RESUMEN
Mycobacterium chimaera is involved in a worldwide alert due to contaminated heater-cooler units. A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based procedure was implemented to survey undetected cases of M. chimaera infection. PCR was negative in the 59 prosthetic heart valves from patients with PCR-16SrRNA-negative infective endocarditis. PCR identified M. chimaera in one of 15 clinically significant retrospective Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare complex isolates, which corresponded to a patient who had undergone heart valve replacement in a different institution. Whole-genome sequencing demonstrated that he was the first case in Spain with involvement of the strain responsible for the global outbreak. These results highlight the relevance of retrospective tracking for undetected M. chimaera infections.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Anciano , Animales , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas/genética , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Secuenciación Completa del GenomaRESUMEN
This study evaluated the validity of bone marrow (BM) and blood specimens for the diagnosis of disseminated mycobacterial infections (DMIs). From 1990 to February 1997, all specimens were processed with the lysis-centrifugation procedure; thereafter (until December 2001), they were processed with the BACTEC Myco/F Lytic system. Twenty-three paired BM-blood specimens with mycobacteria in at least one specimen were studied from 23 patients. The strains isolated were 14 Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and nine M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC). Blood specimens had a statistically significant greater sensitivity for the isolation of MAC than BM (100% vs. 57.1%, respectively), whereas sensitivity for the isolation of MTBC was equal for the two specimen types (66.7%). Although not statistically significant, the times required to detect mycobacteria from blood specimens were lower than those from BM in the MycoF/Lytic system. Overall, blood cultures represented a more sensitive and less invasive alternative to BM cultures for the diagnosis of disseminated mycobacteriosis caused by MAC, especially when the MycoF/Lytic system was used, but provided no advantage for the diagnosis of DMI caused by MTBC.