HIPK2 phosphorylates ΔNp63α and promotes its degradation in response to DNA damage.

Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2) is an emerging player in cell response to genotoxic agents that senses damage intensity and contributes to the cell's choice between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Phosphorylation of p53 at S46, an apoptosis-specific p53 posttranslational modification, is the most characterized HIPK2 function in response to lethal doses of ultraviolet (UV), ionizing radiation or different anticancer drugs, such as cisplatin, roscovitine and doxorubicin (DOX). Indeed, like p53, HIPK2 has been shown to contribute to the effectiveness of these treatments. Interestingly, p53-independent mechanisms of HIPK2-induced apoptosis were described for UV and tumor growth factor-ß treatments; however, it is unknown whether these mechanisms are relevant for the responses to anticancer drugs. Because of the importance of the so-called 'p53-independent apoptosis and drug response' in human cancer chemotherapy, we asked whether p53-independent factor(s) might be involved in HIPK2-mediated chemosensitivity. Here, we show that HIPK2 depletion by RNA interference induces resistance to different anticancer drugs even in p53-null cells, suggesting the involvement of HIPK2 targets other than p53 in response to chemotherapy. In particular, we found that HIPK2 phosphorylates and promotes proteasomal degradation of ΔNp63α, a prosurvival ΔN isoform of the p53 family member, p63. Indeed, effective cell response to different genotoxic agents was shown to require phosphorylation-induced proteasomal degradation of ΔNp63α. In DOX-treated cells, we show that HIPK2 depletion interferes with ΔNp63α degradation, and expression of a HIPK2-resistant ΔNp63α-Δ390 mutant induces chemoresistance. We identify T397 as the ΔNp63α residue phosphorylated by HIPK2, and show that the non-phosphorylatable ΔNp63α-T397A mutant is not degraded in the face of either HIPK2 overexpression or DOX treatment. These results indicate ΔNp63α as a novel target of HIPK2 in response to genotoxic drugs.

Abl interconnects oncogenic Met and p53 core pathways in cancer cells.

The simplicity of BCR-ABL 'oncogene addiction' characterizing leukemia contrasts with the complexity of solid tumors where multiple 'core pathways', including receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and p53, are often altered. This discrepancy illustrates the limited success of RTK antagonists in solid tumor treatment compared with the impact of Imatinib in BCR-ABL-dependent leukemia. Here, we identified c-Abl as a signaling node interconnecting Met-RTK and p53 core pathways, and showed that its inhibition impairs Met-dependent tumorigenesis. Met ensures cell survival through a new path in which c-Abl and p38-MAPK are employed to elicit p53 phosphorylation on Ser(392) and Mdm2 upregulation. We found a clinical correlation between activated Met, phospho-p53, and Mdm2 levels in human tumors, supporting the role of this path in tumorigenesis. Our findings introduce the concept that RTK-driven tumors may be therapeutically treated by hitting signaling nodes interconnecting core pathways. Moreover, they underline the importance of evaluating the relevance of c-Abl antagonists for combined therapies, based on the tumor signaling signature.

HIPK2 is involved in cell proliferation and its suppression promotes growth arrest independently of DNA damage.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: The serine/threonine kinase homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2) is a co-regulator of an increasing number of transcription factors and cofactors involved in DNA damage response and development. We and others have cloned HIPK2 as an interactor of the p53 oncosuppressor, and have studied the role of this interaction in cell response to stress. Nevertheless, our original cloning of HIPK2 as a p53-binding protein, was aimed at discovering partners of p53 involved in cell differentiation and development, still controversial p53 functions. To this aim, we used p53 as bait in yeast two-hybrid screening of a cDNA library from mouse embryo (day 11 postcoitus) when p53 is highly expressed. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we directly explored whether HIPK2 and p53 cooperate in cell differentiation. By measuring HIPK2 expression and activity in skeletal muscle and haemopoietic differentiation, we observed inverse behaviour of HIPK2 and p53--excluding cooperation activity of these two factors in this event. However, by HIPK2 depletion experiments, we showed that drastic HIPK2 suppression promotes cell-cycle arrest by induction of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(Waf-1/Cip-1). HIPK2 activity is independent of DNA damage and takes place in cell-cycle-arresting conditions, such as terminal differentiation, growth factor deprivation, and G(0) resting. CONCLUSIONS: HIPK2 was found to be involved in cell-cycle regulation dependent on p21(Waf-1/Cip-1) and independent of DNA damage.