Predictors of Clinical Success After Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: An International Prospective Multicenter Registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of a symptomatic prosthetic paravalvular leak (PVL) is feasible, but there is presently no conclusive evidence to show consistent efficacy. We aimed to identify predictors of clinical success after transcatheter PVL closure. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to 24 European centers for transcatheter PVL closure in 2017 to 2019 were included in a prospective registry (Fermeture de Fuite ParaProthétique, FFPP). Clinical success was absence of any of the following within 1 month: re-admission for heart failure, blood transfusion, open-heart valvular surgery, and death. RESULTS: We included 216 symptomatic patients, who underwent 238 percutaneous PVL closure procedures on the mitral (64.3%), aortic (34.0%), or tricuspid (1.7%) valve. Symptoms were heart failure, hemolytic anemia, or both in 48.9%, 7.8%, and 43.3% of patients, respectively. One, 2, and 3 leaks were treated during the same procedure in 69.6%, 26.6%, and 3.8% of patients, respectively. The PVL was pinpoint or involved 1/8 or 1/4 of the valve circumference in 18.6%, 52.4%, and 28.1% of cases, respectively. The most frequently used devices were the Vascular Plug 3, Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder, Vascular Plug 2, and Paravalvular Leak Device (45.0%, 16.6%, 14.2%, and 13.6% of cases, respectively). Successful device(s) implantation with leak reduction to ≤grade 2 was obtained in 85.0% of mitral and 91.4% of aortic procedures, respectively (P=0.164); with major periprocedural adverse event rates of 3.3% and 1.2%, respectively (P=0.371); and clinical success rates of 70.3% and 88.0%, respectively (P=0.004). By multivariate analysis, technical failure, mechanical valve, and hemolytic anemia were independently associated with absence of clinical success (odds ratios [95% CIs], 7.7 [2.0-25.0]; P=0.002; 3.6 [1.1-11.1]; P=0.036; and 3.7 [1.2-11.9]; P=0.025; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter PVL closure is efficient and safe in symptomatic patients but is associated with a lower clinical success rate in patients with hemolysis and/or a mechanical valve. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifiers: NCT05089136.

Impact of Simulation-Based Training on Radiation Exposure of Young Interventional Cardiologists.

Reducing radiation exposure during cardiovascular catheterization is of paramount importance to ensure patient and staff safety. Our study aimed to assess the transferability of acquired skills from virtual reality to the real world, including radioprotection measures during mentored simulation training (ST) in coronary angiography. A total of 10 cardiology residents were evaluated during real-life cases in the catheterization laboratory before (group A) and after mentored ST. The educational effect of mentored simulator training on real-life case performance was evaluated at 2 different time points: within the first week (group B) and after 12 weeks (group C). Compared with group A, the total dose area product (DAP) (µGy•m2) and total air kerma (mGy) were lower after ST: group A: 2,633 (1,723 to 3,617) versus group B: 1,618 (1,032 to 2,562), p <0.05 and 214 (136 to 297) versus 135 (84 to 222), p <0.05, respectively. Concerning operator radiation exposure (µSv), left finger dose: 1,090 (820 to 1,460) versus 635 (300 to 900), p = 0.028; left leg dose 80 (0 to 110) versus 0 (0 to 0), p = 0.027; left eye lens dose: 39 (24 to 69) versus 11 (8 to 20), p <0.0001; and chest dose outside the lead apron: 50 (34 to 88) versus 29 (21 to 50), p <0.003 were significantly lower in the group B than group A. A total of 12 weeks after ST, the total DAP and total air kerma remained stable along with operator exposure except left eye lens dose (µSv): group B: 11 (8 to 20) versus group C: 16 (12 to 27), p = 0.02. In addition, left eye lens dose, left wrist dose, and chest dose outside the lead apron were significantly correlated with total DAP (rs = 0.635, rs = 0.729, and rs = 0, 629, respectively) and total air kerma (rs = 0.488, rs = 0.514, and rs = 0.548, respectively) at 12 weeks. In conclusion, ST for coronary angiography may improve radioprotection learning and should be incorporated into training curricula.

Coronary Embolism Among ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Mechanisms and Management.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery embolism (CE) is recognized as an important nonatherosclerotic cause of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The objective was to describe clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes and to identify risks factors of CE in a large consecutive series of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1232 consecutive patients who presented with de novo ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. CE was diagnosed based on criteria encompassing clinical, angiographic, and diagnostic imaging findings. A total of 53 patients were identified in the CE group including 12 (22.6%) patients with multisites CE and 9 patients with other extracoronary localization. Compared with the non-CE group, age and coronary risks factors were not significantly different in the CE group except for smoking (P=0.03) and body mass index (P<0.001). Interventional coronary procedures were characterized by a higher use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (P<0.001) and lower use of angioplasty (P<0.001) in the CE group. The most frequent underlying cardiac diseases were atrial fibrillation (n=15, 28.3%) followed by dilated cardiomyopathy (n=5), endocarditis (n=4), and intracardiac tumor (n=3), whereas among systemic diseases, malignancy (n=8) and systemic autoimmune disease or antiphospholipid syndrome (n=4) were present. No etiopathological mechanisms could be identified in 14 patients (26.4%). Coronary embolism was associated with a higher risk of death (crude hazard ratio, 4.87; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-9.39; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Etiopathogenesis of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction secondary to CE is diverse ranging from cardiac to systemic disease, and patient long-term survival is worse than expected according to the baseline cardiovascular risk.

Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells-1: a new player in platelet aggregation.

Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) is an immunoreceptor initially known to be expressed on neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages. TREM-1 acts as an amplifier of the inflammatory response during both infectious and aseptic inflammatory diseases. Another member of the TREM family, The Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells Like Transcript-1 (TLT-1) is exclusively expressed in platelets and promotes platelet aggregation. As the gene that encodes for TLT-1 is located in the TREM-1 gene cluster, this prompted us to investigate the expression of TREM-1 on platelets. Here we show that TREM-1 is constitutively expressed in α-granules and mobilised at the membrane upon platelet activation. Pharmacologic inhibition of TREM-1 reduces platelet activation as well as platelet aggregation induced by collagen, ADP, and thrombin in human platelets. Aggregation is similarly impaired in platelets from Trem-1-/- mice. In vivo, TREM-1 inhibition decreases thrombus formation in a carotid artery model of thrombosis and protects mice during pulmonary embolism without excessive bleeding. These findings suggest that TREM-1 inhibition could be useful adducts in antiplatelet therapies.

Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Coronary Surgical Revascularization: Prognostic Impact on Long-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome complicated by left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF) are a poor prognosis group. The aim of our study was to assess the short and long term LEVF prognostic value in a cohort of NSTE-ACS patients undergoing surgical revascularization. METHODS: We performed elective and isolated CABG on a cohort of 206 consecutive patients with LVEF≤0.40 complicating acute coronary syndrome. The case cohort was compared with a cohort of controls (LVEF>0.40) randomly selected (2:1) among patients who underwent the procedure during this period. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier 5-year estimated survival rates for patients in the low and normal LVEF groups were 70.8% (95% confidence interval CI: 64.2-77.4) and 81.7% (95%CI: 77.8-85.6), respectively. A low LVEF was associated with both a higher all-cause (HR [95%CI] = 1.84[1.18-2.86]) and a higher cardiovascular mortality (HR = 2.07 [1.27-3.38]) during the first 12 months of follow-up. After adjustment for potential confounders, a low LVEF remained associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality only (1.87[1.03-3.38]) during the first 12 months of follow-up. After 12 months of follow-up, a low LVEF was no more associated with all-cause, nor cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with low LVEF might require more intensive care than patients with normal LVEF during the year after the surgical procedure, but once the first postoperative year over, the initial low LVEF was no more associated with long term mortality.

Comparison of two-year outcomes in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with and without peripheral artery disease.

We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes among patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) after coronary artery bypass grafting. We studied 589 consecutive patients who had undergone isolated coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2003 to June 2005 at our university hospital. The effect of PAD was assessed by comparing the 2-year follow-up data from 2 groups of patients: 243 patients with and 346 without PAD. A large systematic atherosclerosis screening was performed, including cerebrovascular disease, lower extremity artery disease, and abdominal aorta disease and its branches. PAD was defined as a history of treated atherosclerotic disease and significant atherosclerotic stenosis on screening. Patients with PAD were significantly older (70 +/- 9 vs 64 +/- 11 years, p <0.001) and were more often men (p = 0.04) than those without PAD. They had a greater incidence of hypertension (p = 0.002), chronic renal dysfunction (p <0.01), chronic pulmonary disease (p = 0.005), and a history of coronary artery disease (p = 0.03). No significant difference was noted between the 2 groups with regard to the left ventricular ejection fraction. The 2-year cumulative survival rate was 76.6% for patients with PAD and 94.1% for those with isolated coronary disease (p <0.001). In conclusion, after adjusting all significant variables, the presence of PAD appeared as an independent predictive factor for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 5.7, p = 0.001).