Culturing periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles results in isolation of additional microorganisms.

Despite low sensitivity, culture of periprosthetic tissue (PPT) specimens on agars and in broths has traditionally been used for the detection of causative microorganisms in patients suspected for prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the added diagnostic value of culturing PPT in blood culture bottles (BCB) over the conventional combination of standard agar and broth alone. This prospective cohort study was conducted over a 12-month period and included consecutive patients undergoing revision arthroplasty. Overall, 113 episodes from 90 subjects were studied; 45 subjects (50.0%) met the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria for PJI, of whom the majority (75.6%) had an acute infection. Sensitivity and specificity of culture were assessed using IDSA criteria for PJI as gold standard. Although the increase in sensitivity from 84.44 (CI 70.54; 93.51) to 93.33% (81.73; 98.60) was not significant, added diagnostic value of culturing PPT in BCBs was demonstrated by the significantly higher number of detected pathogens in culture sets with BCBs compared to culture without BCBs (61 pathogens in conventional set versus 89 when BCBs were included for 57 PJI episodes, P = <0.0001). In 17 (29.8%) episodes, microorganisms were cultured from BCBs only, and in 9 (52.9%) of these episodes, virulent pathogens were found. This study demonstrates that PPT culture in BCBs leads to isolation of additional microorganisms, both virulent and low-virulent, which were not cultured with use of agars and broths alone. Isolation of additional causative microorganisms has serious consequences for the treatment strategy in PJI.

The prolactin receptor is expressed in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis synovial tissue and contributes to macrophage activation.

OBJECTIVES: Prolactin (PRL) is a lactation-inducing hormone with immunomodulatory properties and is found at elevated levels in the serum of patients with RA and other rheumatic diseases. The PRL receptor (PRLR) has been shown to be expressed by macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of this study was to examine PRLR expression by synovial macrophages and its role in the regulation of macrophage activation. METHODS: Serum monomeric 23 kDa PRL levels were measured in 119 RA patients using a fluoroimmunometric assay. PRLR expression was assessed in synovial tissue of 91 RA, 15 PsA and 8 OA patients by immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. Double IF was used to identify PRLR-expressing cells. The effects of PRL on monocyte-derived macrophage gene expression were examined by quantitative real-time PCR and ELISA. RESULTS: Serum PRL levels were similar in female and male RA patients. Median (interquartile range) PRLR expression was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in RA and PsA synovial tissue compared with OA. PRLR colocalized with synovial CD68+ macrophages and von Willebrand factor+ endothelial cells. In vitro, PRLR was prominently expressed in IFN-γ-and IL-10-polarized macrophages compared with other polarizing conditions. PRL by itself had negligible effects on macrophage gene expression, but cooperated with CD40L and TNF to increase expression of pro-inflammatory genes including IL-6, IL-8 and IL-12ß. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial PRLR expression is enhanced in patients with inflammatory arthritis compared with OA, and PRL cooperates with other pro-inflammatory stimuli to activate macrophages. These results identify PRL and PRLR as potential new therapeutic targets in inflammatory arthritis.

Prolactin receptor antagonism uncouples lipids from atherosclerosis susceptibility.

The pituitary-derived hormone prolactin has been suggested to stimulate the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease through its effects on metabolism and inflammation. In this study, we aimed to challenge the hypothesis that inhibition of prolactin function may beneficially affect atherosclerosis burden. Hereto, atherosclerosis-susceptible LDL receptor (Ldlr) knockout mice were transplanted with bone marrow from transgenic mice expressing the pure prolactin receptor antagonist Del1-9-G129R-hPRL or their non-transgenic littermates as control. Recipient mice expressing Del1-9-G129R-hPRL exhibited a decrease in plasma cholesterol levels (-29%; P<0.05) upon feeding a Western-type diet (WTD), which could be attributed to a marked decrease (-47%; P<0.01) in the amount of cholesterol esters associated with pro-atherogenic lipoproteins VLDL/LDL. By contrast, Del1-9-G129R-hPRL-expressing mice did not display any change in the susceptibility for atherosclerosis after 12 weeks of WTD feeding. Both the absolute atherosclerotic lesion size (223 ± 33 × 10(3) µm(2) for Del1-9-G129R-hPRL vs 259 ± 32 × 10(3) µm(2) for controls) and the lesional macrophage and collagen contents were not different between the two groups of bone marrow recipients. Importantly, Del1-9-G129R-hPRL exposure increased levels of circulating neutrophils (+91%; P<0.05), lymphocytes (+55%; P<0.05), and monocytes (+43%; P<0.05), resulting in a 49% higher (P<0.01) total blood leukocyte count. In conclusion, we have shown that prolactin receptor signaling inhibition uncouples the plasma atherogenic index from atherosclerosis susceptibility in Ldlr knockout mice. Despite an associated decrease in VLDL/LDL cholesterol levels, application of the prolactin receptor antagonist Del1-9-G129R-hPRL does not alter the susceptibility for initial development of atherosclerotic lesions probably due to the parallel increase in circulating leukocyte concentrations.

Microcirculation and atherothrombotic parameters in prolactinoma patients: a pilot study.

Atherothrombosis is a multifactorial process, governed by an interaction between the vessel wall, hemodynamic factors and systemic atherothrombotic risk factors. Recent in vitro, human ex vivo and animal studies have implicated the hormone prolactin as an atherothrombotic mediator. To address this issue, we evaluated the anatomy and function of various microvascular beds as well as plasma atherothrombosis markers in patients with elevated prolactin levels. In this pilot study, involving 10 prolactinoma patients and 10 control subjects, sidestream dark field (SDF) imaging revealed a marked perturbation of the sublingual microcirculation in prolactinoma patients compared to control subjects, as attested to by significant changes in microvascular flow index (2.74 ± 0.12 vs. 2.91 ± 0.05, respectively; P = 0.0006), in heterogeneity index (0.28 [IQR 0.18-0.31] vs. 0.09 [IQR 0.08-0.17], respectively; P = 0.002) and lower proportion of perfused vessels (90 ± 4.0% vs. 95 ± 3.0%, respectively; P = 0.016). In the retina, fluorescein angiography (FAG) confirmed these data, since prolactinoma patients more often have dilatated perifoveal capillaries. In plasma, prolactinoma patients displayed several pro-atherogenic disturbances, including a higher endogenous thrombin potential and prothrombin levels as well as decreased HDL-cholesterol levels. Prolactinoma patients are characterized by microvascular dysfunction as well as plasma markers indicating a pro-atherothrombotic state. Further studies are required to assess if prolactin is causally involved in atherothrombotic disease.

Is prolactin involved in the evolution of atherothrombotic disease?

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) account for approximately 30% of all deaths globally. The most important cause of CVD is atherothrombosis, in other words, narrowing of the arteries as a result of the deposition of cholesterol and other lipoid substances within the arterial wall. Several endocrine disorders have been linked to this pathological state. Recent clinical and experimental studies have suggested that prolactin, a pleiotropic pituitary hormone, may potentially contribute to CVD, either through direct modulation of local cellular processes within atherosclerotic plaques/thrombi and/or through influencing conventional cardiovascular metabolic risk factors. However, the precise role of prolactin in the pathology of CVD remains largely unknown. Here, the authors speculate whether prolactin-lowering treatment may become a future therapeutic approach in patients with elevated prolactin levels and concomitantly presenting with coexisting vascular disease or a significantly elevated risk for premature atherothrombotic vascular disease. Awareness of these new developments may also change our clinical opinions about therapeutic strategies in patients with prolactinomas.

Functional consequences of prolactin signalling in endothelial cells: a potential link with angiogenesis in pathophysiology?

Prolactin is best known as the polypeptide anterior pituitary hormone, which regulates the development of the mammary gland. However, it became clear over the last decade that prolactin contributes to a broad range of pathologies, including breast cancer. Prolactin is also involved in angiogenesis via the release of pro-angiogenic factors by leukocytes and epithelial cells. However, whether prolactin also influences endothelial cells, and whether there are functional consequences of prolactin-induced signalling in the perspective of angiogenesis, remains so far elusive. In the present study, we show that prolactin induces phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and STAT5 and induces tube formation of endothelial cells on Matrigel. These effects are blocked by a specific prolactin receptor antagonist, del1-9-G129R-hPRL. Moreover, in an in vivo model of the chorioallantoic membrane of the chicken embryo, prolactin enhances vessel density and the tortuosity of the vasculature and pillar formation, which are hallmarks of intussusceptive angiogenesis. Interestingly, while prolactin has only little effect on endothelial cell proliferation, it markedly stimulates endothelial cell migration. Again, migration was reverted by del1-9-G129R-hPRL, indicating a direct effect of prolactin on its receptor. Immunohistochemistry and spectral imaging revealed that the prolactin receptor is present in the microvasculature of human breast carcinoma tissue. Altogether, these results suggest that prolactin may directly stimulate angiogenesis, which could be one of the mechanisms by which prolactin contributes to breast cancer progression, thereby providing a potential tool for intervention.

The prolactin receptor is expressed in macrophages within human carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a role for prolactin in atherogenesis?

Atherosclerotic vascular disease is the consequence of a chronic inflammatory process, and prolactin has been shown to be a component of the inflammatory response. Additionally, recent studies indicate that prolactin contributes to an atherogenic phenotype. We hypothesized that this may be the result of a direct effect of prolactin on atherogenesis through activation of the prolactin receptor. Human carotid atherosclerotic plaques were obtained from patients by endarteriectomies. The mRNA of prolactin receptor, but not of prolactin, was detected in these atherosclerotic plaques by quantitative real-time PCR. In situ hybridization confirmed the expression of the prolactin receptor in mononuclear cells. Analysis at the protein level using immunohistochemistry and immunoelectron microscopy revealed that the prolactin receptor was abundantly present in macrophages near the lipid core and shoulder regions of the plaques. Our findings demonstrate that the prolactin receptor is present in macrophages of the atherosclerotic plaque at sites of most prominent inflammation. We therefore propose that prolactin receptor signaling contributes to the local inflammatory response within the atherosclerotic plaque and thus to atherogenesis.

Prolactin does not affect human platelet aggregation or secretion.

Platelets play an important role in the development of plaque formation and in the events after rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque, leading to atherothrombosis. Multiple hormones, either in excess or when deficient, are involved in the development of atherothrombotic disease, but, to which extent such hormones affect platelet function, is still controversial. It was the objective of this study to assess the ability of the pituitary hormone prolactin to affect platelet functions. Venous blood was collected from six healthy males. Platelet activation was studied by (i) flow cytometry in whole blood (exposure of P-selectin as a measure of platelet secretion, and binding of PAC-1 as a measure of ligand-binding conformation of alpha(IIb)beta(3)), and by (ii) optical aggregation and whole blood aggregation. All studies were performed without and with exposure to several concentrations of ADP (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 microM) and prolactin (50 and 1,000 microg/l). The presence of the prolactin receptor was investigated by Western blot and flow cytometry. In response to either 50 or 1,000 microg/l prolactin, no evidence of platelet activation or aggregation was found. In addition, ADP-induced platelet activation or aggregation was not enhanced by prolactin. Finally, prolactin receptors could not be detected on the surface of platelets. The present data indicate that prolactin does not directly modulate platelet function.