The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus for the management of hyper-responders in in vitro fertilization.

PURPOSE: To provide agreed-upon guidelines on the management of a hyper-responsive patient undergoing ovarian stimulation (OS) METHODS: A literature search was performed regarding the management of hyper-response to OS for assisted reproductive technology. A scientific committee consisting of 4 experts discussed, amended, and selected the final statements. A priori, it was decided that consensus would be reached when ≥66% of the participants agreed, and ≤3 rounds would be used to obtain this consensus. A total of 28/31 experts responded (selected for global coverage), anonymous to each other. RESULTS: A total of 26/28 statements reached consensus. The most relevant are summarized here. The target number of oocytes to be collected in a stimulation cycle for IVF in an anticipated hyper-responder is 15-19 (89.3% consensus). For a potential hyper-responder, it is preferable to achieve a hyper-response and freeze all than aim for a fresh transfer (71.4% consensus). GnRH agonists should be avoided for pituitary suppression in anticipated hyper-responders performing IVF (96.4% consensus). The preferred starting dose in the first IVF stimulation cycle of an anticipated hyper-responder of average weight is 150 IU/day (82.1% consensus). ICoasting in order to decrease the risk of OHSS should not be used (89.7% consensus). Metformin should be added before/during ovarian stimulation to anticipated hyper-responders only if the patient has PCOS and is insulin resistant (82.1% consensus). In the case of a hyper-response, a dopaminergic agent should be used only if hCG will be used as a trigger (including dual/double trigger) with or without a fresh transfer (67.9% consensus). After using a GnRH agonist trigger due to a perceived risk of OHSS, luteal phase rescue with hCG and an attempt of a fresh transfer is discouraged regardless of the number of oocytes collected (72.4% consensus). The choice of the FET protocol is not influenced by the fact that the patient is a hyper-responder (82.8% consensus). In the cases of freeze all due to OHSS risk, a FET cycle can be performed in the immediate first menstrual cycle (92.9% consensus). CONCLUSION: These guidelines for the management of hyper-response can be useful for tailoring patient care and for harmonizing future research.

The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus definition of hyper-responders for in-vitro fertilization.

PURPOSE: To provide an agreed upon definition of hyper-response for women undergoing ovarian stimulation (OS)? METHODS: A literature search was performed regarding hyper-response to ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology. A scientific committee consisting of 5 experts discussed, amended, and selected the final statements in the questionnaire for the first round of the Delphi consensus. The questionnaire was distributed to 31 experts, 22 of whom responded (with representation selected for global coverage), each anonymous to the others. A priori, it was decided that consensus would be reached when ≥ 66% of the participants agreed and ≤ 3 rounds would be used to obtain this consensus. RESULTS: 17/18 statements reached consensus. The most relevant are summarized here. (I) Definition of a hyper-response: Collection of ≥ 15 oocytes is characterized as a hyper-response (72.7% agreement). OHSS is not relevant for the definition of hyper-response if the number of collected oocytes is above a threshold (≥ 15) (77.3% agreement). The most important factor in defining a hyper-response during stimulation is the number of follicles ≥ 10 mm in mean diameter (86.4% agreement). (II) Risk factors for hyper-response: AMH values (95.5% agreement), AFC (95.5% agreement), patient's age (77.3% agreement) but not ovarian volume (72.7% agreement). In a patient without previous ovarian stimulation, the most important risk factor for a hyper-response is the antral follicular count (AFC) (68.2% agreement). In a patient without previous ovarian stimulation, when AMH and AFC are discordant, one suggesting a hyper-response and the other not, AFC is the more reliable marker (68.2% agreement). The lowest serum AMH value that would place one at risk for a hyper-response is ≥ 2 ng/ml (14.3 pmol/L) (72.7% agreement). The lowest AFC that would place one at risk for a hyper-response is ≥ 18 (81.8% agreement). Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) as per Rotterdam criteria are at a higher risk of hyper-response than women without PCOS with equivalent follicle counts and gonadotropin doses during ovarian stimulation for IVF (86.4% agreement). No consensus was reached regarding the number of growing follicles ≥ 10 mm that would define a hyper-response. CONCLUSION: The definition of hyper-response and its risk factors can be useful for harmonizing research, improving understanding of the subject, and tailoring patient care.

Assessment of progesterone levels on the day of pregnancy test determination: A novel concept toward individualized luteal phase support.

Research question: The main objective of the study is to define the optimal trade-off progesterone (P4) values on the day of embryo transfer (ET), to identify low P4-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and to establish whether P4 supplementation started on the hCG day can increase the success rate of the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle. Design: A single-center, cohort, retrospective study with 664 hormone replacement therapy (HRT)-FET cycles analyzed female patients who received vaginal 600 mg/day of P4 starting from 6 days before the FET, had normal P4 values on the day before ET, and whose P4 on the day of the pregnancy test was assessed. Results: Of the 664 cycles, 69.6% of cycles showed P4 ≥ 10.6 ng/ml, while 30.4% showed P4 < 10.6 ng/ml on the day of the hCG. Of the 411 chemical pregnancies detected, 71.8% had P4-hCG ≥ 10.6 ng/ml (group A), while 28.2% had P4-hCG < 10.6 ng/ml. Of the cycles with P4-hCG < 10.6 ng/ml, 64.7% (group B) were supplemented with a higher dose of vaginal P4 (1,000 mg/day), while 35.3% (group C) were maintained on the same dose of vaginal micronized P4. The live birth rate was 71.9%, 96%, and 7.3% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Conclusion: The likelihood to detect P4-hCG < 10.6 ng/ml decreased as the level of serum P4 the day before ET increased. The live birth rate (LBR) was shown to be significantly lower when P4 was low and not supplemented.

The effect of polymorphisms in FSHR gene on late follicular phase progesterone and estradiol serum levels in predicted normoresponders.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the presence of FSHR single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affect late follicular phase progesterone and estradiol serum levels in predicted normoresponders treated with rFSH? SUMMARY ANSWER: The presence of FSHR SNPs (rs6165, rs6166, rs1394205) had no clinically significant impact on late follicular phase serum progesterone and estradiol levels in predicted normoresponders undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol with a fixed daily dose of 150 IU rFSH. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous studies have shown that late follicular phase serum progesterone and estradiol levels are significantly correlated with the magnitude of ovarian response. Several authors have proposed that individual variability in the response to ovarian stimulation (OS) could be explained by variants in FSHR. However, so far, the literature is scarce on the influence of this genetic variability on late follicular phase steroidogenic response. Our aim is to determine whether genetic variants in the FSHR gene could modulate late follicular phase serum progesterone and estradiol levels. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this multicenter multinational prospective study conducted from November 2016 to June 2019, 366 patients from Vietnam, Belgium and Spain (166 from Europe and 200 from Asia) underwent OS followed by oocyte retrieval in a GnRH antagonist protocol with a fixed daily dose of 150 IU rFSH. All patients were genotyped for 3 FSHR SNPs (rs6165, rs6166, rs1394205) and had a serum progesterone and estradiol measurement on the day of trigger. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Included patients were predicted normal responder women <38 years old undergoing their first or second OS cycle. The prevalence of late follicular phase progesterone elevation (PE), as well as mean serum progesterone and estradiol levels on the day of trigger were compared between the different FSHR SNPs genotypes. PE was defined as >1.50 ng/ml. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The overall prevalence of PE was 15.8% (n = 58). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of PE in Caucasian and Asian patients (17.5% versus 14.5%). Estradiol levels on the day of trigger and the number of retrieved oocytes were significantly higher in patients with PE (4779 ± 6236.2 versus 3261 ± 3974.5 pg/ml, P = 0.003, and 16.1 ± 8.02 versus 13.5 ± 6.66, P = 0.011, respectively). Genetic model analysis, adjusted for patient age, body mass index, number of retrieved oocytes and continent (Asia versus Europe), revealed a similar prevalence of PE in co-dominant, dominant and recessive models for variants FSHR rs6166, rs6165 and rs1394205. No statistically significant difference was observed in the mean late follicular phase progesterone serum levels according to the genotypes of FSHR rs6166 (P = 0.941), rs6165 (P = 0.637) and rs1394205 (P = 0.114) in the bivariate analysis. Also, no difference was found in the genetic model analysis regarding mean late follicular phase progesterone levels across the different genotypes. Genetic model analysis has also revealed no statistically significant difference regarding mean estradiol levels on the day of trigger in co-dominant, dominant and recessive models for variants FSHR rs6166, rs6165 and rs1394205. Haplotype analysis revealed a statistically significant lower estradiol level on the day of trigger for rs6166/rs6165 haplotypes GA, AA and GG when compared to AG (respectively, estimated mean difference (EMD) -441.46 pg/ml (95% CI -442.47; -440.45), EMD -673.46 pg/ml (95% CI -674.26; -672.67) and EMD -582.10 pg/ml (95% CI -584.92; -579.28)). No statistically significant differences were found regarding the prevalence of PE nor late follicular phase progesterone levels according to rs6166/rs6165 haplotypes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Results refer to a population of predicted normal responders treated with a normal/low fixed dose of 150 IU rFSH throughout the whole OS. Consequently, caution is needed before generalizing our results to all patient categories. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Based on our results, FSHR SNPs rs6165, rs6166 and rs1394205 do not have any clinically significant impact neither on late follicular phase serum progesterone nor on estradiol levels in predicted normal responders. These findings add to the controversy in the literature regarding the impact of individual genetic susceptibility in response to OS in this population. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by an unrestricted grant by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD, IISP56222). N.P.P. reports grants and/or personal fees from MSD, Merck Serono, Roche Diagnostics, Ferring International, Besins Healthcare, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Theramex and Institut Biochimique SA (IBSA). C.A. reports conference fees from Merck Serono, Medea and Event Planet. A.R.N., C.B., C.S., P.Q.M.M., H.T., C.B., N.L.V., M.T.H. and S.G. report no conflict of interests related to the content of this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03007043.

EStradiol and PRogesterone in In vitro ferTilization (ESPRIT): a multicenter study evaluating third- versus second-generation estradiol and progesterone immunoassays.

PURPOSE: To assess estradiol (E2) and progesterone levels during ovarian stimulation determined by third-generation (Gen III) and second-generation (Gen II) Elecsys® immunoassays. METHODS: E2 and progesterone concentrations were measured using Elecsys® Gen III and Gen II immunoassays, and progesterone concentrations on the day of ovulation triggering were determined by LC-MS/MS. This was a retrospective, non-interventional study conducted at European tertiary referral infertility clinics in women aged 18-45 years, with a body mass index 18-35 kg/m2, regular menses, and both ovaries. RESULTS: Serum samples were obtained from 230 women classified by oocyte retrieval as poor (33.0%; 0-3 oocytes), normal (40.9%; 4-15 oocytes), or high (26.1%; > 15 oocytes) responders. E2 and progesterone levels increased during ovarian stimulation, with greatest increases observed in high responders. Elecsys® Gen III and Gen II assay results were highly correlated for E2 (Pearson's r = 0.99) and progesterone (r = 0.89); Gen III results were lower than Gen II for both E2 and progesterone. On the day of triggering, Gen III E2 and progesterone levels showed a difference of - 15.0% and - 27.9%, respectively. Progesterone levels (on day of triggering) measured by LC-MS/MS correlated better with Gen III (0.98) than Gen II (0.90). Mean relative differences for Gen III and Gen II assays versus LC-MS/MS were 14.6% and 62.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: E2 and progesterone levels determined with Elecsys® Gen II and III assays were highly correlated; results were lower for Gen III versus Gen II. Differences observed for progesterone on the day of triggering may be clinically relevant.

Clinically significant intra-day variability of serum progesterone levels during the final day of oocyte maturation: a prospective study with repeated measurements.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there significant variability in progesterone levels during the final day of oocyte maturation in women undergoing ovarian stimulation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Progesterone levels drop from the basal level up to 44% during the final day of oocyte maturation in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It has been suggested that elevated progesterone levels on the final day of ovarian stimulation may be related to poorer outcomes in in vitro fertilization fresh cycles due to a negative impact on the endometrium. However, despite conflicting results regarding the actual effect of progesterone on pregnancy rates and the lack of a well-established cut off, currently many IVF patients have their embryo transfer deferred when progesterone values surpass a threshold of 1.5 ng/ml on the day of ovulation triggering. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in 22 oocyte donors of a university-affiliated fertility centre between November 2017 and January 2018. We calculated the sample size to detect a difference of 15% between the first and last progesterone measurements with a 5% false-positive rate in a two-sided test with 80% statistical power and a 95% confidence interval (CI). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Progesterone circulating levels were evaluated at four different times during the final day of oocyte maturation (08:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00) before ovulation triggering in healthy oocyte donors. A flexible antagonist protocol was used, and ovarian stimulation was achieved with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in all cases. The pairwise percentage differences in progesterone levels for each patient were calculated. Univariate linear regression analysis was adopted in order to evaluate variables associated with progesterone levels on the first measurement. The intra-day variability of progesterone was analysed using mixed models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mean serum progesterone values at 08:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00 were 1.75 ng/ml, 1.40 ng/ml, 1.06 ng/ml and 0.97 ng/ml. The progesterone difference between 08:00 and 20:00 was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.56-0.99), which is equivalent to a 44% decline in the mean progesterone values between the first (08:00) and the last determination (20:00; P < 0.001). Among those patients with basal (08:00) progesterone levels >1.5 ng/ml (n = 10), 70% (n = 7) showed levels reduced to <1.5 ng/ml on the last determination of the day (20:00). A mixed model analysis revealed that the progesterone reduction during the day was significantly associated with time and total recombinant FSH dose administered. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only young healthy oocyte donors stimulated with an antagonist protocol using recombinant FSH were included. Extrapolation to the general IVF population, with different stimulation protocols and gonadotropins, needs to be confirmed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study suggests that a single progesterone determination on the final day of oocyte maturation is not reliable enough to make clinical decisions due to the enormous variation in progesterone during the day. Further studies are needed to better define the impact of the follicular progesterone rise on the endometrium of IVF cycles. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding was granted from Fundació Santiago Dexeus Font. N.P.P. received unrestricted grants and/or lectures fees from Roche Diagnostics, MSD, Merck, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, IBSA, Theramex and BESINS International, not associated with the current study. The remaining authors have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03366025.

Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer on the 5th or 7th day of progesterone supplementation in an artificial cycle: a randomised controlled trial.

Prospective studies comparing different durations of progesterone supplementation before transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts in an artificial cycle are lacking. However, in oocyte donation programmes, the sporadic available evidence demonstrates considerable differences in clinical pregnancy rates according to the duration of progesterone administration. This randomised controlled trial (RCT), included 303 patients undergoing a frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) of one or two vitrified-warmed blastocyst(s) in an artificial cycle. Randomisation was performed when the endometrial thickness reached ≥7 mm after oestrogen supplementation. One hundred and fifty two patients in group A received 7 d of vaginal micronised progesterone tablets and 151 patients in group B received 5 d of micronised vaginal progesterone before FET. No differences were seen in clinical pregnancy rate between both groups: 42/152 (27.6%) in group A versus 49/151 (32.5%) in group B. Although no statistically significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rates, our study was powered to detect an absolute difference of 16%. In this regard, we cannot exclude that smaller, clinically relevant differences might exist and our study did not have the power to detect this. Patients were also not blinded for the intervention, causing a potential bias.

The role of appendectomy as part of the treatment of a mucinous borderline ovarian tumor.

UNLABELLED: Guidelines in surgical treatment of mucinous ovarian neoplasms recommend the use of appendectomy as a measure to rule out a primary appendiceal origin of the ovarian tumor and proper staging. In extension this guideline is also applied for mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (mBOTs). As borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are often diagnosed postoperatively, most patients must undergo a second surgery to add appendectomy and staging to their surgical treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of appendectomy as part of the surgical treatment of mucinous BOTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single institute based study was carried out. The authors evaluated the clinical charts of patients undergoing surgical treatment by a gynecologic oncologist in their institution for a mucinous BOT between January 1990 and January 2014. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included. Appendectomy was performed in 30% of patients during primary or secondary surgical treatment. No appendiceal carcinoma was identified in any of the cases. Five patients already had a previous appendectomy. In eight patients the appendix was described as normal during surgery and left in place. For six patients the authors did not retrieve any information on previous appendectomy neither on the intraoperative state of the appendix. In the present overall study population, 78% showed no appendiceal involvement. For the remaining patients this information was missing. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary appendectomy to rule out a primary appendiceal origin of the mucinous BOT should not be performed when the appendix is described as grossly normal during primary laparoscopic surgery.

What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the impact on clinical pregnancy rates when vitrified cleavage stage Day 3 embryos, warmed and cultured overnight to Day 4, are transferred on the 3rd or 5th day of progesterone administration in an artificial cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER: Clinical pregnancy rates are similar when transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage Day 3 embryo after overnight culture on the 3rd or 5th day of progesterone administration. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In artificially prepared cycles, progesterone supplementation is generally started 3 days before embryo transfer, although the optimal length of exposure to progesterone before frozen embryo transfer (FET) has not been established. However, in a natural cycle, serum progesterone levels start to rise before ovulation, due to the LH-stimulated production by the peripheral granulosa cells. Hence, it could be postulated that progesterone supplementation before embryo transfer in an artificial cycle should start earlier or even later. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Prospective, randomized controlled trial, encompassing 300 patients who had embryos frozen on Day 3 and who underwent FET in an artificial cycle. Between 1 November 2012 and 31 December 2014, 300 patients were allocated to one of two groups as soon as endometrial thickness reached ≥7 mm on ultrasound after estrogen supplementation. A computer-generated randomization list was used, not concealed to the physicians. Each patient was enrolled into the study only once. FET was performed on the fifth day of progesterone supplementation in Group A, whereas in Group B, FET was performed on the third day of vaginal micronized progesterone administration. Embryos were thawed the day before transfer and after overnight culture, one or two Day 4 embryos were transferred. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients in Group A received 5 days of vaginal micronized progesterone tablets and one hundred and fifty patients in Group B received 3 days of micronized progesterone vaginally before FET. In Group A, 13 patients did not have an embryo transfer, compared with 12 patients in Group B. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Clinical pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between both groups (37/137 (27.0%) in Group A versus 26/138 (18.8%) in Group B (OR 1.6 (CI 0.9-2.82), ITALIC! P = 0.11). However, early pregnancy loss was significantly higher in Group B (32/58 (55.2%)) compared with Group A (21/58 (36.2%)) (OR 0.46 (CI 0.22-0.97), ITALIC! P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although no statistically significant difference was seen in the primary outcome, the study may have been underpowered to detect smaller differences. The study was also not blinded and patients were aware of the exact duration of progesterone supplementation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first randomized controlled trial to show that duration of progesterone administration in an artificially prepared FET cycle may modulate cycle outcome and that too short progesterone supplementation might be deleterious. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external finance was involved in this study. All authors declare to have no conflict of interest with regard to this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01940653). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 9 September 2013. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLLMENT: 1 November 2012.

How successful is TESE-ICSI in couples with non-obstructive azoospermia?

STUDY QUESTION: What are the chances of a couple with infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) having their genetically own child by testicular sperm extraction combined with ICSI (TESE-ICSI)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Candidate TESE-ICSI patients with NOA should be counselled that, when followed-up longitudinally, only a minority (13.4%) of men embarking for TESE eventually become a biological father. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Data available in the literature are only fragmentary because they report either on sperm retrieval rates after TESE or on the outcome of ICSI once testicular spermatozoa has been obtained, mostly in a selected subpopulation. Unfortunately, reliable data to counsel men with NOA on their chance to become a biological father are still lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort study performed in the Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Brussel, approved by the institutional review board of the hospital. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: We identified all patients with NOA, based on histology, who had their first testicular biopsy between 1994 and 2009. Patients were followed longitudinally during consecutive ICSI cycles with testicular sperm. The primary outcome measure was live birth delivery. The cumulative live birth delivery rate was calculated, based only on ICSI cycles with testicular sperm (fresh and/or frozen) available for injection. When patients delivered after transfer of supernumerary frozen embryos, this delivery was tallied up to the (unsuccessful) original fresh ICSI cycle. The sperm retrieval rate and pregnancy rate were secondary outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among the 714 men with NOA, 40.5% had successful sperm retrieval at their first TESE. In total, 261 couples had 444 ICSI cycles and 48 frozen embryo transfer cycles, leading to 129 pregnancies and 96 live birth deliveries. Crude and expected cumulative delivery rates after six ICSI cycles were 37 and 78%. LIMITATIONS AND REASON FOR CAUTION: A retrospective cohort study design was the only way to study the cumulative delivery rate after TESE-ICSI in couples with NOA. Intrinsic limitations are related to the observational study design. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDING: TESE-ICSI is a breakthrough in the treatment of infertility due to NOA, with almost 4 out of 10 (37%) couples having ICSI obtaining a delivery. However, unselected candidate NOA patients should be counselled, before undergoing TESE, that only one out of seven men (13.4%) eventually father their genetically own child. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTERESTS: None declared.

Cryopreserved embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: is GnRH agonist down-regulation necessary?

The use of GnRH agonist downregulation in artificial endometrium priming cycles for cryopreserved embryo transfer was retrospectively investigated to establish whether higher live birth rates resulted. Six hundred and ninety-nine patients underwent 1129 artificial endometrium priming cycles for the transfer of cryopreserved embryos between 1 July 2009 and 1 June 2012. Hormonal supplementation with (group A, n = 280 cycles) or without (group B, n = 849 cycles) GnRH agonist co-treatment was given. Live birth rates were comparable between the two groups per started cycle (14.9% [41/275] in group A versus 15.1% [127/839] in group B) or per embryo transfer (17.5% [41/234] in group A versus 17.6% [127/723] in group B). After logistic regression analysis, the only variables that were significantly associated with live birth rates were day of embryo transfer (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.98) for day 3 versus day 5 embryos, the number of embryos transferred (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.58 to 2.86) for two embryos versus one embryo transferred and the endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.25). Live birth rates after cryopreserved embryo transfer in artificial cycles did not increase when a GnRH agonist was administered.

Live birth rates after IVF are reduced by both low and high progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration.

STUDY QUESTION: Are low serum progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration detrimental for live birth delivery rates during in vitro fertilization (IVF)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Progesterone levels ≤0.5 ng/ml on the day of hCG administration hinder live birth rates. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Fundamental research has shown that the presence of late follicular phase progesterone is essential for follicular development, ovulation and endometrial receptivity. However, previous studies in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation have only assessed if progesterone levels in the higher range are detrimental for pregnancy or not. That said, information on the effect of the full range of late follicular progesterone on IVF outcomes is still lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective, single-centre cohort study with 2723 cycles performed in patients aged between 19 and 36 and undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation between January 2006 and March 2012 for their first or second attempt of IVF followed by a fresh embryo transfer (ET). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients underwent ovarian stimulation using a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist for pituitary down-regulation. Final oocyte maturation was triggered with hCG 36 h before oocyte retrieval. On the day of hCG administration, serum progesterone evaluation was performed. Live birth delivery rates were compared amongst various ordinal and regular progesterone intervals (≤0.50, 0.50-0.75, 0.75-1.00, 1.00-1.25, 1.25-1.50, >1.50 ng/ml) using logistic regression. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The average age of our sample was 30.5 years. Almost 82% of all embryo transfers were of a single embryo and 51.8% were performed with a Day 5 embryo. The average value (±standard deviation) of progesterone on the day of hCG administration was 1.02 ± 0.50 ng/ml and the live birth rate was 23.4%. The live birth rates (according to the above-described ordinal serum progesterone intervals) were 17.1, 25.1, 26.7, 25.5, 21.9 and 16.6%, respectively. The live birth rates were significantly lower in patients with both low (≤0.5 ng/ml) and high (>1.5 ng/ml) late follicular progesterone levels (P < 0.05). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main limitation of our study was its retrospective nature. Furthermore, our study was restricted to patients under GnRH antagonist pituitary suppression and requires confirmation in a GnRH agonist setting. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study comprehensively assessed the relationship between live birth delivery rates and progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Clinically relevant lower (≤0.5 ng/ml) and higher (>1.5 ng/ml) progesterone level limits were determined. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding was received for this study and the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Administration of corifollitropin alfa on Day 2 versus Day 4 of the cycle in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a randomized controlled pilot study.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the initiation of corifollitropin alfa administration on cycle day 4 instead of cycle day 2 result in a reduced total rFSH consumption in a GnRH antagonist protocol? SUMMARY ANSWER: Initiation of corifollitropin alfa on cycle day 4 compared with day 2 results in significantly reduced total rFSH consumption at the end of the follicular phase. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In vitro fertilization treatment is associated with significant physical, psychological and emotional stress in infertile patients. This notion has fuelled the search for simplified treatment approaches that may reduce the treatment burden. The introduction of corifollitropin alfa has provided a more patient-friendly treatment protocol because it obviates the need for daily hormonal injections. In addition, postponing the initiation of hormonal stimulation should also reduce the total gonadotrophin consumption and the number of injections needed. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective randomized controlled pilot study was conducted in a university centre in Belgium. Between December 2011 and March 2013, 59 patients were randomized in the study and 52 of these patients received the allocated intervention. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients were randomly assigned to the control group (CD2), with initiation of corifollitropin alfa on cycle day 2, or to the study group (CD4) with initiation of stimulation on day 4. The GnRH antagonist was administered from cycle day 7 onwards in both treatment arms. The main outcome measure was the total rFSH consumption at the end of the follicular phase after corifollitropin alfa treatment. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The total dose of rFSH at the end of the follicular phase was significantly reduced in the CD4 group compared with the CD2 group (324 (276) IU in the CD2 group versus 173 (255) IU in the CD4 group, P = 0.015, mean difference -151, 95% confidence interval (CI) -301 to -1). A significant reduction of total duration of rFSH stimulation in the CD4 group was also observed (8.6 (1.4) days in CD2 group versus 7.8 (1.2) days in the CD4 group, P = 0.008, mean difference -0.8, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.1). The number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes was comparable in both treatment groups (12.8 (7.3) in CD2 group versus 14.7 (8.8) in the CD4 group, P = 0.461, mean difference 1.8, 95% CI -2.7 to 6.4). Ongoing pregnancy rates of 48% in the CD2 group and 41% in the CD4 group were achieved (P = 0.60, relative risk (RR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.46-1.56). Final oocyte maturation was triggered with GnRH agonist instead of hCG in two patients in the CD2 group and in eight patients in the CD4 group, because of an increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (P = 0.078, RR 3.7 (95% CI 0.88-15.8). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Before general implementation can be advised, this trial should be validated in a much larger randomized trial. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS If the approach of starting ovarian stimulation on Day 4 of the cycle could be implemented in a large population of infertile patients, it would result in a significant reduction of gonadotrophin consumption. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external finance was involved in this study. C.B and N.P.P. have received fees from MSD. Otherwise the authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01633580).

Impact of clomiphene citrate during ovarian stimulation on the luteal phase after GnRH agonist trigger.

The use of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation in a GnRH antagonist protocol has been associated with poorer clinical outcomes due to an increased luteal-phase defect. It has been shown that LH activity is crucial in a normal luteal phase. Studies assessing the LH concentrations after clomiphene citrate co-treatment have observed increased luteal-phase LH concentrations. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to analyse the effect of clomiphene citrate on the endocrine profile in the luteal phase when using GnRH agonist trigger. This was evaluated in eight oocyte donors undergoing ovarian stimulation using clomiphene citrate in combination with recombinant FSH compared with a control group of five donors treated with recombinant FSH only. The endocrine profile was comparable in both groups, except for serum LH concentrations on the day after trigger (121.3±53.0IU/l versus 52.9±21.5IU/l, respectively, P=0.022). No significant differences in LH concentrations were found on the day of trigger or 5days after oocyte retrieval. In conclusion, a luteal-phase defect was observed despite treatment with clomiphene citrate during ovarian stimulation. The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to trigger ovulation in IVF has been associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes due to an increased luteal-phase defect. The luteal phase is the last phase of the menstrual cycle and is defined as the period between ovulation and the beginning of pregnancy or menses. It has been shown the activity of LH is crucial in a normal luteal phase. Studies assessing the LH concentrations after clomiphene citrate, an oestrogen receptor inhibitor, co-treatment have observed increased luteal-phase LH concentrations. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to analyse the effect of clomiphene citrate on menstrual cycle day 2-6 on the hormone profile in the luteal phase when using GnRH agonist trigger. This was evaluated was in eight oocyte donors undergoing ovarian stimulation using recombinant FSH compared with a control cohort of donors treated with recombinant FSH only. The current prospective cohort study reports higher LH concentrations on the day after GnRH agonist trigger, but not 5days after oocyte retrieval (i.e. in the luteal phase). In conclusion, a luteal-phase defect was observed despite the administration of clomiphene citrate during ovarian stimulation. Additional treatment with clomiphene citrate in the follicular phase is therefore not a valid alternative to prevent luteal-phase defect after GnRH agonist trigger.

GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients.

STUDY QUESTION: Does a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger followed by a bolus of 1.500 IU hCG in a group of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) reduce the OHSS incidence compared with hCG trigger? SUMMARY ANSWER: A GnRHa trigger followed by early luteal hCG support with one bolus of 1.500 IU hCG appears to reduce OHSS in patients at risk of OHSS; however, in a low-risk group a second bolus of 1.500 IU hCG induced two cases of late onset OHSS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A GnRHa trigger is an alternative to hCG in GnRH antagonist co-treated cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Two RCTs were performed in four Danish IVF units. A total of 446 patients were assessed for eligibility and 390 patients were enrolled in the study from January 2009 until December 2011. The primary outcome of the study was OHSS incidence in the group at risk of OHSS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients received a fixed dose of recombinant human FSH for the first 4 days. On the day of triggering, patients were assessed for their risk of OHSS based on the total number of follicles ≥11 mm diameter, and were classified as being at risk of OHSS when the total number of follicles ≥11 mm was between 15 and 25 and at low risk of OHSS when the total number of follicles ≥11 mm was ≤14. Two separate randomization lists were used for each of the OHSS risk groups. Women at risk of OHSS were allocated (RCT 1) to either: Group A (n = 60), ovulation triggering with a bolus of 0.5 mg buserelin (GnRHa) s.c. followed by a single bolus of 1.500 IU hCG s.c. after the oocyte retrieval-or: Group B (n = 58): 5.000 IU hCG. Similarly, women at low risk of OHSS were allocated (RCT 2) to receive either: Group C (n = 125), a bolus of 0.5 mg buserelin s.c., followed by a bolus of 1.500 IU hCG s.c. after oocyte retrieval and a second bolus of 1.500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval +5-or: Group D (n = 141), 5.000 IU hCG. Groups C and D were included in order to obtain preliminary data. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In women at risk of OHSS (RCT 1) (15-25 follicles) no OHSS case was seen in Group A (GnRHa trigger and one bolus of 1.500 IU hCG), whereas two cases of moderate late-onset OHSS occurred in group B (3.4%), (P = 0.24). In contrast, in women at a low risk of OHSS (RCT 2) (≤14 follicles) two cases of late-onset OHSS occurred in Group C (GnRHa trigger and two boluses of 1.500 IU hCG), whereas no OHSS case was encountered in Group D (P = 0.22). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the first RCT was powered to include 168 patients at risk of OHSS (15-25 follicles ≥11 mm) randomized to either GnRHa trigger or hCG trigger, the trial was prematurely discontinued when a total of 118 patients at risk of OHSS were randomized. In addition the second RCT in the OHSS low-risk group was designed as a feasibility study to assess the incidence of OHSS after GnRHa trigger and dual hCG administration versus 5.000 IU hCG. No power calculation was performed for this trial. In addition, there was a lack of blinding in the RCTs. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although a non-significant result, one bolus of 1.500 IU hCG after GnRHa trigger tended to reduce the OHSS rate in patients with 15-25 follicles ≥11 mm as well as secure the ongoing pregnancy rate. In contrast, in patients at low risk of OHSS the administration of two boluses of 1.500 IU hCG after GnRHa trigger should be avoided as it may induce OHSS.

Addition of highly purified HMG after corifollitropin alfa in antagonist-treated poor ovarian responders: a pilot study.

STUDY QUESTION: Will sequential administration of highly purified (hp)-HMG after corifollitropin alfa in a GnRH antagonist protocol benefit women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria? SUMMARY ANSWER: Corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-HMG in a GnRH antagonist protocol results in very promising pregnancy rates, albeit only in young (<40 years old) poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria have a very poor prognosis in terms of successful IVF outcome. Although a recent study demonstrated low pregnancy rates in this group of patients after treatment with corifollitropin alfa followed by recombinant FSH in a GnRH antagonist protocol, previous studies showed that the addition of LH activity in 36- to 39-year-old women significantly increases implantation rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this retrospective pilot study, we included poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria treated with a completely novel protocol, with corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-HMG in a GnRH antagonist setting. Overall, 51 patients were treated within a period of 1 year (August 2011-August 2012). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients received 150 µg corifollitropin alfa on second day of the menstrual cycle followed by a fixed daily dose of 0.25 mg of GnRH antagonist on Day 7 of the cycle onwards. On the ninth day of the cycle, a daily fixed dose of 300 IU hp-HMG was administered until the day of ovulation triggering. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate per patient. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among 47 eligible women, 29 patients were <40 years old and 18 patients were ≥ 40 years old. No differences were observed in endocrine profile, number of cycles with oocyte retrieval (66 versus 67%) and cycles with embryo transfer (62 versus 61%) in women <40 versus ≥ 40 years old, respectively. However, 8 of the 29 women <40 years old had an ongoing pregnancy (28%) compared with 0 of 18 patients who were ≥ 40 years of age (P = 0.017). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Owing to the specific retrospective study design, bias cannot be ruled out and these results should not be extrapolated to other treatment protocols for poor ovarian responders. Therefore, caution should be taken when interpreting the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The promising results from this pilot study of corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-HMG stimulation indicate a potential beneficial effect in young poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria. The data provide the rationale for performing a randomized controlled trial to determine if there is sound evidence for a clinical introduction of this protocol. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No conflicts of interest to declare. No specific funding was received for this study.

A prediction model to select PCOS patients suitable for IVM treatment based on anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count.

STUDY QUESTION: Which baseline patient characteristics can help assisted reproductive technology practitioners to identify patients who are suitable for in-vitro maturation (IVM) treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: In patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who undergo oocyte IVM in a non-hCG-triggered system, circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC) and total testosterone are independently related to the number of immature oocytes and hold promise as outcome predictors to guide the patient selection process for IVM. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Patient selection criteria for IVM treatment have been described in normo-ovulatory patients, although patients with PCOS constitute the major target population for IVM. With this study, we assessed the independent predictive value of clinical and endocrine parameters that are related to oocyte yield in patients with PCOS undergoing IVM. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cohort study involving 124 consecutive patients with PCOS undergoing IVM whose data were prospectively collected. Enrolment took place between January 2010 and January 2012. Only data relating to the first IVM cycle of each patient were included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: Patients with PCOS underwent oocyte retrieval for IVM after minimal gonadotrophin stimulation and no hCG trigger. Correlation coefficients were calculated to investigate which parameters are related to immature oocyte yield (patient's age, BMI, baseline hormonal profile and AMH, AFC). The independence of predictive parameters was tested using multivariate linear regression analysis. Finally, multivariate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses for cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) yield were performed to assess the efficiency of the prediction model to select suitable candidates for IVM. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Using multivariate regression analysis, circulating baseline AMH, AFC and baseline total testosterone serum concentration were incorporated into a model to predict the number of COC retrieved in an IVM cycle, with unstandardized coefficients [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.03 (0.02-0.03) (P < 0.001), 0.012 (0.008-0.017) (P < 0.001) and 0.37 (0.18-0.57) (P < 0.001), respectively. Logistic regression analysis shows that a prediction model based on AMH and AFC, with unstandardized coefficients (95% CI) of 0.148 (0.03-0.25) (P < 0.001) and 0.034 (-0.003-0.07) (P = 0.025), respectively, is a useful patient selection tool to predict the probability to yield at least eight COCs for IVM in patients with PCOS. In this population, patients with at least eight COC available for IVM have a statistically higher number of embryos of good morphological quality (2.9 ± 2.3; 0.9 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate [30.4% (24 out of 79); 11% (5 out of 45); P = 0.01] when compared with patients with less than eight COC. ROC curve analysis showed that this prediction model has an area under the curve of 0.7864 (95% CI = 0.6997-0.8732) for the prediction of oocyte yield in IVM. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The proposed model has been constructed based on a genuine IVM system, i.e. no hCG trigger was given and none of the oocytes matured in vivo. However, other variables, such as needle type, aspiration technique and whether or not hCG-triggering is used, should be considered as confounding factors. The results of this study have to be confirmed using a second independent validation sample. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The proposed model could be applied to patients with PCOS after confirmation through a further validation study. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by a research grant by the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders, Project number IWT 070719.

Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in premenopausal and post-menopausal women. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effect of misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy for cervical dilatation, no solid conclusion has been reached. We therefore set out to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the ISI Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify RCTs comparing misoprostol versus placebo or control prior to hysteroscopy. No restrictions on language or time were applied. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all dichotomous outcomes, whereas mean differences (MDs) and 95% CIs were calculated for continuous outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel or DerSimonian-Laird model according to the heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of the initial 141 potentially relevant articles that were retrieved, 21 RCTs involving 1786 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed according to menopausal status and according to whether diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy was performed. Premenopausal women treated with misoprostol had a significantly lower risk for further cervical dilatation in the diagnostic setting [RR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.34-0.92)] and a significantly lower risk for cervical laceration in the operative setting [RR (95% CI): 0.22 (0.09-0.54)], compared with placebo. In contrast, post-menopausal patients did not experience any clear benefit from misoprostol compared with placebo regarding the need for further cervical dilatation [RR (95% CI): 0.99 (0.76-1.30)] and the cervical laceration rate [RR (95% CI): 1.15 (0.40-3.29)]. In addition, the mean cervical width prior to hysteroscopy was significantly higher in premenopausal women treated with misoprostol compared with placebo [MD (95% CI): 2.47 mm (1.81-3.13)] but did not differ among post-menopausal patients [MD (95% CI): 0.39 mm (-0.42 to 1.21)]. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy appears to facilitate an easier and uncomplicated procedure only in premenopausal women.