Co-Morbidity Differences Associated With Long-Term Amputation and Repeat Revascularization Rates After Femoropopliteal Artery Intervention for Intermittent Claudication by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity.

Use of peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for intermittent claudication (IC) continues to expand, but there is uncertainty whether baseline demographics, procedural techniques and outcomes differ by sex, race, and ethnicity. This study aimed to examine amputation and revascularization rates up to 4 years after femoropopliteal (FP) PVI for IC by sex, race, and ethnicity. Patients who underwent FP PVI for IC between 2016 and 2020 from the PINC AI Healthcare Database were analyzed. The primary outcome was any index limb amputation, assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Secondary outcomes included index limb major amputation, repeat revascularization, and index limb repeat revascularization. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. This study included 19,324 patients with IC who underwent FP PVI, with 41.2% women, 15.6% Black patients, and 4.7% Hispanic patients. Women were less likely than men to be treated with atherectomy (45.1% vs 47.8%, p = 0.0003); Black patients were more likely than White patients to receive atherectomy (50.7% vs 44.9%, p <0.001), and Hispanic patients were less likely than non-Hispanic patients to receive atherectomy (41% vs 47%, p = 0.0004). Unadjusted rates of any amputation were similar in men and women (6.4% for each group, log-rank p = 0.842), higher in Black patients than in White patients (7.8% vs 6.1%, log-rank p = 0.007), and higher in Hispanic patients than in non-Hispanic patients (8.8% vs 6.3%, log-rank p = 0.031). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, Black race was associated with higher rates of repeat revascularization (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.22) and any FP revascularization (adjusted HR 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.20). No statistical difference in amputation rate was observed among comparison groups. Women and men with IC had similar crude and adjusted amputation and revascularization outcomes after FP PVI. Black patients had higher repeat revascularization and any FP revascularization rates than did White patients. Black and Hispanic patients had higher crude amputation rates, but these differences were attenuated by adjustment for baseline characteristics. Black patients were more likely to receive atherectomy and had higher rates of any repeat revascularization and specifically FP revascularization. Further study is necessary to determine whether these patterns are related to disease-specific issues or practice-pattern differences among different populations.

Hospital healthcare resource utilization and costs for chimeric antigen T-cell therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant in patients with large B-cell lymphoma in the United States.

The efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is well-established. This study, using the Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database, assessed hospital costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between CAR T-cell therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) for 733 LBCL patients from 01/01/2017-04/30/2021 (166 CAR T and 567 AHCT from 37 US hospital systems. CAR T-cell therapy had higher index costs but lower non-pharmacy costs, shorter hospital stays, lower ICU utilization than AHCT. The CAR T-cell cohort also presented fewer preparatory costs and HRU. At a 180-day follow-up, AHCT had lower hospitalization rates and costs. Overall, despite higher index costs, CAR T-cell therapy has lower non-pharmacy costs and HRU during the index procedure and requires less preparation time with lower preparation HRUs and costs than AHCT. This has important implications for resource management and informed decision-making for stakeholders.

Disparities in Access to Outpatient Surgery Related to Removal of Procedures from Medicare's Inpatient Only List.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the shift from inpatient to outpatient surgical care related to changes to the Inpatient Only List in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The extent to which procedures shift from the inpatient to outpatient setting following removal from Medicare's Inpatient Only List is unknown. Many health systems also encouraged a shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Assessing the relative change in outpatient surgical utilization for procedures removed from the Inpatient Only List during COVID-19 would provide empirical data on whether reimbursement policy changes or inpatient capacity needs during the pandemic were more likely to shift care from the inpatient to outpatient setting. METHODS: We used administrative data from the PINC AI Healthcare Database across 723 hospitals to determine the within-facility relative change in outpatient vs inpatient procedural volume in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 using a multivariable conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression model. We also assessed whether outpatient surgical utilization varied by race and ethnicity. Using a multivariable linear probability model, we assessed the absolute change in risk-adjusted 30-day complication, readmission, and mortality rates for inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures. RESULTS: In 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 respectively, there was a 5.3% (95% CI, 1.4% to 9.5%) and 41.3% (95% CI 33.1% to 50.0%) relative increase in outpatient elective procedural volume. Outpatient procedural volume increased most significantly for hip replacement which was removed from the Inpatient Only List in 2020 (increase in outpatient surgical utilization of 589.3% (95% CI, 524.9% to 660.3%)). The shift to outpatient hip replacement procedures was concentrated among White patients; in 2021, hip replacement procedural volume increased by 271.1% (95% CI, 241.2% and 303.7%) for White patients and 29.5% (95% CI, 24.4% and 34.9%) for Black patients compared to 2019 levels. There were no consistent or large changes in 30-day complication, readmission, or mortality risk in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019. CONCLUSION: There was a modest increase in elective outpatient surgeries and a pronounced increase in outpatient orthopedic surgeries which were removed from the Inpatient Only List during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilization of outpatient surgical procedures was concentrated among White patients.

Initial renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality associates with 90-day postdischarge RRT dependence in critically ill AKI survivors.

PURPOSE: Real-world comparison of RRT modality on RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge among ICU patients discharged alive after RRT for acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: Using claims-linked to US hospital discharge data (Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database [PHD]), we compared continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) vs. intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) for AKI in adult ICU patients discharged alive from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021. RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge was defined as ≥2 RRT treatments in the last 8 days. Between-group differences were balanced using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Of 34,804 patients, 3804 patients (from 382 hospitals) had claims coverage for days 83-90 postdischarge. Compared to IHD-treated patients (n = 2740), CRRT-treated patients (n = 1064) were younger; had more admission to large teaching hospitals, surgery, sepsis, shock, mechanical ventilation, but lower prevalence of comorbidities (p < 0.05 for all). Compared to IHD-treated patients, CRRT-treated patients had lower RRT dependence at hospital discharge (26.5% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.04) and lower RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge (4.9% vs. 7.4% p = 0.006) with weighted adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.47-0.97), p = 0.03. Results persisted in sensitivity analyses including patients who died during days 1-90 postdischarge (n = 112) or excluding patients from hospitals with IHD patients only (n = 335), or when excluding patients who switched RRT modalities (n = 451). CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted for potential confounders, the odds of RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge among survivors of RRT for AKI was 30% lower for those treated first with CRRT vs. IHD, overall and in several sensitivity analyses. SUMMARY: Critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU) may develop acute kidney injury (AKI) that requires renal replacement therapy (RRT) to temporarily replace the injured kidney function of cleaning the blood. Two main types of RRT in the ICU are called continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is performed almost continuously, i.e., for >18 h per day, and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), which is a more rapid RRT that is usually completed in a little bit over 6 h, several times per week. The slower CRRT may be gentler on the kidneys and is more likely to be used in the sickest patients, who may not be able to tolerate IHD. We conducted a data-analysis study to evaluate whether long-term effects on kidney function (assessed by ongoing need for RRT, i.e., RRT dependence) differ depending on use of CRRT vs. IHD. In a very large US linked hospital-discharge/claims database we found that among ICU patients discharge alive after RRT for AKI, fewer CRRT-treated patients had RRT dependence at hospital discharge (26.5% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.04) and at 90 days after discharge (4.9% vs. 7.4% p = 0.006). In adjusted models, RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge was >30% lower for CRRT than IHD-treated patients. These results from a non-randomized study suggest that among survivors of RRT for AKI, CRRT may result in less RRT dependence 90 days after hospital discharge.

Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Infection among Patients Undergoing Elective, Posterior, Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgeries: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Post-surgical invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections among spinal fusion patients are serious complications that can worsen clinical outcomes and increase healthcare utilization. Risk of such infections at the population level remains unknown. This study assessed the post-surgical risk of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections among patients undergoing elective posterior instrumented spinal fusion surgeries in 129 U.S. hospitals. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent thoracolumbar/lumbar and cervical fusion surgeries during 2010 - 2014 using the Premier Healthcare Database, the largest hospital discharge database in the United States. Risks of blood stream infection (BSI), deep or organ/space surgical site infections (SSI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus during 90 and 180 days post-index surgery were estimated. Infections were identified based on positive culture results, related International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes, and specific claims information. Results: Among 11,236 patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion, 90- and 180-day BSI/SSI infection risks were higher for multilevel than single level fusion (90-day, 1.52% vs. 1.07%, p = 0.05; 180-day, 1.66% vs. 1.07%, p = 0.014). Among 1,641 patients with cervical fusion, 90- and 180-day BSI/SSI infection risks were also higher in multilevel fusions but not statistically significant (90-day, 1.66% vs. 0.52%, p = 0.350; 180-day, 1.80% vs. 0.51%, p = 0.241). The risk for SSI/BSI was more than twice as high among multilevel thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion patients with more than two comorbidities than those with no comorbidity at both 90-day (2.78% vs. 1.00%, p < 0.05) and 180-day (3.01% vs. 1.10%, p < 0.05). Similar trend without statistical significance was seen in multilevel cervical fusion cohort (90-day, 2.91% vs. 1.25%, p > 0.05; 180-day, 3.88% vs. 1.41%, p > 0.05). Conclusions: The risk of BSI/SSI infection for elective posterior instrumented spinal fusions ranged between 0.5% and 2%. Higher risk was observed in multilevel thoracolumbar/lumbar surgery, with infection risk greatest in patients with more than two comorbidities. These real-world findings highlight the need for additional measures, in addition to antibiotic prophylaxis, to reduce invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections in this setting.

Epidemiology of Invasive Escherichia coli Infection and Antibiotic Resistance Status Among Patients Treated in US Hospitals: 2009-2016.

BACKGROUND: Published data is limited on the prevalence and risk of recurrence of extraintestinal invasive Escherichia coli infections (IEIs) in the United States. METHODS: The analysis included all inpatient and hospital-based outpatient visits occurring between 2009 and 2016 at hospitals with continuous microbiology data submission to the Premier Healthcare Database for 90 days before and 12 months after the admission or visit. IEI was defined as having positive E. coli culture from a normally sterile site (eg, blood, cerebrospinal fluid). The prevalence of IEI, 12-month risk of recurrent IEI, and antibiotic resistance were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 144 944 725 hospital visits among 37 207 510 patients were analyzed, and 71 909 IEI events occurred in 67 583 patients, corresponding to an IEI prevalence of 0.50 events per 1000 visits and 1.82 events per 1000 patients. Recurrence was common: 26.9 per 1000 patients had a recurrent IEI in the 12 months after their infection. Most infections were community acquired (66.4%), and urosepsis was most common clinical syndrome (66.0%). The 30-day risk of IEI among patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy was high: 5.03 events per 1000 patients. Among all IEI cases with antibiotic susceptibility testing, 9.18% were resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, 28.22% to fluoroquinolones, and 0.14% to carbapenems. Resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins increased from 5.46% to 12.97% during the 8-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study indicates a substantial burden of IEI and recurrent IEI exists in the United States, as well as increasing resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Future research should explore risk factors of recurrent IEI aiming to effectively prevent such infections.

Cost and Hospital Resource Utilization of Staphylococcus aureus Infection Post Elective Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgeries in U.S. Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess hospital resource utilization and costs associated with Staphylococcus aureus infection within 180 days post elective posterior instrumented spinal fusion surgeries (index surgery) between 2010 and 2015. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical site infections (SSIs) and blood stream infections (BSIs) post spinal fusion surgeries are associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased costs. Economic data specific to the most common pathogen of infections post spinal fusion surgeries, S. aureus, are limited. METHODS: We analyzed hospital discharge and microbiology data from 129 U.S. hospitals in Premier Healthcare Database. Selection criteria included age ≥ 18 years; had a primary/secondary ICD-9-CM procedure code for index surgery; and had microbiology data during study period. Outcomes included total hospitalization cost, length of stay, and risk of all-cause readmission. Infection status was classified as culture-confirmed invasive (i.e., BSIs, deep or organ/space SSIs), any, and no S. aureus infection. Multivariable regression analyses were used to compare outcome variables between infection groups controlling for known confounders. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients had any S. aureus infection (151 had invasive infection) and 12,918 had no infection. Compared with no infection group, invasive and any infection groups had higher total hospitalization cost (adjusted mean in 2015 U.S. dollars: $88,353 and $64,356 vs. $47,366, P < 0.001), longer length of stay (adjusted mean: 20.98 and 13.15 vs. 6.77 days, P < 0.001), and higher risk of all-cause readmission [adjusted risk ratio: 2.15 (95% confidence interval: 2.06-2.25) for invasive and 1.70 (95% confidence interval: 1.61-1.80) for any infection groups]. CONCLUSION: S. aureus infections post elective posterior instrumented spinal fusion surgeries are associated with significantly higher hospitalization cost, length of stay, and 180-day risk of readmission than those with no such infection, which presents substantial burden to hospitals and patients. Reducing such infections may cut costs and hospital resource utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.