Mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio in colorectal cancer: a retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a marker of platelet activation. MPV and platelet count (PC) are negatively correlated, and their ratio (MPV/PC) is informative for the diagnosis of malignant tumors. However, the relationship between MPV/PC and colorectal cancer is unclear. This retrospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of MPV/PC in colorectal cancer. METHODS: Hematological examinations were performed at initial diagnosis in patients with colorectal cancer (n = 186) or adenomatous polyp (n = 132) and healthy controls (n = 108). Hematological parameters evaluated included white blood cells, red blood cells, hemoglobin, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, PC, and MPV. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis H test, chi-square tests, Spearman's correlation test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC). ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic values of MPV and MPV/PC in colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Among these groups, MPV was significantly lower in colorectal cancer than in adenomatous polyp (p = 0.002) and healthy controls (p < 0.001) but did not significantly differ between adenomatous polyp and healthy controls (p = 0.210). MPV/PC was lower in colorectal cancer compared with adenomatous polyp and healthy controls (p < 0.001) and in adenomatous polyp compared with healthy controls (p = 0.010). MPV did not significantly differ among colorectal cancer subgroups, while MPV/PC significantly differed between TNM stages and the presence/absence of lymph node metastasis. MPV/PC was negatively correlated with the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR) (p = 0.002) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio(PLR) concentration (p < 0.001). In the differential diagnosis between colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyp, MPV/PC produced a larger ROC curve than MPV, NLR or PLR alone. Using MPV/PC to distinguish between colorectal cancer and controls produced a larger AUC than using MPV or NLR alone. CONCLUSIONS: MPV/PC may be useful for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. However, further studies are warranted to include additional regions and more data, to assess the utility of MPV/PC as a novel diagnostic screening tool for colorectal cancer.

Diagnostic value of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays an important role in the occurrence and development of cancer. Numerous studies have used the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) to evaluate prognosis in many types of cancer. However, the relationship between dNLR and ovarian cancer and its value in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors remain unknown. METHODS: A total of 262 patients with ovarian cancer, 258 with benign ovarian disease, and 232 healthy controls were included in this study. dNLR was calculated using whole blood cell parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to obtain sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) to evaluate the diagnostic values of dNLR. RESULTS: dNLR was significantly different among the ovarian cancer, benign ovarian disease, and healthy control groups (all P < 0.001). Moreover, there were significant differences in dNLR between patients with early-stage (I and II) and advanced-stage (III and IV) disease (P < 0.001). dNLR was positively correlated with stage and carbohydrate antigen-125 in ovarian cancer. A cutoff value of dNLR ≤2.11 was diagnostic in distinguishing ovarian cancer from benign ovarian disease with AUC of 0.729 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.689-0.767; P = 0.0001). A cutoff value of dNLR ≤1.9 was diagnostic in distinguishing ovarian cancer from healthy controls with an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI, 0.784-0.854; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: dNLR may be a useful indicator for distinguishing between ovarian cancer and benign ovarian disease and for identifying early and advanced ovarian cancer.

Single and combined use of red cell distribution width, mean platelet volume, and cancer antigen 125 for differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and benign ovarian tumors.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is widely believed to result from chronic inflammation, and red cell distribution width (RDW) and mean platelet volume (MPV) are considered as inflammatory markers for cancer. We investigated the values of RDW, MPV, and cancer antigen 125 (CA125), alone or in combination, for distinguishing between ovarian cancer and benign ovarian tumors. METHODS: The study included 326 patients with ovarian cancer, 290 patients with benign ovarian tumors, and 162 control subjects. Hematologic tests were performed at initial diagnosis. RESULTS: RDW was increased and MPV was decreased in the ovarian cancer group compared with the control and benign ovarian tumor groups. RDW was positively correlated and MPV was negatively correlated with cancer stage. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis for ovarian cancer versus benign ovarian tumors revealed that the specificity and sensitivity were increased for the combination of MPV and CA125 compared with either marker alone, and the specificity was increased for the combination of RDW and CA125, compared with either alone. The AUCs for RDW plus CA125 and MPV plus CA125 were significantly larger than for any of the markers alone. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, combinations of the markers RDW, MPV, and CA125 may improve the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and benign ovarian tumors.