Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(16)2021 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34439301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reducing side effects of cancer treatments is a major challenge for clinicians involved in the management of breast cancer patients. METHODS: We analyzed data from 63 patients (32 in the general anesthesia group and 31 in the hypnosis sedation group) who were included in 1 prospective non-randomized trial evaluating hypnosis sedation in breast cancer treatment. The patients were followed every 3 months for 2 years. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes. Thereafter, patients underwent surgery while on general anesthesia or while on hypnosis sedation. Radiotherapy was administered according to institutional guidelines. Endocrine therapy was prescribed if tumors expressed hormone receptors. Prevalence, intensity and duration of polyneuropathy, musculoskeletal pain, postoperative pain and cancer-related fatigue were assessed at each medical visit. RESULTS: Symptoms duration was statistically reduced for polyneuropathy (p < 0.05), musculoskeletal pain (p < 0.05) postoperative pain and cancer-related fatigue (p < 0.05) in the hypnosis group. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of this study (lack of randomization and small size) we conclude that hypnosis sedation may exert a role on different side effects of breast cancer treatment in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mainly by reducing their duration.

2.
Integr Cancer Ther ; 18: 1534735419869494, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31441331

RESUMEN

Objectives: The main aim of this prospective nonrandomized study was to evaluate if mastectomy performed with perioperative hypnosedation led to a lower incidence of chronic pain compared with mastectomy under general anesthesia. Methods: Forty-two breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy either under GA (GA group, n = 21) or HYP (HYP group, n = 21) associated with local and/or regional anesthesia were included. The type of adjuvant therapy as well as the number of reconstructive surgical procedures were well balanced between the 2 groups. The average age of the patients and the type of axillary surgery were also equivalent. Incidence of postmastectomy chronic pain, lymphedema, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were evaluated after a mean 4-year follow-up. Results: The study shows a statistically significant lower incidence of postmastectomy chronic pain in HYP group (1/21, 1 patient out of 21 experiencing pain) compared with GA group (9/21) with 9 patients out of 21 experiencing pain (P = .008). ROM for shoulder was also less frequently affected in the hypnosedation group, as only 1 patient had decreased ROM, instead of 7 in the other group (P = .04). Conclusions: Our study is the first to hint at the potential benefits of hypnosedation on postmastectomy chronic pain. Despite the limitations of this study (nonrandomized, small sample), preliminary results merit further study of hypnosedation.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Anestesia General/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnosis Anestésica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 61(3): 698-702, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25720928

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our experience of total laparoscopic aortic bypass surgery performed for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), focusing on early 30-day mortality and morbidity and short-term and midterm outcomes. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective study was conducted between October 2002 and October 2011; we performed 173 total laparoscopic aortic surgeries to treat AIOD. RESULTS: Patients included 135 men and 38 women. The mean age was 57.2 years (range, 34-77 years). The median operative time was 205 minutes (range, 120-420 minutes), the median aortic clamping time was 50 minutes (range, 20-120 minutes), and the mean blood loss was 263 mL (range, 0-3200 mL). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 12.1% of patients. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.3% (four of 173 patients). Major morbidity occurred in 6.9% of patients. Wound complications occurred in 8%. Four patients had a groin infection (2.3%), treated by surgical trimming in three patients and replacement of the prosthesis by venous bypass in one patient. Early graft thrombosis (within 30 days) occurred in one patient (0.6%), requiring reintervention. With a mean follow-up of 42 months (standard deviation, 37 months), 96% of bypasses were patent. Patency rates at 3 and 5 years were 97% and 85% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, laparoscopic aortic bypass surgery for AIOD is a safe procedure with an acceptable morbidity rate, short intensive care unit and hospital stay, fast recovery, and early return to general diet. It is a good indication after failure of endovascular surgery.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Enfermedades de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/mortalidad , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Bélgica , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
4.
PLoS One ; 8(6): e66616, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23840510

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggest that the clinical parameter "amenorrhea" is insufficient to define the menopausal status of women treated with chemotherapy or tamoxifen. In this study, we investigated and compared the ovarian function defined either by clinical or biological parameters in pre-menopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen administered as adjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2003, 138 premenopausal patients consecutively treated for early breast cancer were included. Sixty-eight received tamoxifen in monotherapy as the only adjuvant systemic treatment (Group I) and 70 were treated with tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy (Group II). All patients had a confirmed premenopausal status based on clinical parameters and hormonal values at study entry. They were followed prospectively every 3 months for 3 years: menses data, physical examination and blood tests (LH, FSH, 17-beta-estradiol). Vaginal ultrasonography was carried out every 6 months. After 3 years, prospective evaluation was completed and monitoring of ovarian function was performed as usual in our institution (1x/year). All data were retrospectively evaluated in 2011. RESULTS: Three patients were excluded from the study in group I and 2 were excluded in group II. Patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to clinical data, i.e. menses patterns. These patterns were assessed by questionnaires. a: Regular menses (>10 cycles/year) b: Oligomenorrhea (5 to 9 cycles/year) c: Severe oligomenorrhea (1 to 4 cycles/year) d: Complete amenorrhea Estrogen levels did not appear to have any impact on disease-free survival rates after 3 or 8 years. FSH values were also documented and analyzed. They exhibited the same profile as estradiol values. CONCLUSIONS: Amenorrhea is an insufficient parameter to define menopausal status in patients receiving tamoxifen. Low estradiol levels must be coupled with other biological parameters to characterize endocrine status. These data are very important for the choice of endocrine therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Ovario/fisiopatología , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Amenorrea/inducido químicamente , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/sangre , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Ciclo Menstrual/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Premenopausia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
BMC Cancer ; 8: 56, 2008 Feb 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18291033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the incidence of reversible amenorrhea in women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without docetaxel. METHODS: We studied the incidence and duration of amenorrhea induced by two chemotherapy regimens: (i) 6 cycles of 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (6FEC) and (ii) 3 cycles of FEC 100 followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (3FEC/3D). Reversible amenorrhea was defined as recovery of regular menses and, where available (101 patients), premenopausal hormone values (luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol) in the year following the end of chemotherapy. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four premenopausal patients were included: 84 treated with 6FEC and 70 with 3FEC/3D. The median age was 43.5 years (range: 28-58) in the 6FEC arm and 44 years (range: 29-53) in the 3FEC/3D arm. Seventy-eight percent of patients were treated in the context of the PACS 01 trial. The incidence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea at the end of chemotherapy was similar in the two groups: 93 % in the 6FEC arm and 92.8 % in the 3FEC/3D arm. However, in the year following the end of chemotherapy, more patients recovered menses in the 3FEC/3D arm than in the 6FEC arm: 35.5 % versus 23.7 % (p = 0.019). Among the 101 patients for whom hormone values were available, 43 % in the 3FEC/3D arm and 29 % in the 6FEC arm showed premenopausal levels one year after the end of chemotherapy (p < 0.01). In the 3FEC/3D group, there was a statistically significant advantage in disease-free survival (DFS) for patients who were still amenorrheic after one year, compared to patients who had recovered regular menses (p = 0.0017). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that 3FEC/3D treatment induces more reversible amenorrhea than 6FEC. The clinical relevance of these findings needs to be investigated further.


Asunto(s)
Amenorrea/epidemiología , Antraciclinas/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Amenorrea/etiología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Docetaxel , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taxoides/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA