RAF1 contributes to cell proliferation and STAT3 activation in colorectal cancer independently of microsatellite and KRAS status.

More than 30% of all human cancers are driven by RAS mutations and activating KRAS mutations are present in 40% of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the two main CRC subgroups, MSS (Microsatellite Stable) and MSI (Microsatellite Instable). Studies in RAS-driven tumors have shown essential roles of the RAS effectors RAF and specifically of RAF1, which can be dependent or independent of RAF's ability to activate the MEK/ERK module. In this study, we demonstrate that RAF1, but not its kinase activity, plays a crucial role in the proliferation of both MSI and MSS CRC cell line-derived spheroids and patient-derived organoids, and independently of KRAS mutation status. Moreover, we could define a RAF1 transcriptomic signature which includes genes that contribute to STAT3 activation, and could demonstrate that RAF1 ablation decreases STAT3 phosphorylation in all CRC spheroids tested. The genes involved in STAT3 activation as well as STAT3 targets promoting angiogenesis were also downregulated in human primary tumors expressing low levels of RAF1. These results indicate that RAF1 could be an attractive therapeutic target in both MSI and MSS CRC regardless of their KRAS status and support the development of selective RAF1 degraders rather than RAF1 inhibitors for clinical use in combination therapies.

Performance of Next-Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer With Deficient DNA Mismatch Repair.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to detect microsatellite instability (MSI) arising from defective mismatch repair (dMMR) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) before treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In this study, we aimed to evaluate and improve the performance of NGS to identify MSI in CRC, especially dMMR mCRC treated with ICI. METHODS: CRC samples used in this post hoc study were reassessed centrally for MSI and dMMR status using the reference methods of pentaplex polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was used to evaluate MSISensor, the Food and Drug Administration-approved and NGS-based method for assessment of MSI. This was performed in (1) a prospective, multicenter cohort of 102 patients with mCRC (C1; 25 dMMR/MSI, 24 treated with ICI) from clinical trials NCT02840604 and NCT033501260, (2) an independent retrospective, multicenter cohort of 113 patients (C2; 25 mCRC, 88 non-mCRC, all dMMR/MSI untreated with ICI), and (3) a publicly available series of 118 patients with CRC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (C3; 51 dMMR/MSI). A new NGS-based algorithm, namely MSICare, was developed. Its performance for assessment of MSI was compared with MSISensor in C1, C2, and C3 at the exome level or after downsampling sequencing data to the MSK-IMPACT gene panel. MSICare was validated in an additional retrospective, multicenter cohort (C4) of 152 patients with new CRC (137 dMMR/MSI) enriched in tumors deficient in MSH6 (n = 35) and PMS2 (n = 9) after targeted sequencing of samples with an optimized set of microsatellite markers (MSIDIAG). RESULTS: At the exome level, MSISensor was highly specific but failed to diagnose MSI in 16% of MSI/dMMR mCRC from C1 (4 of 25; sensitivity, 84%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 63.9%-95.5%), 32% of mCRC (8 of 25; sensitivity, 68%; 95% CI, 46.5%-85.1%), and 9.1% of non-mCRC from C2 (8 of 88; sensitivity, 90.9%; 95% CI, 82.9%-96%), and 9.8% of CRC from C3 (5 of 51; sensitivity, 90.2%; 95% CI, 78.6%-96.7%). Misdiagnosis included 4 mCRCs treated with ICI, of which 3 showed an overall response rate without progression at this date. At the exome level, reevaluation of the MSI genomic signal using MSICare detected 100% of cases with true MSI status among C1 and C2. Further validation of MSICare was obtained in CRC tumors from C3, with 96.1% concordance for MSI status. Whereas misdiagnosis with MSISensor even increased when analyzing downsampled WES data from C1 and C2 with microsatellite markers restricted to the MSK-IMPACT gene panel (sensitivity, 72.5%; 95% CI, 64.2%-79.7%), particularly in the MSH6-deficient setting, MSICare sensitivity and specificity remained optimal (100%). Similar results were obtained with MSICare after targeted NGS of tumors from C4 with the optimized microsatellite panel MSIDIAG (sensitivity, 99.3%; 95% CI, 96%-100%; specificity, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to MSISensor, the new MSICare test we propose performs at least as efficiently as the reference method, MSI polymerase chain reaction, to detect MSI in CRC regardless of the defective MMR protein under both WES and targeted NGS conditions. We suggest MSICare may rapidly become a reference method for NGS-based testing of MSI in CRC, especially in mCRC, where accurate MSI status is required before the prescription of ICI.

Adrenal gland as a sanctuary site for immunotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer.

Metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) harboring microsatellite instability (MSI) are sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs remain unclear. Dissociated responses in patients with ICI-treated cancer suggest that certain organs may serve as sanctuary sites due to the tumor microenvironment. This case series describes five patients with ICI-treated MSI mCRC with disease progression limited to the adrenal glands. At ICI initiation, three patients were free of metastasis in the adrenal glands. Four patients experienced objective response per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) while treated with ICI. ICI treatment was discontinued due to progressive disease limited to the adrenal glands (n=3) or toxicity (n=2). The time between ICI initiation and progression in the adrenal glands ranged from 11 to 39 months. Adrenalectomy (n=3) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (n=2) were performed. At the last follow-up, all patients were alive and progression free. Molecular analyses were performed in one patient. A significant impairment of the antigen presentation pathway was observed in the ICI-resistant lesion of the adrenal gland, which could be explained by the presence of glucocorticoids in the adrenal gland microenvironment. We also detected an overexpression of TSC22D3, a glucocorticoid-target gene that functions as a mediator of anti-inflammation and immunosuppression. This case series suggests that the adrenal glands may be the sanctuary sites for ICI-treated MSI mCRC through the glucocorticoid-induced impairment of the antigen presentation machinery.

Identification of Positively and Negatively Selected Driver Gene Mutations Associated With Colorectal Cancer With Microsatellite Instability.

Background & Aims: Recent studies have shown that cancers arise as a result of the positive selection of driver somatic events in tumor DNA, with negative selection playing only a minor role, if any. However, these investigations were concerned with alterations at nonrepetitive sequences and did not take into account mutations in repetitive sequences that have very high pathophysiological relevance in the tumors showing microsatellite instability (MSI) resulting from mismatch repair deficiency investigated in the present study. Methods: We performed whole-exome sequencing of 47 MSI colorectal cancers (CRCs) and confirmed results in an independent cohort of 53 MSI CRCs. We used a probabilistic model of mutational events within microsatellites, while adapting pre-existing models to analyze nonrepetitive DNA sequences. Negatively selected coding alterations in MSI CRCs were investigated for their functional and clinical impact in CRC cell lines and in a third cohort of 164 MSI CRC patients. Results: Both positive and negative selection of somatic mutations in DNA repeats was observed, leading us to identify the expected true driver genes associated with the MSI-driven tumorigenic process. Several coding negatively selected MSI-related mutational events (n = 5) were shown to have deleterious effects on tumor cells. In the tumors in which deleterious MSI mutations were observed despite the negative selection, they were associated with worse survival in MSI CRC patients (hazard ratio, 3; 95% CI, 1.1-7.9; P = .03), suggesting their anticancer impact should be offset by other as yet unknown oncogenic processes that contribute to a poor prognosis. Conclusions: The present results identify the positive and negative driver somatic mutations acting in MSI-driven tumorigenesis, suggesting that genomic instability in MSI CRC plays a dual role in achieving tumor cell transformation. Exome sequencing data have been deposited in the European genome-phenome archive (accession: EGAS00001002477).