Cardiac amyloidosis and left atrial appendage closure. The CAMYLAAC study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) patients often have atrial fibrillation and increased bleeding/thrombogenic risks. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) compared with patients without a known diagnosis of CA. METHODS: Comparison at long-term of patients diagnosed with ATTR-CA who underwent LAAC between 2009 and 2020 and those without a known diagnosis of CA. RESULTS: We studied a total of 1159 patients. Forty patients (3.5%) were diagnosed with ATTR-CA; these patients were older and had more comorbidities, higher HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and lower left ventricular function. Successful LAAC was achieved in 1137 patients (98.1%) with no differences between groups. Regarding in-hospital and follow-up complications, there were no differences between the groups in ischemic stroke (5% vs 2.5% in those without a known diagnosis of CA; P=.283), hemorrhagic stroke (2.5% and 0.8% in the control group; P=.284), major or minor bleeding. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in mortality (ATTR-CA: 20% vs those without known CA: 13.6%, 0.248); however, the at 5-year follow-up, ATTR-CA patients had higher mortality (40% vs 19.2%; P <.001) but this difference was unrelated to hemorrhagic complications or ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: LAAC could reduce the risk of bleeding complications and ischemic cerebrovascular events without increasing the rate of early or mid-term complications. Although long-term survival was impaired in ATTR-CA patients, it was comparable to that of patients without a known diagnosis of CA at the 2-year follow-up, suggesting that LAAC for patients with ATTR-CA might not be futile.

Clinical implications of diabetes mellitus in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Prognostic role and use of new P2Y12 receptor inhibitors.

AIMS: We investigated the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, and the 2-year prognosis based on antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: This is a prospective and multicenter registry including hospitalized ACS patients. Clinical management and antiplatelet therapy at discharge were recorded. Bleeding events, all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were recorded during 2-years and compared according to DM and the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. RESULTS: From 1717 ACS patients, 653 (38%) had DM. Diabetic patients were older, more commonly females, with higher prevalence of comorbidities and more conservative management. After excluding antiplatelet monotherapy or oral anticoagulation, clopidogrel was prescribed in 59.6% of DM patients. Cox regression analysis showed that DM was an independent risk factor for MACE (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.83). The use of clopidogrel instead of ticagrelor/prasugrel was also independently associated with MACE (aHR 1.71, 95% CI 1.11-2.63), and all-cause mortality (aHR 2.47, 95% CI 1.23-4.96) in diabetic patients (log-rank p-values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients, DM was associated with higher risk of MACE. In such patients, the use of ticagrelor/prasugrel reduced MACE and mortality compared to clopidogrel. Novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors might be used as the first therapeutic choice in these high-risk patients.

One-year efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Results from a prospective and multicentre ACHILLES registry.

BACKGROUND: Prasugrel and ticagrelor have demonstrated higher efficacy than clopidogrel in their main clinical trials for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the long-term prognosis and different clinical characteristics related to the type of antiplatelet prescription in current clinical practice ACS patients have not been analysed in depth. The objective of this study was to analyse the clinical profile of ACS and the efficacy and safety of novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors in current clinical practice patients discharged afterACS. METHODS: We collected data from the ACHILLES registry, and an observational, prospective and multicentre registry of patients discharged after ACS. We analysed baseline characteristics, clinical profile and therapy during ACS admission and compared with the different treatments at discharge. After 1 year of follow-up, ischaemic and major bleeding events were analysed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan Meier curves were also plotted. RESULTS: Of 1717 consecutive patients, 1294 (75.4%) were discharged with a P2Y12 inhibitor without oral anticoagulation. Novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors were indicated in 47%. Patients treated with clopidogrel were elderly (69.1 ± 13.4 vs 60.4 ± 11.5 years; P < .001) and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. GRACE and CRUSADE scores were higher in the clopidogrel than in novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors group (P < .001). After 1 year of follow-up, 64(5.0%/year) patients had a new myocardial infarction, 127(10.0%/year) had a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and 78(6.1%/year) died. Patients treated with clopidogrel had a significantly higher annual rate of cardiovascular mortality, MACE and all-cause mortality (allP < .001) without differences in major bleeding (P = .587) compared with novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors. After multivariate adjustment for the main clinical variables related to adverse prognosis in ACS patients, the discharge with novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors therapy was independently associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR0.49, 95% CI [0.24-0.98], P = .044) and lower risk of MACE (HR0.64, 95% CI [0.41-0.98], P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, observational and current clinical practice ACS registry, the use of novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with a reduction in adverse events compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS. Novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors prescription at discharge was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality and MACE without differences in bleeding events. However, clopidogrel remained the most common P2Y12 inhibitor employed for ACS, especially in older and high-risk patients.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Third-Generation P2Y12 Inhibitors Use in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Impact on the Prognosis at 1 Year.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, they are underrepresented in clinical trials. We aimed to investigate differences in prognosis of acute coronary syndrome patients with and without CKD, focusing on the use of novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. This multicenter registry involved patients with acute coronary syndrome from 3 tertiary institutions. After excluding anticoagulated patients and patients on antiplatelet monotherapy, 1280 patients remained. During 1 year of follow-up, we recorded all major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke), bleeds (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification) and deaths. Of 1280 patients, 325 (25.4%) had CKD; 55.5% of non-CKD patients and 22.7% of CKD patients were prescribed novel P2Y12 inhibitors. During follow-up, CKD patients under novel P2Y12 inhibitors showed a not statistically significant lower mortality and incidence of thrombotic events than clopidogrel-treated ones. In contrast, non-CKD patients taking novel P2Y12 inhibitors had better outcomes in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (4.72 vs 9.41; P = .006), all-cause mortality (1.32 vs 4.24; P = .006), and severe bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3-5) (0.94 vs 2.82; P = .030), without differences for any bleeding (8.11 vs 8.47; P = .849). Bleeding risk was not increased by using third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors in either group of patients. In conclusion, the use of third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors among non-CKD patients was associated with better outcomes. CKD patients receiving third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors treatment showed no statistically significant lower mortality and thrombotic events. Bleeding risk was not increased with the use of third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors in either group of patients.

Comparación de la eficacia y seguridad de flecainida y dronedarona como terapias antiarrítmicas para mantenimiento de ritmo sinusal en fibrilación auricular / Comparison of the efficacy and safety of dronedarone and flecainide as maintenance antiarrhythmic therapy for sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation

Resumen Introducción y objetivos: Dronedarona y flecainida son antiarrítmicos de primera elección para reducir recurrencias de fibrilación auricular (FA), sin existir estudios que los comparen entre sí. Nuestro objetivo es comparar la eficacia en cuanto a prevención de recurrencias y seguridad de ambos fármacos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron 123 pacientes de forma consecutiva en tratamiento con flecainida o dronedarona desde octubre de 2010 hasta febrero de 2013 por FA paroxística (76.4%) y FA persistente (23.6%). Se realizó cardioversión eléctrica en un 7.3% de los pacientes y farmacológica en un 16.3%. La mediana (rango intercuartílico) de seguimiento fue de 301 días (92-474), con una media de 2.8 revisiones por paciente. Se realizó análisis de tiempo hasta el primer evento mediante Kaplan-Meier y regresión de Cox ajustada por un índice de propensión. Resultados: De entre los 123 sujetos incluidos con FA, 71 fueron tratados con flecainida y 52 con dronedarona. Durante el seguimiento se registraron 36 recurrencias y 20 efectos adversos. Se documentaron un 36.6% de recurrencias en los pacientes tratados con flecainida en comparación con un 21% en los tratados con dronedarona (p = 0.073). En el análisis multivariante, dronedarona se mostró al menos tan eficaz como flecainida para prevenir recurrencias de FA (HR: 0.53, IC 95%: 0.20-1.44, p = 0.221) y demostró un perfil de seguridad comparable al de flecainida (HR: 0.68, IC 95%: 0.18-2.53, p = 0.566). Conclusiones: Según nuestra experiencia, dronedarona resulta al menos tan eficaz como flecainida para el mantenimiento de ritmo sinusal, con un buen perfil de tolerabilidad, a pesar de pautarse en pacientes con un perfil clínico más desfavorable.

Abstract Introduction and objectives: Dronedarone and flecainide are the first pharmacological choice to reduce recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there are no studies comparing them. A study was performed to compare the efficacy in terms of recurrence of AF and safety of both drugs. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included 123 consecutive patients treated with flecainide or dronedarone due to paroxysmal AF (76.4%) or persistent AF (23.6%), from October 2010 to February 2013. Electrical cardioversion was performed in 7.3% of patients and pharmacological cardioversion in 16.3%. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 301 days (92-474) with a mean of 2.8 reviews per patient. Time to first event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression, adjusted for propensity score. Results: Of the 123 consecutive patients with AF included, 71 were on dronedarone and 52 on flecainide. During the follow-up, there were 36 AF recurrences and 20 safety events. There were recurrences in 36.6% of patients treated with flecainide, compared with 21% of those receiving dronedarone (P = .073). Dronedarone showed to be at least as effective as flecainide in preven- ting recurrence of atrial fibrillation (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.20-1.44, P = .221), and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when compared with flecainide (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.18-2.53, P = .566). Conclusions: In our experience, dronedarone has been at least as effective and safe as flecainide, despite it was most frequently prescribed in patients with worse baseline risk profile.

Perioperative and Periprocedural Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: Consensus Document of SEC, SEDAR, SEACV, SECTCV, AEC, SECPRE, SEPD, SEGO, SEHH, SETH, SEMERGEN, SEMFYC, SEMG, SEMICYUC, SEMI, SEMES, SEPAR, SENEC, SEO, SEPA, SERVEI, SECOT and AEU.

During the last few years, the number of patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy has increased worldwide. Since this is a chronic treatment, patients receiving it can be expected to need some kind of surgery or intervention during their lifetime that may require treatment discontinuation. The decision to withdraw antithrombotic therapy depends on the patient's thrombotic risk versus hemorrhagic risk. Assessment of both factors will show the precise management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in these scenarios. The aim of this consensus document, coordinated by the Cardiovascular Thrombosis Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and endorsed by most of the Spanish scientific societies of clinical specialities that may play a role in the patient-health care process during the perioperative or periprocedural period, is to recommend some simple and practical guidelines with a view to homogenizing daily clinical practice.

Temporal Trends in the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) recommend the use of potent antiplatelet therapy, prasugrel or ticagrelor, because both drugs consistently reduce cardiovascular events. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine temporal changes in the use of optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. METHODS: A total of 1717 consecutive patients admitted for ACS in 3 tertiary hospitals from February 2014 to December 2015 were enrolled. We divided these 23 months into 4 semesters: period I (0-5 months), period II (6-11 months), period III (12-17 months), and period IV (17-23 months). Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected both at admission and at discharge. RESULTS: Treatment with clopidogrel remained constant throughout the periods (52%, 50%, 44%, and 50% for periods I, II, III, and IV, respectively), whereas a progressive increase in ticagrelor treatment was observed (15%, 25%, 26%, and 28%; P = .001). Indeed, new P2Y12 agents showed an increase from 47% at the first semester to 65% in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and in patients younger than 75 years from 36% to 53%. However, for patients older than 75 years, diabetic, and patients with end-stage kidney disease, clopidogrel was the second most commonly used antiplatelet agent. CONCLUSION: In this real-life registry of patients with ACS, we observed there is still a high rate of use of clopidogrel, despite guidelines recommendations, and our analyses also showed a trend toward the use of ticagrelor. Patients who received new antiplatelet agents were patients with STEMI, younger than 75 years, and with less comorbidities. However, the use of ticagrelor and prasugrel remains low, highlighting a therapeutic inertia with considerable gap between evidence-based clinical guidelines and daily clinical practice.

CALU A29809G polymorphism in coronary atherothrombosis: Implications for coronary calcification and prognosis.

INTRODUCTION: Arterial calcification is a risk factor for atherosclerosis. Calumenin (CALU), a protein regulating proteins involved in coagulation and arterial calcification also has extracellular functions related to atherosclerosis. We recently described that CALU polymorphism A29809G was related to acenocoumarol requirements, and we wanted to evaluate its role in arterial calcification and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 374 consecutive patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (nSTACS). In 175 of them, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, we assessed calcification in each main coronary artery. Follow-up at 1 and 6 months was performed for adverse end-points. RESULTS: CALU 29809G carriers were more frequent in the low calcium group (P = 0.037). The presence of >or=3 cardiovascular risk factors and CALU polymorphism were associated with arterial calcification (OR 2.34, P = 0.049; and OR 0.34, P = 0.019, respectively). CALU 29809G allele was the only variable associated with events at 1 month (HR 0.42; P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis showed that, at 6 months, age and severe anginal symptoms were associated with worse prognosis (HR 2.13, P = 0.023; and HR 2.01, P = 0.011, respectively), whereas CALU 29809G allele associated with good prognosis (HR 0.59, P = 0.044). Our results suggest that CALU A29809G is associated with arterial calcification and short-term prognosis of the outcome of patients with nSTACS.

The prognostic value of biomarkers after a premature myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular thrombogenesis is influenced by a complex interplay of factors related to a procoagulant state, fibrinolysis, endothelial damage/dysfunction and inflammation. We hypothesised that abnormalities of these biological systems would contribute to outcome of coronary artery disease presenting at a young age. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 142 subjects presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at a young age (defined as age ≤45 years), to determine the clinical and laboratory predictors of cardiovascular events during 36 months of follow-up. We assessed conventional risk factors and abnormalities of thrombophilia [total homocysteine (tHcy), lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], antiphospholipid antibodies (APA)], as well as lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides), fibrinogen and fibrin D-dimer (as indices of a hypercoagulable state and thrombogenesis), von Willebrand factor (vWF, an index of endothelial damage/dysfunction), tissue plasminogen activator [t-PA antigen] and its inhibitor [PAI-1 antigen] (as indices of fibrinolysis), and C-reactive protein [CRP] (an index of inflammation). RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, the variables independently associated with cardiovascular events at follow-up were levels of homocysteine (OR 3.73, 95% CI (1.54-9.02); p=0.003), left ventricle systolic dysfunction (OR 3.04, 95% CI (1.00-9.25); p=0.050), and smoking habit (OR 2.79, 95% CI (1.09-7.14) p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic markers associated with cardiovascular events in premature CAD (young AMI subjects) were cigarette smoking and EF<50% of left ventricle as conventional clinical risk factors, as well as higher levels of homocysteine.

[Long-term follow-up of patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis treated with stent]. / Seguimiento a largo plazo de pacientes con estenosis de la arteria coronaria descendente anterior proximal tratadas con stent.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery are a special high-risk group. In the present study we analyzed the efficacy and safety of coronary stenting in such lesions and the factors related to a less favorable prognosis in long-term follow-up. METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients with severe left anterior descending artery stenosis were enrolled, all with coronary angioplasty and elective stenting. Clinical follow-up was carried out annually in all patients by personal interview or telephone contact. The incidence of death, new infarction, anginal status, and new revascularization procedures was registered. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables were analyzed to identify predictors of long term prognosis. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 38 11 months. There was only one major periprocedural complication, which required urgent surgery. Five deaths were registered, 3 of non-cardiac and 2 of cardiac origin. Twenty-five patients developed angina and 11 underwent a new revascularization of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (6 surgical and 5 angioplasty). Two patients had new anterior myocardial infarction. At 60 months the major cardiac event-free rate was 83.7% and the cardiac death-free rate was 98%. The use of two stents and the association of diabetes-hypertension-hypercholesterolemia were associated with a less favorable prognosis in our population. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting of left anterior descending coronary stenosis was safe and effective in a long-term analysis. The survival rate was high and the incidence of new revascularization was low.