The Role of Suprapubic Superficial Fascial System Reconstruction During Repair of Adult-Acquired Buried Penis.

BACKGROUND: Adult-Acquired Buried Penis is a disorder associated with systemic obesity that confers increased risks of malignancy, sexual dysfunction, urinary abnormalities, and psychological distress. Surgical correction improves patient-reported functional and psychological outcomes and often requires collaboration between plastic and urologic surgeons. To improve postoperative cosmetic outcomes and decrease wound complications following adult-acquired buried penis repair, we performed an anatomic and histologic study of the superficial fascial layers providing support to the external male genitalia and describe our approach for fascial reconstruction. METHODS: We characterized the superficial fascial anatomy in three patients undergoing adult-acquired buried penis repair, including two patients with Wisconsin Type II disease and one patient with Wisconsin Type IV disease. Gross specimens were sent from two patients histologic analysis using H&E and elastin-specific stains to characterize the identity of the superficial fibrofatty tissue. RESULTS: In all three patients, the fundiform ligament overlying the suspensory ligament was identified, isolated, and transected for removal with the suprapubic specimen. We found that reapproximation of this ligament following transection at the time of escutcheonectomy provided significant lift to the penis and genitals via improved support of dartos fascia. Histologic analysis of the superficial fibrofatty tissue located beneath the dermis revealed histologic similarities with the superficial fascial system described previously in abdominal and breast tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Reapproximation of the fundiform ligament and superficial fascial tissue following suprapubic/lower abdominal fat pad removal during adult-acquired buried penis may improve postoperative cosmesis by reducing strain on the dermal closure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Patient Interaction With the Health Care System Following a Nonopioid Discharge Strategy for Anterior Urethroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Continued efforts have been made to minimize postoperative opioids following urologic interventions. Studies show that patient-reported pain outcomes are similar between those patients discharged with and without opioids following anterior urethroplasty, but we do not know what impact this has on health care utilization. We aim to show that a nonopioid discharge following anterior urethroplasty does not increase postoperative health care utilization. METHODS: Five hundred patients who underwent anterior urethroplasty from January 2016 to October 2022 were identified from retrospective chart review. Patient demographic information, surgical characteristics, and postoperative interactions with the health care system were extracted from the electronic medical record. We then compared these outcomes by discharge opioid prescription status. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were discharged without an opioid prescription. Patients who received an opioid were more likely to have had a perineal incision (73% vs 64%, P = .02), more likely to have had an overnight hospital stay (30% vs 14%, P < .01), and were more likely to have been prescribed an opioid preoperatively (13% vs 7%, P = .03). There were overall low rates of interaction with the health system in both groups with no significant difference in 30-day unplanned office visits, emergency department visits, or office phone calls. Overall, by the end of our study period 97% were discharged without an opioid and 94% of patients were discharged the same day. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing anterior urethroplasty can safely be discharged home without opioids following surgery without undue postoperative burden on the health care system.

Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Patients With Postprostatectomy, Postradiation Anastomotic Stenosis.

PURPOSE: The treatment of urethral stenosis after a combination of prostatectomy and radiation therapy for prostate cancer is understudied. We evaluate the clinical and patient-related outcomes after dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (D-BMGU) in men who underwent prostatectomy and radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective review of men with vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis or bulbomembranous urethral stricture disease after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy from 8 institutions between 2013 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and development of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Secondary outcomes were surgical complications, changes in voiding, and patient-reported satisfaction. RESULTS: Forty-five men were treated with D-BMGU for stenosis following prostatectomy and radiation. There was a total of 7 recurrences. Median follow-up in patients without recurrence was 21 months (IQR 12-24). There were no incidents of de novo incontinence, 28 patients were incontinent pre- and postoperatively, and of the 6 patients managed with suprapubic catheter preoperatively, 4 were continent after repair. Following repair, men had significant improvement in postvoid residual, uroflow, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Prostate Symptom Score quality-of-life domain. Overall satisfaction was +2 or better in 86.6% of men on the Global Response Assessment. CONCLUSIONS: D-BMGU is a safe, feasible, and effective technique in patients with urethral stenosis after a combination of prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Although our findings suggest this technique may result in lower rates of de novo urinary incontinence compared to conventional urethral transection and excision techniques, head-to-head comparisons are needed.

Minimally Invasive Management of Posterior Urethral Stricture/Stenosis with DVIU and Mitomycin C Injection.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a technique for minimally invasive endoscopic management of posterior urethral strictures, including those at the bladder neck and vesicourethral anastomosis. METHODS: Herein, we have included endoscopic video footage from 3 patients with posterior urethral strictures, including 1 at the bladder neck, 1 at the vesicourethral anastomosis, and 1 in the bulbomembranous urethra. In each patient, we perform a direct visualization internal urethrotomy (DVIU) with incisions at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions to widen the urethral lumen, followed by injection of 2 mg mitomycin C (MMC) in a total volume of 5 mL sterile water. RESULTS: Herein, we describe our technique for the endoscopic management of posterior urethral strictures, including those in the prostatic urethra and bladder neck. MMC injection, in conjunction with traditional DVIU, adds minimally to the complexity and length of the procedure but may substantially improve long-term surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Bladder outlet obstruction due to stenosis or stricture of the posterior urethra is a common urologic diagnosis whose etiology can often be traced to prior urethral manipulation or iatrogenic trauma. While Americal Urological Assicuation (AUA) guidelines state that dilation or direct visualization internal urethrotomy (DVIU) should be offered for bulbar strictures measuring less than 2 cm in length, recent evidence suggests that DVIU with or without MMC injection may have utility in the management of bladder neck or vesicourethral anastomotic contractures. We have found that DVIU with subsequent MMC injection is a viable minimally invasive approach for the treatment of posterior urethral strictures. While more data are needed to better understand the long-term success rates of these procedures, this approach should be considered for patients with a bladder outlet obstruction secondary to a short stricture of the posterior urethra, bladder neck, or vesicourethral anastomosis.

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Technique Video.

OBJECTIVE: The artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard treatment for male stress urinary incontinence which commonly results from prostatectomy or pelvic radiation for prostate cancer. Patients with prior pelvic radiation history experience increased risk of developing urethral erosion. Transcorporal AUS (TAUS) placement can be used as an alternative for compromised urethras to incorporate a small portion of the corporal bodies for additional support. The inclusion of an additional tissue barrier has been shown to improve outcomes. Patients who undergo this technique require device explanation and AUS revision less often than those with AUS devices placed in the standard fashion. Additionally, TAUS placement has been shown to improve functional urinary outcomes such as postoperative Internal prostate symptom score (IPSS), and postoperative IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 67-year-old male with a past medical history of prostate cancer treated with surgery and radiation underwent a TAUS placement which was filmed to demonstrate placement technique and tips. Informed consent was obtained prior to filming this video. RESULTS: This technique can serve as a successful primary or salvage AUS placement technique as seen in this video. CONCLUSION: This video is used to demonstrate the technique of TAUS placement.

Fasciocutaneous Flap Perineal Closure with Testicular Thigh Pouch for Scrotal Defects: Surgical Technique and Initial Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical technique and evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary outcomes of perineal closure with fasciocutaneous flaps as an alternative to scrotoplasty for large genital wounds. METHODS: Cases of perineal closure with fasciocutaneous flaps and thigh pouch creation for patients having undergone scrotectomy from January 2015 until August 2022 were reviewed for operative details and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified undergoing this procedure. Patients had a median age of 64 (Inter-quartile range [IQR] 58-70), body mass index of 34 (IQR 29-40) and Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (IQR 4-8). Median total wound area was 443 cm2 (IQR 225-600). Operative technique in all cases included testicular thigh pouch and fasciocutaneous flap creation for perineal closure; these flaps were raised from the thigh in 18 patients and abdominal wall in 8. This technique resulted in 100% closure rate of the perineum with 3 patients required abdominal split thickness skin grafting (STSG) to complete closure. Complication occurred in 3 patients (15%) with 1 wound infection and 2 episodes of bleeding. Forty percent of patients were discharged home. Median follow-up was 9 months with only 1 patient reporting pain related to thigh pouches and none desiring elective scrotoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Despite large defects, perineal closure was completed in all patients with minimal use of STSG. Complication rates were comparable to other methods despite significant patient frailty and no patients desired staged scrotoplasty. This method of closure adds an option for the complex perineal reconstruction patient.

Catheter Free Day of Surgery Discharge vs Overnight Observation Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.

Introduction To confirm the safety and examine outcomes of a day of surgery discharge following artificial urinary sphincter implantation in a population discharged without a catheter. Methods We retrospectively identified 110 patients, 31 of whom were discharged on the day of surgery, from a single surgeon following artificial urinary sphincter implantation. After institutional board review approval, patient charts were reviewed capturing demographics as well as three, thirty, and ninety-day outcomes. Further outcomes specific to urinary retention were obtained. Results Patients who were discharged the same day were older (71 vs. 68), had shorter operative times (92 minutes vs 109 minutes), and were less likely to have been smokers (6% vs 31%). There were no differences in the proportion of patients who underwent prior radiation or prior implant surgery. There was no significant difference in the number of patients who had emergency department visits, urinary retention, office calls, office visits, or unplanned office visits at all time points following surgery. There was no significant difference in overall urinary retention (15% vs 5%), retention presenting after the initial surgical event (6% vs 5%), or need for a suprapubic tube (0% vs 5%). Conclusions Day of surgery discharge is a safe discharge strategy for patients who have undergone artificial urinary sphincter placement. Furthermore, catheter-free days of discharge surgery did not have a significantly greater risk of urinary retention, office calls, emergency department (ED) visits, or office visits compared to our overnight observation population. This approach should be considered for all patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation.

A multicenter prospective cohort study of endoscopic urethral realignment versus suprapubic cystostomy after complete pelvic fracture urethral injury.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) occurs in up to 10% of pelvic fractures. There is mixed evidence supporting early endoscopic urethral realignment (EUR) over suprapubic tube (SPT) placement and delayed urethroplasty. Some studies show decreased urethral obstruction with EUR, while others show few differences. We hypothesized that EUR would reduce the rate of urethral obstruction after PFUI. METHODS: Twenty-six US medical centers contributed patients following either an EUR or SPT protocol from 2015 to 2020. If retrograde cystoscopic catheter placement failed, patients were included and underwent either EUR or SPT placement based on their institution's assigned treatment arm. Endoscopic urethral realignment involved simultaneous antegrade/retrograde cystoscopy to place a catheter across the urethral injury. The primary endpoint was development of urethral obstruction. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the relationship between PFUI management and development of urethral obstruction. RESULTS: There were 106 patients with PFUI; 69 (65%) had complete urethral disruption and failure of catheter placement with retrograde cystoscopy. Of the 69 patients, there were 37 (54%) and 32 (46%) in the EUR and SPT arms, respectively. Mean age was 37.0 years (SD, 16.3 years) years, and mean follow-up was 463 days (SD, 280 days) from injury. In the EUR arm, 36 patients (97%) developed urethral obstruction compared with 30 patients (94%) in the SPT arm ( p = 0.471). Urethroplasty was performed in 31 (87%) and 29 patients (91%) in the EUR and SPT arms, respectively ( p = 0.784). CONCLUSION: In this prospective multi-institutional study of PFUI, EUR was not associated with a lower rate of urethral obstruction or need for urethroplasty when compared with SPT placement. Given the potential risk of EUR worsening injuries, clinicians should consider SPT placement as initial treatment for PFUI when simple retrograde cystoscopy is not successful in placement of a urethral catheter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Buried Penis Reconstruction in the Management of Localized Penile Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this article is to describe surgical techniques for the management of localized penile cancer concurrent with adult acquired buried penis. Penile cancer, while rare, invariably impacts quality of life as the primary surgical management ranges from local excision to total penectomy. Penile cancer has recently been linked to adult acquired buried penis (AABP) with the hypothesis that chronic inflammation of the penis contributes to risk of penile malignancy. Buried penis reconstruction is now a well-described procedure involving escutcheonectomy and split thickness skin grafting which has been shown to improve quality of life in individuals with adult acquired buried penis. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: This report describes a patient with AABP requiring partial penectomy and inguinal node dissection who also underwent adult acquired buried penis repair during his procedure. A review of cases of buried penis cases was carried out and four other cases of penile cancer were identified who were managed with penile preserving procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of surgical techniques strives to improve quality of life and facilitate cancer surveillance without compromising oncologic outcomes.

The Outcomes of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injuries Stratified by Urethral Injury Severity: A Prospective Multi-institutional Genitourinary Trauma Study (MiGUTS).

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient outcomes across a range of pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) severity. PFUI is a devastating consequence of a pelvic fracture. No study has stratified PFUI outcomes based on severity of the urethral distraction injury. METHODS: Adult male patients with blunt-trauma-related PFUI were followed prospectively for a minimum of six months at 27 US medical centers from 2015-2020. Patients underwent retrograde cystourethroscopy and retrograde urethrography to determine injury severity and were categorized into three groups: (1) major urethral distraction, (2) minor urethral distraction, and (3) partial urethral injury. Major distraction vs minor distraction was determined by the ability to pass a cystoscope retrograde into the bladder. Simple statistics summarized differences between groups. Multi-variable analyses determined odds ratios for obstruction and urethroplasty controlling for urethral injury type, age, and Injury Severity Score. RESULTS: There were 99 patients included, 72(72%) patients had major, 13(13%) had minor, and 14(14%) had partial urethral injuries. The rate of urethral obstruction differed in patients with major (95.8%), minor (84.6%), and partial injuries (50%) (P < 0.001). Urethroplasty was performed in 90% of major, 66.7% of minor, and 35.7% of partial injuries (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In PFUI, a spectrum of severity exists that influences outcomes. While major and minor distraction injuries are associated with a higher risk of developing urethral obstruction and need for urethroplasty, up to 50% of partial PFUI will result in obstruction, and as such need to be closely followed.

Outcomes of Initial Transcorporal Versus Standard Placement of Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Patients With Prior Radiation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate both device and functional outcomes of men who underwent initial artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement after pelvic radiation using the transcorporal versus the standard approach. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent first-time AUS placement after pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer was conducted between January 2008 and June 2020. Patients were grouped by transcorporal versus standard device placement. The primary outcomes of interest included major complications (revision or explant surgery) and functional outcomes (pads per day, International Prostate Symptom Score {IPSS}, quality of life {QOL} score). RESULTS: We identified 45 patients who underwent first-time AUS with a history of prior pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer, 27 underwent transcorporal placement and 18 underwent standard placement. Transcorporal AUS placement resulted in a significantly lower number of major complications (p=0.01), explants (p=0.02), and revisions (p=0.04) The transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter group had better postoperative pads per day (p=0.04), IPSS (p<0.01), and IPSS QOL score (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Initial transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement is a promising technique with lower rates of major complications in patients with a history of prior pelvic radiation and had better functional urinary outcomes.

The Gullwing Technique: A Novel Method of Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement for the Fragile Urethra.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the novel gullwing technique for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. The transcorporal technique for AUS placement is beneficial in patients with 'fragile urethras' (previous failed AUS, urethroplasty or history of radiation) however limitations include insufficient lateral and ventral urethral support in addition to potential cinching during corporotomy closure which, in the absence of additional grafting may restrict our ability to conserve internal corporal capacity and limit options for future preservation of erectile function via penile prosthesis placement. The gullwing variation of the technique offers the potential to circumvent these disadvantages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This case describes the gullwing variation of transcorporal AUS placement in a complex patient with a history of abdominopelvic trauma and prior failed AUS placements secondary to urethral erosion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Transcorporal AUS placement in patients with prior urethral compromise has been shown to result in lower revision and erosion rates. The gullwing modification of the technique is a novel variation providing improved circumferential urethral protection and, with the addition of corporal grafting, aims to enable the preservation of the three-dimensional corporal volume necessary for ease of subsequent penile prosthesis implantation. However, studies assessing the long-term functional outcomes and durability of this technique are needed.

Outcomes of Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis and Bladder Neck Contracture With Direct Visual Internal Urethrotomy With Mitomycin-C After Prostate Cancer Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of Direct Visual Internal Urethrotomy with Mitomycin-C (DVIU-MMC) for bladder neck contracture and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis in men who have undergone treatment for prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients at a tertiary care center who underwent DVIU-MMC for recurrent bladder neck contracture/vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis between 2012 and 2020. Patients with complete urethral obliteration, prior bladder neck reconstruction, or less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Patients were sorted into three groups based on prostate cancer treatment history: radical prostatectomy (RP), RP with subsequent external beam radiation therapy (RP-EBRT), and radiation therapy (RT). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with a median follow up of 32 months were included. Twenty-nine percent had pre-operative suprapubic tube (SPT), Foley, or required clean intermittent catheterization. Overall success after initial DVIU-MMC was 45%. In all patients with up to four procedures, cumulative overall success was 84%. There was no significant difference in relative success rates between groups. However, the interval to recurrence after initial DVIU-MMC was shortest for RP-EBRT group (P = .018). Three patients required SPT, all were in the RP-EBRT group. There was no statistical difference in recurrence after any number of procedures between patients in radiation (RP-EBRT and RT) and non-radiation (RP) groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in success rates between patients who had undergone RP-EBRT, RT, or RP. However, our data suggests that RP-EBRT patients experience poorer outcomes given that their interval to recurrence was more rapid and all patients requiring SPT placement were in this group.

The concealed morbidity of buried penis: a narrative review of our progress in understanding adult-acquired buried penis as a surgical condition.

Adult acquired buried penis (AABP) is a condition of entrapment of the phallus resulting most commonly from morbid obesity and formation of cicatrix with other etiologies including genital lymphedema, hidradenitis and trauma. The incidence of this syndrome is invariably connected to the increasing prevalence of obesity. The purpose of this review is to examine the current literature in AABP with a focus on the morbidity of AABP and perioperative management. The discussion and literature surrounding buried penis reconstruction started with the goal of correcting a cosmetic problem and has recently become fairly successful in this aim with an over 85% rate of successful reconstruction in many series with a more uniform surgical approach. The most recent trends have examined the significant burden of morbidity and even mortality that AABP can place on patients as it contributes to risk of penile cancer, urethral strictures and mood disorders. Studies in this space have shown that surgical repair can be successful in improving quality of life for patients with AABP and the removal of the offending pathophysiology suggests its success in correcting the physical morbidities. New directions for research and management of this condition should include a focus on educating providers and patients to make reconstruction more accessible to patients in need as AABP continues to journey toward mainstream acceptance as a surgical condition.

The Use of a Hartmann's Pouch for Bowel Vaginoplasty: A Case Report.

Bowel vaginoplasty is a well-described procedure utilizing a pedicled segment of large or small bowel. It has most commonly been used for vaginal agenesis, male-to-female gender affirmation surgery when the phallus skin is not sufficient, or a revision after failure of the primary reconstruction. Our case report describes the usage of a pedicled segment of large bowel to reconstruct the vagina after severe stricture of the original reconstruction. We were able to provide relief of the symptomatic Hartmann's pouch mucocele, urethral stricture, and provide a functional introitus and vaginal canal. This technique can provide a framework that can be used as a salvage plan in patients with previously irritated and inhospitable defects.

A multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis.

PURPOSE: To critically evaluate a multi-institutional patient cohort undergoing Dorsal-Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty (D-BMGU) for recurrent post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. METHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with posterior urethral stenosis from 10 institutions between 2010-2019 was performed. Patients with at least 1-year follow-up were assessed. Patient demographics, stenosis characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, and post-operative clinical and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and de-novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were changes in voiding, sexual function, and patient-reported satisfaction. RESULTS: Seventy-nine men with post-radiation urethral stenosis treated with D-BMGU met inclusion criteria. Median age and stenosis length were 72 years, (IQR 66-75), and 3.0 cm (IQR 2.5-4 cm), respectively. Radiation modalities included: 36 (45.6%) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 13 (16.5%) brachytherapy (BT), 10 (12.7%) combination EBRT/BT, and 20 (25.3%) EBRT/radical prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 13-40), 14 patients (17.7%) had stenosis recurrence. Among 37 preoperatively-continent patients, 3 men (8.1%) developed de-novo SUI following dorsal onlay urethroplasty. Of 29 patients with preoperative SUI all but one remained incontinent post-operatively (96.6%). Following repair, patients experienced significant improvement in PVR (92.5 to 26 cc, p = 0.001) and Uroflow (4.6 to 15.9 cc/s, p = 0.001), and high overall satisfaction, with 91.9% reporting a GRA of + 2 or better). CONCLUSION: Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique in patients with post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. This non-transecting approach may confer low rates of de-novo SUI. Further research is needed to compare this technique with excisional urethroplasty.

Transurethral ventral buccal mucosa graft inlay for treatment of distal urethral strictures: international multi-institutional experience.

PURPOSE: To critically evaluate a multi-institutional patient cohort undergoing single-stage distal urethral repair using a novel transurethral buccal mucosa graft inlay urethroplasty technique (TBMGI). METHODS: A retrospective multi-institutional review of consecutive patients with fossa navicularis (FN) strictures treated with a single-stage TBMGI technique at 12 institutions from March 2014-March 2018 was performed. Patient demographics, stricture characteristics, clinical and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were stricture recurrence and complications. Secondary outcomes were change in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), PVR, and changes in IPSS, SHIM and global response assessment (GRA) questionnaire responses. Descriptive statistical analysis was used for evaluation of outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-eight men met inclusion criteria. Median age and stricture length were 60 years (IQR 48-69) and 2 cm (IQR 2-3), respectively. Most common stricture etiology was lichen sclerosus (34%). Median operative time and EBL were 72 min (IQR 50-120) and 20 mL (IQR 10-43), respectively. Fifty-seven men completed ≥ 12-month follow-up. At a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 13-22), 54 patients (95%) remained stricture-free. Median Qmax improved from 5 to 18 mL/s (p < 0.0001), PVR 76-21 mL (p < 0.0001), and IPSS 15-5 (p < 0.0001); IPSS-QOL score: 5-1 (p < 0.0001). SHIM score did not significantly change following repair (median 22-21 p = 0.85). On GRA assessment, a majority of men reported "marked" (64%) or "moderate" (28%) overall improvement. No patient developed fistula, glanular dehiscence, graft necrosis or chordee. CONCLUSIONS: This novel minimally invasive transurethral urethroplasty technique is feasible and has demonstrated generalizable outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort with varying etiologies.

The Prevalence of Penile Cancer in Patients With Adult Acquired Buried Penis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of penile cancer in patients with adult acquired buried penis (AABP). Penile cancer is a rare but aggressive cancer. Several case reports have recently been published that indicate that AABP may increase the risk of penile cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of adults diagnosed with AABP and penile cancer between January, 2008 and December, 2018 seen at a tertiary referral center. Demographics including age, BMI, comorbidities, etiology of AABP, smoking history, circumcision status, and premalignant lesions (condyloma, lichen sclerosus [LS] carcinoma in situ [CIS]) were recorded. For patients with penile cancer, AJCC staging, grade, TNM staging and treatments were recorded. Basic descriptive statistics were performed for the overall cohort. We used Chi-square tests and Fisher exact tests to compare differences between patients with benign pathology and patients with malignant or pre-malignant pathology. RESULTS: We identified 150 patients with the diagnosis of AABP. The prevalence of penile squamous cell carcinoma was 7%. There was a 35% rate of premalignant lesions. This study is limited by its retrospective and single-institution nature. CONCLUSION: AABP is a condition that incorporates multiple risk factors for penile cancer. The prevalence of penile cancer appears to be higher in patients with AABP; however, more data are needed to confirm these initial findings. Patients with AABP should be counseled on these risks and should be considered for buried penis repair if a physical examination cannot be performed.

Prevalence and surgical management of concurrent adult acquired buried penis and urethral stricture disease.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and surgical management of coexistent adult acquired buried penis (AABP) and urethral stricture disease. AABP patients often have urinary dribbling with resultant chronic local moisture, infection, and inflammation that combine to cause urethral stricture disease. To date, no screening or surgical management algorithms have been described. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted of the surgical management strategies for patients with concurrent AABP and urethral stricture disease from 2010 to 2017. AABP patient demographics, physical exam findings, and comorbidities were compared between those with and without stricture disease to suggest those that would selectively benefit from screening for stricture disease. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients surgically managed for AABP, 13 had urethral stricture disease (31.0%). Stricture location was universal in the anterior urethra. Sixty-one percent (n = 8) of strictures were 6 cm or longer and managed prior to AABP repair with Kulkarni urethroplasty. Patients with urethral stricture disease were significantly more likely to have clinically diagnosed lichen sclerosus (p = 0.00019). There was no significant difference in BMI, age, or comorbidities between patients with and without urethral stricture disease. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive anterior urethral stricture is common in patients with AABP. Clinical characteristics cannot predict stricture presence except possibly the presence of lichen sclerosus. Definitive stricture surgical options include extensive Johanson Urethroplasty or Kulkarni Urethroplasty. Kulkarni Urethroplasty prior to AABP repair has the benefits of a single-stage repair, good cosmetic outcome with meatal voiding, and dorsal graft placement to allow safe degloving of the penis in the subsequent AABP repair.