous (TV)-ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive HCM patients implanted with a S- (n = 216) or TV-ICD (n = 211) were enrolled. Propensity-adjusted cumulative Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare 5-year event-free survival and the risk of events. The S-ICD patients had lower 5-year risk of appropriate (HR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.15-0.65; P = 0.002) and inappropriate (HR: 0.44; 95%CI: 0.20-0.95; P = 0.038) ICD interventions, driven by a high incidence of ATP therapy in the TV-ICD group. The S- and TV-ICD patients experienced similar 5-year rate of device-related complications, albeit the risk of major lead-related complications was lower in S-ICD patients (HR: 0.17; 95%CI: 0.038-0.79; P = 0.023). The TV- and S-ICD patients displayed similar risk of disease-related complications (HR: 0.64; 95%CI: 0.27-1.52; P = 0.309) and mortality (HR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.29-1.87; P = 0.521). CONCLUSION: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients implanted with a S-ICD had lower 5-year risk of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies as well as of major lead-related complications as compared to those implanted with a TV-ICD. Long-term comparative follow-up studies will clarify whether the lower incidence of major lead-related complications will translate into a morbidity or survival benefit.

The role of fibrosis, inflammation, and congestion biomarkers for outcome prediction in candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy: is "response" the right answer?

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in selected patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It has been proposed that myocardial fibrosis and inflammation could influence CRT "response" and outcome. Our study investigated the long-term prognostic significance of cardiac biomarkers in HFrEF patients with an indication for CRT. Methods: Consecutive patients referred for CRT implantation were retrospectively evaluated. The soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), galectin-3 (Gal-3), N-terminal portion of the B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate their correlation with the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations at a mean follow-up of 9 ± 2 years. Results: Among the 86 patients enrolled, 44% experienced the primary outcome. In this group, the mean baseline values of NT-proBNP, Gal-3, and sST2 were significantly higher compared with the patients without cardiovascular events. At the multivariate analyses, baseline Gal-3 [cut-off: 16.6 ng/ml, AUC: 0.91, p < 0.001, HR 8.33 (1.88-33.33), p = 0.005] and sST2 [cut-off: 35.6 ng/ml AUC: 0.91, p < 0.001, HR 333 (250-1,000), p = 0.003] significantly correlated with the composite outcome in the prediction models with high likelihood. Among the parameters evaluated at 1-year follow-up, sST2, eGFR, and the variation from baseline to 1-year of Gal-3 levels showed a strong association with the primary outcome [HR 1.15 (1.08-1.22), p < 0.001; HR: 0.84 (0.74-0.91), p = 0.04; HR: 1.26 (1.10-1.43), p ≤ 0.001, respectively]. Conversely, the echocardiographic definition of CRT response did not correlate with any outcome. Conclusion: In HFrEF patients with CRT, sST2, Gal-3, and renal function were associated with the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations at long-term follow-up, while the echocardiographic CRT response did not seem to influence the outcome of the patients.

Safety and efficacy of cryoablation for atrial fibrillation in young patients: A multicenter experience in the 1STOP project.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an uncommon arrhythmia in young adults without structural heart disease, and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) is an important therapeutic strategy for rhythm control in patients with drug-refractory AF. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of CB-PVI in a large cohort of young patients in comparison with middle-aged adults in a real-world setting. METHODS: From 2012 to 2020, a total of 3033 patients with AF underwent CB-PVI and were followed prospectively in the framework of the 1STOP Clinical Service project, involving 34 Italian centers. Out of 3033 total 1STOP project subjects, a subgroup of 1318 patients were defined which included a YOUNG group (age ≤ 45 years; n = 368) and a MIDDLE-AGED group (age 60-65 years; n = 950). RESULTS: The acute success rate of PVI did not differ between the two cohorts (99.9 ± 1.3% vs. 99.8 ± 3.2%, p = 0.415). There was no difference in procedural characteristics, and periprocedural complication rates were similar among the two cohort (1.9% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.646). The 12-month freedom from AF recurrence was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.7-92.0) in the YOUNG cohort and 85.6% (95% CI: 82.9-88.0) in the MIDDLE-AGED group. At 36-month follow-up, freedom from AF recurrence was 72.4% (65.5%-78.2%) and 71.8% (67.7%-75.6%), respectively with no significant difference among groups (p = 0.550). CONCLUSION: CB-PVI had similar efficacy and safety in YOUNG and MIDDLE-AGED patients. Younger age did not affect acute procedural results, complication rate, or AF recurrence after a single procedure.

Role of CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation by cryoablation (PVI-C) is a standard therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a well-established predictor of AF-related stroke. Whether the CHA2DS2-VASc score can also be useful in predicting the long-term clinical outcomes following PVI-C is still unsettled. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the role of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting AF recurrence after PVI-C. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic AF underwent an index PVI-C. Data were collected prospectively in the framework of the 1STOP ClinicalService project. Patients were categorized into two groups: low risk (LR) and high risk (HR) based on CHA2DS2-VASc score (0-1 and ≥ 2, respectively). RESULTS: Out of 3313 patients, 1910 (57.6%) had a CHA2DS2-VASc score between 0 and 1, while 1403 (42.3%) had CHA2DS2-VASc > = 2. Patient characteristics were significantly different between the two cohorts, including age, sex, BMI, paroxysmal AF, history of stroke, diabetes, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. On the contrary, procedural times and acute complications were comparable. The 36-month freedom from AF after a single procedure was 72.5% (95% CI: 69.8-75.0) in the LR group and 65.9% (95% CI: 62.3-69.2) in the HR score group (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.47, p = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score was still a significant predictor of the risk of AF recurrence (HR: 1.33; 1.10-1.60, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: PVI-C is highly effective in the treatment of AF over the long term. A CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 is an independent predictor of AF recurrence during the follow-up and should be considered during the clinical management after the index procedure.

Second versus fourth generation of cryoballoon catheters: The 1STOP real-world multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: It has been observed that the fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4) ablation catheter increased the rate of acute real-time recordings of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) during the ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this analysis was to compare the long-term outcome results between patients treated with the CB4 and second-generation cryoballoon (CB2). METHODS: In total, 492 patients suffering from AF, underwent PVI ablation with either the CB2 or CB4 catheter within this examination of the 1STOP real-world Italian project and were included in the analysis. Specifically, 246 consecutive patients treated by CB4 were compared to 246 propensity-matched control patients who underwent PVI using CB2. RESULTS: When comparing the patient cohorts treated with CB2 versus CB4, acute success rate (99.6 ± 4.7% vs. 99.7 ± 3.6%, p = .949) and peri-procedural complications (3.7% vs.1.2%, p = .080) were similar in both groups, respectively. However, procedure time (100 vs.75 min, p < .001) and fluoroscopy duration (21 vs.17 min, p < .001) were all significantly lower in the CB4 treated patient cohort. At the 12-month follow-up, the freedom from AF recurrence after a 90-day blanking period was significant higher in the CB4 as compared with the CB2 group (93.3% vs.81.3%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, usage of the CB4 ablation catheter increased the rate of acute PVI recording capability and resulted in a higher rate of long-term PVI success, as demonstrated by the reduced rate of AF recurrence in comparison to the CB2 cohort at the 12-month follow-up period.

Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias after biventricular defibrillator replacement: impact on safety of downgrading from CRT-D to CRT-P.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and hospitalizations. It is debated whether CRT alone (CRT-P) or CRT plus defibrillator (CRT-D) is preferable, and still guidelines are not exhaustive. The aim of the study was to investigate whether to implant CRT-P or CRT-D in CRT-D patients who did not experience malignant arrhythmias at the moment of replacement. METHODS: Out of 451 heart failure patients undergoing CRT-D according to guidelines, 103 (67±10 years, 80% men) underwent device replacement with CRT-D. Every 6 months patients underwent to clinical evaluation and device interrogation and episodes of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) stored. At baseline and before replacement echocardiogram was performed. Patients were defined responders if left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume decreased ≥15% and super-responders if LV ejection fraction increased ≥40% or ≥50%. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 75±24 months after implantation and 26±10 months after replacement. First VAs incidence per year did not decrease over time (P=0.619). Before replacement, 27 patients (26.2%, 15 responders/12 non-responders) experienced VA. After replacement, 8 patients (7.7%, 4 responders/4 non-responders) experienced VA for the first time. Super-responder condition was not associated with lower VA incidence before (0.499) and after (P=0.339) replacement. At multivariate analysis, age was the only independent predictor of electrical appropriate therapy after substitution (ORper year=1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.34; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Freedom from VA before device replacement does not correlate with freedom from VA after replacement, so downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-P is not feasible at replacement, in particular in the elderlies, independently of responder and super-responder condition.

First-line therapy: insights from a real-world analysis of cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is mainly reserved for patients with drug-refractory or drug-intolerant symptomatic atrial fibrillation. We evaluated a large cohort of patients treated in a real-world setting and examined the safety and efficacy profile of CBA when applied as a first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation. METHODS: In total, 249 patients (23% women; 56 ±â€Š13 years; mean left atrial diameter 41 ±â€Š7 mm; 73.5% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; and 26.5% persistent atrial fibrillation) underwent an index PVI by CBA. Data were collected prospectively in the framework of the 1STOP ClinicalService project, involving 26 Italian cardiology centers. RESULTS: Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 90.0 and 21.0 min, respectively. Acute procedural success was 99.8%. Acute/periprocedural complications were observed in seven patients (2.8%), including: four transient diaphragmatic paralyses, one pericardial effusion (not requiring any intervention), one transient ischemic attack, and one minor vascular complication. The Kaplan--Meier freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence was 86.3% at 12 months and 76% at 24 months. Seventeen patients (6.8%) had a repeat catheter ablation procedure during the follow-up period. At last follow-up, 10% of patients were on an anticoagulation therapy, whereas 6.8% were on an antiarrhythmic drug. CONCLUSION: In our multicenter real-world experience, PVI by CBA in a first-line atrial fibrillation patient population was well tolerated, effective, and promising. CBA with a PVI strategy can be used to treat patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation with good acute procedural success, short procedure times, and acceptable safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01007474).

Cryoablation for pulmonary veins isolation in obese patients with atrial fibrillation compared to nonobese patients.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) by cryoballoon (CB) ablation is marginally represented in clinical studies in obese patients. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CB-PVI in a large cohort of overweight and obese patients from the 1STOP project. METHODS: From 2012 to 2018, 2048 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) (70% male, 59 ± 11 years; 75% paroxysmal AF) underwent index CB-PVI. The patient data were separated into three cohorts for statistical evaluation, including: normal weight (body mass index [BMI] < 25 kg/m2 ), overweight (BMI = 25-30 kg/m2 ), and obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m2 ). RESULTS: Out of 2048 patients, 693 (34%) patients had a BMI < 25 and were deemed as normal. There were 944 (46%) patients categorized as overweight (BMI = 25-30) and 411 (20%) as obese (BMI > 30). Overweight or obese patients were more often in persistent AF, had more frequently hypertension and diabetes, had higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, and had a number of failed antiarrhythmic drug (AAD). Periprocedural complication rates were similar among the three cohorts. The 12-month freedom from AF recurrence was 76.4% in the normal BMI group as compared to 79.2% in the overweight and 73.5% in the obese group (p = .35). However, 48% of overweight patients were on AAD treatment during the follow-up. By multivariate analysis, BMI was not a predictor for AF recurrence following the index CB-PVI. CONCLUSION: CB-PVI in obese patients is a safe procedure. Increased BMI (either moderate or severe) does not seem to be associated with a worse outcome or to a different rate of AAD discontinuation at 12 months.

Overweight and aging increase the risk of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery independently of left atrial size and left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI), age, left atrium (LA) dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have been linked to post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to better define the role of these risk factors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 249 patients (without prior atrial dysrhythmia) undergoing cardiac or aortic surgery. Prior to surgery, the following data were collected: age, BMI, LA diameter, LA area, LVEF, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), creatinine and the presence of arterial hypertension (AH) and diabetes. Intraoperative data such as operation time, total clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and presence of pericardial/pleural effusion were also collected. Only patients without pre- and post-surgery prophylactic anti-arrhythmic therapy were included. RESULTS: Patients with (N = 127, 51%) and without POAF (N = 122, 49%) were compared. No difference was observed for sex, LA diameter, LA area, LVEF, TSH, diabetes and use of ACE inhibitors or statins prior to intervention. Moreover, no difference was observed in terms of operation time, total clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and presence of pericardial/pleural effusion. However, patients with POAF were older (70.6 ± 10.7 vs. 60.4 ± 16.4 years, p = 0.001), had higher BMI (26.8 ± 4.5 vs. 24.9 ± 3.6 kg/m2, p = 0.001), higher baseline creatinine (1.06 ± 0.91 vs. 0.88 ± 0.32 mg/dL, p = 0.038) and a higher frequency of arterial hypertension (73.2% vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and Bentall procedure (24.4% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent predictors of POAF were age (OR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.07, p = 0.001) and BMI (OR = 1.11 95%CI 1.03-1.2,p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that advanced age and a higher BMI are strong risk factors for POAF in patients without previous AF even in the presence of comparable LA dimensions and LVEF.

Predictive role of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cryoballoon ablation.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to determine the rate and the predictors of early recurrences of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) after cryoballoon (CB) ablation and to evaluate whether ERAF correlate with the long-term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three thousand, six hundred, and eighty-one consecutive patients (59.9 ± 10.5 years, female 26.5%, and 74.3% paroxysmal AF) were included in the analysis. Atrial fibrillation recurrence, lasting at least 30 s, was collected during and after the 3-month blanking period. Three-hundred and sixteen patients (8.6%) (Group A) had ERAF during the blanking period, and 3365 patients (Group B) had no ERAF. Persistent AF and number of tested anti-arrhythmic drugs ≥2 resulted as significant predictors of ERAF. After a mean follow-up of 16.8 ± 16.4 months, 923/3681 (25%) patients had at least one AF recurrence. The observed freedom from AF recurrence, at 24-month follow-up from procedure, was 25.7% and 64.8% in Groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.001). ERAF, persistent AF, and number of tested anti-arrhythmic drugs ≥2 resulted as significant predictors of AF. In a propensity score matching, the logistic model showed that ERAF 1 month after ablation are the best predictor of long-term AF recurrence (P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing CB ablation for AF, ERAF are rare and are a strong predictor of AF recurrence in the follow-up, above all when occur >30 days after the ablation.

Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation? Alternating technique for repeat procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Which technique is better for repeat ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to compare long-term efficacy of repeat ablation using the alternative technique for the first redo ablation procedure: (a) cryoballoon (CB) re-ablation after a failed index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation, RF-then-CB group or (b) RF repeat ablation following a failed CB ablation, CB-then-RF group. METHODS: Within the 1STOP Italian Project, consecutive patients undergoing repeat ablation with a different technique from the index procedure were included. RESULTS: We studied 474 patients, 349 in RF-then-CB and 125 in CB-then-RF group. Less women (21% vs 30%; P = .041), more persistent AF (33% vs 22%; P = .015), longer duration of AF (60 vs 31 months; P < .001), and more hypertension (50% vs 36%; P = .007) were observed in the RF-then-CB cohort as compared with the CB-then-RF group. The number of reconnected PVs was 3.7 ± 0.7 and 1.4 + 1.3 in RF-then-CB and CB-then-RF group, respectively (P < .001). During the follow-up, significantly less AF recurrence occurred in the CB-then-RF group (22% vs 8%, HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.92; P = .025). Cohort designation was the only independent predictor of AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Alternation of energy source for repeat ablation was safe and effective, regardless the energy used first. However, patients initially treated with CB PVI undergoing repeat ablation with RF current had less AF recurrence at long-term follow-up as compared with those originally treated by RF ablation receiving a CB repeat ablation.

A comparison of acute procedural outcomes within four generations of cryoballoon catheters utilized in the real-world multicenter experience of 1STOP.

INTRODUCTION: Four generations of the cryoballoon (CB) catheter were retrospectively evaluated in a real-world examination of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred eighty patients (27% female and 60 ± 10 years) suffering from AF, underwent pulmonary vein (PV) ablation with one-of-four generations of the CB catheter. The total cohort was divided into four groups of patients: 120 with first-generation (CB-1); 120 with second-generation (CB-2); 120 with third-generation (CB-3); and 120 with fourth-generation (CB-4). Equal group sizes were achieved by examining the last 120 patients treated in each cohort, attempting to minimize the effect of a learning curve between the generations of CB catheter. Baseline clinical and patient characteristics were similar between the four cohorts, excepting age and the number of tested antiarrhythmic drugs. Procedure, fluoroscopy, and left atrial dwell times were significantly lower in the CB-4 cohort compared to previous generations of the CB catheters, while the acute procedural success rate was comparable across all catheter groups (>99%). Total acute procedural complications were low (2.5%), and acute complications were comparable within the CB-2, CB-3, and CB-4 groups (0.8% reported in each cohort). The rate of time-to-isolation (TTI) visualization increased with later generations of the CB catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The novel CB-4 achieved significantly faster procedural ablation times in comparison to the previous generations, while still maintaining a low rate of acute complications. Also, the rate of TTI visualization was observed to be higher with the CB-4 catheter. Further long-term evaluation is necessary, including an assessment of AF recurrence and PV reconnection(s).

Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: An Evaluation of Cohorts With and Without Structural Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most widely adopted strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation. Limited evidence on acute results and late outcomes of cryoballoon (CB)-PVI in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) exist. The aim of this analysis was to compare acute procedural results and the 1-year recurrence rate of a single CB-PVI procedure in a PAF population with and without SHD. METHOD: From April 2012 to May 2017, a total of 2,031 patients with AF underwent CB-PVI and were followed prospectively in the framework of the One Shot TO Pulmonary vein isolation (1STOP) ClinicalService project, involving 36 Italian cardiology centres. We identified patients with SHD according to criteria proposed by current ESC guidelines: left ventricular (LV) systolic or diastolic dysfunction, long-standing hypertension with LV hypertrophy, and/or other structural heart disease. Data on procedural outcomes and long-term freedom from AF recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Our population consisted of 1,452 patients, of whom 282 (19.4%) were classified as having SHD. Compared to non-SHD patients, the SHD cohort was older (mean ± standard deviation, 62.9 ± 9.0 vs 58.2 ± 11.4 years; p < 0.001), was more frequently male (79.1% vs 69.8%; p < 0.002), had a higher thrombo-embolic risk (CHA2DS2VASc ≥2: 63.4% vs 40.2%; p < 0.001), had a higher body mass index (27.7 ± 3.9 vs 26.4 ± 3.9 kg/m2; p < 0.001), had a larger atrial diameter (43.8 ± 7.0 vs 40.2 ± 5.8 mm; p < 0.001), and had a lower LV ejection fraction (57.2 ± 7.7% vs 60.7 ± 6.0%; p < 0.001). At the time of ablation, 73% of patients were on class Ic or III anti-arrhythmic drugs. Procedure time (106.9 ± 41.5 vs 112.1 ± 46.8 min; p = 0.248), fluoroscopic time (28.7 ± 14.7 vs 28.6 ± 15.2 min; p = 0.819), and complication rate (3.9% vs 4.8%; p = 0.525) were not different between the SHD and non-SHD cohorts. However, the acute success rate (98.9% vs 97.7%; p = 0.016) was higher in patients with SHD. After a follow-up of 13.4 ± 12.8 months, freedom from symptomatic recurrence was 78.0% for SHD and 78.4% for non-SHD (p = 0.895). Recurrence rate was not related to either left atrial size or LVEF. In the SHD cohort, Class Ic or III anti-arrhythmic drugs treatment decreased from 70.7% of patients before ablation to 28.7% of patients after CB-PVI (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CB-PVI was extensively applied to treat patients with PAF. Unlike previous PVI experiences, the acute success and recurrence rate after a single procedure was not related to the presence of SHD or to the degree of cardiac remodelling. Further studies are required to define whether CB-PVI has a useful role in patients with a significantly reduced ejection fraction as those patients were under-represented in the current population.

Sex effect on efficacy of pulmonary vein cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: data from the multicenter real-world 1STOP project.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoablation (PVI-C) is a widespread therapy for treating symptomatic, recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). The impacts of sex on efficacy and safety of PVI-C in a real-world clinical practice is lacking. In a multicenter prospective project, we evaluated whether clinical characteristics, procedure parameters, procedural complications, long-term AF recurrence rates, and/or AF-related symptoms differed according to sex in patients treated with PVI-C. METHODS: Data from the study population were collected in the framework of the 1STOP ClinicalService® project, involving 47 Italian cardiology centers. Multivariable statistical analyses were conducted to determine if any baseline clinical characteristics impacted the efficacy of PVI-C. RESULTS: From April 2012, 2125 patients (27% female, 59 ± 11 years, 73% paroxysmal AF, and mean left atrial diameter = 42 ± 8 mm) underwent PVI-C. According to baseline characteristics, women were more likely to be older, with higher clinical risk scores (e.g., CHA2DS2-VASc), and a higher number of tested antiarrhythmic drugs before the index PVI-C procedure. Male and female cohorts showed comparable procedure time (mean = 107.7 ± 46.8 min) and a similar incidence of periprocedural complications (4.5% overall), even after adjustment for baseline characteristics (P = 0.880). The multivariable analyses demonstrated that the strongest predictor of AF recurrences was sex (0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.93; P = 0.011). After propensity score adjustment, the hazard ratio from a multivariable model, which included age and AF type (persistent) as covariates, was 0.76 (0.60-0.97) (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: According to the 1STOP project, in a real-world setting, PVI-C was relatively safe regardless of the patient's sex; however, when considering efficacy of the procedure, female patients had a lower long-term efficacy in comparison to males. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01007474.

Cryoablation for paroxysmal and persistent AF in patients with structural heart disease and preserved ejection fraction: Clinical outcomes from 1STOP, a multicenter observational project.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an accepted strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent AF (PerAF) ablation. Limited data are available on outcomes of cryoballoon (CB) PVI in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The purpose is to assess the clinical efficacy of a single CB-PVI procedure in patients with PAF or PerAF who also have SHD. METHODS: From April 2012, 460 AF patients with concomitant SHD underwent CB-PVI and were followed prospectively in the framework of the 1STOP ClinicalService® project. Data on procedural outcomes and long-term freedom from AF recurrence were evaluated. Out of 460 subjects, 282 patients (61%) had PAF and 178 (39%) PerAF. RESULTS: SHD patients were predominantly male (80.9%), old (62.8±8.9 years), with preserved functional capacity (New York Heart Association class >1: 39.4%), high cardioembolic risk (CHA2DS2VASc score ≥2: 69.3%), and conserved left ventricular ejection fraction (56.5±8% LVEF). Both subjects with PAF and PerAF had similar baseline clinical characteristics except for left atrial diameter (43.8±7 vs. 45.7±7mm) and area (22.9±5.2 vs. 25.1±4.4cm2), respectively. Procedure time and fluoroscopic time as well as the rate of procedural complications were not different between subjects with PAF and PerAF. After a mean follow-up of 12 months, antiarrhythmic drug therapy had dropped from 71.7% before ablation to 33.6% post-ablation (p<0.001) and the freedom from symptomatic AF recurrence was 78% for PAF and 77% for PerAF (p=0.793). Furthermore, atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate was not related to SHD. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter, real-world cohort, CB-PVI was used to treat patients with PAF and PerAF who also had SHD. The arrhythmia recurrence after a single procedure was not related to either the degree of cardiac structural remodeling or the type of AF, and the rate of AF recurrence was lower than previously reported in patients with SHD in other cohort series using focal radiofrequency catheter ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01007474).

Center experience does not influence long-term outcome and peri-procedural complications after cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Data on 860 patients from the real-world multicenter observational project.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to evaluate whether the procedural data, the incidence of complications, and the long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences are influenced by center experience in a paroxysmal AF (PAF) population performing a first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by cryoballoon ablation (CBA). METHODS: A total of 860 patients underwent PVI by CBA. Center experience groups were predefined according to the quartiles of the distribution regarding the amount of performed procedures: 3.1%, 10.6%, 22.7% and 63.6% of patients were respectively followed in each group from 1st (less experienced) to 4th (more experienced) quartile of experience. RESULTS: In the entire population, median procedure and fluoroscopy time were 105 and 25 min, respectively. The median procedure time significantly decreased from 130 to 90 min (P < 0.001) as the center's experience increased. In 47 (5.5%) patients, a peri-procedural complication occurred. As the experience of centers increased, the acute intraprocedural PVI success rate increased (from 94.3% to 98.9%, P = 0.007), whereas there was a tendency towards a decreased incidence of peri-procedure complications (from 7.4% to 4.6%, P = 0.998). The mean 1-year freedom from AF recurrence probability was 78.3%, and the 18-month mean was 68.9% with no difference among the groups with different levels of experience. CONCLUSION: CBA is a safe and effective treatment for patients with PAF. Peri-procedural complications and procedural times were low in all the analyzed sub-groups, showing a decreasing trend in function of center expertise. The long-term freedom from AF recurrence was not influenced by the level of experience. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01007474).

Pulmonary vein isolation cryoablation for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcomes from the real-world multicenter observational project.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone ablation strategy in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Consensus guidelines and statements recommend PVI during the index catheter ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF who were treated with the cryoballoon ablation catheter by PVI technique. METHODS: Consecutive patients with drug-refractory symptomatic persistent and long-standing persistent AF who underwent cryoballoon catheter ablation by a PVI-only procedure were prospectively included in this single-arm multicenter evaluation. Data on procedural characteristics, safety, and long-term freedom from AF recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-six subjects (mean age 60.8 ± 9.3 years; 389 (80%) men; 434 (89.3%) with persistent AF; 52 (10.7%) with long-standing persistent AF; left atrial diameter 44.6 ± 6.2 mm) underwent cryoballoon ablation in 35 Italian centers. The mean procedure time (skin-to-skin) was 109.9 ± 52.9 minutes, and the mean fluoroscopy time was 29.6 ± 14.5 minutes. Periprocedural complications were observed in 21 subjects (4.3%), and the acute PVI success rate was 97.6% across all patients. Using a 90-day blanking period, the single procedure Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF event-free survival were 63.9% at 12 months and 51.5% at 18 months. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter evaluation of cryoballoon ablation, the PVI procedure was safe, effective, and efficient with regard to the treatment of patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF. The reasonable mid-term success rates agree with current clinical studies that establish PVI as a cornerstone index ablation strategy.

Recurrences in the Blanking Period and 12-Month Success Rate by Continuous Cardiac Monitoring After Cryoablation of Paroxysmal and Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrences within the blanking period (early recurrences) are common after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), but their clinical significance is still controversial. We aimed at evaluating the significance of within-blanking recurrences at 12-month follow-up after cryoballoon (CB) PVI, and to assess the real procedural success rate by continuous monitoring of cardiac rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty consecutive AF patients (34 paroxysmal, 56.7%) underwent their first CB-PVI at one Italian center (May 2013 to April 2015), and subsequent implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR). Overall, 12-month success rate after the blanking period was 55%. The shortest detected event was 7 minutes long. Late recurrences were more frequent in non-paroxysmal (19/26, 73.1%) than in paroxysmal AF (8/34, 23.5%; P <0.001). Early recurrences occurred in 17 (28.3%) patients, with 14 also having late recurrences (82.3%), while only 13 out of 43 (30.2%) without within-blanking recurrences experienced post-blanking events (P <0.001). Overall, early recurrences showed 51.8% sensitivity (95% CI 31.9-71.3%) and 90.9% specificity (95% CI 75.7-98.1%) for later recurrences, with 82.3% (95% CI 56.6-96.2%) positive and 69.8% (95% CI 53.9-82.8%) negative predictive value. The positive likelihood ratio was 5.7 (95% CI 1.8-17.8). At multivariable analysis, non-paroxysmal AF (HR: 3.113; 95% CI 1.309-7.403; P = 0.010) and within-blanking recurrences (HR: 3.453; 95% CI 1.544-7.722; P = 0.003) were independent predictors of post-blanking AT/AF. CONCLUSION: CB-PVI for paroxysmal AF shows a 12-month success rate of 76.5% after one single procedure, as assessed by continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring. Within-blanking recurrences predict the ablation failure in more than 80% of patients.