Prevalence and clinical associations of myositis antibodies in a large cohort of interstitial lung diseases.

BACKGROUND: Serologic testing for autoantibodies is recommended in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), as connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are an important secondary cause. Myositis antibodies are associated with CTD-ILD, but clinical associations with other ILDs are unclear. In this study, associations of myositis antibodies in various ILDs were evaluated. METHODS: 1463 ILD patients and 116 healthy subjects were screened for myositis antibodies with a line-blot assay on serum available at time of diagnosis. Additionally, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALf) was analysed. RESULTS: A total of 394 patients demonstrated reactivity to at least one antibody, including anti-Ro52 (36.0%), anti-Mi-2ß (17.3%) and anti-Jo-1 (10.9%). Anti-Jo-1 (OR 6.4; p<0.100) and anti-Ro52 (OR 6.0; p<0.001) were associated with CTD-ILD. Interestingly, anti-Mi-2ß was associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF; OR 5.3; p = 0.001) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP; OR 5.9; p<0.001). Furthermore, anti-Mi-2ß was strongly associated with a histological usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (OR 6.5; p < 0.001). Moreover, anti-Mi-2ß reactivity was identified in BALf and correlated with serum anti-Mi-2ß (r = 0.64; p = 0.002). No differences were found in survival rates between ILD patients with and without serum Mi-2ß reactivity (hazard ratio 0.835; 95% CI 0.442-1.575; p = 0.577). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, novel associations of antibody Mi-2ß with fibrotic ILD were found. Furthermore, serum anti-Mi-2ß was associated with a histological UIP pattern and presence of anti-Mi-2ß in BALf. Possibly, anti-Mi-2ß could be implemented as a future diagnostic biomarker for fibrotic ILD.

Elevated Serum Amyloid a Levels Are not Specific for Sarcoidosis but Associate with a Fibrotic Pulmonary Phenotype.

Elevated Serum Amyloid A (SAA) levels have been found in several inflammatory diseases, including sarcoidosis. SAA is suggested to be involved in sarcoidosis pathogenesis by involvement in granuloma formation and maintenance. We hypothesized that SAA serum levels would be higher in sarcoidosis compared to other non-infectious granulomatous and non-granulomatous diseases. SAA levels were measured in serum from sarcoidosis, Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and (eosinophilic) granulomatosis with polyangiitis ((E)GPA) patients. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients were included as non-granulomatous disease group. SAA levels of patients with sarcoidosis (31.0 µg/mL), HP (23.4 µg/mL), (E)GPA (36.9 µg/mL), and IPF (22.1 µg/mL) were all higher than SAA levels of healthy controls (10.1 µg/mL). SAA levels did not differ between the diagnostic groups. When SAA serum levels were analyzed in sarcoidosis subgroups, fibrotic sarcoidosis patients showed higher SAA levels than sarcoidosis patients without fibrosis (47.8 µg/mL vs. 29.4 µg/mL, p = 0.005). To conclude, the observation that fibrotic sarcoidosis patients have higher SAA levels, together with our finding that SAA levels were also increased in IPF patients, suggests that SAA may next to granulomatous processes also reflect the process of fibrogenesis. Further studies should clarify the exact role of SAA in fibrosis and the underlying mechanisms involved.