Comparing Calcaneus Fracture Radiographic Outcomes and Complications after Percutaneous Pin versus Screw Fixation.

Calcaneus fracture fixation is associated with high rates of morbidity and disability from wound complications, infection, subtalar arthritis, and malunion. Percutaneous fixation with Kirshner wires (K-wires) or screws may be implemented when soft tissue injury precludes an open approach. Although screws are thought to provide greater stability, limited data exists directly comparing fixation success of these implants. Medical record data from 53 patients (62 total fractures) surgically treated with percutaneous screws (28 fractures) or K-wires (34 fractures) for joint-depression calcaneus fractures at a large tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Bohler's angle and calcaneal varus were assessed from available radiographs at time of injury, postoperatively, and at final follow-up, and joint congruity was assessed postoperatively and at final follow-up. Complications were also extracted. There were no statistical differences in patient characteristics between surgical groups although a higher proportion of patients treated with K-wires compared to screws had other associated injuries (79% vs 42%, p = .01). A higher proportion of fractures treated with screws compared to K-wires maintained joint congruity at the final follow-up (69% vs 32%, p = .005). However, there were no statistically detectable differences in other postoperative radiographic metrics (p > .05). In conclusion, joint congruity was more often maintained with screw fixation although there was no statistical difference in restoration and maintenance of Bohler's angle or varus alignment. The difference in radiographic metrics was not correlated with secondary procedures, namely subtalar arthrodesis, and may not be clinically significant. Neither group was completely effective in attaining and maintaining reduction, and additional fixation strategies should be considered if feasible based on patient, injury, and soft tissue characteristics.

Sacral Insufficiency Fractures.

¼: Primary osteoporosis is the most common cause of sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs). Therefore, a multidisciplinary team approach is necessary for treatment of the fracture and the underlying biologic pathology, as well as prevention of future fragility fractures. ¼: The presentation of SIFs typically includes lower back or buttock pain after a ground-level fall or without an identified trauma. Symptoms often have an insidious onset and are nonspecific; consequently, a delay in diagnosis and treatment is common. Clinicians need to have a high index of suspicion, particularly in high-risk patients. ¼: Postmenopausal women who are >55 years of age are the most common demographic affected by SIFs. Other risk factors include osteoporosis, history of a prior fragility fracture, local irradiation, long-term corticosteroid use, rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disorders, vitamin D deficiency, pregnancy, history of prior multilevel spinal fusion, and malignancy. ¼: Typical imaging on computed tomography (CT) shows sclerosis of cancellous bone in the sacral ala, with or without a discrete fracture line or displacement. Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than CT and shows hypointense signal on T1-weighted sequences and hyperintensity on T2-weighted or short tau inversion recovery sequences. ¼: The treatment of SIFs is dependent on the severity of symptoms, fracture displacement, and instability of the pelvis. Accepted treatments include nonoperative rehabilitation, sacroplasty, iliosacral screw fixation, transsacral bar or screw fixation, transiliac internal fixation, and lumbopelvic fixation.